Skip to main content
Log in

Ensembles of a small number of conformations with relative populations

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Biomolecular NMR Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In our previous work, we proposed a new way to represent protein native states, using ensembles of a small number of conformations with relative Populations, or ESP in short. Using Ubiquitin as an example, we showed that using a small number of conformations could greatly reduce the potential of overfitting and assigning relative populations to protein ensembles could significantly improve their quality. To demonstrate that ESP indeed is an excellent alternative to represent protein native states, in this work we compare the quality of two ESP ensembles of Ubiquitin with several well-known regular ensembles or average structure representations. Extensive amount of significant experimental data are employed to achieve a thorough assessment. Our results demonstrate that ESP ensembles, though much smaller in size comparing to regular ensembles, perform equally or even better sometimes in all four different types of experimental data used in the assessment, namely, the residual dipolar couplings, residual chemical shift anisotropy, hydrogen exchange rates, and solution scattering profiles. This work further underlines the significance of having relative populations in describing the native states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ángyán AF, Gáspári Z (2013) Ensemble-based interpretations of NMR structural data to describe protein internal dynamics. Molecules 18:10548–10567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin RH, Beeson KW, Eisenstein L, Frauenfelder H, Gunsalus IC (1975) Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. Biochemistry 14:5355–5373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best RB, Lindorff-Larsen K, DePristo MA, Vendruscolo M (2006) Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10901–10906

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Boehr DD, Nussinov R, Wright PE (2009) The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat Chem Biol 5:789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choy WY, Forman-Kay J (2001) Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain. J Mol Biol 308:1011–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004a) Amplitudes of protein backbone dynamics and correlated motions in a small α/β protein: correspondence of dipolar coupling and heteronuclear relaxation measurements. Biochemistry 43:10678–10691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004b) How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J Am Chem Soc 126:2923–2938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornilescu G, Bax A (2000) Measurement of proton, nitrogen, and carbonyl chemical shielding anisotropies in a protein dissolved in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 122:10143–10154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornilescu G, Marquardt JL, Ottiger M, Bax A (1998) Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 120:6836–6837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePristo MA, de Bakker PI, Blundell TL (2004) Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. Structure 12:831–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick RB, Esteban-Martín S, Richter B, Lee D, Walter KF, Milovanovic D, Becker S, Lakomek NA, Griesinger C, Salvatella X (2011) Weak long-range correlated motions in a surface patch of ubiquitin involved in molecular recognition. J Am Chem Soc 133:10336–10339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher CK, Huang A, Stultz CM (2010) Modeling intrinsically disordered proteins with bayesian statistics. J Am Chem Soc 132:14919–14927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG (1991) The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254:1598–1603

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Frauenfelder H, McMahon BH, Austin RH, Chu K, Groves JT (2001) The role of structure, energy landscape, dynamics, and allostery in the enzymatic function of myoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2370–2374

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Grishaev A, Wu J, Trewhella J, Bax A (2005) Refinement of multidomain protein structures by combination of solution small-angle X-ray scattering and NMR data. J Am Chem Soc 127:16621–16628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grishaev A, Guo L, Irving T, Bax A (2010) Improved fitting of solution X-ray scattering data to macromolecular structures and structural ensembles by explicit water modeling. J Am Chem Soc 132:15484–15486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández G, Anderson JS, LeMaster DM (2010) Assessing the native state conformational distribution of ubiquitin by peptide acidity. Biophys Chem 153:70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang KY, Amodeo GA, Tong L, McDermott A (2011) The structure of human ubiquitin in 2-methyl-2, 4-pentanediol: a new conformational switch. Protein Sci 20:630–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM (1993) Naccess. Computer Program, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London 2

  • Kontaxis G, Bax A (2001) Multiplet component separation for measurement of methyl 13C–1H dipolar couplings in weakly aligned proteins. J Biomol NMR 20:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakomek NA, Walter KF, Fares C, Lange OF, de Groot BL, Grubmuller H, Bruschweiler R, Munk A, Becker S, Meiler J et al (2008) Self-consistent residual dipolar coupling based model-free analysis for the robust determination of nanosecond to microsecond protein dynamics. J Biomol NMR 41:139–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange OF, Lakomek NA, Fares C, Schroder GF, Walter KF, Becker S, Meiler J, Grubmuller H, Griesinger C, de Groot BL (2008) Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320:1471–1475

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • LeMaster DM, Anderson JS, Hernández G (2009) Peptide conformer acidity analysis of protein flexibility monitored by hydrogen exchange. Biochemistry 48:9256–9265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Li C, Sarkar S, Zhang J, Witham S, Zhang Z, Wang L, Smith N, Petukh M, Alexov E (2012) DelPhi: a comprehensive suite for DelPhi software and associated resources. BMC Biophys 5:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Prestegard J (2010) A device for the measurement of residual chemical shift anisotropy and residual dipolar coupling in soluble and membrane-associated proteins. J Biomol NMR 47:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKerell AD, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha SA (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makowski L (2010) Characterization of proteins with wide-angle X-ray solution scattering (WAXS). J Struct Funct Genomics 11:9–19

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Maltsev AS, Grishaev A, Roche J, Zasloff M, Bax A (2014) Improved cross validation of a static ubiquitin structure derived from high precision residual dipolar couplings measured in a drug-based liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 136:3752–3755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massi F, Grey MJ, Palmer AG (2005) Microsecond timescale backbone conformational dynamics in ubiquitin studied with NMR R1ρ relaxation experiments. Protein Sci 14:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald IK, Thornton JM (1994) Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 238:777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips GN (2009) Describing protein conformational ensembles: beyond static snapshots. F1000 Biol Rep 1

  • Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE (2013) Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:5915–5920

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Prestegard J (1998) New techniques in structural NMR—anisotropic interactions. Nat Struct Mol Biol 5:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam CD, Hammel M, Hura GL, Tainer JA (2007) X-ray solution scattering (SAXS) combined with crystallography and computation: defining accurate macromolecular structures, conformations and assemblies in solution. Q Rev Biophys 40:191–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter B, Gsponer J, Varnai P, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M (2007) The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins. J Biomol NMR 37:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitô H, Ando I, Ramamoorthy A (2010) Chemical shift tensor–the heart of NMR: insights into biological aspects of proteins. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 57:181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwieters CD, Clore GM (2007) A physical picture of atomic motions within the Dickerson DNA dodecamer in solution derived from joint ensemble refinement against NMR and large-angle X-ray scattering data. Biochemistry 46:1152–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu A, Surolia A, Robertson AD, Sundd M (2011) A hydrogen bond regulates slow motions in ubiquitin by modulating a β-turn flip. J Mol Biol 411:1037–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svergun DI, Koch MHJ (2003) Small-angle scattering studies of biological macromolecules in solution. Rep Prog Phys 66:1735

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Svergun D, Barberato C, Koch MHJ (1995) CRYSOL—a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates. J Appl Crystallogr 28:768–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman JR, Flanagan JM, Kennedy MA, Prestegard JH (1995) Nuclear magnetic dipole interactions in field-oriented proteins: information for structure determination in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92:9279–9283

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy C, Zeng J, Zhou P, Donald BR (2012) Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data. Proteins: structure. Function, and Bioinformatics 80:433–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vammi V, Lin T-L, Song G (2014) Enhancing the quality of protein conformation ensembles with relative populations. J Biomol NMR 58:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijay-Kumar S, Bugg CE, Cook WJ (1987) Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 194:531–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding from National Science Foundation (CAREER award, CCF-0953517) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank Dr. LeMaster for his invaluable help in the initial phase of hydrogen exchange calculations. The authors would also like to extend thanks to Dr. Grishaev for his invaluable advice and help in computing solution scattering profiles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Vammi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vammi, V., Song, G. Ensembles of a small number of conformations with relative populations. J Biomol NMR 63, 341–351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9993-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9993-9

Keywords

Navigation