Skip to main content
Log in

Preschool teachers’ knowledge of repeating patterns: focusing on structure and the unit of repeat

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates 27 preschool teachers’ verbalization of various aspects of pattern structure as well as their knowledge of pattern structure while solving patterning activities. Aspects of structure that are investigated include the unit of repeat, its length and the amount of times it is repeated, and whether or not the pattern ends in a complete unit of repeat. Data collected in the beginning of a professional development program came from five different tasks—defining repeating patterns, comparing repeating patterns, drawing repeating patterns, extending repeating patterns, and choosing between different possible ways for extending repeating patterns when the given pattern does not necessarily end with a complete unit of repeat. Qualitative analysis was performed on the verbal tasks. Results indicated that most teachers referred in some way to the fixed structure of the unit of repeat and to the notion of repetition, but without focusing on the length of the unit of repeat and the number of times it is repeated. In addition, it seems that not all teachers are aware that a repeating pattern can end in an incomplete unit of repeat. Teacher educators can use this study to plan appropriate professional development for promoting teachers’ deep understanding of repeating patterns. This study can also offer preschool teachers a way to vary two well-known patterning activities—extending patterns and comparing patterns—in order to promote an approach to patterning activities which focuses on structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, C. (2016). Playing with patterns: Conclusions from a learning study with toddlers. In T. Meaney, O. Helenius, M. L. Johansson, T. Lange, & A. Wernberg (Eds.), Mathematics education in the early years: Results from the POEM2 conference (pp. 269–288). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R. (1992). Learning mathematics through inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Chiang, C. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children’s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 499–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Serama, J. (2007). Early childhood mathematics learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 461–555). New York: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & Warren, E. A. (1998). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teacher, 91(2), 166–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2005). Child-initiated mathematical patterning in the pre-compulsory years. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 313–320). Melbourne, Australia: PME.

  • Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2006). Primary trainee teachers’ understanding of basic geometrical figures in Scotland. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME30) (Vol. 3, pp. 129–136). Prague, Czech Republic.

  • Goldenberg, P., & Mason, J. (2008). Shedding light on and with example spaces. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenes, C., Ginsburg, H. P., & Balfanz, R. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel National Mathematics Preschool Curriculum (INMPC) (2008). Retrieved April 7, 2009, from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Tochniyot_Limudim/KdamYesodi/Math1.pdf.

  • Kidd, J. K., Pasnak, R., Gadzichowski, K. M., Gallington, D. A., McKnight, P., Boyer, C. E., et al. (2014). Instructing first-grade children on patterning improves reading and mathematics. Early Education and Development, 25(1), 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klibanoff, R. S., Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., & Hedges, L. V. (2006). Preschool children’s mathematical knowledge: The effect of teacher “math talk”. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P. (2004). Repeating pattern or number pattern: The distinction is blurred. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 26(3), 24–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüken, M., Peter-Koop, A., & Kollhoff, S. (2014). Influence of early repeating patterning ability on school mathematics learning. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterie, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, (Vol. 4, pp. 137–144). Vancouver, Canada: PME.

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365–380). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., English, L., Mitchelmore, M., Welsby, S., & Crevensten, N. (2011) An evaluation of the pattern and structure mathematics awareness program in the early school years. In J. Clark, Julie, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.) Proceedings of the AAMT-MERGA conference 2011, (pp. 548–556). The Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Inc. and Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Alice Springs.

  • Mulligan, J., Papic, M., Prescott, A. E., & Mitchelmore, M. (2006). Improving early numeracy through a pattern and structure mathematics awareness program (PASMAP). In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, A. McDonough, & R. Pierce (Eds.), Conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia. MERGA, (pp. 376–383). Sydney, Australia: Education Research Group of Australia.

  • Papic, M. & Mulligan, J. T. (2007). The growth of early mathematical patterning: An intervention study. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice (Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, (pp. 591–600). Adelaide: MERGA.

  • Papic, M., Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., McLean, L. E., & McEldoon, K. L. (2013). Emerging understanding of patterning in 4-year-olds. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14(3), 376–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2004). What is developmentally appropriate in early childhood mathematics education? Lessons from new research. In D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, & A.-M. DiBiase (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 91–104). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E., Tabach, M., & Barkai, R. (2015). Kindergarten children’s recognition of pattern structure. In J. Novotná and H. Moraová (Eds.), Proceedings international symposium elementary maths teaching (pp. 331–340). Prague, The Czech Republic.

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Barkai, R., & Tabach, M. (2017). Repeating patterns in kindergarten: Findings from children’s enactments of two activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9762-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsamir, P., Tirosh, D., Levenson, E., Tabach, M., & Barkai, R. (2012). Conceptualizing preschool teachers’ knowledge and self-efficacy for teaching mathematics: The CAMTE framework. POEM, Feb. 2012, Germany. Retrieved August 19, 2012, from http://cermat.org/poem2012/main/proceedings_files/Tsamir-POEM2012.pdf.

  • Vinner, S. (1991). The role of definitions in teaching and learning mathematics. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 65–81). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ professional learning in early algebraic thinking: A model that supports new knowledge and pedagogy. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 10, 30–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Young Australian Indigenous students’ effective engagement in mathematics: The role of language, patterns, and structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. (2004). Mathematical patterning in early childhood settings. In I. Putt & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium (pp. 565–572). Townsville: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2008). Exemplifying definitions: a case of a square. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69(2), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant No. 1270/14).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther S. Levenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tirosh, D., Tsamir, P., Levenson, E.S. et al. Preschool teachers’ knowledge of repeating patterns: focusing on structure and the unit of repeat. J Math Teacher Educ 22, 305–325 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9395-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9395-x

Keywords

Navigation