Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of management intensity on ant diversity in cocoa plantation (Oume, centre west Côte d’Ivoire)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anthropogenic habitat modifications, including conversion of forest to agricultural production cause losses of native species. In this study we examined the losses suffered by ant communities in relation to the intensity of management in cocoa plantations established in former tropical forest. An extensive sampling protocol consisting of pitfall trapping, leaf litter sampling, soil sampling and hand sampling was used to characterize ant species richness and composition in the native forest and compare it with three cocoa farms differing in their management intensity. Species richness was negatively correlated with management intensity and differed greatly between management practices and the forest. Two subfamilies (Myrmicinae and Amblyoponinae) showed a significant negative correlation with agricultural intensification probably because their species are constrained to living in forest like habitat. The species composition differed greatly between management practices and the forest. Intensively and moderately managed cocoa plantations were most dissimilar to the forest. In contrast, forest ants were well represented in the least intensively managed plantation. Overall, the findings of this study show that only slightly managed cocoa plantations sustain an ant diversity that comes close to that of the forest. This also holds true for cocoa plantations on former agricultural, and thus previously heavily used, land. The findings may help in the conservation of biodiversity as management practices most likely to sustain forest like ant communities have been identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agosti D, Alonso LE (2000) The ALL protocol: a standard protocol for the collection of ground-dwelling ants. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 204–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Agosti D, Johnson NF (2005) Antbase. http://www.antbase.org. Accessed 21 July 2011

  • Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (2000) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1990) The use of ant communities to evaluate change in Australian terrestrial ecosystems: a review and a recipe. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 16:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1991) Sampling communities of ground foraging ants: pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust J Ecol 16:273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1993) Ants as indicators of restoration success at uranium mine in tropical Australia. Restor Ecol 1:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen AN (1995) A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 20:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AntWeb (2002) Biodiversity database. California Academy of Sciences. http://www.antweb.org. Accessed 21 July 2011

  • Armbrecht I, Gallego MC (2007) Testing ant predation on the coffee berry borer in shaded and sun coffee plantations in Colombia. Entomol Exp Appl 124:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrecht I, Perfecto I (2003) Litter-twig dwelling ant species richness and predation potential within a forest fragment and neighboring coffee plantations of contrasting habitat quality in Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 97:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrecht I, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2004) Enigmatic biodiversity correlations: ant diversity responds to diverse resources. Science 304:284–286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armbrecht I, Perfecto I, Silverman E (2006) Limitation of nesting resources for ants in Colombian forests and coffee plantations. Ecol Entomol 31:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa SS, Kress WJ, Nadkarni NM, Lele S (2004) Beyond paradise—meeting the challenges in tropical biology in the 21st century. Biotropica 36:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belshaw R, Bolton B (1993) The effect of forest disturbance on leaf-litter ant fauna in Ghana. Biodivers Conserv 2:656–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bestelmeyer BT, Agosti D, Alonso L, Brandão CRF, Brown LW, Delabie JHC, Silvestre R (2000) Field techniques for the study of ground dwelling ants. In: Agosti D, Majer J, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 122–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1973) The ant genus Polyrhachis F. Smith in the Ethiopian region (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 28:285–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1974) A revision of the Ponerine ant genus Plectroctena F. Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 30:311–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1975a) A revision of the ant genus Leptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Ethiopian region with a review of the Malagasy species. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 31:237–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1975b) A revision of the African ponerine ant genus Psalidomyrmex André (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 32:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1976) The ant tribe Tetramoriini (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Constituent genera, review of smaller genera and review of Triglyphothrix Forel. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 34:283–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1981) A revision of the ant genera Meranoplus F. Smith, Dicroaspis Emery and Calyptomyrmex Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Ethiopian zoogeographical region. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 42:43–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1982) Afrotropical species of the Myrmicine ant genera Cardiocondyla, Lepthothorax, Melissotarsus, Messor and Cataulacus (Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 45:307–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1983) The Afrotropical dacetine ants (Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 46:267–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1986) A taxonomic and biological review of the tetramoriine ant genus Rhoptromyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Syst Entomol 11:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1987) A revision of the Solenopsis genus-group and revision of Afrotropical Monomorium Mayr (Hymenoptera). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 54:263–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1994) Identification guide to ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (1995) A new general catalogue of the ants of the world. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (2000) The ant tribe Dacetini. Mem Am Entomol Inst 65:1–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (2003) Synopsis and classification of Formicidae. Mem Am Entomol Inst 71:1–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B (2011) An online catalog of ants of the world. http://www.antcat.org/catalog/index. Cited 21 July 2011

  • Bolton B, Brown W Jr (2002) Loboponera gen. n. and a review of the Afrotropical Plectroctena genus group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 71:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Fisher BL (2011) Taxonomy of Afrotropical and West Palaearctic ants of the ponerine genus Hypoponera Santschi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Zootaxa 2843:1–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton B, Gotwald WH Jr, Leroux J-M (1976) A new west African ant of the genus Plectroctena with ecological notes (Hymenotera: Formicidae). Annales de l’Université d’Abidjan, Série E, Ecologie 9:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos MM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2007) The contribution of cacao agroforests to the conservation of lower canopy ant and beetle diversity in Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 16:2429–2444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JWL (1978) Contribution toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. Part VI. Ponerinae, tribe Ponerini, subtribe Odontomachiti. Section B. genus anochetus and bibliography. Studia Entomol 20:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley RC (1982) Ant-plant interactions: a world review. In: Buckley RC (ed) Ant-plant interactions in Australia. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 111–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cassano CR, Schroth G, Faria D, Delabie JHC, Bede L (2009) Landscape and farm scale management to enhance biodiversity conservation in the cocoa producing region of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18:577–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatelain C, Dao H, Gautier L, Spichiger R (2003) Forest cover changes in Côte d’Ivoire and upper Guinea. In: Poorter L, Bongers F, Kouamé FN, Hawthorne WD (eds) An ecological atlas of woody plant species: biodiversity of West Africa forests. CABI, Wallingford, pp 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2005) Estimates: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut. Ver. 7.5. User’s Guide and Application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Cited 20 May 2013

  • Decaëns T, Jiménez JJ (2002) Earthworm communities under an agricultural intensification gradient in Colombia. Plant Soil 240:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dejean A, Djiéto-Lordon C, Durand JL (1997) Ant mosaic in oil palm plantations of the South-west province of Ant communities in cocoa plantations Cameroon: impact on a leaf miner chrysomelid beetle. J Econ Entomol 90:1092–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Delabie JHC, Jahyny B, Do Nascimento IC, Mariano CSF, Lacau S, Campiolo S, Philpott SM, Leponce M (2007) Contribution of cocoa plantations to the conservation of native ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with a special emphasis on the Atlantic Forest fauna of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 16:2359–2384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández F (2004) The American species of the myrmicine ant genus Carebara Westwood (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Caldasia 26:191–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher BL (1998) Ant diversity patterns along an elevational gradient in the Réserve Spéciale d’Anjanaharibe-Sud and on the Western Masoala Peninsula, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zool 90:39–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher BL (1999) Improving inventory efficiency: a case study of leaf litter ant diversity in Madagascar. Ecol Appl 9:714–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher BL, Robertson HG (2002) Comparison and origin of forest and grassland ant assemblages in the high plateau of Madagascar (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biotropica 34:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fittkau EJ, Klinge H (1973) On biomass and trophic structure of the Central Amazonian rainforest ecosystem. Biotropica 5:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade PJM, Mott JJ (1979) Ants of native and sown pastures in the Katherine area, Northern Territory, Australia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In: Crosby TK, Pottinger RP (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian conference on grassland invertebrate ecology. Government Printer, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaumet JL, Adjanohoune E (1971) La végétation de la Côte d’Ivoire. In: Avenard J-M, Adjanohoune E, Eldin M et al (eds) Le milieu naturel De La Côte d’Ivoire. Mémoire Office de la recherche scientifique et technique outre-mer, Paris, pp 161–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeon Electr 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway JD, Stork NE (1991) The dimensions of biodiversity: the use of invertebrates as indicators of human impact. In: Hawkesworth DL (ed) The biodiversity of microorganisims and invertebrates: its role in sustainable agriculture. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 37–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Schachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystems engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler M, Kebler PJ, Gradstein SR, Bach K, Schmull M, Pitopang R (2005) Tree diversity in primary forest and different land use systems in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 14:547–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobry de Bruyn LA (1999) Ants as bioindicators of soil function in rural environments. Agricult Ecosyst Environ 74:425–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobry de Bruyn LA, Conacher AJ (1994) The bioturbation activity of ants in agricultural and naturally vegetated habitats in semi-arid environments. Aust J Soil Res 32:555–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino LT (2000) What to do with data. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) ANTS: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 186–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo AE (1988) Estimating reductions in diversity of tropical forest species. In: Wilson EO (ed) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 58–70

