Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of deformation and heat treatment parameters on the microstructure and properties of forged TB18 titanium alloy

  • Metals & corrosion
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TB18 titanium alloy is a near-β-titanium alloy with high strength and good plasticity. However, its microstructure and mechanical properties are affected by its deformation and heat treatment parameters. The effects of deformation pass number, deformation temperature, and heat treatment temperature on the microstructure and mechanical properties of TB18 titanium alloy were conducted by free forging experiments. The results show that the deformation pass had limited effect on the mechanical properties of the sample after heat treatment. Three types of microstructures were obtained after heat treatment: equiaxed or needle-like primary α (αp) + lenticular secondary α (αs), long or short rod-like αp + lenticular αs, and Widmannstatten α (αWGB) + grain boundary α (αGB) + lenticular αs. The equiaxed or needlelike αp + lenticular αs microstructure had the optimal elongation and reduction of area, owing to the transgranular fracture caused by the nucleation and propagation of cracks in the αp phase. The long or short rodlike αp + lenticular αs microstructure had the optimal tensile and yield strengths, which was ascribed to the interface strengthening caused by the dispersed αs phase. The αWGB + αGB + lenticular αs microstructure had the optimal fracture and impact toughness values, which was attributed to the deflection of cracks at crossed grain boundaries during propagation, increasing the crack path length and consuming more energy. The best comprehensive mechanical properties were obtained when deformed in the (α + β) two-phase or β-single-phase regions plus heat treatment in the β-single-phase region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dipankar Banerjee JCw (2013) Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta Mater 61(3):844–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolli RP, Devaraj A (2018) A review of metastable beta titanium alloys. Metals 8(7):506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ureña J, Tsipas S, Pinto AM, Toptan F, Gordo E, Jiménez-Morales A (2018) Corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of β-type Ti-Nb and Ti-Mo surfaces designed by diffusion treatments for biomedical applications. Corr Sci 140:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yumak N, Aslantaş K (2020) A review on heat treatment efficiency in metastable β titanium alloys: the role of treatment process and parameters. J Market Res 9(6):15360–15380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leyens, C, Peters M (2003) Titanium and titanium alloys: fundamentals and applications

  6. Cotton JD, Briggs RD, Boyer RR, Tamirisakandala S, Russo P, Shchetnikov N, Fanning JC (2015) State of the art in beta titanium alloys for airframe applications. Jom 67(6):1281–1303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed M, Savvakin DG, Ivasishin OM, Pereloma EV (2013) The effect of cooling rates on the microstructure and mechanical properties of thermo-mechanically processed Ti–Al–Mo–V–Cr–Fe alloys. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Processa 576(1):167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss I, Semiatin SL (1998) Thermomechanical processing of beta titanium alloys—an overview. Mater Sci Eng A

  9. Ivasishin OM, Markovsky PE, Semiatin SL, Ward CH (2005) Aging response of coarse- and fine-grained beta titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater Prop Misrostruct Process 405(1/2):405

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixit S, Dash BB, Kumar D, Bhattacharjee A, Sankaran S (2023) Influence of phase morphology, static recrystallization, and crystallographic texture on room temperature tensile properties of Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Comparison between post-tested equiaxed, bimodal, and lamellar microstructures. Mater Sci Eng A 873:144990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones NG, Jackson M (2011) On mechanism of flow softening in Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr. Mater Sci Technol 27(6):1025–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warchomicka F, Poletti C, Stockinger M (2011) Study of the hot deformation behaviour in Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–3Cr–1Zr. Mater Sci Eng A 528(28):8277–8285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang J, Wang Z, Xue K (2011) Cyclic deformation response and micromechanisms of Ti alloy Ti–5Al–5V–5Mo–3Cr–0.5 Fe. Mater Sc Eng A 528(29–30):8723–8732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Lim SCV, Ding C, Huang A, Weyland M (2021) Unravelling the competitive effect of microstructural features on the fracture toughness and tensile properties of near beta titanium alloys. J Mater Sci Technol Shenyang

  15. Robert RO (2011) The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat Mater 10(11):817–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fan JK, Li JS, Kou HC, Hua K, Tang B (2014) The interrelationship of fracture toughness and microstructure in a new near β titanium alloy Ti–7Mo–3Nb–3Cr–3Al. Mater Charact 96:93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lütjering G, Albrecht J, Sauer C, Krull T (2007) The influence of soft, precipitate-free zones at grain boundaries in Ti and Al alloys on their fatigue and fracture behavior. Mater Sci Eng A 468:201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu CM, Wang HM, Tian XJ, Liu D (2014) Development of a pre-heat treatment for obtaining discontinuous grain boundary α in laser melting deposited Ti–5Al–5Mo–5V–1Cr–1Fe alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 604:176–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hirth J, Froes F (1977) Interrelations between fracture toughness and other mechanical properties in titanium alloys. Metall Trans A 8:1165–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattacharjee A, Varma VK, Kamat SV, Gogia AK, Bhargava S (2006) Influence of β grain size on tensile behavior and ductile fracture toughness of titanium alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al. Metall Mater Trans A 37:1423–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharjee A, Ghosal P, Nandy TK, Kamat SV, Gogia AK, Bhargava S (2008) Effect of grain size on the tensile behaviour and fracture toughness of Ti-10V-4.5 Fe-3Al beta titanium alloy. Trans Indian Inst Metals 61:399–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Breslauer E, Rosen A (1991) Relationship between microstructure and mechanical properties in metastable β titanium 15–3 alloy. Mater Sci Technol 7(5):441–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yongqiang Z, Hongzhen G, Rui L, Tao W, Zhanglong Z, Zekun Y (2013) Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of beta Isothermal Forged TC18 Alloy. Rare Metal Mater Eng 42(3):634–638

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fu YY, Song YQ, Hui SX, Mi X, Ye W, Yu Y (2009) Strength and fracture toughness of beta-titanium alloys. Chinese J Rare Metals 32:92–95

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fan XG, Zhang Y, Zheng HJ, Zhang ZQ, Gao PF, Zhan M (2018) Pre-processing related recrystallization behavior in β annealing of a near-β Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-3Cr-1Zr titanium alloy. Mater Charact 137:151–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Furuhara T, Poorganji B, Abe H, Maki T (2007) Dynamic recovery and recrystallization in titanium alloys by hot deformation. Jom 59:64–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang K, Logé RE (2016) A review of dynamic recrystallization phenomena in metallic materials. Mater Des 111:548–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin YC, Xiao YW, Jiang YQ, Pang GD, Li HB, Zhang XY, Zhou KC (2020) Spheroidization and dynamic recrystallization mechanisms of Ti-55511 alloy with bimodal microstructures during hot compression in α+ β region. Mater Sci Eng A 782:139282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu W, Tan C, Xiao R, Sun Q, Sun J (2020) Slip behavior of Bi-modal structure in a metastable β titanium alloy during tensile deformation. J Mater Sci Technol 57:188–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu W, Lei J, Su B, Sun Q (2020) The interdependence of microstructure, strength and fracture toughness in a novel β titanium alloy Ti–5Al–4Zr–8Mo–7V. Mater Sci Eng A 782:139248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chuan Wu, Zhan M (2019) Microstructural evolution, mechanical properties and fracture toughness of near β titanium alloy during different solution plus aging heat treatments. J Alloy Compd 805:1144–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Terlinde G, Duerig T, Williams J (1983) Microstructure, tensile deformation, and fracture in aged ti 10V–2Fe-3Al. Metall Trans A 14:2101–2115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Niinomi M, Kobayashi T (1996) Fracture characteristics analysis related to the microstructures in titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 213(1–2):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang H, Zhao Q, Xin S, Zhao Y, Zhou W, Zeng W (2021) Microstructural morphology effects on fracture toughness and crack growth behaviors in a high strength titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng, A 821:141626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ragozin YI, Antonov YY (1984) Method of accelerated fracture toughness KIc testing of metallic materials. Strength Mater 16(2):179–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QF contributed to writing—original draft, investigation, formal analysis and date curation; WX contributed to methodology, writing—review and editing, investigation, formal analysis and date curation. WHY contributed to supervision, investigation and date curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wuhua Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

This manuscript does not involve human tissue or related experiments.

Additional information

Handling Editor: P. Nash.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fu, Q., Xiang, W. & Yuan, W. Effect of deformation and heat treatment parameters on the microstructure and properties of forged TB18 titanium alloy. J Mater Sci 59, 6986–7008 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09554-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09554-z

Navigation