Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stress reduction in silicon/oxidized silicon–Pyrex glass anodic bonding for MEMS device packaging: RF switches and pressure sensors

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Standard temperature for anodic bonding process (usually 450 °C) degrade the MEMS device performance due to stress generated on mechanical components during wafer level packaging. The traditional perspective of bonding at medium temperatures (280–350 °C) by various research communities were pertaining to lesser efficiency and un-reliability. Partial bonding and increased number of voids were the results of medium temperature bonding. Here we introduce a new method that reduced the bonding temperature well below to 280 °C for silicon–Pyrex bond and to 320 °C for oxidized silicon–Pyrex bond. This article reports the study of stress reduction (by reducing the bow) in bonding material by decreasing bonding temperature through a modified electrode (cathode) in anodic bonding process. Dropping the temperature from 450 to 280 °C has reduced the bowing effect up to 51 times. Also the effect of glass thickness (2 and 1 mm) on bonding has been studied. It was found that there was a decrease of 49 and 53 % in bow height (at 400 and 450 °C) when used 1 mm thick Pyrex glass instead of 2 mm thick glass. The amount of gas trapped to form voids while bonding by means of the new load, has reduced to a great level. Extensive characterization of the surfaces and interfaces have been made with AFM, OM, SEM and laser bow measurement equipment which defines the surface roughness, cleanliness, bubble formation, interface integrity and surface bow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Ramesham, R. Ghaffarian, Challenges in interconnection and packaging of micromechanical systems (MEMS), in 2000 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, May 2000, pp. 666–675

  2. W.P. Eaton, J.H. Smith, Micromachined pressure sensors: review and recent developments. Smart Mater. Struct. 6, 530 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Chen, A.V.H. Pham, N.A. Evers, C. Kapusta, J. Iannotti, W. Kornrumpf, J.J. Maciel, N. Karabudak, Design and development of a package using LCP for RF/microwave MEMS switches. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 54(11), 4009–4015 (2006)

  4. G. Rebeiz, RF MEMS: Theory, Design, and Technology (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. R.M. Henderson, L.P.B. Kathehi, Silicon-based micromachined packages for high-frequency applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47(8), 1563–1569 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.-A. Kim, Y.-H. Seo, Y.-H. Cho, G. H. Kim, J.-U. Bu, Fabrication and characterization of a low-temperature hermetic MEMS package bonded by a closed loop AuSn solder-line, in IEEE 16th Annual International MEMS Conference, Kyoto, Japan, Jan. 2003, pp. 614–617

  7. F. Niklaus, H. Andersson, P. Enoksson, G. Stemme, Low temperature full wafer adhesive bonding of structured wafers. Sens. Actuators A 92, 235–241 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. R.R. Tummala, E.J. Rymaszewski (eds.), Microelectronics Packaging Handbook (Van Nostrand, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Zhang, H. Xu, Y. Li, Z. Song, H. San, Y. Yu, A Si–glass based pressure sensor with a single piezoresistive element for harsh environment applications. NEMS 2013, Suzhou, China, 7–10 April, 2013

  10. R. Tummala, V. Madisetti, System on chip or system on package? IEEE Des. Test. Comput. 16(2), 48–56 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Wallis, D.I. Pomerantz, Field assisted glass-metal sealing. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 3946–3949 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. PlöBl, G. Kräuter, Wafer direct bonding: tailoring adhesion between brittle materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R25, 1–88 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Schmidt, Wafer-to wafer bonding for microstructure formation. Proc. IEEE 86(8), 1574–1585 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Bengtsson, Semiconductor wafer bonding: a review of interfacial properties and applications. J. Electron. Mater. 21(8), 841 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Akhtar, B.B. Dixit, B.D. Pant, V.P. Deshwal, Polysilicon piezoresistive pressure sensors based on based on MEMS technology. IETE J. Res. 49(6), 365–377 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Q.-Y. Tong, U. Gösele, Semiconductor Wafer Bonding (Wiley, New York, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Harz, W. Brűckner, Stress reduction in anodically bonded silicon and borosilicate glass by thermal treatment, J Electrochem. Soc. 143(4) (1996)

  18. R. Joyce, K. Singh, H. Sharma, S. Varghese, J. Akhtar, Low cost anodic bonding for MEMS packaging applications. Microsyst. Technol. (2013). doi:10.1007/s00542-013-1834-8

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Singh, R. Joyce, S. Varghese, J. Akhtar, A new method for fast anodic bonding in microsystem technology. Microsyst. Technol. (2013). doi:10.1007/s00542-013-1898-5

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.X. Chen, X.J. Yi, Z.Y. Gan, S. Liu, Reliability of anodically bonded silicon–glass packages. Sens. Actuators A 120, 291–295 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Lin, Some problems of stress release in annealing of commercial flat glass. Glass 27(6), 4–7 (2000). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Director, CSIR-CEERI, Pilani, Dr. Chandra Shekhar and HOD of SNST, NIT Calicut are thanked for their constant support and encouragement. The authors (RJ) and (KS) heartfully thank Mr. Alex Kurian, Manager R&D, Hero Moto Corp., Dharuhera, Haryana for his continuous support and meaningful discussions. The authors extend their thanks to Mr. G.S. Negi and Mr. Hemant Ajal of CEERI for their continuous support throughout the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanomaterials and Device Research Laboratory, School of Nano Science and Technology, National Institute of Technology-Calicut, Calicut, India

    Robin Joyce, Kulwant Singh & Soney Varghese

  2. Sensors and Nanotechnology Group, CSIR-Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute, Pilani, India

    Robin Joyce, Kulwant Singh & Jamil Akhtar

Authors
  1. Robin Joyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kulwant Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soney Varghese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jamil Akhtar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Joyce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joyce, R., Singh, K., Varghese, S. et al. Stress reduction in silicon/oxidized silicon–Pyrex glass anodic bonding for MEMS device packaging: RF switches and pressure sensors. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26, 411–423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2415-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2415-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation