Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Edaphic beetle (Insecta: Coleoptera) diversity over a forest-matrix gradient in a tropical rainforest

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Species from natural communities show different capacities for moving across contrasting habitats, and they may gradually respond along the transition between forests and anthropogenic areas. Because beetles are effective bioindicators, we analyzed the Coleoptera assemblage structure in the transition between sugarcane matrices and forest fragment. The study was conducted in an Atlantic rainforest fragment and sugarcane matrices after 2 and 6 months of replantation. Beetles were sampled in linear transects that were 50, 100, and 200 m from the forest edge and toward both forest core and matrices. We analyzed beetle abundance, species richness and composition, and diversity numbers. The abundance and species richness were higher in the forest, and species richness was higher at the sampling site 100 m inside the forest than at the gradients within the sugarcane matrices. The species composition differed between the forest and matrices, but not between the matrices with different replantation ages. Alpha diversity based on the number of species was higher in the forest, and alpha diversity based on the Shannon index was higher in the forest and matrix after 6 months of replantation. Our results suggest that the sugarcane matrices, chiefly the matrix after 2 months of replantation, sustain an impoverished beetle assemblage when compared with the forest fragment. Despite the strong habitat distinction, the beetle fauna in the sugarcane matrices was not affected by the horizontal distance from the forest. Here, we have highlighted the importance of forest fragments embedded in harsh matrices for the maintenance of biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre A, Dirzo R (2008) Effects of fragmentation on pollinator abundance and fruit set of an abundant understory palm in a Mexican tropical forest. Biol Conserv 141:375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo RA, Araújo MS, Gonring AHR, Guedes RNC (2005) Impact of controlled sugarcane straw burning on local insect community. Neotrop Entomol 34:649–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audino LD, Louzada J, Comita L (2014) Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: is it possible to recover species and functional diversity? Biol Conserv 169:248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ávila CJ, Parra JRP (2003) Leaf consumption by Diabrotica speciosa (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) adults on different host plants. Sci Agr 60:789–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa MGV, Fonseca CRV, Hammond PMH, Stork NE (2002) Diversity and similarity between habitats based on the leaf litter Coleoptera fauna from the terra firme forest of Central Amazonia. Mongr Terc Milenio 2:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS et al (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18555–18560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bozsik A (2014) Food preference of Chrysolina fastuosa adults (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 60:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent EN, Asner GP, Keller M, Knapp DE, Oliveira PJC, Silva JN (2008) Forest fragmentation and edge effects from deforestation and selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Biol Conserv 141:1745–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KS Jr (1991) Conservation of Neotropical environments: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM (ed) The conservation of insects and their habitats, 1st edn. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 349–404

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carpio C, Donoso DA, Ramón G, Dangles O (2009) Short term response of dung beetle communities to disturbance by road construction in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 45:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casari S, Ide S (2012) Coleoptera. In: Rafael JA, Melo GAR, Carvalho CJB, Casari SA, Constantino R (eds) Insetos do Brasil. Holos Editora, Ribeirão Preto, pp 359–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellon TD, Sieving KE (2006) An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conserv Biol 20:135–145

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

  • Costa FC, Pessoa KKT, Liberal CN, Filgueiras BKC, Salomão RP, Iannuzzi L (2013) What is the importance of open habitat in a predominantly closed forest area to the dung beetle (Coleoptera, Scarabaeinae) assemblage? Rev Bras Entomol 57:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2013) The R book, 2nd edn. Aptara Inc., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Anunciação PER, Silva MFV, Ferrante L, Assis DS, Casagrande T, Coelho AZG, Amâncio BCS, Pereira TR, da Silva VX (2013) Forest fragments surrounded by sugar cane are more inhospitable to terrestrial amphibian abundance than fragments surrounded by pasture. Int J Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/183726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Didham R, Lawton J, Hammond P, Eggleton P (1998) Trophic structure stability and extinction dynamics of beetles (Coleoptera) in tropical forest fragments. Philos Trans R Soc B 353:437–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleton P, Bignell DE, Hauser S, Dibog L, Norgrove L, Madong B (2002) Termite diversity across an anthropogenic disturbance gradient in the humid forest zone of West Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 90:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elzen PJ, Baxter JR, Westervelt D, Randall C, Delaplane KS, Cutts L, Wilson WT (1999) Field control and biology studies of a new pest species, Aethinatumida Murray (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae), attacking European honey bees in the Western Hemisphere. Apidologie 30:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enedino TR, Loures-Ribeiro A, Santos BA (2018) Protecting biodiversity in urbanizing regions: the role of urban reserves for the conservation of Brazilian Atlantic Forest birds. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evidences and Lessons from Latin America (ELLA) (2012) From manual to mechanical harvesting: reducing environmental impacts and increasing cogeneration potential. http://ella.practicalaction.org/knowledge-brief/from-manual-to-mechanical-harvesting-reducing-environmental-impacts-and-increasing-cogeneration-potential. Accessed 11 Jan 2018

