Abstract
Professional support in the form of a year-long video club based on teacher noticing of student thinking was provided to three rural teachers who comprised the entire mathematics department of one secondary school (grades six through twelve). The focus of the study was to understand how participation in a video club structure for rural secondary teachers supports the development of noticing and to understand how the content of what rural teachers notice influences their pedagogical design capacity. Assuming a situative perspective, findings suggest video club participation influenced the teachers’ curricular vision, their pedagogical design capacity, and their view of collaboration, as well as increasing their ability to notice and utilize student thinking for instructional decisions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J., Greeno, J., Reder, L., & Simon, H. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29, 11–13.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–15.
Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17–37). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bush, W. S. (2005). Improving research on mathematics learning and teaching in rural contexts. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(8), 1–11.
Cicchinelli, L., & Beesley, A. (2017). Introduction: Current state of the science in rural education research. In G. Nugent, G. Kunz, S. Sheridan, T. Glover, & L. Knoche (Eds.), Rural education research in the United States: State of the science and emerging directions (pp. 1–14). New York: Springer.
Cirillo, M., Drake, C., Eisenmann, B. H., & Hirsch, C. (2009). Curriculum vision and coherence: Adapting curriculum to focus on authentic mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 103(1), 70–75.
Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 7, 13–20.
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Davis, E. A., Beyer, C., Forbes, C. T., & Stevens, S. (2011). Understanding pedagogical design capacity through teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 797–810.
Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.
Dunekacke, S., Jenßen, L., Eilerts, K., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Epistemological beliefs of prospective preschool teachers and their relation to knowledge, perception, and planning abilities in the field of mathematics: A process model. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 125–137.
Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 17–34). New York: Routledge.
Hoth, J., Schwarz, B., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2016). Uncovering predictors of disagreement: Ensuring the quality of expert ratings. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 83–95.
Howley, C. (2003). Mathematics achievement in rural schools. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
Howley, C., Howley, A., & Huber, D. (2005). Prescriptions for rural mathematics instruction: Analysis of the rhetorical literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(7), 1–16.
Idaho State Department of Education. (2015a). Curricular Adoption Guide for Mathematics. Retrieved November 1, 2015 from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/curricular_materials/adoption_guide.htm.
Idaho State Department of Education. (2015b). 2015-16 Rural districts as defined by Idaho Code §33-319. Retrieved from https://www.sde.idaho.gov/site/ruraleducation/.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
Johnson, J., Showalter, D., Kelin, R., & Lester, C. (2014). Why rural matters 2013–2014: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.
Lamb, S., Glover, S., & Walstab, A. (2014). Educational disadvantage and regional and rural schools. Quality and equity, what does research tell us? (pp. 65–74). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Lamme, V. (2003). Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends Cognitive Science, 1, 12–18.
Lande, E., & Mesa, V. (2016). Instructional decision making and agency of community college mathematics faculty. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 199–212.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leinwand, S. (2012). Sensible mathematics: A guide for school leaders in the era of common core state standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York: Routledge.
Mason, J. (2011). Noticing: Roots and branches. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 35–50). New York: Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation: Revised and expanded from qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, K. F. (2011). Situation awareness in teaching: What educators can learn from video-based research in other fields. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2017). Retrieved www.nctm.org.
Peressini, D., Borko, H., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., & Willis, C. (2004). A conceptual framework for learning to teach secondary mathematics: A situative perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 67–96.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Roth McDuffie, A. R., Foote, M. Q., Drake, C., Turner, E., Aguirre, J., Bartell, T. G., et al. (2014). Use of video analysis to support prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of equitable practices. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 2(2), 108–140.
Scheiner, T. (2016). Teacher noticing: Enlightening or blinding? ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 28, 227–238.
Sherin, B., & Star, R. (2011a). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.
Sherin, B. L., & Star, J. R. (2011b). Reflections on the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 66–78). New York: Routledge.
Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers’ professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20–37.
Smith, M., & Stein, M. K. (2011). Five practices for orchestrating productive mathematical discourse. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Stein, M. K., & Kaufman, J. H. (2010). Selecting and supporting the use of mathematics curricula at scale. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 663–693.
van Es, E. A. (2009). Participants’ roles in the context of a video club. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 100–137.
van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York: Routledge.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers’ thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155–176.
Williams, J. H. (2005). Cross-national variations in rural mathematics achievement: A descriptive overview. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(5), 1–18.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge and thank the Idaho State Department of Education and the Idaho State Board of Education for their support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: van Es (2011), p. 139, learning to notice framework
Level 1 baseline | Level 2 mixed | Level 3 focused | Level 4 extended | |
---|---|---|---|---|
What teachers notice How teachers notice | Attend to whole class environment, behavior, and learning and to teacher pedagogy Form general impressions of what occurred Provide descriptive and evaluative comments Provide little or no evidence to support analysis | Primarily attend to teacher pedagogy Begin to attend to particular students’ mathematical thinking and behaviors Form general impressions and highlight noteworthy events. Provide primarily evaluative with some interpretive comments Begin to refer to specific events and interactions as evidence | Attend to particular students’ mathematical thinking Highlight noteworthy events Provide interpretive comments Refer to specific events and interactions as evidence Elaborate on events and interactions | Attend to the relationship between particular students’ mathematical thinking and between teaching strategies and student mathematical thinking Highlight noteworthy events Provide interpretive comments Refer to specific events and interactions as evidence Elaborate on events and interactions Make connections between events and principles of teaching and learning On the basis of interpretations, propose alternative pedagogical solutions |
Appendix 2: Video club protocol
-
1.
Researcher provides a brief outline for the meeting including videos to be observed and the projected ending time. Video club observations forms (“Appendix 3”) are given to each teacher (no more than 5 min).
-
2.
Teachers are provided 5 min to complete page one of the video club observation form in order to reflect on their individual tasks and consider content they wanted to highlight with the group.
-
3.
All video content is shown to the group; the teachers and researcher take notes using the additional pages of the video club observation form. The video is paused briefly between each instructional episode so that teachers can record any additional thoughts before moving on to the next teacher’s video (time varies depending on number of video episodes 15–35 min).
-
4.
Teachers are prompted to discuss what they noticed while watching the videos. This discussion is led by the teachers with the researcher facilitating the conversation through occasional questioning to highlight larger concepts. The researcher attempts to provide all teachers with opportunities to discuss and when specific teachers are less active, the researcher will address a question specifically to that individual (most discussions take approximately 60 min depending on content).
-
5.
The researcher ends the meeting with scheduling observations, subsequent meetings, and addressing any additional concerns raised by the teachers.
Appendix 3: Video club observation form
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wallin, A.J., Amador, J.M. Supporting secondary rural teachers’ development of noticing and pedagogical design capacity through video clubs. J Math Teacher Educ 22, 515–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9397-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9397-3