Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spine rod straightening as a possible cause for revision

  • Clinical Applications of Biomaterials
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous study, the authors examined the elastic and short-term anelastic springback of Ti6Al4V, CoCrMoC and A316L stainless steel spine rods to observe how the rods mechanically respond in OR contouring. In that study rods were 200 mm long and only the movement at the tip was recorded. The implication of that work was that rods will straighten in-vivo, however, in order for the mechanism of straightening to be determined, the movement of individual bends over time must first be elucidated. Spine rods used were, commercially pure titanium (CP Ti) a primarily α-phase; Ti-6Al-4V; α/β-phase titanium alloy from two different suppliers (denoted by, Ti-6Al-4V (L) and Ti-6Al-4V); β-phase titanium (TNTZ) and CoCrMoC. Following contouring the rods were aged unconstrained, in normal atmosphere or simulated body fluid (SBF) in a CO2 incubator for up to 288 h. Elastic springback is significantly different between alloys with different microstructures. Both types of Ti6Al4V rods, while meeting the ASTM F136 industry standard, have significantly different properties, most importantly yield strength, flexural modulus, and springback. Environment showed no significant impact on anelasticity. The anelastic response of Ti6Al4V L sample, which has relatively more beta phase than the Ti6Al4V sample, follows the pure beta phase TNTZ in its extended time response. CoCrMoC and CP Ti have a very reduced anelastic response compared to the other alloys. This potentially can have unanticipated effects on the outcome of spine procedures, as the surgeon is reliant on the rods having similar properties to achieve a desired outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayers RA, Burger EL, Kleck CJ, Patel VV. Metallurgy of Spinal Instrumentation. In: Mitsuo N, Takayuki N, Masaki N, editors. Advances in metallic biomaterials technology. springer series in biomaterials science and engineering. Heidelberg: Springer; 2015. p. 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Warren Y. Advances in spinal instrumentation. Oper Tech Orthop. 2003;13:159–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu SS, Pashman RS. Spinal instrumentation. Evolution and state of the art. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:632–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Noshchenko A, Xianfeng Y, Armour GA, Baldini T, Patel VV, Ayers RA, Burger EL. Evaluation of spinal instrumentation rod bending characteristics for in-situ contouring. J Biomed Mater Res. 2011;98B:192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel V, Kleck C, Burger E. Early experience and initial outcomes with patient-specific spine rods for adult spinal deformity. Orthopedics. 2016;39:79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burger EL, Baratta RV, King AGS, Easton R, Lu Y, Solomonow M, Riemer BL. The memory properties of cold worked titanium rods in scoliosis constructs. Spine. 2005;30:375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshihara H. Rods in spinal surgery: a review of the literature. Spine J. 2013;13:1350–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Broom MJ, Banta JV, Renshaw TS. Spinal fusion augmented by luque-rod segmental instrumentation for neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:32–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:162–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. del Rio J, Beguiristain J, Duart J. Metal levels in corrosion of spinal implants. Eur Spine J. 2007;16:1055–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldenberg Y, Tee JW, Salinas-La Rosa CM, Murphy M. Spinal metallosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:1467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akazawa T, Minami S, Takahashi K, Kotani T, Hanawa T, Moriya H. Corrosion of spinal implants retrieved from patients with scoliosis. Orthop Sci. 2005;10:200–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Niinomi M. Metallic biomaterials. J Artif Organs. 2008;11:105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou YL, Niinomi M. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti-50 mass% Ta alloy for biomedical applications. J Alloy Compd. 2008;466:535–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva EF, Oliveira LFC. Chemical and metallographic characterization of stainless steel in implants removed from patients. Acta Ortop Bras. 2011;19:280–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gammon LM, Briggs RD, Packard JM, Batson KW, Boyer R, Domby CW. Metallography and Microstructures of Titanium and Its Alloys. G.F. Vander Voort, editor, ASM Handbook, Volume 9: Metallography and Microstructures. 2004. p. 899–917.

  17. Adamus J, Lacki P. Forming of the titanium elements by bending. Comput Mater Sci. 2011;50:1305–1309.

  18. Narita K, Niinomi M, Nakai M, Akahori T, Tsutsumi H, Oribe K. Bending fatigue and spring back properties of implant rods made of β-type titanium alloy for spinal fixture. Advanced Materials Research. 2010;89-9:400–404.

  19. Nixon ME, Cazacu O, Lebensohn RA. Anisotropic response of high-purity α-titanium: Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling. International Journal of Plasticity. 2010;26:516–532.

  20. Babu B, Lindgren LE. Dislocation density based model for plastic deformation and globularization of Ti-6Al-4V. International Journal of Plasticity. 2013;50:94–108.

  21. Smith WF, Structure and Properties of Engineering Alloys 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993.

  22. Lim H, Lee MG, Sung JH, Wagoner RH. Time-dependent Springback. Int J Mater Form. 2008;Suppl 1:1577–160.

  23. Xia ZC, Miller CE, Ren F. Springback Behavior of AA6111T4 with SplitRing Test AIP Conf. Proc. 2004;712:934–939.

  24. Gan W, Babu SS, Kapustka N, Wagoner RH. Microstructural effects on the springback of advanced high-strength steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2006;37:3221–3231.

  25. Gurao NP, Sethuraman S, Suwas S. Evolution of Texture and Microstructure in Commercially Pure Titanium with Change in Strain Path During Rolling. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2013;44:1497–1507.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was accomplished under NIH Grant 1R15AR060011-01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, B202 Room 4603, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

    Reed Ayers & Evalina Burger

  2. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 80401, USA

    Mathew Hayne

Authors
  1. Reed Ayers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mathew Hayne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evalina Burger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reed Ayers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ayers, R., Hayne, M. & Burger, E. Spine rod straightening as a possible cause for revision. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 28, 123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5935-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-017-5935-2

Search

Navigation