Skip to main content
Log in

Approaches to improve integration and regeneration of an ex vivo derived temporomandibular joint disc scaffold with variable matrix composition

  • Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to their natural biochemical and biomechanical characteristics, using ex vivo tissues as platforms for guided tissue regeneration has become widely accepted, however subsequent attachment and integration of these constructs in vivo is often overlooked. A decellularized porcine temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc has shown promise as a scaffold to guide disc regeneration and preliminary work has shown the efficacy of surfactant (SDS) treatment within the fibrocartilaginous disc to remove cellular components. The majority of studies focus on the intermediate region of the disc (or disc proper). Using this approach, inherent attachment tissues can be maintained to improve construct stability and integration within the joint. Unlike human disc attachment tissue, the porcine attachment tissues have high lipid content which would require a different processing approach to remove immunogenic components. In order to examine the effect of delipidation on the attachment tissue properties, SDS and two organic solvent mixtures (acetone/ethanol and chloroform/methanol) were compared. Lipid and cellular solubilization, ECM alteration, and seeded human mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) morphology and viability were assessed. Quantitative analysis showed SDS treatments did not effectively delipidate the attachment tissues and cytotoxicity was noted toward MSC in these regions. Acetone/ethanol removed cellular material but not all lipids, while chloroform/methanol removed all visible lipid deposits but residual porcine cells were observed in histological sections. When a combination of approaches was used, no residual lipid or cytotoxicity was noted. Preparing a whole TMJ graft with a combined approach has the potential to improve disc integration within the native joint environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willard VP, Arzi B, Athanasiou KA. The attachments of the temporomandibular joint disc: A biochemical and histological investigation. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57:599–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christo JE, Bennett S, Wilkinson TM, Townsend GC. Discal attachments of the human temporomandibular joint. Aust Dent J. 2005;50:152–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Merida-Velasco JR, Rodriguez JF, de la Cuadra C, Peces MD, Merida JA, Sanchez I. The posterior segment of the temporomandibular joint capsule and its anatomic relationship. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:30–3. United Statesp

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res. 2008;87:296–307. United Statesp

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heffez LB, Jordan SL. Superficial vascularity of temporomandibular joint retrodiskal tissue: an element of the internal derangement process. Cranio. 1992;10:180–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matuska AM, Muller S, Dolwick MF, McFetridge PS. Biomechanical and biochemical outcomes of porcine temporomandibular joint disc deformation. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;64:72–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolwick MF. The role of temporomandibular joint surgery in the treatment of patients with internal derangement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:150–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lumpkins SB, Pierre N, McFetridge PS. A mechanical evaluation of three decellularization methods in the design of a xenogeneic scaffold for tissue engineering the temporomandibular joint disc. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:808–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matuska AM, McFetridge PS. The effect of terminal sterilization on structural and biophysical properties of a decellularized collagen-based scaffold; implications for stem cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2015;103:397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matuska AM, McFetridge PS. Laser micro-ablation of fibrocartilage tissue: effects of tissue processing on porosity modification and mechanics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106:1858–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Juran CM, Dolwick MF, McFetridge PS. Engineered microporosity: enhancing the early regenerative potential of decellularized temporomandibular joint discs. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21:829–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Herring SW. The dynamics of mastication in pigs. Arch Oral Biol. 1976;21:473–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown BN, Freund JM, Han L, Rubin JP, Reing JE, Jeffries EM, et al. Comparison of three methods for the derivation of a biologic scaffold composed of adipose tissue extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2011;17:411–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Keane TJ, Londono R, Turner NJ, Badylak SF. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials. 2012;33:1771–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3233–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Meer G, Voelker DR, Feigenson GW. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:112–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montoya CV, McFetridge PS. Preparation of ex vivo-based biomaterials using convective flow decellularization. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2009;15:191–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore M, Sarntinoranont M, McFetridge P. Mass transfer trends occurring in engineered ex vivo tissue scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:2194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uzarski JS, Van De Walle AB, McFetridge PS. Preimplantation processing of ex vivo-derived vascular biomaterials: Effects on peripheral cell adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101:123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McFetridge PS, Daniel JW, Bodamyali T, Horrocks M, Chaudhuri JB. Preparation of porcine carotid arteries for vascular tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70:224–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prasertsung I, Kanokpanont S, Bunaprasert T, Thanakit V, Damrongsakkul S. Development of acellular dermis from porcine skin using periodic pressurized technique. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;85:210–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolf MT, Daly KA, Reing JE, Badylak SF. Biologic scaffold composed of skeletal muscle extracellular matrix. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2916–25. England: 2012 Elsevier Ltdp.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lakes EH, Matuska AM, McFetridge PS, Allen KD. Mechanical integrity of a decellularized and laser drilled medial meniscus. J Biomech Eng. 2016;138:4032381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Pognan F. Investigation of the alamar blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:5421–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Levy RJ, Vyavahare N, Ogle M, Ashworth P, Bianco R, Schoen FJ. Inhibition of cusp and aortic wall calcification in ethanol- and aluminum-treated bioprosthetic heart valves in sheep: Background, mechanisms, and synergism. J Heart Valve Dis. 2003;12:209–16. discussion 16

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dunmore-Buyze J, Boughner DR, Macris N, Vesely I. A comparison of macroscopic lipid content within porcine pulmonary and aortic valves. Implic bioprosthetic valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:1756–61. United Statesp.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vyavahare N, Hirsch D, Lerner E, Baskin JZ, Schoen FJ, Bianco R, et al. Prevention of bioprosthetic heart valve calcification by ethanol preincubation. Effic Mech Circ. 1997;95:479–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jorge-Herrero E, Fernandez P, de la Torre N, Escudero C, Garcia-Paez JM, Bujan J, et al. Inhibition of the calcification of porcine valve tissue by selective lipid removal. Biomaterials. 1994;15:815–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chappard D, Fressonnet C, Genty C, Basle MF, Rebel A. Fat in bone xenografts: Importance of the purification procedures on cleanliness, wettability and biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 1993;14:507–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cebotari S, Tudorache I, Jaekel T, Hilfiker A, Dorfman S, Ternes W, et al. Detergent decellularization of heart valves for tissue engineering: toxicological effects of residual detergents on human endothelial cells. Artif Organs. 2010;34:206–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Reuber MD. Carcinogenicity of chloroform. Environ Health Perspect. 1979;31:171–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH; 1R21DE022449) and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1315138).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter S. McFetridge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matuska, A.M., Dolwick, M.F. & McFetridge, P.S. Approaches to improve integration and regeneration of an ex vivo derived temporomandibular joint disc scaffold with variable matrix composition. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 29, 152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6164-z

Navigation