Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

High-power, low-flow, short-ablation duration—the key to avoid collateral injury?

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A common approach to ablating along the posterior wall of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation ablation is to use low power with longer duration for durable lesions and reducing thermal injury. We hypothesize that similar lesions can be safely obtained at high power with low open-irrigation flow and low duration.

Methods

Twenty-two porcine ventricles were placed in a tissue bath with circulating 0.45% NaCl at a maintained temperature of 37 °C. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a 4-mm-tip irrigated, force-sensing catheter was performed with various combinations of irrigation, power, and duration at 20g of contact force. Fiber optic temperature probes were placed at depths of 3 mm and 5 mm. Temperature was measured during and 30 s after each ablation.

Results

Two hundred sixty-eight lesions were made. At a fixed power and flow rate, lesion surface diameter, maximum lesion width, and lesion depth all increased with longer ablation duration. At fixed duration and irrigation flow rate, increased power led to increased lesion dimensions. At a lower flow rate (2 ml/min), surface lesion diameter and maximum width were significantly larger compared to a higher flow rate (17 ml/min), but lesion depth was not significantly different. The maximum temperature and the rate of temperature rise at a depth of 5 mm with different power settings and ablation durations were lower as compared to a depth of 3 mm at both flow rates (2 ml/min and 17 ml/min).

Conclusions

Effective lesions can be performed with high-power and short-ablation durations, thereby reducing RFA procedure time. Higher power, shorter duration lesions result in adequate temperature for myocardial lesion formation at 3 mm, but do not result in excessive temperature at 5 mm depth, potentially reducing the risk of collateral injury. Compared to higher irrigation flow rate, larger surface lesions and comparable maximum lesion width are achieved with lower irrigation flow rate, thus resulting in better lesion contiguity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130:e199–267.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Teunissen C, Clappers N, Hassink RJ, van der Heijden JF, Wittkampf FH, Loh P. A decade of atrial fibrillation ablation: shifts in patient characteristics and procedural outcomes. Neth Heart J. 2017;25(10):559–566.

  3. Deshmukh A, Patel NJ, Pant S, Shah N, Chothani A, Mehta K, et al. In-hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013;128:2104–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, et al. Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1798–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbhaiya CR, Kumar S, John RM, Tedrow UB, Koplan BA, Epstein LM, et al. Global survey of esophageal and gastric injury in atrial fibrillation ablation: incidence, time to presentation, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:1377–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dagres N, Anastasiou-Nana M. Prevention of atrial-esophageal fistula after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halbfass P, Pavlov B, Muller P, Nentwich K, Sonne K, Barth S et al. Progression from esophageal thermal asymptomatic lesion to perforation complicating atrial fibrillation ablation: a single-center registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2017;10:e005233.

  8. Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muller P, Dietrich JW, Halbfass P, Abouarab A, Fochler F, Szollosi A, et al. Higher incidence of esophageal lesions after ablation of atrial fibrillation related to the use of esophageal temperature probes. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1464–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martinek M, Bencsik G, Aichinger J, Hassanein S, Schoefl R, Kuchinka P, et al. Esophageal damage during radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: impact of energy settings, lesion sets, and esophageal visualization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:726–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings JE, Barrett CD, Litwak KN, et al. Esophageal luminal temperature measurement underestimates esophageal tissue temperature during radiofrequency ablation within the canine left atrium: comparison between 8 mm tip and open irrigation catheters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:641–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vijayaraman P, Netrebko P, Geyfman V, Dandamudi G, Casey K, Ellenbogen KA. Esophageal fistula formation despite esophageal monitoring and low-power radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:e31–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Black-Maier E, Pokorney SD, Barnett AS, Zeitler EP, Sun AY, Jackson KP, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1328–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gitenay E, Ge OH, Sarrazin JF, Nault I, Philippon F, Sadron Blaye-Felice M, et al. Contact-force catheters: efficacy versus safety? Case report of 2 atrioesophageal fistulae. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1483–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halbfass P, Nentwich K, Krug J, et al. Impact of surround flow catheter tip irrigation in contact force ablation on the incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective comparative study. Europace. 2017;19:1116–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, Nalliah C, Qian P, Barry T, et al. Five seconds of 50-60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017;19:874–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Platonov PG, Ivanov V, Ho SY, Mitrofanova L. Left atrial posterior wall thickness in patients with and without atrial fibrillation: data from 298 consecutive autopsies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:689–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stabile G, Solimene F, Calo L, et al. Catheter-tissue contact force values do not impact mid-term clinical outcome following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;42:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Andreu D, Gomez-Pulido F, Calvo M, Carlosena-Remírez A, Bisbal F, Borràs R, et al. Contact force threshold for permanent lesion formation in atrial fibrillation ablation: a cardiac magnetic resonance-based study to detect ablation gaps. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park CI, Lehrmann H, Keyl C, Weber R, Schiebeling J, Allgeier J, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:701–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakamura K, Naito S, Sasaki T, Minami K, Take Y, Shimizu S, et al. Predictors of chronic pulmonary vein reconnections after contact force-guided ablation: importance of completing electrical isolation with circumferential lines and creating sufficient ablation lesion densities. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47:321–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:647–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss C, Antz M, Eick O, Eshagzaiy K, Meinertz T, Willems S. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using cooled electrodes: impact of irrigation flow rate and catheter contact pressure on lesion dimensions. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25:463–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, Arruda M, Wang X, Ohtomo K, et al. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation. 1995;91:2264–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorwarth U, Fiek M, Remp T, Reithmann C, Dugas M, Steinbeck G, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation: different cooled and noncooled electrode systems induce specific lesion geometries and adverse effects profiles. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:1438–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen D, Zipse M, Borne R, Tzou W, Schuller J, Zheng L, et al. Increasing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) power is more effective to create larger lesion volumes than extending RFA duration time. Heart rhythm scientific sessions. Vol 14. Chicago: Heart Rhythm; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aryana A, O’Neill PG, Pujara DK, Singh SK, Bowers MR, Allen SL, et al. Impact of irrigation flow rate and intrapericardial fluid on cooled-tip epicardial radiofrequency ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(8):1602–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rozen G, Ptaszek L, Zilberman I, Cordaro K, Heist EK, Beeckler C, et al. Prediction of radiofrequency ablation lesion formation using a novel temperature sensing technology incorporated in a force sensing catheter. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(2):248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ullah W, Hunter RJ, Baker V, Dhinoja MB, Sporton S, Earley MJ, et al. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(1):63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Winkle RA, Moskovitz R, Mead RH, Engel G, Kong MH, Fleming W, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;1:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nilsson B, Chen X, Pehrson S, Svendsen JH. The effectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2006;8:962–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Winkle RA, Mead RH, Engel G, Patrawala RA. Atrial fibrillation ablation: “perpetual motion” of open irrigated tip catheters at 50 W is safe and improves outcomes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:531–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yuyun MF, Stafford PJ, Sandilands AJ, Samani NJ, Andre NG. The impact of power output during percutaneous catheter radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation on efficacy and safety outcomes: a systematic review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1216–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu E, Shaw G, Belden W, Thosani A. High power short duration radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: safety and acute procedural outcomes. Heart rhythm scientific sessions. Vol 14. Chicago: Heart Rhythm; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA

    Fatima Ali-Ahmed, Vishal Goyal, Meet Patel & David E. Haines

  2. Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA

    Felix Orelaru

  3. Mercy Health, 3300 Mercy Health Blvd, Cincinnati, OH, 45211, USA

    Wai Shun Wong

Authors
  1. Fatima Ali-Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vishal Goyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meet Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Felix Orelaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David E. Haines
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wai Shun Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wai Shun Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The Beaumont Research Institute approved this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali-Ahmed, F., Goyal, V., Patel, M. et al. High-power, low-flow, short-ablation duration—the key to avoid collateral injury?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 55, 9–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0473-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0473-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation