Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring the Environmental Risks Around Medinet Habu and Ramesseum Temple at West Luxor, Egypt, Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, the preservation of cultural heritage is a pressing issue especially for territories subjected to a long period of human action that could adversely influence environment and heritage properties, thus producing a deterioration of archaeological features and alteration of historical landscape. In this paper, the environmental risks and their effects on preservation issues are investigated for the archaeological area of the Luxor city (south of Egypt) where the most famous Temples in Egypt are located. A comprehensive analysis has been conducted for the Ramesseum and Medinet Habu temples considering their building material and characteristics, environmental (geological and hydrological) setting, and past and ongoing changes around the monument areas. Satellite multitemporal images have been used to detect all the changes mainly linked to the expansion of urban and agriculture areas. Results from the analysis conducted along with in situ investigations have suggested that many of the environmental problems around the archaeological areas are coming as a result of urban and agriculture sprawling. Both of them strongly influence the distribution in the levels of groundwater which along with temperature are considered as the main causes of the deterioration process affecting the Medinet Habu and Ramesseum temple. The degree of weathering damage appears to be much more dependent on exposure characteristics of the investigation areas, especially as related to salt weathering processes. Innovative solutions to support the preservation of these temples are herein presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Warith, A. (2007). Egypt infrastructure improvements project secondary cities scoping statement for city of Luxor groundwater lowering of antiquities sites on the west bank, (NOPWASD) and (USAID), p. 4.

  • Abraham, G., & Bakr, A. (2000). Comprehensive development plan for the city of Luxor Egypt—Investment Project # 4, investment portfolio for the development of infrastructure serving New Luxor and El Toad, pp. 1–125.

  • Agapiou, A., Hadjimitsis, D. G., Papoutsa, C., Alexakis, D. D., & Papadavid, G. (2011). The importance of accounting for atmospheric effects in the application of NDVI and interpretation of satellite imagery supporting archaeological research: the case studies of Palaepaphos and Nea Paphos sites in Cyprus. Journal of Remote Sensing, 3, 2605-2629.

  • Ahmed, A. A. (2009). Land use change and deterioration of Pharaonic monuments in Upper Egypt. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, 37(1), 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. A. (2014). Fluoride in quaternary groundwater aquifer, Nile Valley, Luxor, Egypt, Saudi Society for Geosciences 2013. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 3073. doi:10.1007/s12517-013-0962-x

  • Ahmed, A. A., & Fogg, G. E. (2014). The impact of groundwater and agricultural expansion on the archaeological sites at Luxor, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 95, 100. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2014.02.007

  • Alexakis, D. D., Agapiou, A., Hadjimitsis, D. G., & Sarris, A. (2012). Remote sensing applications in archaeological research, isbn: 978-953-51-0651-7, Intech, available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/remote-sensingapplications/remote-sensing-applications-in-archaeology , p. 435.

  • Aubry, M., Berggren, W. A.., Dupuis, C., Ghaly, H., Ward, D., King, C., Knox, R. W.O’B., Ouda, K., Youssef, M., & Galal, W. F. (2011). Pharaonic necrostratigraphy: a review of geological and archaeological studies in the Theban Necropolis, Luxor, West Bank, Egypt. Terra Nova, 21(4), 237–256, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, p. 23.

  • Bednarski (2005). Holding Egypt: tracing the reception of the description de l’Égypte in nineteenth-century, Great Britain Golden House Publications, Printed in the United Kingdom London, p. 87.

  • Bennett, R. (2011). Archaeological remote sensing: visualisation and analysis of grass-dominated environments using airborne laser scanning and digital spectra data, Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree ‘Doctor of Philosophy’, awarded by Bournemouth University, p. 10.

  • Blackman, A. M. (1923). Luxor & its temples, Printed in Great Britain Billing and Sons, Ltd., Guildford and Eshek, pp. 120–160.

  • Butt, A., Shabbir, R., Ahmad, S., & Aziz, N. (2015). Land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, E. (2009). A groundwater flow model for water related damages on historic monuments—case study West Luxor Egypt. Vatten, 65, 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casciati, S., & Borja, R. I. (2004). Dynamic FE analysis of south Memnon colossus including 3D soil–foundation–structure interaction. Computers and Structures, 82(2004) 1719–1736), 1721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challis, K. and Andy Howard, J. 2006. A Review of trends within archaeological remote sensing in alluvial environments, Published online 13 November 2006 in Wiley inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com). doi:10.1002/arp.296. p. 1.