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay WP, Rebeles A, Arredondo HC, Rodriguez A, Gonzalez DA, Vinson SB (1991) Impact of the slashing and burning of a tropical rainforest on the native ant fauna (Hymentoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 18:257–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD (1983) Ants: bio-indicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use, and land conservation. Environ Manag 7:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JEH (1983) Les insectes et Arachnides du Canada, partie I: Récolte, Préparation et Conservation des Insectes, des Acariens et des Araignées. Direction générale de la recherche, Agriculture Canada, Publication 1643, Ottawa

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Tree 14:450–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely JA (2004) Nature vs. nurture: managing relationships between forests, agroforestry and wild biodiversity. Agrofor Syst 61:155–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. 86 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittelmeier RA, Mittelmeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 493:853–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Hanson P, Cartin V (1997) Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agroecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 6:935–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Foster PF (2005) Nest-site limitation in coffee agroecosystems: artificial nests maintain diversity of arboreal ants. Ecol Appl 15:1478–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel DA, Stachow U, Takacs DA, Brubaker HW, Dumas AR, Meaney JJ, O’Neil JA, Onsi DE, Corzilius DB (1992) Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems. Bioscience 42:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid WV, Miller KR (1989) Keeping options alive: the scientific basis for conserving biodiversity. World Resources Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Room PM (1971) The relative distribution of ant species in Ghana’s cocoa farms. J Anim Ecol 40:735–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Room PM (1975) Distributions of ant species in cocoa plantations in Papua New Guinea. J Appl Ecol 12:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf F, Schroth G (2004) Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical view of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation. In: Schroth G, Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac A-MN (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 107–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Harvey CA (2007) Biodiversity conservation in cocoa production landscape: an overview. Biodivers Conserv 16:2237–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Fonseca GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL (2004) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze CH, Waltert M, Kessler PJA, Pitopang R, Veddeler D, Muhlenberg M, Gradstein SR, Leuschner C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2004) Biodiversity indicator groups of tropical landuse systems: comparing plants, birds and insects. Ecol Appl 14:1321–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert B (2003) The ant genus Cardiocondyla (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – A taxonomic revision of the C. elegens, C. bulgarica, C. batesii, C. nuda, C. shuckardi, C. stambuloffii, C. wroughtonii, C. emeryi and C. minutior species groups. Ann Nat Mus Wien 104:203–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Kessler M, Barkmann J, Bos MM, Buchori D, Erasmi S, Faust H, Gerold G, Glenk K, Gradstein SR, Guhardja E, Harteveld M, Hertel D, Höhn P, Kappas M, Kohler S, Leuschner C, Maertens M, Marggraf R, Migge-Kleian S, Mogea J, Pitopang R, Schaefer M, Schwarze S, Sporn SG, Steingrebe A, Tjitrosoedirdjo SS, Tjitrosoemito S, Twele A, Weber R, Woltmann L, Zeller M, Tscharntke T (2007) Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. PNAS 104:4973–4978

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tylianakis JM, Klein AM, Lozada T, Tscharntke T (2006) Spatial scale of observation affects alpha, beta and gamma diversity of cavity-nesting bees and wasps across a tropical land-use gradient. J Biogeogr 33:1295–1304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mele P (2008) A historical review of research on the weaver ant Oecophylla in biological control. Agric For Entomol 10:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos HL (1999) Effects of forest disturbance on the structure of groung-foraging ant communities in Central Amazonia. Biodivers Conserv 8:409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M, Mardiastuti A, Mühlenberg M (2004) Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 18:1339–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M (2003) A monographic revision of the ant genus Pristomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Bull Mus Compar Zool 157:383–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1987) The arboreal ant fauna of Peruvian Amazon forests: a first assessment. Biotropica 19:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Rainforest Movement (2004) Côte d’Ivoire: le cacao, encore une cause de la déforestation. Bulletin du WRM, Numéro 85 Août 2004. wrm@wrm.org.uy

  • Yeo K, Konate S, Tiho S, Camara KS (2011) Impacts of land use types on ant communities in a tropical forest margin (Oumé – Côte d’Ivoire). Afr J Agric Res 6:260–274

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the farmers in Oumé region who provided access to their fields for this study and to Mr Firmin, Eric and Arnaud for their assistance in the field. This work was founded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), through the BIOTAWest project (FZ 01LC0617A2).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouhamadou Kone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kone, M., Konate, S., Yeo, K. et al. Effects of management intensity on ant diversity in cocoa plantation (Oume, centre west Côte d’Ivoire). J Insect Conserv 18, 701–712 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9679-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9679-8

Keywords

Navigation