Abstract
Background
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via permanent His bundle pacing (pHBP) has gained acceptance globally, but robust studies comparing pHBP-CRT with classic CRT are lacking. In this study, we aimed to compare the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after pHBP-CRT versus classic CRT.
Methods
This was a single-center study comparing a prospective series of pHBP-CRT with a historical series of CRT via classic biventricular pacing (BVP). Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, baseline LVEF < 35%, left bundle branch block (LBBB), and CRT indications were selected.
Results
Fifty-one patients underwent classic CRT and 52 patients underwent pHBP-CRT. In the classic CRT group, the median (interquartile range) basal LVEF was 30% (IQR, 29–35%) before implantation and 40% (35–48%) at follow-up. In the pHBP-CRT group, the median basal LVEF was 30% (28–34%) before implantation and 55% (45–60%) at follow-up, with significant differences between both modalities at follow-up (p = 0.001). The median long term His recruitment threshold with LBBB correction was 1.25 (1–2.5) V at 0.4 ms in cases of pHBP-CRT, compared to a left ventricular coronary sinus threshold of 1.25 (1–1.75) V in cases of classic CRT (p = 0.48). After CRT, the median paced QRS was 135 (120–145) ms for pHBP-CRT versus 140 (130–150) ms for BVP-CRT (p = 0.586).
Conclusions
The improvement in LVEF was superior with pHBP-CRT than with classic CRT. The thresholds at follow-up were similar in both groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BBB:
-
Bundle branch block
- BVP:
-
Biventricular pacing
- CRT:
-
Cardiac resynchronization therapy
- HBP:
-
His bundle pacing
- HF:
-
Heart failure
- ICD:
-
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- LBBB:
-
Left bundle branch block
- LV:
-
Left ventricle
- LVEF:
-
Left ventricular ejection fraction
- pHBP:
-
Permanent His bundle pacing
- VP:
-
Ventricular pacing
References
Moriña-Vázquez P, Barba-Pichardo R, Venegas-Gamero J, Herrera-Carranza M. Cardiac resynchronization through selective His bundle pacing in a patient with the so-called InfraHis atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:726–9.
Barba-Pichardo R, Manovel-Sánchez A, Fernández-Gómez JM, Moriña-Vázquez P, Venegas-Gamero J, Herrera-Carranza M. Ventricular resynchronization therapy by direct His-bundle pacing using an internal cardioverter defibrillator. Europace. 2013;15:83–8.
Ajijola OA, Upadhyay GA, Macias C, Shivkumar K, Tung R. Permanent His-bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: initial feasibility study in lieu of left ventricular lead. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1353–61.
Lustgarten DL, Crespo EM, Arkhjpova-Jenkins I, Lobel R, Winget J, Koehler J, Liberman E, Sheldon T. His-bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients: a crossover design comparison. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1548–57.
Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Herweg B, Wilson D, Singh R, Naperkowski A, Koneru JN, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:413–20.
Huang W, Su L, Wu S, Xu L, Xiao F, Zhou X, Mao G, Vijayaraman P, Ellenbogen KA. Long-term outcomes of His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure with left bundle branch block. Heart. 2019;105:137–43.
Moriña-Vazquez P, Moraleda-Salas MT, Manovel-Sánchez A, Fernández-Gómez JM, Arce-León A, Venegas-Gamero J, Barba-Pichardo R. Early improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction by cardiac resynchronization through His bundle pacing in patients with heart failure. Europace. 2020;22:125–32.
McAlister FA, Ezekowitz J, Hooton N, Vandermeer B, Spooner C, Dryden DM, Page RL, Hlatky MA, Rowe BH. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;297:2502–14.
Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2129–200.
Moriña-Vázquez P, Moraleda-Salas MT, Arce-León Á, Fernández-Gómez JM, Venegas-Gamero J, Díaz-Fernández JF. Electrocardiographic patterns predictive of left bundle branch block correction with His bundle pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;43:1318–24.
Vijayaraman P, Dandamudi G, Zanon F, Shrama PS, Tung R, Huang W, Koneru J, Tada H, Ellenbogen KA, Lustgarten DL. Permanent His bundle pacing: recommendations from a multicenter his bundle pacing collaborative working group for standardization of definitions, implant measurements, and follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:460–8.
Upadhyay GA, Cherian T, Shatz DY, Beaser AD, Aziz Z, Ozcan C, Broman MT, Nayak HM, Tung R. Intracardiac delineation of septal conduction in left bundle-branch block patterns. Circulation. 2019;139:1876–88.
Arnold AD, Shun-Shin MJ, Keene D, Howard JP, Sohaib SMA, Wright IJ, Cole GD, Qureshi NA, Lefroy DC, Koa-Wing M, et al. His resynchronization versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3112–22.
Upadhyay GA, Vijayaraman P, Nayak HM, Verma N, Dandamudi G, Sharma PS, Saleem M, Mandrola J, Genovese D, Oren JW, et al. On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: a secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1797–807.
Funding
This study received a grant from the Andalusian Society of Cardiology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Clinical perspective
What is known
• There is a lack of conclusive studies comparing cardiac resynchronization therapy via permanent His bundle pacing with classic cardiac resynchronization therapy.
What the study adds
• The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction was superior permanent His bundle pacing than with the classic method.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moriña-Vázquez, P., Moraleda-Salas, M.T., Rodríguez-Albarrán, A. et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a comparative non-randomized study of His Bundle pacing versus biventricular pacing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1077–1084 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01192-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01192-2