Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Foster Parent’s Perspectives Regarding the Transition of a New Placement into their Home: An Exploratory Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This qualitative study examined foster parents’ perceptions of the initial transition period in order to better understand the family formation process that occurs when a new placement is transitioned into the home. A snowball sampling method was used to recruit ten foster parents to participate. A constant comparative analysis of interview transcripts guided by grounded theory approaches yielded a model of the foster family transition process that identified three main tasks: establishing trust and a sense of belonging; re-establishing family homeostasis; and working with external stakeholders. Responsive, trauma-sensitive care; realistic expectations; parenting skills; and access to resources facilitated foster family movement through the transition process. While foster families shared many of the same tasks as other family forms adding a new member, unique aspects of the foster family context were identified. Foster families often form with an incomplete knowledge of the new family member’s medical and trauma history and under the oversight of the social service system. Unlike other family types, permanence is not the primary objective of foster family formation. Study findings have implications for foster parent training and support during the transition of a new placement and affirm the value of including foster parents’ perspectives in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler-Baeder, F., & Higginbotham, B. (2004). Implications of remarriage and stepfamily formation for marriage education. Family Relations, 53(5), 448–458. doi:10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00053.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D. (2008). Foster parents’ perceptions of factors needed for successful foster placements. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 17, 538–554. doi:10.1007/s10826-007-9172-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., Anderson, L., & Rodgers, J. (2015). Resource workers’ relationships with foster parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies. Online first. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0204-9.

  • Brown, J. D., & Campbell, M. (2007). Foster parent perceptions of placement success. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(8), 1010–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., Cox, M. E., & Cuddeback, G. (2003). Foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1), 61–83. doi:10.1177/1473325003002001281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, C. (2012). The challenges of being a mother in a stepfamily. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53(6), 503–513. doi:10.1080/10502556.2012.682904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, B., & McMurtry, J. (2007). A comparative evaluation of preservice training of kinship and nonkinship foster/adoptive families. Child Welfare, 86(2), 125–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. E., & Petren, R. E. (2011). Foster parent perceptions of competency: implications for foster parent training. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1968–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2012). Normative family transitions, couple relationship quality, and healthy child development. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: growing diversity and complexity. 4th edn. (pp. 428–451). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, E. (2011). Gentle iron will: foster parents’ perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 910–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. (2009). Children’s well-being in care: evidence from a longitudinal study of outcomes. Child and Youth Services Review, 31, 1092–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A., Berrick, J. D., & Frasch, K. (2008). Safety, family, permanency, and child well-being: what we can learn from children. Child Welfare, 87(1), 63–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing. Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, D., & Wildfire, J. (2007). Length of service for foster parents: using administrative data to understand retention. Children & Youth Services Review, 29(5), 588–599. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., Kinkier, L. A., Moyer, A. M., & Weber, E. (2014). Intimate relationship challenges in early parenthood among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual couples adopting via the child welfare system. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 45(4), 221–230. doi:10.1037/a0037443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin, L. (2014). A sense of belonging in a changeable everyday life—a follow-up study of young people in kinship, network, and traditional foster families. Child & Family Social Work, 19(2), 165–173. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00887.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, G., & Larkin, M. (2011). The language and policy of care and parenting: understanding the uncertainty about key players’ roles in foster care provision. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2198–2206. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, E. K., Sasaki, T., & Hazen, N. L. (2013). Smooth versus rocky transitions to parenthood: family systems in developmental context. Family Relations, 62(5), 824–837. doi:10.1111/fare.12041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, L., & Cossar, J. (2014). Attachment interventions with foster and adoptive parents: a systematic review. Child Abuse Review, 23(6), 426–439. doi:10.1002/car.2313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, E., & Skoog, V. (2014). The road to placement breakdown: foster parents’ experiences of the events surrounding the unexpected ending of a child’s placement in their care. Qualitative Social Work, 13(2), 255–269. doi:10.1177/1473325012474017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kids count (2011). Data snapshot on foster care placement. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/m/resourcedoc/AECF-DataSnapshotOnFosterCarePlacement-2011.pdf#page=1.

  • Leve, L. D., Harold, G. T., Chamberlain, P., Landsverk, J. A., Fisher, P. A., & Vostanis, P. (2012). Practitioner review: children in foster care—vulnerabilities and evidence-based interventions that promote resilience processes. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(12), 1197–1211. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02594.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhiem, O., & Dozier, M. (2007). Caregiver commitment to foster children: the role of child behavior. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(4), 361–374. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, K., Ross, L. E., & Goldberg, A. E. (2010). Adaptation to parenthood during the post-adoption period: a review of the literature. Adoption Quarterly, 13(2), 125–144. doi:10.1080/10926755.2010.481040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, K., Rubin, D., Makonnen, R., Zlotnik, S., & O’Reilly, A. (2009). Securing child safety, well-being, and permanency through placement stability in foster care. Evidence to Action, 1 retrieved from http://stoneleighfoundation.org/sites/default/files/Evidence%20to%20Action%20No%201.pdf.

  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterman, M., Schuengel, C., Slot, N., Bullens, R., & Doreleijers, T. (2007). Disruptions in foster care: a review and meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portrie, T., & Hill, N. R. (2005). Blended families: a critical review of the current research. Family Journal, 13(4), 445–451. doi:10.1177/1066480705279014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rock, S., Michelson, D., Thomson, S., & Day, C. (2015). Understanding foster placement instability of looked after children: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of quantitative and qualitative evidence. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 177 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, S., Cummings, A., & Leschied, A. W. (2006). Who is caring for our most vulnerable children? The motivation to foster in child welfare. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30(10), 1129–1142. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rork, K. E., & McNeil, C. B. (2011). Evaluation of foster parent training programs: a critical review. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 33, 139–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostill-Brookes, H., Larkin, M., Toms, A., & Churchman, C. (2011). A shared experience of fragmentation: making sense of foster placement breakdown. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 16(1), 103–127. doi:10.1177/1359104509352894.

  • Sanchirico, A., Lau, W. J., Jablonka, K., & Russell, S. J. (1998). Foster parent involvement in service planning: does it increase job satisfaction? Children and Youth Services Review, 20(4), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. J., & McQuillan, K. (2014). Perspectives of foster parents and social workers on foster placement disruption. Child Care in Practice, 20(2), 232–249. doi:10.1080/13575279.2013.859567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H., McPherson, S., & Marsland, L. (2016). ‘Am I damaging my own family?’: relational changes between foster carers and their birth children. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 21(1), 48–65. doi:10.1177/1359104514554310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Children’s Bureau (2015). Trends in foster care and adoption. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport22.pdf.

  • Whenan, R., Oxlad, M., & Lushington, K. (2009). Factors associated with foster carer well-being, satisfaction and intention to continue providing out-of-home care. Children & Youth Services Review, 31(7), 752–760. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, Washington State University Vancouver, 14204 NE Salmon Creek Avenue, Vancouver, WA, 98686 9600, USA

    Jane D. Lanigan

  2. Department of Family and Human Development, Arizona State University, 850 S. Cady Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA

    Elizabeth Burleson

Authors
  1. Jane D. Lanigan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Burleson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane D. Lanigan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lanigan, J.D., Burleson, E. Foster Parent’s Perspectives Regarding the Transition of a New Placement into their Home: An Exploratory Study. J Child Fam Stud 26, 905–915 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0597-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0597-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation