Abstract
As part of the SAMPL5 blinded experiment, we computed the absolute binding free energies of 22 host–guest complexes employing a novel approach based on the BEDAM single-decoupling alchemical free energy protocol with parallel replica exchange conformational sampling and the AGBNP2 implicit solvation model specifically customized to treat the effect of water displacement as modeled by the Hydration Site Analysis method with explicit solvation. Initial predictions were affected by the lack of treatment of ionic charge screening, which is very significant for these highly charged hosts, and resulted in poor relative ranking of negatively versus positively charged guests. Binding free energies obtained with Debye–Hückel treatment of salt effects were in good agreement with experimental measurements. Water displacement effects contributed favorably and very significantly to the observed binding affinities; without it, the modeling predictions would have grossly underestimated binding. The work validates the implicit/explicit solvation approach employed here and it shows that comprehensive physical models can be effective at predicting binding affinities of molecular complexes requiring accurate treatment of conformational dynamics and hydration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron R, McCammon JA (2013) Molecular recognition and ligand association. Ann Rev Phys Chem 64:151–175
de Beer S, Vermeulen NPE, Oostenbrink C (2010) The role of water molecules in computational drug design. Curr Top Med Chem 10(1):55–66
Hummer G (2010) Molecular binding: under water’s influence. Nat Chem 2(11):906
Li Z, Lazaridis T (2007) Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:573–581
Mancera RL (2007) Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design. Curr Opin Drug Discov Dev 10(3):275–280
Wong SE, Lightstone FC (2011) Accounting for water molecules in drug design. Expert Opin Drug Dis 6(1):65–74
Ball P (2008) Water as an active constituent in cell biology. Chem Rev 108(1):74–108
Ladbury JE (1996) Just add water! the effect of water on the specificity of protein-ligand binding sites and its potential application to drug design. Chem Biol 3(12):973–980
Levy Y, Onuchic JN (2006) Water mediation in protein folding and molecular recognition. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 35:389–415
Young T, Abel R, Kim B, Berne BJ, Friesner RA (2007) Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein-ligand binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:808–813
Bodnarchuk MS, Russell V, Michel J, Essex JW (2014) Strategies to calculate water binding free energies in protein-ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model 54(6):1623–1633
Huggins DJ (2012) Application of inhomogeneous fluid solvation theory to model the distribution and thermodynamics of water molecules around biomolecules. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14(43):15106–15117
Ross GA, Morris GM, Biggin PC (2012) Rapid and accurate prediction and scoring of water molecules in protein binding sites. PLoS One 7(3):e32036
Sindhikara DJ, Hirata F (2013) Analysis of biomolecular solvation sites by 3D-RISM theory. J Phys Chem B 117(22):6718–6723
Ross GA, Bodnarchuk MS, Essex JW (2015) Water sites, networks, and free energies with grand canonical monte carlo. J Am Chem Soc 137(47):14930–14943
Biedermann F, Nau WM, Schneider H-J (2014) The hydrophobic effect revisited–studies with supramolecular complexes imply high-energy water as a noncovalent driving force. Angew Chem Int Ed 53(42):11158–11171
Biela A, Nasief NN, Betz M, Heine A, Hangauer D, Klebe G (2013) Dissecting the hydrophobic effect on the molecular level: the role of water, enthalpy, and entropy in ligand binding to thermolysin. Angew Chem Int Ed 52(6):1822–1828
Haider K, Wickstrom L, Ramsey S, Gilson MK, Kurtzman T (2016) Enthalpic breakdown of water structure on protein active-site surfaces. J Phys Chem B. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01094
Setny P, Baron R, McCammon AJ (2010) How can hydrophobic association be enthalpy driven? J Chem Theory Comput 6:2866–2871
Nguyen CN, Cruz A, Gilson MK, Kurtzman T (2014) Thermodynamics of water in an enzyme active site: grid-based hydration analysis of coagulation factor Xa. J Chem Theory Comput 10(7):2769–2780
Lazaridis T (1998) Inhomogeneous fluid approach to solvation thermodyanmics. I. Theory. J Phys Chem B 102:3531–3541
Gallicchio E, Lapelosa M, Levy RM (2010) Binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM) for estimation of protein-ligand binding affinities. J Chem Theory Comput 6:2961–2977
Gallicchio E, Deng N, He P, Perryman AL, Santiago DN, Forli S, Olson AJ, Levy RM (2014) Virtual screening of integrase inhibitors by large scale binding free energy calculations: the SAMPL4 challenge. J Comp Aided Mol Des 28:475–490
Wickstrom L, Deng N, He P, Mentes A, Nguyen C, Gilson MK, Kurtzman T, Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2016) Parameterization of an effective potential for protein-ligand binding from host-guest affinity data. J Mol Recognit 29:10–21
Xia J, Flynn WF, Gallicchio E, Zhang BW, He P, Tan Z, Levy RM (2015) Large scale asynchronous and distributed multi-dimensional replica exchange molecular simulations and efficiency analysis. J Comp Chem 36:1772–1785
Gallicchio E, Xia J, Flynn WF, Zhang B, Samlalsingh S, Mentes A, Levy RM (2015) Asynchronous replica exchange software for grid and heterogeneous computing. Comp Phys Commun 196:236–246
Lazaridis T, Karplus M (2000) Effective energy functions for protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:139–145
Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2004) AGBNP: an analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high-resolution modeling. J Comput Chem 25:479–499
Gallicchio E, Paris K, Levy RM (2009) The AGBNP2 implicit solvation model. J Chem Theory Comput 5:2544–2564
Deng Y, Roux B (2009) Computations of standard binding free energies with molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 113:2234–2246
Mobley DL (2012) Let’s get honest about sampling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26:93–95
Wickstrom L, He P, Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2013) Large scale affinity calculations of cyclodextrin host-guest complexes: understanding the role of reorganization in the molecular recognition process. J Chem Theory Comput 9:3136–3150
Gibb CL, Gibb BC (2014) Binding of cyclic carboxylates to octa-acid deep-cavity cavitand. J Comp Aided Mol Des 28(4):319–325
Gan H, Benjamin CJ, Gibb BC (2011) Nonmonotonic assembly of a deep-cavity cavitand. J Am Chem Soc 133(13):4770–4773
Gibb BC, Isaacs L et al (2016) Tbd. J Comp Aided Mol Des. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9925-0
Gallicchio E, Chen H, Chen H, Fitzgerald M, Gao Y, He P, Kalyanikar M, Kao C, Lu B, Niu Y, Pethe M, Zhu J, Levy RM (2015) BEDAM binding free energy predictions for the SAMPL4 octa-acid host challenge. J Comp Aided Mol Des 29(4):315–325
Luzar A, Chandler D (1993) Structure and hydrogen bond dynamics of water-dimethyl sulfoxide mixtures by computer simulations. J Chem Phys 98(10):8160–8173
Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Developement and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225–11236
Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (2001) Evaluation and reparameterization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 105:6474–6487
Still A, Tempczyk WC, Hawley RC, Hendrikson T (1990) Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 112:6127–6129
Hawkins GD, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (1996) Parametrized models of aqueous free energies of solvation based on pairwise descreening of solute atomic charges from a dielectric medium. J Phys Chem 100:19824–19839
Srinivasan J, Trevathan MW, Beroza P, Case DA (1999) Application of a pairwise generalized born model to proteins and nucleic acids: inclusion of salt effects. Theor Chem Acc 101(6):426–434
Tan Z, Gallicchio E, Lapelosa M, Levy RM (2012) Theory of binless multi-state free energy estimation with applications to protein-ligand binding. J Chem Phys 136:144102
Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2011) Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. Adv Prot Chem Struct Biol 85:27–80
Sugita Y, Okamoto Y (1999) Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding. Chem Phys Lett 314:141–151
Gallicchio E, Levy RM, Parashar M (2008) Asynchronous replica exchange for molecular simulations. J Comp Chem 29:788–794
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926–935
Bowers KJ, Chow E, Xu H, Dror RO, Eastwood MP, Gregersen BA, Klepeis JL, Kolossváry I, Moraes MA, Sacerdoti FD, Salmon JK, Shan Y, Shaw DE (2006) Scalable algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations on commodity clusters. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE conference on supercomputing (SC06), Tampa, Florida. IEEE
Shelley JC, Cholleti A, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Timlin MR, Uchimaya M (2007) Epik: a software program for pK a prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des 21(12):681–691
Lapelosa M, Gallicchio E, Levy RM (2012) Conformational transitions and convergence of absolute binding free energy calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 8:47–60
Gallicchio E (2012) Role of ligand reorganization and conformational restraints on the binding free energies of DAPY non-nucleoside inhibitors to HIV reverse transcriptase. Mol Biosci 2:7–22
Gilson MK, Given JA, Bush BL, McCammon JA (1997) The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. Biophys J 72:1047–1069
Mobley DL, Klimovich PV (2012) Perspective: Alchemical free energy calculations for drug discovery. J Chem Phys 137:230901
Acknowledgments
E.G. and R.K.P. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation (SI2-SSE 1440665). R.M.L. acknowledges support from the National Institutes of Health (GM30580 and P50 GM103368). T.K. acknowledges support from the National Institutes of Health (1R01GM100946 and 5SC3GM095417). L.W. acknowledges support from PSC-CUNY (68457-00 46). REMD simulations were carried out on the Supermic cluster of XSEDE (supported by TG-MCB150001), and BOINC distributed networks at Temple University and Brooklyn College of the City University of New York. The authors acknowledge invaluable technical support from Gene Mayro, Jaykeen Holt, Zachary Hanson-Hart from the IT department at Temple University, and James Roman, and John Stephen at Brooklyn College.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised: Corrections done in the original article has been published in the erratum.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9987-z.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pal, R.K., Haider, K., Kaur, D. et al. A combined treatment of hydration and dynamical effects for the modeling of host–guest binding thermodynamics: the SAMPL5 blinded challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des 31, 29–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9956-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9956-6