Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multisite cardiac resynchronization therapy for traditional and non-traditional indications

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Multisite cardiac resynchronization therapy (MSCRT) with dual-vein left ventricular (LV) pacing has theoretical advantages over conventional CRT in faster and more physiological LV activation. We aimed to define indications, feasibility, safety, acute, and long-term results of MSCRT.

Methods

All patients implanted with MSCRT during 2008–2014 in a single center were reviewed and analyzed.

Results

Thirty-nine patients (90% CRT-defibrillators, 64 ± 9 years, 85% male, 74% ischemic etiology) were included. Four groups of indications were recognized: (1) significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in patients planned for device implantation without right ventricular lead (n = 3). Follow-up (f/u) of 4 ± 3 years showed major symptomatic improvement in all, with stable LV size and function and deferral of valve surgery; (2) severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 4). Except for 1 early death for acute renal failure, all others showed no VT episodes and HF improvement (f/u 4.5 ± 0.5 years); (3) severe HFrEF and wide QRS (≥ 150 ms) or failure of biventricular pacing to narrow QRS during implantation (n = 5). One patient had periprocedural mortality. The others had major clinical improvement; (4) severe HF and narrow QRS/RBBB (n = 27). 23/24 patients with available f/u of 3 ± 1.7 years improved clinically and 57% had EF improvement. In 3 patients, LV1 was disabled and one had LV2 dislodgement.

Conclusions

MSCRT is feasible, safe, and valuable in selected patients with a need to avoid RV lead during device implantation, refractory VT with no other solution, severe HFrEF with wide QRS or CRT non-responsiveness, and severe HF without LBBB. Randomized controlled studies are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) Study Investigators. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(15):1539–49. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, Dresing T, Starling RC, Wilkoff BL, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(9):765–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rinaldi CA, Burri H, Thibault B, Curnis A, Rao A, Gras D, et al. A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2015;17(1):7–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappone C, Rosanio S, Oreto G, Tocchi M, Gulletta S, Salvati A, et al. Cardiac pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: impact of pacing site for optimizing left ventricular resynchronization. Ital Heart J. 2000;1(7):464–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leclercq C, Gadler F, Kranig W, Ellery S, Gras D, Lazarus A, et al. A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(15):1455–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers DP, Lambiase PD, Lowe MD, Chow AW. A randomized double-blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(5):495–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenarczyk R, Kowalski O, Kukulski T, Szulik M, Pruszkowska-Skrzep P, Zielinska T, et al. Triple-site biventricular pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a feasibility study. Europace. 2007;9(9):762–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eum140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Padeletti L, Colella A, Michelucci A, Pieragnoli P, Ricciardi G, Porciani MC, et al. Dual-site left ventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102(12):1687–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogano M, Iwasaki YK, Tanabe J, Takagi H, Umemoto T, Hayashi M, et al. Antiarrhythmic effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with triple-site biventricular stimulation. Europace. 2013;15(10):1491–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ploux S, Whinnett Z, Bordachar P. Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012;5(2):213–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-011-9342-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ginks MR, Duckett SG, Kapetanakis S, Bostock J, Hamid S, Shetty A, et al. Multi-site left ventricular pacing as a potential treatment for patients with postero-lateral scar: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive hemodynamic assessment. Europace. 2012;14(3):373–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bordachar P, Labrousse L, Thambo JB, Reant P, Lafitte S, O'Neill MD, et al. Hemodynamic impact of the left ventricular pacing site during graded ischemia in an open-chest pig model. Europace. 2008;10(2):242–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eum285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Köbe J, Dechering DG, Rath B, Reinke F, Mönnig G, Wasmer K, et al. Prospective evaluation of electrocardiographic parameters in cardiac resynchronization therapy: detecting non-responders by left ventricular pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(4):499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, Bax JJ, Borer JS, Brugada J, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. NEJM. 2013;369(15):1395–405. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1306687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Bawardy R, Krishnaswamy A, Bhargava M, Dunn J, Wazni O, Murat Tuzcu E, et al. Tricuspid regurgitation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: a comprehensive review. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(5):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaturi M, Kusniec J, Shapira Y, Nevzorov R, Yedidya I, Weisenberg D, et al. Right ventricular pacing increases tricuspid regurgitation grade regardless of the mechanical interference to the valve by the electrode. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11(6):550–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jeq018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadreddini M, Haroun M, Buikema L, Morillo C, Ribas S, Divarakaramenon S, et al. Tricuspid valve regurgitation induced by temporary or permanent endocardial lead insertion, and the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2014;8:83–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfannmueller B, Hirnle G, Seeburger J, Davierwala P, Schroeter T, Borger MA, et al. Tricuspid valve repair in the presence of a permanent ventricular pacemaker lead. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(5):657–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarthy PM, Bhudia SK, Rajeswaran J, Hoercher KJ, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Tricuspid valve repair: durability and risk factors for failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(3):674–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.11.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Restivo M, Gough WB, el-Sherif N. Reentrant ventricular rhythms in the late myocardial infarction period: prevention of reentry by dual stimulation during basic rhythm. Circulation. 1988;77(2):429–44. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.77.2.429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barsheshet A, Wang PJ, Moss AJ, Solomon SD, Al-Ahmad A, McNitt S, et al. Reverse remodeling and the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the MADIT-CRT. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(24):2416–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sundaram V, Sahadevan J, Waldo AL, Stukenborg GJ, Reddy YNV, Asirvatham SJ, et al. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with versus without resynchronization therapy in patients with a QRS duration >180 ms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(16):2026–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stockburger M, Moss AJ, Klein HU, Zareba W, Goldenberg I, Biton Y, et al. Sustained clinical benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-LBB patients with prolonged PR-interval. MADIT-CRT long-term follow-up. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(11):944–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-016-1003-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haghjoo M, Bagherzadeh A, Farahani MM, Haghighi ZO, Sadr-Ameli MA. Significance of QRS morphology in determining the prevalence of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization: particular focus on patientswith right bundle branch block and without coexisting left-sided conduction defects. Europace. 2008;10(5):566–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eun081.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bordachar P, Ploux S, Ritter P. Three left ventricular leads required for improved hemodynamic and clinical status of a patient with very severe heart failure and a narrow QRS duration. Europace. 2011 Mar;13(3):439. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Daubert JC. Triple-site Biventricular Stimulation in the Optimization of CRT (TRIUMPH-CRT) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02350842.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avishag Laish-Farkash.

Ethics declarations

The study was approved by the local research ethics committee and all patients gave their written informed consent to the procedure.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laish-Farkash, A., Bruoha, S., Khalameizer, V. et al. Multisite cardiac resynchronization therapy for traditional and non-traditional indications. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 51, 143–152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0316-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0316-4

Keywords

Navigation