Abstract
Introduction
Ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is a critical component in many arrhythmias, has a diagnostic value in electrophysiology study (EPS), and is implicated in pacemaker-mediated arrhythmias. This study sought to characterize retrograde conduction during EPS and to utilize it as a diagnostic tool in patients without AV block.
Methods and results
Patients with intact AV conduction undergoing EPS were included in this study to systematically evaluate baseline VA conduction. If absent, parahisian pacing was used to determine the level of block (nodal or infranodal). Recovery of VA conduction with increased sympathetic activity was assessed with isoproterenol infusion. Baseline characteristics and electrophysiological data were collected and analyzed. Among the 801 patients studied, VA conduction was present in 98% (81% at baseline and 17% after isoproterenol infusion). Parahisian pacing demonstrated that the block was at the AV node level among 150 patients with VA dissociation at baseline. Among patients presenting with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 98.7% with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) had VA conduction at baseline versus 82.7% presenting with other SVT (atrial fibrillation excluded), P < 0.001. Thus, the absence of VA conduction at baseline during an EPS for SVT carries a negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.9% for AVNRT.
Conclusions
VA conduction is present in most patients (98%) with intact AV conduction. The level of VA dissociation when present at baseline is always at the level of the AV node. Patients with SVT presenting for EPS that lacked VA conduction at baseline were unlikely to have AVNRT.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- VA:
-
Ventriculoatrial conduction
- HDAVB:
-
High-degree atrioventricular block
- AV:
-
Atrioventricular
- CHB:
-
Complete AV block
- EPS:
-
Electrophysiological study
- ISP:
-
Isoproterenol
- AVNRT:
-
Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
- CIED:
-
Cardiac implantable electronic devices
- PMT:
-
Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia
- RNRVAS:
-
Repetitive non-reentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony
References
Hayes DL, Furman S. Atrioventricular and ventriculoatrial conduction times in patients undergoing pacemaker implant. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983;6:38–46.
Schuilenburg RM. Patterns of V-A conduction in the human heart in the presence of normal and abnormal A-V conduction. In: Wellens HJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ, editors. The Conduction System of the Heart: Structure, Function, and Clinical Implications. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1976. p. 485.
Josephson ME. Clinical cardiac electrophysiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Picker O, Schwarte LA, Schindler AW, Scheeren TW. Desflurane increases heart rate independent of sympathetic activity in dogs. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Dec;20(12):945–51.
Royster RL, Keeler DK, Haisty WK, Johnston WE, Prough DS. Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of fentanyl and combinations of fentanyl and neuromuscular relaxants in pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(1):15–20.
Nakagawa H, Jackman WM. Para-Hisian pacing: useful clinical technique to differentiate retrograde conduction between accessory atrioventricular pathways and atrioventricular nodal pathways. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(6):667–72.
Obeyesekere M, Leong-Sit P, Skanes A, Krahn A, Yee R, Gula LJ, et al. Determination of inadvertent atrial capture during para-hisian pacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:510–4.
Akhtar M, Damato AN, Batsford WP, Ruskin JN, Ogunkelu JB. A comparative analysis of antegrade and retrograde conduction patterns in man. Circulation. 1975;52(5):766–78.
Cossú SF, Rothman SA, Chmielewski IL, Hsia HH, Vogel RL, Miller JM, et al. The effects of isoproterenol on the cardiac conduction system: site-specific dose dependence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8(8):847–53.
Patil G, Phadke M, Lokhandwala Y, Shaikh Z, Nathani P, Mahajan A. Prevalence and predictors of ventriculo-atrial conduction in structurally normal hearts. Indian Heart J. 2017;69:316–8.
Akhtar M, Gilbert CJ, Wolf FG, Schmidt DH. Retrograde conduction in the His-Purkinje system. Analysis of the routes of impulse propagation using His and right bundle branch recordings. Circulation. 1979;59:1252.
Vargas G, Akhtar M, Damato AN. Electrophysiologic effects of isoproterenol on cardiac conduction system in man. Am Heart J. 1975 Jul;90(1):25–34.
Love CJ. Pacemaker troubleshooting and follow-up. In: Ellenbogen KA, Kay GN, Lau CP, Wilkoff BL, editors. Clinical Cardiac Pacing Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2007. p. 1005–62.
Duray GZ, Israel CW, Wegener FT, Hohnloser SH. Tachycardia after pacemaker implantation in a patient with complete atrioventricular block. Europace. 2007;9:900–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors have complied with the ethical standards and have obtained approval of the local IRB prior to conducting the study.
Funding information
The authors have not received any financial support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elayi, C.S., Morales, G., Butt, M. et al. Ventriculoatrial conduction in patients without high-grade AV block: when is it present?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 59, 393–400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00658-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00658-0