Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stability of various particle-stabilised aluminium alloys foams made by gas injection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aluminium alloy foams are created by injecting air into liquid alloys containing non-metallic particles. In addition to an alloy containing the usual SiC particles, other types of metal/particle composites are studied, which are created by in situ reactions in the melts: two fluoride salts react and form TiB2 particles, and Ca addition or addition of CuO and SiO2 gives rise to the formation of various oxides and spinel particles. Injecting air into the molten composites through two different steel cannulas leads to the formation of first bubbles and then foam. The entire process is monitored in situ by X-ray radioscopy. The goal is not only to understand how and what kind of particles stabilise gas injected foams better, but also to reduce the fraction of added particles, which could improve mechanical properties, solve recycling issues and reduce production costs. All the observed composites are shown to have the potential to be processed to metallic foam. Melts containing TiB2 particles are found to perform as well as those containing SiC even at lower volume fractions. Oxidation of alloy melts promoted by Ca addition gives rise to melts that exhibit good foamability. Melts oxidised by CuO and SiO2 addition show partial stability. Mg is found to be a required alloying element to create stable foams. Smaller bubbles can be produced using smaller injector needle openings. By reducing bubble size and using new variants of in situ generated particles, more stable foams can be achieved with a lower number density of stabilising particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banhart J, Baumeister J (1998) Porous and cellular materials for structure applications. In: Schwartz DS, Shih DS, Evans AG (eds) Materials research society symposium San Francisco, pp 121–132

  2. Liu XN, Li YX, Chen X et al (2010) Foam stability in gas injection foaming process. J Mater Sci 45:6481–6493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heim K, Vinod-Kumar GS, García-Moreno F et al (2015) Stabilisation of aluminium foams and films by the joint action of dispersed particles and oxide films. Acta Mater 99:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin I, Kenny LD, Sang H (1990) Method of producing a lightweight foamed metal, US Patent 4,973,358, 27 Nov 1990

  5. Ip SW, Wang Y, Toguri JM (1999) Aluminium foam stabilization by solid particles. Can Metall Q 38:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou Y, Li Y, Yuan J (2015) The stability of aluminum foams at accumulation and condensation stages in gas injection foaming process. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 482:468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Leitlmeier D, Degischer HP, Flankl HJ (2002) Development of a foaming process for particulate reinforced aluminum melts. Adv Eng Mater 4:735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Babcsán N, Leitlmeier D, Banhart J (2005) Metal foams––high temperature colloids Part I. Ex situ analysis of metal foams. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 261:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy AR, Asavavisithchai S (2004) Effect of ceramic particle additions on foam expansion and stability in compacted Al–TiH2 powder precursors. Adv Eng Mater 6:400–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozben T, Kilickap E, Çakır O (2008) Investigation of mechanical and machinability properties of SiC particle reinforced Al-MMC. J Mater Process Technol 198:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang D, Shi Z (2003) Effect of ceramic particles on cell size and wall thickness of aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A 361:45–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinod-Kumar GS, Chakraborty M, García-Moreno F, Banhart J (2011) Foamability of MgAl2O4 (spinel)-reinforced aluminum alloy composites. Metall Mater Trans A 42:2898–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Babcsán N, Vinod-Kumar GS, Murty BS, Banhart J (2007) Grain refiners as liquid metal foam stabilisers. Trans Indian Inst Met 60:127–132

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miyoshi T, Itoh M, Akiyama S, Kitahara A (2000) ALPORAS Aluminum foam: production process, properties, and applications. Adv Eng Mater 2:179–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Atturan UA, Nandam SH, Murty BS, Sankaran S (2016) Processing and characterization of in situ TiB2 stabilized closed cell aluminium alloy composite foams. Mater Des 101:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  16. Babcsán N, García-Moreno F, Banhart J (2007) Metal foams–––high temperature colloids Part II: In situ analysis of metal foams. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 309:254–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. García-Moreno F, Siegel B, Heim K et al (2015) Sub-mm sized bubbles injected into metallic melts. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 473:60–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. García Moreno F, Fromme M, Banhart J (2004) Real-time X-ray radioscopy on metallic foams using a compact micro-focus source. Adv Eng Mater 6:416–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartels C, Raabe D, Gottstein G, Huber U (1997) Investigation of the precipitation kinetics in an Al6061/TiB2 metal matrix composite. Mater Sci Eng 237:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellie J, Wood J (1995) Reaction processing in the metals industry. Mater Process 3:10–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gergely V, Degischer HP, Clyne TW (2000) Recycling of MMCs and production of metallic foams. Compr Compos Mater 3:797–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohatgi PK, Pai BC, Panda SC (1979) Preparation of cast aluminium–silica particulate composites. J Mater Sci 14:2277–2283. doi:10.1007/BF00737014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hashim J, Looney L, Hashmi MS (1999) Metal matrix composites: production by the stir casting method. J Mater Process Technol 92–93:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu H, Jian X, Meek TT, Han Q (2004) Degassing of molten aluminum A356 alloy using ultrasonic vibration. Mater Lett 58:3669–3673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maity PC, Chakraborty PN, Panigrahi SC (1996) Formation of spinel (MgAl2O4), MgO and pure Cu particles in Al-2 Mg alloy-CuO particle composites. J Mater Sci 31:6377–6382. doi:10.1007/BF00354463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sreekumar VM, Ravi KR, Pillai RM et al (2008) Thermodynamics and kinetics of the formation of Al2O3/MgAl2O4/MgO in Al–silica metal matrix composite. Metall Mater Trans A 39:919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mcleod AD, Gabryel CM (1992) Kinetics of the growth of spinel, MgAl204, on alumina particulate in aluminum alloys containing magnesium. Metall Trans A 23A:1279–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshikawa N, Kikuchi A, Taniguchi S (2000) Microstructures of Al/Al2O3 composite bodies obtained by reaction between SiO2 and molten Al at temperatures ranging from 1073 to 1473 K. Mater Trans 41:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Babcsán N, Leitlmeier D, Degischer HP, Banhart J (2004) The role of oxidation in blowing particle-stabilised aluminium foams. Adv Eng Mater 6:421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vinod-Kumar GS, García-Moreno F, Babcsán N et al (2007) Study on aluminium-based single films. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:6415–6425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. DebRoy T, Bandopadhyay A, Roy R (1994) Oxide matrix composite by directional oxidation of a commercial aluminum–magnesium alloy. J Am Ceram Soc 77:1296–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaptay G (2004) Interfacial criteria for stabilization of liquid foams by solid particles. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 230:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heim K, Vinod-Kumar GS, García-Moreno F, Banhart J (2014) Role of ambient oxygen in the stabilisation of single aluminium alloy films. Procedia Mater Sci 4:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. G. S. Vinod-Kumar

    Present address: SRM Research Institute, SRM University, Kattankulathur, 603203, India

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Hardenbergstraße 36, 10623, Berlin, Germany

    K. Heim, F. García-Moreno & J. Banhart

  2. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, Hahn Meitner Platz 1, 14109, Berlin, Germany

    K. Heim, G. S. Vinod-Kumar, F. García-Moreno & J. Banhart

Authors
  1. K. Heim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. S. Vinod-Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. García-Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Banhart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Heim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heim, K., Vinod-Kumar, G.S., García-Moreno, F. et al. Stability of various particle-stabilised aluminium alloys foams made by gas injection. J Mater Sci 52, 6401–6414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0874-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0874-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation