Skip to main content
Log in

Association of body mass index with cardiac resynchronization therapy intention and left ventricular lead implantation failure: insights from the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation involves left ventricular (LV) lead placement for biventricular pacing and is more complex than implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-only implantation. Differences in the prescription of CRT-D versus ICD may result from clinician biases based on patient body habitus, and body habitus may be associated with LV lead implantation failure.

Objective

We sought to evaluate whether patient body mass index (BMI) was associated with planned use and implantation failure of CRT-D therapy.

Methods

We studied all patients enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry who met standard CRT-D criteria and received either an ICD or CRT-D between 2010 and 2012. BMI was categorized based on World Health Organization classification. Using hierarchical logistic regression, two multivariate models adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were fit based on the following outcome variables: (1) planned implantation with CRT-D versus ICD and (2) failed versus successful LV lead placement.

Results

Of 337,547 patients, 41,872 met inclusion criteria for the first analysis and 35,186 met criteria for the second analysis. After multivariable adjustment, patients with extreme (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity were less likely to receive guideline-concordant CRT-D compared with patients with normal weight (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75–0.99; p = 0.04). Extreme (BMI > 40 kg/m2) obesity was associated with higher odds of failed LV lead placement (AOR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.07–1.72, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with normal weight patients, extremely obese (BMI > 40 kg/m2) CRT-D eligible patients were less likely to be prescribed CRT-D and were at higher odds for failed LV lead placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

CRT:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

HF:

Heart failure

ICD:

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

LV:

Left ventricular

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

TAVR:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

CIED:

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

NCDR:

National cardiovascular data registry

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

References

  1. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, DeLurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(24):1845–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cleland JGF, Daubert J-C, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Essebag V, Joza J, Birnie DH, Sapp JL, Sterns LD, Philippon F, et al. Incidence, predictors, and procedural results of upgrade to resynchronization therapy: the RAFT upgrade substudy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:152–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, Dimarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NAM, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guide. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e6–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein AE, Dimarco JP, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NAM, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2008;117:2820–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fatemi M, Etienne Y, Castellant P, Blanc JJ. Primary failure of cardiac resynchronization therapy: what are the causes and is it worth considering a second attempt? A single-centre experience. Europace. 2008;10:1308–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kautzner J, Riedlbauchova L, Cihak R, Bytesnik J, Vancura V. Technical aspects of implantation of LV lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(6 Pt 1):783–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gras D, Böcker D, Lunati M, Wellens HJJ, Calvert M, Freemantle N, et al. Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems in the CARE-HF trial: procedural success rate and safety. Europace. 2007;9:516–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daoud EG, Kalbfleisch SJ, Hummel JD, Weiss R, Augustini RS, Duff SB, et al. Implantation techniques and chronic lead parameters of biventricular pacing dual-chamber defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002;13:964–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holroyd EW, Sirker A, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, Ludman PF, De Belder MA, et al. The relationship of body mass index to percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: Does the obesity paradox exist in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention cohorts? Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2017;10:1283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moscarella E, Spitaleri G, Brugaletta S, Sentí Farrarons S, Pernigotti A, Ortega-Paz L, et al. Impact of body mass index on 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST–segment elevation myocardial infarction after Everolimus-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120(9):1460–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abawi M, Rozemeijer R, Agostoni P, van Jaarsveld RC, van Dongen CS, Voskuil M, et al. Effect of body mass index on clinical outcome and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Neth Heart J. 2017;25:498–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arsalan M, Filardo G, Kim W-K, Squiers JJ, Pollock B, Liebetrau C, et al. Prognostic value of body mass index and body surface area on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(12):1042–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buschur ME, Smith D, Share D, Campbell W, Mattichak S, Sharma M, et al. The burgeoning epidemic of morbid obesity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insight from the blue cross blue shield of Michigan cardiovascular consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:685–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Payvar S, Kim S, Rao SV, Krone R, Neely M, Paladugu N, et al. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in extremely obese and normal-weight patients: findings from the NCDR (national cardiovascular data registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:692–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Attanasio P, Lacour P, Ernert A, Pieske B, Haverkamp W, Blaschke F, et al. Cardiac device implantations in obese patients: success rates and complications. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(4):230–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Venkataraman G, Mathur D, Joshi S, Strickberger A. Comparison of ICD implantation in obese and nonobese patients. PACE. 2014;37:481–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsu JC, Varosy PD, Bao H, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Marcus GM. Low body mass index but not obesity is associated with in-hospital adverse events and mortality among implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:e003863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hammill SC, Kremers MS, Stevenson LW, Kadish AH, Heidenreich PA, Lindsay BD, et al. Review of the Registry’s second year, data collected, and plans to add Lead and pediatric ICD procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(9):1359–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Messenger JC, Ho KKL, Young CH, Slattery LE, Draoui JC, Curtis JP, et al. The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) data quality brief: the NCDR data quality program in 2012. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1484–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Masoudi FA, Ponirakis A, Yeh RW, Maddox TM, Beachy J, Casale PN, et al. Cardiovascular care facts: a report from the national cardiovascular data registry: 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1931–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. (2000) (Vol. 894). ISBN 92 4 120894 5.

  25. Austin PC, Tu JV, Alter DA. Comparing hierarchical modeling with traditional logistic regression analysis among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: should we be analyzing cardiovascular outcomes data differently? Am Heart J. 2003;145:27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horwich TB, Fonarow GC, Hamilton MA, MacLellan WR, Woo MA, Tillisch JH. The relationship between obesity and mortality in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:789–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Oreopoulos A, Padwal R, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Fonarow GC, Norris CM, McAlister FA. Body mass index and mortality in heart failure: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2008;156:13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Oga EA, Eseyin OR. The obesity paradox and heart failure: a systematic review of a decade of evidence. J Obes. 2016;2016(9040248):1–9.

  29. Nagarajan V, Kohan L, Holland E, Keeley EC, Mazimba S. Obesity paradox in heart failure: a heavy matter. ESC Heart Failure. 2016;3(4):227–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Neeland IJ, Das SR, Simon DN, Diercks DB, Alexander KP, Wang TY, et al. The obesity paradox, extreme obesity, and long-term outcomes in older adults with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the NCDR. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017;3(3):183–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vijayaraman P, Lustgarten D, Dandamudi G, Ellenbogen KA. Permanent his bundle pacing: electrophysiological and echocardiographic observations from long-term follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:883–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding sources

This research was supported by the American College of Cardiology Foundation’s National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Hsu.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

Jonathan Hsu reports receiving honoraria from Medtronic, St. Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik and research grants from Biosense-Webster and Biotronik.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishimura, M., Marcus, G.M., Varosy, P.D. et al. Association of body mass index with cardiac resynchronization therapy intention and left ventricular lead implantation failure: insights from the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 57, 279–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00550-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00550-x

Keywords

Navigation