Skip to main content
Log in

Hunting Technologies and Archaeofaunas: Societal Differences Between Hunter-Gatherers of the Eastern Arctic

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates human–animal interaction in two very different hunter-gatherer societies, Late Dorset and Thule Inuit, who once occupied the eastern Arctic (Canadian Arctic and Greenland). I focus on their disparate hunting technologies in order to achieve a nuanced understanding on how cultural factors influenced this relationship and to ultimately better understand why Late Dorset disappeared from the archeological record. I assess how hunting technologies impacted each society’s archaeofaunas and describe what appear to be culturally distinct trends in the faunal remains. In light of these findings, differences between Late Dorset and Thule Inuit hunting strategies, and other societal aspects including labor organization, hierarchy, and food provisioning are considered. This research discusses how generalized versus specialized hunting technologies impacted the social trajectory of each society, and methodologically, it provides a case study for how the use of specialized technologies can be viewed in the archeological record.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Focal prey refers to caribou and fish at Iqaluktuuq and small seals at the Grinnell Peninsula and Smith Sound sites. Though arctic fox is the most frequent mammal at the Late Dorset Smith Sound site, its small size and less palatable meat suggests it was primary captured for its fur (Howse 2016).

  2. Resources are ranked based on the number of calories used in their pursuit and processing and how many calories they provide (Bettinger 1991).

  3. Radiocarbon dates from both H21 and H22, at the Skraeling Island site, were based on samples of heather. That from H21 yielded a date of 630 ± 60 bp, which calibrates to 1275–1415 ce at 2 sigma; the sample from H22 yielded a date of 790 ± 50 bp, which calibrates to 1154–1292 ce at 2 sigma (McCullough 1989:241). Both dates were corrected for C13/C12 ratios and calibrated with the program CALIB 7.1.

References

  • Allison, R. F. (1984). Thule tent rings at Porden point, Devon Island: a preliminary report of the 1984 field season. Unpublished manuscript on file, Gatineau, Canadian Museum of Civilization.

  • Angelbeck, B., & Cameron, I. (2014). The Faustian bargain of technological change: evaluating the socioeconomic effects of the bow and arrow transition in the coast Salish past. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 36, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelt, M., & Gulløv, H. C. (Eds.). (1999). Late Dorset in high Arctic Greenland: final report on the gateway to Greenland project. Copenhagen: The Danish National Museum and Danish Polar Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelt, M., Damkjar, E., & Friesen, M. (2016). Late Dorset. In M. Friesen & O. Mason (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the prehistoric Arctic (pp. 783–806). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, A. W. F. (1974). The mammals of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, D. G., & Massom, R. A. (2007). Chapter 1 the role of sea ice in Arctic and Antarctic polynyas. In W. O. Smith & D. G. Barber (Eds.), Elsevier oceanography series (Vol. 74, pp. 1–54). Elsevier.

  • Bendix, B. (2000). Aspects of Late Dorset faunal analysis from sites in Hatherton Bay, Thule District, Greenland. In M. Appelt, J. Berglund, & H. C. Gulløv (Eds.), Identities and cultural contacts in the Arctic: proceedings from a conference at the Danish National Museum (pp. 77–81). Copenhagen: The Danish National Museum and Danish Polar Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinger, R. L. (1991). Hunter-gatherers: archaeological and evolutionary theory. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, M. W. (2008). Subsistence and culture in the western Canadian Arctic: a multicontextual approach, Mercury series archaeology paper 169. Ottawa: Canadian Museum of Civilization.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, M. & Friesen T, M. (2004). Quantifying hunter-gatherer intensification: a zooarchaeological case study from Arctic Canada. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 357–384.

  • Bielawski, E. (1979). Contactual transformation: The Dorset-Thule succession. In: A.P. McCartney (Ed.), Thule Eskimo culture: an anthropological retrospective. Mercury Series, Archaeological Survey of Canada Paper 88 (pp. 100–109). Ottawa: National Museum of Man.

  • Binford, L. R. (1980). Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity, 45(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference: an analytical method for archaeological theory building using ethnographic and environmental data sets. Berkley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1888). The central Eskimo. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, E. W., Gjertz, I., & Reeves, R. (1995). Population assessment of Atlantic walrus. Norsk Polarinstitutts Meddelelser, 138, 1–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J. M. (1997). Widening diet breadth, declining foraging efficiency, and prehistoric harvest pressure: ichthyofaunal evidence from the Emeryville Shellmound, California. Antiquity, 71, 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, V. L. (2000). Resource depression on the northwest coast of North America. Antiquity, 74, 649–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. E. (1993). Weapon technology, prey size selection, and hunting methods in modern hunter-gatherers, implications for hunting in the Palaeolithic and Mesolithic. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 4(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleator, H., & Stirling, I. (1989). Winter distribution of bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus) in the Penny Strait area, northwest territories, as determined by underwater vocalizations. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47, 1071–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conkey, M. W. (1991). Contexts of action, contexts for power: material culture and gender in the Magdalenian. In J. Gero & M. W. Cokey (Eds.), Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory (pp. 57–92). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croes, D. (2004). Northwest coast wet-site artifacts: a key to understanding resource procurement, storage, management and exchange. In R. G. Matson, G. Coupland, & Q. Mackie (Eds.), Emerging from the mist (pp. 53–75). Vancouver, UBC press.

  • D'Altroy, T. N., & Earle, T. K. (1985). Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy. Current Anthropology, 26(2), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwent, C. (2001). High Arctic Paleoeskimo fauna: temporal changes and regional differences. University of Missouri-Columbia

  • Darwent, C., & Foin, J. (2010). Zooarchaeological analysis of a Late Dorset and an Early Thule dwelling at Cape Grinnell, Northwest Greenland. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 11(2), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, P. M. (2009). A l’Origine du Dorsetien Apport de la Technologie Lithique des sites Ghgk-63 et Tayara (Kbfk-7) au Nunavik. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, U.F.R. d'Histoire de l'Art et d'Archaeologie, Universite Paris 1—Pantheon—Sorbonne.

  • Desrosiers, P. M., & Sørensen, M. (2012). Eastern Arctic under pressure: from Paleoeskimo to Inuit culture (Canada and Greenland) the emergence of pressure blade making. In P. M. Desrosiers (Ed.), (pp. 375–400). Springer US.

  • Dobres, M. A., & Hoffman, C. R. (1994). Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(3), 211–258.

  • Erlandson, J. M., Braje, T. J., Rick, T. C., & Davis, T. (2009). Comparing faunal remains and subsistence technology at CA-SMI-507: a 9,000-year-old Paleocoastal Shell Midden on San Miguel Island, California. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology, 4(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564890903058576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freuchen, P., & Salomonsen, F. (1958). The Arctic year. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, T. M. (2000). The role of social factors in Dorset–Thule interaction. In M. Appelt, J. Berglund, & H. C. Gullov (Eds.), Identities and cultural contacts in the Arctic: proceedings from a conference at the Danish National Museum, Copenhagen (pp. 206–220). The Danish National museum and Danish Polar Center: Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, T. M. (2004). Contemporaneity of Dorset and Thule cultures in the North American Arctic: new radiocarbon dates from Victoria Island, Nunavut. Current Anthropology, 45(5), 685–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, T. M. (2007). Hearth rows, hierarchies and Arctic hunter-gatherers: the construction of equality in the Late Dorset period. World Archaeology, 39(2), 194–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, T. M. (2013). The impact of weapon technology on caribou drive system variability in the prehistoric Canadian Arctic. Quaternary International, XXX, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, T.M., & Mason, O. (2016). Introduction: Archaeology of the North American Arctic In M. Friesen & O. Mason (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Prehistoric Arctic (pp.1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hickey, C. G. (1979). The historic Beringian trade network: its nature and origins. In A. P. McCartney (Ed.), Thule Eskimo culture: an anthropological retrospective. Mercury series, archaeological survey of Canada paper 88 (pp. 411–434). Ottawa: National Museum of Man.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, W. R., & Jones, T. L. (1992). Evolution of marine mammal hunting: a view from the California and Oregon coasts. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 11, 360–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, W. R., & Jones, T. L. (2002). Depletion of prehistoric pinniped populations along the California and Oregon coasts: were humans the cause? In C. E. Kay & R. T. Simmons (Eds.), Wilderness and political ecology: aboriginal influences and the original state of nature (pp. 72–110). Salt Lake City, Utah: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houmard, C. (2011). Caractérisation Chrono-Culturelle et Évolution du Paléoesquimau dans le Golfe de Foxe (Canada): Étude Typologique et Technologique des Industries en Matières Dures d’Origine Animale. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense et Université Laval.

  • Howse, L. (2008). Late Dorset caribou hunters: zooarchaeology of the Bell site, Victoria Island. Arctic Anthropology, 45(1), 22–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse, L. (2013). Revisiting an early Thule Inuit occupation of Skraeling Island, Canadian high Arctic. Études/Inuit/Studies, 37(1), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howse, L. (2016). Eating beyond ecology: the impacts of hunting technologies on archaeofaunas from the eastern Arctic. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.

  • Howse, L., & Friesen, M. (2016). Technology, taphonomy, and seasonality: understanding differences between Dorset and Thule subsistence strategies at Iqaluktuuq, Victoria Island. Arctic, 69(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness, D. (1922). The life of the copper Eskimo, Report of the Canadian Arctic expedition, 1913–18. Ottawa: National Museum of Man.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, T. B. (2012). A zooarchaeological and ethnographic investigation of subsistence change through time at Iita, Northwest Greenland. Davis: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, T. B. (2013). Foraging efficiency and small game: the importance of dovekie (Alle alle) in Inughuit subsistence. Anthropozoologica, 48(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1980). An archaeological view of the Inuit/European contact period in Central Labrador. Études/Inuit/Studies, 4(1–2), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, D. J., Lambert, P. M., Johnson, J. R., & Culleton, B. J. (2013). Sociopolitical effects of bow and arrow technology in Prehistoric Coastal California. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 22(3), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupo, K., & Schmitt, D. (2005). Small prey hunting technology and zooarchaeological measures of taxonomic diversity and abundance: ethnoarchaeological evidence from central African Forest foragers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 24, 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, R. L. (2008). Quantitative Paleozoology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Magurran, C. W. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H., & Mason, O. (2013). The bow and arrow in northern North America. Evoluationary Anthropology, 22, 133–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, M. S. (1985). Prehistory of the eastern Arctic. Orlando: Academic Press, INC..

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, K. (1989). The Ruin Islanders. Early Thule culture pioneers in the Eastern High Arctic. Archaeological Survey of Canada (141).

  • McGhee, R. (1996). Ancient people of the Arctic. Vancouver: UBC Press published in association with the Canadian Museum of Civilization.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, R. (2000). Radiocarbon dating and the timing of the Thule migration. In M. Appelt, J. Berglund, & H. C. Gullov (Eds.), Identities and cultural contacts in the Arctic: proceedings from a conference at the Danish National Museum, Copenhagen (pp. 181–191). The Danish National Museum and Danish Polar Center.

  • McNiven, I. (2010). Navigating the human–animal divide: marine mammal hunters and rituals of sensory allurement. World Archaeology, 42(2), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, K. D. (1994). The intensification of production: archaeological approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1(2), 111–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, L. (2002). Explaining subsistence change in southern New Zealand using foraging theory models. World Archaeology, 34(1), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, M. (1997). Palaeoeskimo cultural transition: a case study from Ivujivik, eastern Arctic: Nunavik Archaeology Monograph Series No. 1. Avataq Cultural Institute.

  • Park, R. W. (1989). Porden point: an intrasite approach to settlement system analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Alberta.

  • Park, R. W. (2016). The Dorset–Thule transition. In M. Friesen & O. Mason (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the prehistoric Arctic (pp. 808–826). Oxford: Oxford university press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partlow, M. A. (2006). Sampling fish bones: a consideration of the importance of screen size and disposal context in the North Pacific. Arctic Anthropology, 43(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E., & Wing, E. (1999). Zooarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, P. R., Orr, J. R., Dietz, R., & Dueck, L. (1998). Sightings of belugas and other marine mammals in the north water, late March 1993. Arctic, 51(1), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, A. (2011). Camping at the caribou crossing: relating Palaeo-Eskimo lithic technological change and human mobility patterns in southeastern Victoria Island, Nunavut. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.

  • Roby, D. D., & Thing, H. (1985). Behaviour of West Greenland caribou during a population decline. Holarctic Ecology, 8(2), 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. (2012). The significance of choice in Late Dorset: the technology of domestic architecture in the Eastern North American Arctic C.1500 B.P.–500 B.P. Barr international series 2444. Oxford: Archaeopress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, B., & Danks, H. (1986). The Arctic and its wildlife. New York: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess, A. E. (1979). Reindeer and caribou hunters: an archaeological study. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, L. G. (2006). Of stones and bones: interpreting site function in the upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic of Western Europe. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25, 500–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, R. (1991). Northwest Greenland: a history. Orono: University of Maine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibe, C. (1981). Pattedyr. In F. Salomonsen (Ed.), Grønlands Fauna: Fisk, Fugle, Pattedyr (pp. 263–459). København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierra, B. (1995). Subsistence and stone tool technology: an old world perspective. Tempe, Arizona State University.

  • Wells, P. (2012). Social life and technical practice: an analysis of the osseous tool assemblage at the Dorset Palaeoeskimo site of Phillip’s garden, Newfoundland. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

  • Whitridge, P. (2001). Zen fish: a consideration of the discordance between artifactual and zooarchaeological indicators of Thule Inuit fish use. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 20, 3–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitridge, P. (2016). Classic Thule. In M. Friesen & O. Mason (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the prehistoric Arctic (pp. 827–832). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangrando, A. F. (2009). Is fishing intensification a direct route to hunter-gatherer complexity? A case study from the Beagle Channel region (Tierra del Fuego, southern South America). World Archaeology, 41(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903363848

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The data for this article is derived from my doctoral dissertation. I am indebted to my doctoral advisor Max Friesen for his generous support and advice, and to Gary Coupland and David Smith for their guidance throughout my research. I also benefited from the insightful comments of the rest of my examination committee, Katherine Patton, Genevieve Dewar, and Bjarne Grønnow. I am very grateful to Robert Park, Karen McCullough, and Martin Appelt, as well as to the Canadian Museum of History, Greenland National Museum, and the Zoological Museum of Denmark for supporting my analysis of the Grinnell Peninsula and Smith Sound faunal collections. An Ontario Graduate scholarship funded part of my doctoral studies, the University of Toronto’s Research Travel Grant and the Department of Anthropology’s Preliminary Research Grant funded travel to Copenhagen to identify the faunal sample from Greenland, the Northern Scientific Training Program (Northern Development Canada) supported part of my work at the Bell site, and excavations at Iqaluktuuq were funded by a SSHRC received by M. Friesen. I owe many thanks to Adam Allentuck and Mari Kleist for their comments on an earlier draft of this article and to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Thank-you to Michael O’Rourkewho made an earlier draft of Fig. 1. All errors are my own.

Funding

This study was in part funded by the Vonda McCrae Clarke Memorial Ontario Graduate Scholarship, the University of Toronto, the Northern Scientific Training Program (Northern Development Canada, Government of Canada), and a SSHRC awarded to Max Friesen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lesley Howse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Howse, L. Hunting Technologies and Archaeofaunas: Societal Differences Between Hunter-Gatherers of the Eastern Arctic. J Archaeol Method Theory 26, 88–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9366-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-018-9366-2

Keywords

Navigation