  • Chandra, P. (2011). Performance evaluation of vegetation indices using remotely sensed data. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences, 2(1), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigna, F., Lasaponara, R., Masini, N., Milillo, P., & Tapete, D. (2014). Persistent scatterer interferometry processing of COSMO-SkyMed StripMap HIMAGE time series to depict deformation of the historic centre of Rome, Italy. Remote Sensing, 6(12), 12593–12618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrie, R. (2011). Detection of ancient Egyptian archaeological sites using satellite remote sensing and digital image processing, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications II, edited by Ulrich Michel, Daniel L. Civco, Proc. of SPIE Vol. 8181, 81811B, 2011 SPIE1, p. 1.

  • Elwaseif, M., Ismail, A., Abdalla, M., Abdel-Rahman, M., & Hafez, M. (2012). A 2012 geophysical and hydrological investigations at the west bank of Nile River (Luxor, Egypt). Environment and Earth Science, 67, 911–921. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1525-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. M. (2009). The eighteenth dynasty temple, part 1 “the inner sanctuaries”. The university of Chicago Oriental Institute Publications, 136, 1–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, J.A., and Storemyr P 2009 Ancient Egyptian quarries—an illustrated overview. In N. Abu-Jaber, E.G. Bloxam, P. Degryse, & T. Heldal (Eds.), Quarry scopes: ancient stone quarry landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean (pp. 8–9). Geological Survey of Norway Special Publication, 12.

  • Holme, A., Burnside, D., & Mitchell, A. (1987). The development of a system for monitoring trend in range condition in the arid shrublands of Western Australia. Australian Rangeland Journal, 9, 14–20.

  • Holscher, U. (1941). The mortuary temple of Ramses III part 1, translated by Mrs. Keith C. Seele (pp. 1–134). U.S.A: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, A., Anderson, N. L.., Rogers, J.D., Abbas, M. A., & Atekwana, E. A. (2006). Hydro geophysical Investigation at Luxor, Southern Egypt. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/statematerialsoffice/geotechnical/conference/materials/ismailanderson-rogers-abbas-atekwana.pdf, p. 6.

  • Johnson, J. K. (2006). Remote sensing in archaeology (p. 130). Mississippi: The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloos Published for The Center for Archaeological Research at the University of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelong, T., Yuqing, W., Lin, Y., Riping, Z., Wei, C., & Yaobao, M. (2008). A new archaeological remote sensing technology, the International archives of the photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVII(Part B7. Beijing 2008), 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khorram, S., Koch, F. H., van der Wiele, C. F., & Nelson, S. A. C. (2012). Remote sensing, Library of Congress control number: 2012930489 (p. 76). Berlin (www.springer.com): Springer Science+Business Media.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, D. D., & Klemm, R. (2002). The building stones of ancient Egypt—a gift of its geology. Journal of African Earth Science, Published by Elsevier Science Ltd, p. 637.

  • Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2012). Satellite remote sensing (a new tool for archaeology), Library of Congress control number: 2011946224 (p. 162). Berlin (www.springer.com): Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2013a). Satellite synthetic aperture radar in archaeology and cultural landscape: an overview. Archaeological Prospection, 20(2), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2013b). Full-waveform airborne laser scanning for the detection of medieval archaeological microtopographic relief. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10, e78–e82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara, R., Masini, N., Rizzo, E., & Orefici, G. (2011). New discoveries in the Piramide Naranjada in Cahuachi (Peru) using satellite, ground probing radar and magnetic investigations. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(9), 2031–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara, R., Leucci, G., Masini, N., Persico, R., & Scardozzi, G. (2016). Towards an operative use of remote sensing for exploring the past using satellite data: the case study of Hierapolis (Turkey). Remote Sensing of Environment, 174, 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, N. (1999). Fundamentals of Remote Sensing, ​p. 8. http://www.geoservis.ftn.uns.ac.rs/downloads/ISP/1999-fundamentals-of-remote-sensing.pdf.

  • Masini, N., & Lasaponara, R. (2006). Satellite-based recognition of landscape archaeological features related to ancient human transformation. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 3(3), 230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini, N., Lasaponara, R., & Orefici, G. (2009). Addressing the challenge of detecting archaeological adobe structures in Southern Peru using QuickBird imagery. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10, e3–e9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLane, J., Wüst, R. A. J., Porter, B., & Rutherford, J. (2003). Flash-flood impacts and protection measures in the Valley of the Kings, Luxor, Egypt. APT Bulletin, 34(1), 37–45.

  • Mosbeh, I. R. H., & Kaloop, R. (2015). Monitoring urban growth and land use change detection with GIS and remote sensing techniques in Daqahlia governorate Egypt, Gulf Organisation for Research and Development. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4, 117–124(2015), 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M. A. (2002). Egyptian temples, London Sampson low, Marston6 Co., LTD, printed in Great Britain by Purnell and Sons, pp. 132–158.

  • Orlando, P., & Villa, B. (2011). Remote sensing applications in archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori, 22(2011), 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parcak, S. H. (2009). Satellite remote sensing for archaeology, First published 2009 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016, p. 38.

  • Peters, S. M. (2011) Decoding the Medinet Habu inscriptions: the ideological subtext of Ramesses III’s war accounts, word count: 17,070 (with footnotes + bibliography included), pp. 1–55.

  • Quibell, J. E. (1898) The Ramesseum, London: printed by William Clowes and Sons, Limited, Stamford Street and Charing Cross 1898, pp. 1–20.

  • Rajan, Y. S., & Ninan, J. (1983). International scene in remote sensing. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences (Engineering Science), 6(4), 355–371.9 Printed in India, p. 357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokni, K., Ahmad, A., Selamat, A., & Hazini, S. (2014). Water feature extraction and change detection using multitemporal Landsat imagery. Journal of Remote Sensing. (www.mdpi.com/journal/rem otesensing). pp. 4173–4189.

  • Roudgarmi, P., Monavari, M., Feghhi, J., Nouri, J., & Khorasani, N. (2008). Environmental impact prediction using remote sensing images. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A ISSN 1673-565X (Print); ISSN 1862-1775 (Online). www. zju.edu.cn/jzus; www.springerlink.com. p. 381.

  • Said, R. (1962) The geology of Egypt, PH. D. (Harvard) Cairo University, Gizeh (Egypt, U.A.R.), Elsevier publishing company Amsterdam-New York, Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 61-18143, pp. 93.

  • Skidmore, A. (2003). Environmental modeling with GIS and remote sensing, published In the USA and Canada, second publishing, p. 8.

  • Smith, C. (2014). Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0465-2, New York, pp. 3631–4147.

  • Storemyr, P., Bloxam, E., Adel Kelany, T. H., Harrell, J. A.., Yousri, R., & Fathy, E. (2007). Risk assessment and monitoring of ancient Egyptian quarry landscapes, Printed at the Geological Survey of Norway, p. 103.

  • Tapete, D., Cigna, F., Masini, N., & Lasaponara, R. (2013). Prospection and monitoring of the archaeological heritage of Nasca, Peru, with ENVISAT ASAR. Archaeological Prospection, 20(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia L. E. (2011). Mud-brick architecture. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark 21198/zz0026w9hb, pp. 1–9.

  • Wiseman, J., & El-Baz, F. (2007). Remote sensing in archaeology, Library of Congress control number: 2001012345 (p. 71). Berlin: Springer Science.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wüst, R. A. J., & McLane, J. (2000). Rock deterioration in the Royal Tomb of Seti I (p. 184). Egypt: Elsevier Science B.V, www.elsevier.nl/locate/enggeo, All rights reserved.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaghloul, E.A., El-Dessouki, A. , Hawwas, Z., Fayed, A., Elbeih, S., El-Nawawy, I., Meikhaeil, N., Bahy El-Din, A., & Ragi, I. (2008). Using remote sensing and GIS techniques to monitor the geo-environmental changes around Madinat Habo, west Luxor, Egypt.

Further reading

Download references

Acknowledgments

These results are part of the PhD thesis of Mr. Abdelaziz Elfadaly. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the National Authority for Remote Sensing & Space Sciences (NARSS) for funding the PhD data. Thanks are given to the Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis (CNR) for the support and for funding the publication. Thanks are also given to the Egyptian Cultural Affairs sector and the missions (Ministry of Higher Education) for funding the PhD study at Basilicata University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosa Lasaponara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elfadaly, A., Attia, W. & Lasaponara, R. Monitoring the Environmental Risks Around Medinet Habu and Ramesseum Temple at West Luxor, Egypt, Using Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques. J Archaeol Method Theory 25, 587–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-017-9347-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-017-9347-x

Keywords

Navigation