Skip to main content
Log in

Ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence in primary versus secondary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients and role of electrophysiology study

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In recent years, there has been a shift away from performing electrophysiologic study (EPS) to guide implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation with a reliance on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) alone.

Methods

ICD patients were prospectively recruited from the multicentre COMFORT (Concept of Optimal Management of ventricular Fibrillation Or Very fast ventricular Tachycardia) trial. Primary prevention ICD patients (n = 260, groups 1 and 2) were compared to secondary prevention ICD patients (n = 210, group 3). Primary prevention ICDs were implanted in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy based on LVEF ≤ 40 % and inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) at EPS (n = 123, group 1) or impaired LVEF alone (LVEF ≤ 30 % or LVEF ≤ 35 % with NYHA class II or III; n = 137, group 2). EPS was performed in 61 % of secondary prevention ICD patients (n = 129). Patients were followed up for >12 months with a primary endpoint of spontaneous VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Results

A significantly higher rate of spontaneous VT/VF occurred in secondary versus primary prevention ICD patients (P < 0.001) and in EPS-guided versus LVEF-guided primary prevention ICD patients (P = 0.029). At 2 years, the proportion of patients with ≥1 VT/VF episode was 24.6 ± 4.2 %, 19.9 ± 4.6 % and 37.1 ± 3.9 % for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In the secondary prevention, patients who underwent EPS, VT/VF occurred in 44.4 ± 5.9 % and 14.1 ± 6.6 % with a positive versus negative result, respectively (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

Secondary prevention ICD patients have more spontaneous VT/VF than primary prevention ICD patients. Secondary and primary prevention ICD patients with inducible VT at EPS have more VT/VF than patients without inducible VT or impaired LVEF alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buxton, A. E., Lee, K. L., Fisher, J. D., Josephson, M. E., Prystowsky, E. N., & Hafley, G. (1999). A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(25), 1882–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss, A. J., Hall, W. J., Cannom, D. S., Daubert, J. P., Higgins, S. L., Klein, H., et al. (1996). Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(26), 1933–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moss, A. J., Zareba, W., Hall, W. J., Klein, H., Wilber, D. J., Cannom, D. S., et al. (2002). Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(12), 877–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bardy, G. H., Lee, K. L., Mark, D. B., Poole, J. E., Packer, D. L., Boineau, R., et al. (2005). Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(3), 225–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stockburger, M., Krebs, A., Nitardy, A., Habedank, D., Celebi, O., Knaus, T., et al. (2009). Survival and appropriate device interventions in recipients of cardioverter defibrillators implanted for the primary versus secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 32(Suppl 1), S16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney, M. O., Wathen, M. S., Volosin, K., Abdalla, I., DeGroot, P. J., Otterness, M. F., et al. (2005). Appropriate and inappropriate ventricular therapies, quality of life, and mortality among primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: results from the Pacing Fast VT REduces Shock ThErapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial. Circulation, 111(22), 2898–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Welsenes, G. H., van Rees, J. B., Borleffs, C. J., Cannegieter, S. C., Bax, J. J., van Erven, L., et al. (2011). Long-term follow-up of primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients. Europace, 13(3), 389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilkoff, B. L., Hess, M., Young, J., & Abraham, W. T. (2004). Differences in tachyarrhythmia detection and implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy by primary or secondary prevention indication in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 15(9), 1002–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sivagangabalan, G., Chik, W., Zaman, S., Stafford, W., Hayes, J., Denman, R., et al. (2013). Antitachycardia pacing for very fast ventricular tachycardia and low-energy shock for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators. American Journal of Cardiology, 112(8), 1153–1157.

  10. Sivagangabalan, G., Eshoo, S., Eipper, V. E., Thiagalingam, A., & Kovoor, P. (2008). Discriminatory therapy for very fast ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(9), 1095–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tokano, T., Bach, D., Chang, J., Davis, J., Souza, J. J., Zivin, A., et al. (1998). Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac haemodynamics. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 9, 791–797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourke, J. P., Richards, D. A., Ross, D. L., Wallace, E. M., McGuire, M. A., & Uther, J. B. (1991). Routine programmed electrical stimulation in survivors of acute myocardial infarction for prediction of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up: results, optimal stimulation protocol and cost-effective screening. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 18(3), 780–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaman, S., Sivagangabalan, G., Narayan, A., Thiagalingam, A., Ross, D. L., & Kovoor, P. (2009). Outcomes of early risk stratification and targeted implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation, 120(3), 194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, S., Sivagangabalan, G., Zaman, S., West, E. B., Narayan, A., Thiagalingam, A., et al. (2010). Electrophysiology-guided defibrillator implantation early after ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm, 7(11), 1589–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar, S., Sivagangabalan, G., Choi, M. C., Eipper, V., Thiagalingam, A., & Kovoor, P. (2010). Long-term outcomes of inducible very fast ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 200–250 ms) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21(3), 262–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng, A., Wang, Y., Berger, R. D., Calkins, H., Buxton, A. E., Curtis, J. P., et al. (2012). Electrophysiology studies in patients undergoing ICD implantation: findings from the NCDR(R). Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 35(8), 912–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy, V. Y., Reynolds, M. R., Neuzil, P., Richardson, A. W., Taborsky, M., Jongnarangsin, K., et al. (2007). Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(26), 2657–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Daubert, J. P., Zareba, W., Hall, W. J., Schuger, C., Corsello, A., Leon, A. R., et al. (2006). Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 47(1), 98–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. New England Journal of Medicine. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83. PubMed PMID: 9411221. Epub 1997/12/31. eng.

  20. Wilkoff, B. L., Williamson, B. D., Stern, R. S., Moore, S. L., Lu, F., Lee, S. W., et al. (2008). Strategic programming of detection and therapy parameters in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduces shocks in primary prevention patients: results from the PREPARE (Primary Prevention Parameters Evaluation) study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 52(7), 541–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wathen, M. S., DeGroot, P. J., Sweeney, M. O., Stark, A. J., Otterness, M. F., Adkisson, W. O., et al. (2004). Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (Pain-FREE Rx II) trial results. Circulation, 110, 2591–2596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schron, E. B., Exner, D. V., Yao, Q., Jenkins, L. S., Steinberg, J. S., Cook, J. R., et al. (2002). Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial: impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation, 105, 589–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Flavia Ng, Janice Sullivan, Anne Mitchell, Tom Christensen, Steve Graves, Suzanne, Clem Lee, Catrina Codd and Michelle Roch for their time and dedication. We also thank Dr. Henri Heynen, Clinical Trials and Research Manager at Medtronic, for providing support during the trial.

Funding

This work was supported by an unrestricted grant provided by Medtronic Australia to Westmead Millennium Institute. Dr. Sivangabalan was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. Dr. Chik was supported by a medical research scholarship from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand and the University of Sydney. No other financial disclosures for the other authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pramesh Kovoor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaman, S., Sivagangabalan, G., Chik, W. et al. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence in primary versus secondary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients and role of electrophysiology study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 41, 195–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9941-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-014-9941-8

Keywords

Navigation