Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A multi-stage satisfaction index estimation model integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a satisfaction index estimation model is proposed integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming methods with fuzzy customer data. Firstly, a deep literature survey is conducted in this field of study. Then, a new model is proposed by taking into consideration gaps in the literature. The estimation model is composed of five stages and first stage is building conceptual model in which measurement and latent variables are introduced. At the second stage, a fuzzy evaluation method is developed for decreasing subjectivity in customer data. At the third stage, for measurement variables that are directly observed, a measurement model is developed with Linear Structural Relations. In the solution of the measurement model maximum likelihood algorithm is used. In the solution of structural model that is composed of latent variables that are not directly observed, a mathematical estimation model is developed in this study at the fourth stage. Mathematical model is coded in ILOG Cplex Optimization Studio. In the mathematical model that minimizes estimation errors, structural relations and measurement variable weights (precedence coefficients) are defined as constraints. At the fifth and last stage, index scores are calculated with mathematical model outputs. Application of the model is carried out in public sector at a local government service point. In the application model, service quality, innovation, communication, satisfaction and cost perception dimensions are used. Application results are discussed for both measurement and latent variables in detail. The results of model we developed are also compared with an alternative model outcomes and we show that we achieve optimum estimation capability with minimum estimation errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aktepe A. (2015). Model proposals for customer satisfaction index estimation: Public sector application, Ph. D. Thesis, Gazi University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, (Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bilal TOKLU, Co-supervisor: Assoc. Prof Dr. Süleyman ERSÖZ).

  • Aktepe, A., Ersoz, S., & Toklu, B. (2015). Customer satisfaction and loyalty analysis with classification algorithms and structural equation modeling. Computers & Industrial Engineering,. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2014.09.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayhan, M. B., Aydin, M. E., & Oztemel, E. (2015). A multi-agent based approach for change management in manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(5), 975–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Nasser, A. D., Al-Rawwash, M. Y., & Alakhras, A. S. (2011). An approach to setting up a national customer satisfaction index: The Jordan case study. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(9), 1977–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angilella, S., Corrente, S., Greco, S., & Słowińskic, R. (2014). MUSA-Int: Multicriteria customer satisfaction analysis with interacting criteria. Omega, 42(1), 189–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar, E., Tatoğlu, E., Türkyilmaz, A., Delen, D., & ve Zaim, S. (2012). Measuring the efficiency of customer satisfaction and loyalty for mobile phone brands with DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling With LISREL, PIRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (1 st ed., p. 412). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

  • Chen, L. H. (2005). A demerit control chart with linguistic weights. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3), 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Zhang, G., Hu, D., & Fu, C. (2007). Customer segmentation based on survival character. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18(4), 513–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1996). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 37–55).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  • Ciavolino, E., & Dahlgaard, J. J. (2007). ECSI-customer satisfaction modelling and analysis: A case study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(5), 545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları (Üçüncü Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayınları, 424.

  • Fink, A., & Kosecoff, J. B. (2005). How to conduct surveys. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. (1992). A national satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 12, 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., Michael, D. J., Eugene, W. A., Jaesung, C., & Barbara, E. B. (1996). The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, purpose and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2002). Preference disaggregation for measuring and analyzing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2004). A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: someresults from the transportation-communications sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2), 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). Lisrel 8.80 for Windows (Computer Software). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide (2 nd ed., p. 378). Chicago: Scientific Software International.

  • Kristensen, K., Martensen, A., & Gronholdt, L. (2000). Customer satisfaction measurement at Post Denmark: Results of application of the European Customer Satisfaction Index Methodology. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 11(7), 1007–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, C. K., & Bai, H. (2002). A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13(5), 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q. (2013). A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(5), 1609–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Zeng, X., Xu, Y., & Koehl, L. (2008). A fuzzy model of customer satisfaction index in e-commerce. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 77(5–6), 512–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, H. S., & Lee, J. D. (2005). A fuzzy set theory approach to national composite S&T indices. Scientometrics, 64(1), 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1998). Psychological testing (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory (1st ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orel, F. D., & Kara, A. (2013). Super market self-checkout service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.07.002i.

  • Risdiyono, Koomsap P. (2013). Design by customer: Concepts and applications. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(2), 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, X. X., Tan, K. C., & Xie, M. (2001). The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 12(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (Released 2007). SPSS for Windows. Version 16.0, Chicago, SPSS Inc.

  • Sun, K. A., & Kim, D. Y. (2013). Does customer satisfaction increase firm performance? An application of American Customer Satisfaction Index(ACSI). International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 68–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen, Z. (2004). Mühendislikte Bulanık (Fuzzy) Mantık İle Modelleme Prensipleri (Baskı Sayısı). İstanbul: Su Vakfı Yayınları, p. 191.

  • Türkyılmaz, A. (2007). Müşteri Memnuniyet İndeks Model Önerisi ve Model Tahmininde Kısmi En Küçük Kareler ve Yapay Sinir Ağları Metodu Kullanımı, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul (pp. 1–109).

  • Turkyilmaz, A., Ozkan C. (2007). Development of a customer satisfaction index model: An application to the Turkish mobile phone sector. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5), 672–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usmanij, P. A., Khosla, R., & Chu, M.-T. (2013). Successful product or successful system? User satisfaction measurement of ERP software. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(6), 1131–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., Li, H., Liu, A. (2015). A novel method for determining the key customer requirements and innovation goals in customer collaborative product innovation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1102-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial, S. F. (1996). Know your customer: New approaches to understanding customer value and satisfaction (1st ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2004). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Dördüncü Baskı) (pp. 45–55). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by 1001 scienctific project programme of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK. Our special thanks go to TUBITAK 1001 and 2211 programs for financial support, to expert team for their scientific efforts, to the students of Kirikkale University Industrial Engineering Department for their support in data collection and finally to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey

    Adnan Aktepe & Süleyman Ersöz

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

    Bilal Toklu

Authors
  1. Adnan Aktepe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Süleyman Ersöz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bilal Toklu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adnan Aktepe.

Additional information

This study was partially supported by 1001 project programme of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey-TUBITAK (Project #: 112K156).

This study is a selected paper by paper assessment committee of IMSS’14 & CIE’44 to Special Issue of Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing journal (Special Issue: Recent developments in intelligent manufacturing and service systems) presented in IMSS’14 & CIE’44 symposium in 2014 (Paper ID: imss14-cie44-136).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aktepe, A., Ersöz, S. & Toklu, B. A multi-stage satisfaction index estimation model integrating structural equation modeling and mathematical programming. J Intell Manuf 30, 2945–2964 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1166-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1166-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation