Skip to main content
Log in

Supporting secondary rural teachers’ development of noticing and pedagogical design capacity through video clubs

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Professional support in the form of a year-long video club based on teacher noticing of student thinking was provided to three rural teachers who comprised the entire mathematics department of one secondary school (grades six through twelve). The focus of the study was to understand how participation in a video club structure for rural secondary teachers supports the development of noticing and to understand how the content of what rural teachers notice influences their pedagogical design capacity. Assuming a situative perspective, findings suggest video club participation influenced the teachers’ curricular vision, their pedagogical design capacity, and their view of collaboration, as well as increasing their ability to notice and utilize student thinking for instructional decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–37). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W. S. (2005). Improving research on mathematics learning and teaching in rural contexts. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(8), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchinelli, L., & Beesley, A. (2017). Introduction: Current state of the science in rural education research. In G. Nugent, G. Kunz, S. Sheridan, T. Glover, & L. Knoche (Eds.), Rural education research in the United States: State of the science and emerging directions (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirillo, M., Drake, C., Eisenmann, B. H., & Hirsch, C. (2009). Curriculum vision and coherence: Adapting curriculum to focus on authentic mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 103(1), 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 7, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. T., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., Eilerts, K., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Epistemological beliefs of prospective preschool teachers and their relation to knowledge, perception, and planning abilities in the field of mathematics: A process model. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoth, J., Schwarz, B., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Uncovering predictors of disagreement: Ensuring the quality of expert ratings. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howley, C. (2003). Mathematics achievement in rural schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.

  • Howley, C., Howley, A., & Huber, D. (2005). Prescriptions for rural mathematics instruction: Analysis of the rhetorical literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(7), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idaho State Department of Education. (2015a). Curricular Adoption Guide for Mathematics. Retrieved November 1, 2015 from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/adoption_guide.htm.

  • Idaho State Department of Education. (2015b). 2015-16 Rural districts as defined by Idaho Code §33-319. Retrieved from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/ruraleducation/.

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., Showalter, D., Kelin, R., & Lester, C. (2014). Why rural matters 2013–2014: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, S., Glover, S., & Walstab, A. (2014). Educational disadvantage and regional and rural schools. Quality and equity, what does research tell us? (pp. 65–74). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamme, V. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cognitive Science, 1, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, E., & Mesa, V. (2016). Instructional decision making and agency of community college mathematics faculty. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leinwand, S. (2012). Sensible mathematics: A guide for school leaders in the era of common core state standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. F. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2017). Retrieved www.nctm.org.

  • Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Drake, C., Turner, E., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014). Use of video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of equitable practices. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2(2), 108–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, T. (2016). Teacher noticing: Enlightening or blinding? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 28, 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, B., & Star, R. (2011a). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, B. L., & Star, J. R. (2011b). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematical discourse. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Kaufman, J. H. (2010). Selecting and supporting the use of mathematics curricula at scale. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 663–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. H. (2005). Cross-national variations in rural mathematics achievement: A descriptive overview. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(5), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and thank the Idaho State Department of Education and the Idaho State Board of Education for their support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abraham J. Wallin.

Appendices

Appendix 1: van Es (2011), p. 139, learning to notice framework

 

Level 1 baseline

Level 2 mixed

Level 3 focused

Level 4 extended

What teachers notice

How teachers notice

Attend to whole class environment, behavior, and learning and to teacher pedagogy

Form general impressions of what occurred

Provide descriptive and evaluative comments

Provide little or no evidence to support analysis

Primarily attend to teacher pedagogy

Begin to attend to particular students’ mathematical thinking and behaviors

Form general impressions and highlight noteworthy events.

Provide primarily evaluative with some interpretive comments

Begin to refer to specific events and interactions as evidence

Attend to particular students’ mathematical thinking

Highlight noteworthy events

Provide interpretive comments

Refer to specific events and interactions as evidence

Elaborate on events and interactions

Attend to the relationship between particular students’ mathematical thinking and between teaching strategies and student mathematical thinking

Highlight noteworthy events

Provide interpretive comments

Refer to specific events and interactions as evidence

Elaborate on events and interactions

Make connections between events and principles of teaching and learning

On the basis of interpretations, propose alternative pedagogical solutions

Appendix 2: Video club protocol

  1. 1.

    Researcher provides a brief outline for the meeting including videos to be observed and the projected ending time. Video club observations forms (“Appendix 3”) are given to each teacher (no more than 5 min).

  2. 2.

    Teachers are provided 5 min to complete page one of the video club observation form in order to reflect on their individual tasks and consider content they wanted to highlight with the group.

  3. 3.

    All video content is shown to the group; the teachers and researcher take notes using the additional pages of the video club observation form. The video is paused briefly between each instructional episode so that teachers can record any additional thoughts before moving on to the next teacher’s video (time varies depending on number of video episodes 15–35 min).

  4. 4.

    Teachers are prompted to discuss what they noticed while watching the videos. This discussion is led by the teachers with the researcher facilitating the conversation through occasional questioning to highlight larger concepts. The researcher attempts to provide all teachers with opportunities to discuss and when specific teachers are less active, the researcher will address a question specifically to that individual (most discussions take approximately 60 min depending on content).

  5. 5.

    The researcher ends the meeting with scheduling observations, subsequent meetings, and addressing any additional concerns raised by the teachers.

Appendix 3: Video club observation form

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wallin, A.J., Amador, J.M. Supporting secondary rural teachers’ development of noticing and pedagogical design capacity through video clubs. J Math Teacher Educ 22, 515–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9397-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9397-3

Keywords

Navigation