  • Fagundes C, Di Mare R, Wink C, Manfio D (2011) Diversity of the families of Coleoptera captured with pitfall traps in five different environments in Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. Braz J Biol 71:381–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueiras BKC, Liberal CN, Aguiar CDM, Hernández MIM, Iannuzzi L (2009) Attractivity of omnivore, carnivore and herbivore mammalian dung to Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in a tropical Atlantic rainforest remnant. Rev Bras Entomol 53:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filgueiras BKC, Tabarelli M, Leal IR, Vaz-de-Mello FZ, Iannuzzi L (2015) Dung beetle persistence in human-modified landscapes: combining indicator species with anthropogenic land use and fragmentation-related effects. Ecol Indic 55:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Importance of matrix habitats in maintaining biological diversity. PNAS 106:349–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner TA, Barlow J, Araújo IS et al (2008) The cost-effectiveness of biodiversity surveys in tropical forests. Ecol Lett 11:139–150

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gascon C, Lovejoy TE, Bierregaard RO Jr, Malcolm JR, Stouffer PC, Vasconcelos HL, Laurance WF, Zimmerman B, Tocher M, Borges S (1999) Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biol Conserv 91:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goehring DM, Daily GC, Sekercioglu CH (2002) Distribution of ground-dwelling arthropods in tropical countryside habitats. J Insect Conserv 6:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs S, Pauchard A (2015) Struggling to maintain native plant diversity in a peri-urban reserve surrounded by a highly anthropogenic matrix. Biodivers Conserv 24:2769–2788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulcr J, Mogia M, Isua B, Novotny V (2007) Host specificity of ambrosia and bark beetles (Col., Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae) in a New Guinea rainforest. Ecol Entomol 32:762–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatisticas (IBGE) (1985) Atlas nacional do Brasil: região nordeste. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113:363–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallimanis AS, Mazaris AD, Tsakanikas D, Dimopoulos P, Pantis JD, Sgardelis SP (2012) Efficient biodiversity monitoring: which taxonomic level to study? Ecol Indic 15:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karem J, Woods SA, Drummond F, Stubbs C (2006) Sampling native wasps along both vertical and horizontal gradients in the maine lowbush blueberry landscape. Environ Entomol 35:1083–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karen M, John O, John B, Paul G, Josephine P, Thomas K (2008) Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle—implications for management. Forest Ecol Manag 256:624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo T, Ando Y (1989) Food preference of a polyphagous leaf beetle, Atrachya menetriesi Faldermann (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). Jpn J Appl Entomol Z 33:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen TH, Lopera A, Forsyth A (2006) Extreme trophic and habitat specialization by peruvian dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Coleop Bul 60:315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Peres CA (2006) Emerging threats to tropical forests. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizée M, Manel S, Mauffrey J, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species-area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landsc Ecol 27:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Barrera F, Armesto JJ, Williams-Linera G, Smith-Ramírez C, Manson RH (2007) Fragmentation and edge effects on plant-animal interactions, ecological processes and biodiversity. In: Newton AC (ed) Biodiversity loss and conservation in fragmented forest landscapes: the forests of montane Mexico and temperate South America. Cabi Publishing, Wallingford, pp 69–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maleque MA, Maeto K, Ishii HT (2009) Arthropods as bioindicators of sustainable forest management, with a focus on plantation forests. Appl Entomol Z 44:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelik Y, Dayan T, Chikatunov V, Kravchenko V (2007) Reliability of a higher-taxon approach to richness, rarity, and composition assessments at the local scale. Conserv Biol 21:1506–1515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez FS, Franceschini MC, Poi A (2013) Food preference Neochetina eichhorniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by aquatic plants of different nutritional value. Rev Colomb Entomol 39:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina MF, Farinós HBM (2012) Los componentes alfa, beta y gamma de la biodiversidad. Aplicación al estudio de comunidades vegetales. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/16285. Accessed 1 July 2017

  • Monk WA, Wood PJ, Hannah DM, Extence CA, Chadd RP, Dunbar MJ (2012) How does macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution influence ecohydrological relationships in riverine ecosystems. Ecohydrology 5:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia C (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 10:58–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Chapin CFS, Costanza R, Ehrlich PR, Golley FB, Hooper DU, Lawton JH, O’Neill RV, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Symstad AJ, Tilman D (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: maintaining natural life support processes. Issues Ecol 4:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols E, Larsen T, Spector D, Davis AL, Escobar F, Favila M, Vulinec K (2007) Global dung beetle response to tropical forest modification and fragmentation: a quantitative literature review and meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 137:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MA, Grillo AS, Tabarelli M (2004) Forest edge in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: drastic changes in tree species assemblages. Oryx 38:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhoon M, Kappelle M (2000) Vegetation structure and composition along an interior-edge-exterior gradient in a Costa Rican montane cloud forest. Forest Ecol Manag 126:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DL, Cassola F (1992) World-wide species richness patterns of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for biodiversity and conservation studies. Conserv Biol 6:376–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto SRR, Mendes G, Santos AMM, Dantas M, Tabarelli M, Melo FPL (2010) Landscape attributes drive complex spatial microclimate configuration of Brazilian Atlantic forest fragments. Trop Conserv Sci 3:389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pôrto KC, Almeida-Cortez JS, Tabarelli M (2005) Diversidade Biológica e Conservação da Floresta Atlântica ao Norte do Rio São Francisco. Ministério do Meio Ambiente, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevedello JA, Vieira MV (2010) Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodivers Conserv 19:1205–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta P, Blom T, Niemela J, Joensuu E, Siitonen M (1998) The fragmented Atlantic rainforest of Brazil: size, shape and distribution of forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 7:385–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MV, Venkataiah B (1990) Seasonal abundance of soil-surface arthropods in relation to some meteorological and edaphic variables of the grassland and tree-planted areas in a tropical semi-arid savanna. Int J Biometeorol 34:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Fletcher RJ Jr, Battin J, Sisk TD (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:491–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JP, Pearson DL, Barrera RR (1998) A test for the adequacy of bioindicator taxa: are tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) appropriate indicators for monitoring the degradation of tropical forests in Venezuela? Biol Conserv 83:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slingenberg A, Braat L, Windt H, Rademaekers K, Eichler L, Turner K (2009) Study on understanding the causes of biodiversity loss and the policy assessment framework. Ecorys, Research and Consulting, Rotterdan

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabarelli M, Melo M, Lira O (2006) A mata Atlântica do nordeste - Mata Atlântica uma rede pela floresta. Rede de Ongs da Mata Atlântica, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara-Prado M, Brown KS, Freitas AVL (2006) Species richness, composition and abundance of fruit-feeding butterflies in the Brazilian Atlantic forest: comparison between a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16:43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veloso HP, Rangel Filho ALR, Lima JCA (1991a) Classificação da vegetação brasileira, adaptada a um sistema universal. Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Veloso HP, Rangel-Filho ALR, Lima JCA (1991b) Classificação da vegetação brasileira adaptado a um sistema universal. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardhaugh CW, Edwards W, Stork NE (2013) Variation in beetle community structure across five microhabitats in Australian tropical rainforest trees. Insect Conserv Diver 6:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore T (1997) Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. In: Laurance WF, Bierregaard RO (eds) Tropical forest remnants: ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams-Guillén K, Olimpi E, Maas B, Taylor PJ, Arlettaz R (2015) Bats in the anthropogenic matrix: challenges and opportunities for the conservation of Chiroptera and their ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. In: Voigt C, Kingston T (eds) Bats in the anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world. Springer, Cham, pp 151–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank to Serra Grande sugar processing plant for infrastructure, logistic support, and for authorizing our fieldwork. We also thank “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” (CAPES) for a doctoral scholarship to AFA Lira. We also thank “Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología” (CONACYT) for a doctoral scholarship to RP Salomão.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renato Portela Salomão.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest (financial and non-financial).

Ethical approval

The experiment was not invasive and complied with Brazilian law (SISBIO/ICMBIO Permit Number: 1982628). At the end of the experiment, the specimens were deposited in the Entomological Collection of the Federal University of Pernambuco, according to standard procedures. This study had no human participants; thus, no “informed consent” was required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10841_2018_79_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Fig. S1—Significant relation between species richness and abundance of edaphic beetles sampled in in the Atlantic rainforest, northeastern Brazil (TIFF 38217 KB)

Supplementary material (DOCX 30 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salomão, R.P., Pordeus, L.M., de Araujo Lira, A.F. et al. Edaphic beetle (Insecta: Coleoptera) diversity over a forest-matrix gradient in a tropical rainforest. J Insect Conserv 22, 511–519 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0079-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-018-0079-3

Keywords

Navigation