Abstract
This paper examines the global implications of policy borrowing, employing case examples of Chinese school systems, which enjoy the success of grafting new identities to improve education. The paper comments on contemporary scholars’ use of identity grafting theory (Lee in Managing Chineseness: identity and ethnic management in Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2017) to generate insights on how schools, teachers and students engaged educational change in mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. Scholars presented empirical findings by using identity grafting constructs to explain education stakeholders’ diverse responses to change: (1) born-again—rejecting change by reviving traditional practices; (2) repression—repressing traditional identities instead of embracing change; (3) integration—combining traditional identities and progressive change to achieve a balance; and (4) situationalism—developing new identities that transcend boundaries between traditional identities and progressive change. The scholars contributed research that advances the theorization of identity grafting. First, rising born-again Chinese sentiments seek to reject the imposition of a singular Chinese identity imposed by state governments. Born-again Chineseness no longer singularly focuses on defending traditional identities against Western influences. Second, a better understanding is achieved on identity repression—change resistance results from a displaced focus on repressing traditional identities. Third, the prevalence of identity integration strategies can be explained by intensive policy borrowing in the region. Policy borrowers need to ensure externally imposed identities are represented to overcome challenges generated by identity grafting strategies that impede progressive change. This popularity of integrationist strategies accounts for the challenges in achieving identity situationalism—policy borrowing needs culturally divisive identity markers that provide clear indicators to what needs to change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Members of a hukou (household) are registered either as a rural or urban, and registration is based on hereditary origins, not residency.
References
Alatas, S. F. (2006). Alternative discourses in Asian social science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi: Sage.
Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
Bryant, D. A., Walker, A., & Qian, H. (2017). Asian geographies of educational leadership. In D. Waite & I. Bogotch (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership (pp. 375–396). Hoboken: Wiley.
Castells, M. (2010). End of millennium: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.
Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society (Vol. 12). Hoboken: Wiley.
Chan, C. P. (2016). Post-umbrella movement: Localism and radicalness of the Hong Kong student movement. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2(2), 885–908.
Chong, E. K. M. (2015). Global citizenship education and Hong Kong’s secondary school curriculum guidelines. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(2), 221–247.
Chu, Y. (2014). The politics of reception: “Made in China” and Western critique. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(2), 159–173.
Chua, B. H., & Tan, J. E. (1999). Where the new middle class sets the standard. In M. Pinches (Ed.), Culture and privilege in capitalist Asia (pp. 138–159). London: Routledge.
Curriculum Development Council, & Hong Kong Examinations Assessment Authority. (2007). Business, accounting and financial studies curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4-6). Government Logistics Department. Retrieved December 2, 2018, from https://334.edb.hkedcity.net/doc/chi/curriculum2015/BAFS_CA_Guide_e_2015.pdf.
Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.
Dewey, J. (1928). Progressive education and the science of education. In C. Rose (Ed.), American decades primary sources (Vol. 3, pp. 177–181). Detroit: Gale.
Fanon, F. (2007). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.
Goh, D. P. (2010). Multiculturalism and the problem of solidarity. In T. Chong (Ed.), Management of success: Singapore revisited (pp. 561–578). Singapore: ISEAS.
Halse, C. (2018). Looking in from outside: Schools and schooling in Asia from an outside perspective. In K. J. Kennedy & J. C.-K. Lee (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of schools and schooling in Asia (pp. 58–72). New York: Routledge.
Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. London: Sage.
Hawkins, J. N. (2000). Centralization, decentralization, recentralization—Educational reform in China. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 442–455.
Hayhoe, R., Li, J., Lin, J., & Zha, Q. (2012). Portraits of 21st century chinese universities: In the move to mass higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hu, S. (2012). Outline of history of China’s philosophy. Beijing: Dongfang Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2005). Regional autonomy for ethnic minorities in China. Retrieved October 16, 2019, from http://www.gov.cn/english/official/2005-07/28/content_18127.htm.
Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (2013). Sinicization and the rise of China: Civilizational processes beyond East and West. New York: Routledge.
Lee, D. H. L. (2013). Bourdieu’s symbolic power and postcolonial organization theory in local–expatriate relationships: An ethnographic study of a French multinational corporation in Singapore. Current Sociology, 61(3), 341–355.
Lee, D. H. L. (2017). Managing Chineseness: Identity and ethnic management in Singapore. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, D. H. L., & Chiu, C. S. (2017). “School banding” principals’ perspectives of teacher professional development in the school-based management context. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 686–701.
Lee, W. O. (2011). Multiple modalities of Asia-pacific citizenship pedagogies: Eclectic concepts, hybridised approaches and teachers’ preferences. In K. J. Kennedy, W. O. Lee, & D. Grossman (Eds.), Citizenship pedagogies in Asia and the Pacific (pp. 335–356). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lee, W. O., & Ho, C. H. (2008). Citizenship education in China: Changing concepts, approaches and policies in the changing political, economic and social context. In J. Arthur, I. Davies, & C. Hahn (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of education for citizenship and democracy (pp. 139–157). London: Sage.
LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany, and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43–89.
Li, J. (2012). World-class higher education and the emerging Chinese model of the university. Prospects: Quarterly Review of Comparative Education, 42(3), 319–339.
Li, J. (2016). Chinese University 3.0 in a global age: History, modernity and future. In P. C. I. Chou & J. Spangler (Eds.), Chinese education models in a global age: Transforming practice into theory (pp. 15–35). Singapore: Springer.
Mahbubani, K. (1993). The dangers of decadence: What the rest can teach the west. Foreign Affairs, 72(4), 10–14.
Miller, J. P. (2019). Holistic education: A brief history. In J. P. Miller, K. Nigh, M. J. Binder, B. Novak, S. Crowell, & P. H. Wong (Eds.), International handbook of holistic education (pp. 5–16). New York: Routledge.
OECD. (2015). Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Random House.
Shirley, D. (2016). The new imperatives of educational change: Achievement with integrity. New York: Routledge.
Siu, P., & Chung, K. (2018, March 7). Can Beijing achieve its next big goal for Hong Kong—making people feel more Chinese? South China Morning Post.
Tse, T. K. C. (2007). Whose citizenship education? Hong Kong from a spatial and cultural politics perspective. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 28(2), 159–177.
Wong, K. L., Lee, C. K. J., Chan, K. S. J., & Kennedy, K. J. (2017). The model of teachers’ perceptions of ‘Good Citizens’: Aligning with the changing conceptions of ‘Good Citizens’. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 43–66.
World Bank. (2013). China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative society. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yan, F. Q. (2013). The same term but different connotations: Cultural and historical perspectives on studying the academic profession in China and other Asian countries. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(2), 198–213.
Younis, M., Lin, X. X., Sharahili, Y., & Selvarathinam, S. (2008). Political stability and economic growth in Asia. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(3), 203–208.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank and acknowledge these funding bodies and interest groups for supporting the publication of this paper: Research Grants Council Hong Kong (Grant Number: 28605318), and Diversity, Equity and Social Inclusion (DESI) Research Group of The Education University of Hong Kong.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, D.H.L., Halse, C.M. Advancing the theory of identity grafting in Chinese school systems. J Educ Change 22, 297–314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09398-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09398-9