Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the association between progesterone (P) level on the day of trigger and time to blastulation in IVF cycles.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study with autologous IVF cycles performed at our Institution from January 2019 to December 2021. A total of 1109 IVF cycles were included. The primary outcome was to compare time to blastulation in terms of percentage of expanded (grade 3) blastocysts on day 5 according to progesterone level at trigger.
Results
A total of 3517 blastocysts were analyzed. After dividing progesterone level in quartiles (Q1, P < 0.50 ng/ml; Q2 0.50 ng/ml ≤ P ≤ 0.78 ng/ml; Q3, 0.79 ng/ml ≤ P ≤ 1.15 ng/ml; Q4, P > 1.15 ng/ml), we observed a delay in blastocyst development according to the increasing level of progesterone at trigger (analysis by rank, P-value = 0.01). After adjusting for confounding factors at the multivariate analysis, the percentage of day 5 blastocysts was reduced for Q3 (− 13.8%, 95% CI from − 20.5 to − 7.0%, p < 0.001) and Q4 (− 7.7%, 95% CI from − 15.5 to 0.0%, p = 0.05) compared to Q1 (reference).
Conclusions
Progesterone levels on day of trigger correlate to the percentage of expanded (grade 3) blastocysts on day 5 and a delayed blastocyst development day 5 is expected for high progesterone levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simon C, Remohi J, Jenkins J, Pellicer A. Circulating progesterone levels and ongoing pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for in vitro fertilization: analysis of over 4000 cycles. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:2092–100.
Venetis CA, Kolibianakis EM, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC. Progesterone elevation and probability of pregnancy after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 60 000 cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:433–57.
Labarta E, Martínez-Conejero JA, Alamá P, Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Simón C, Bosch E. Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1813–25.
Healy MW, Yamasaki M, Patounakis G, et al. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:362–7.
Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S. Embryo cryopreservation rescues cycles with premature luteinization. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:636–41.
Healy MW, Patounakis G, Connell MT, Devine K, DeCherney AH, Levy MJ, Hill MJ. Does a frozen embryo transfer ameliorate the effect of elevated progesterone seen in fresh transfer cycles? Fertil Steril. 2016;105:93-99.e91.
Huang B, Ren X, Wu L, Zhu L, Xu B, Li Y, Ai J, Jin L. Elevated progesterone levels on the day of oocyte maturation may affect top quality embryo IVF cycles. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0145895.
Vanni VS, Somigliana E, Reschini M, et al. Top quality blastocyst formation rates in relation to progesterone levels on the day of oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176482.
Woo J, Kwon H, Choi D, et al. Effects of elevated progesterone levels on the day of hCG on the quality of oocyte and embryo. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4319.
Simon C, Moreau J, Gatimel N, Cohade C, Parinaud J, Leandri R. Impact of estradiol and progesterone levels during the late follicular stage on the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocols. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35:481–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1538346.
Hernandez-Nieto C, Lee JA, Alkon-Meadows T, Luna-Rojas M, Mukherjee T, Copperman AB, Sandler B. Late follicular phase progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation is not associated with decreased implantation of chromosomally screened embryos in thaw cycles. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:1889–99.
Racca A, Santos-Ribeiro S, De Munck N, Mackens S, Drakopoulos P, Camus M, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, Blockeel C. Impact of late-follicular phase elevated serum progesterone on cumulative live birth rates: is there a deleterious effect on embryo quality? Hum Reprod. 2017;33:860–8.
Racca A, Vanni VS, Somigliana E, Reschini M, Viganò P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Drakopoulos P, Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Papaleo E, Candiani M, Blockeel C. Is a freeze-all policy the optimal solution to circumvent the effect of late follicular elevated progesterone? A multicentric matched-control retrospective study analysing cumulative live birth rate in 942 non-elective freeze-all cycles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36:2463–72.
Vanni VS, Viganò P, Quaranta L, Pagliardini L, Giardina P, Molgora M, Munaretto M, Candiani M, Papaleo E. Are extremely high progesterone levels still an issue in IVF? J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(1):69–75.
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.
Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis [Internet]. Springer-Verlag New York; 2016. Available from: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. Accessed 12 Dec 2022.
Kofinas JD, Mehr H, Ganguly N, Biley Y, Bochkovsky S, McCulloh D, Grifo J. Is it the egg or the endometrium? Elevated progesterone on day of trigger is not associated with embryo ploidy nor decreased success rates in subsequent embryo transfer cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1169–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0752-y.
Neves AR, Santos-Ribeiro S, García-Martínez S, Devesa M, Soares SR, García-Velasco JA, Garrido N, Polyzos NP. The effect of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation on embryo ploidy and cumulative live birth rates. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43:1063–9.
Turgut EN, Ecemis S, Boynukalin KF, Gultomruk M, Yarkiner Z, Findikli N, Bahceci M. Being on the side of old findings: progesterone elevation on the day of oocyte maturation induction does not affect embryological parameters throughout the blastocyst culture period. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303:581–7.
Carter F, Rings F, Mamo S, Holker M, Kuzmany A, Besenfelder U, Havlicek V, Mehta JP, Tesfaye D, Schellander K, Lonergan P. Effect of elevated circulating progesterone concentration on bovine blastocyst development and global transcriptome following endoscopic transfer of in vitro produced embryos to the bovine oviduct. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:707–19.
Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, Ruberti A, Casciani V, Scarselli F, Spinella F, Fiorentino F, Varricchio MT, Greco E. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2245–54.
Tong J, Niu Y, Wan A, Zhang T. Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:369–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
E.P. reports grant and personal fees from MSD, grants from Ferring, from IBSA, grants and personal fees from Merck, grants from TEVA, grants from Gedeon Richter, not related to the present study. All the other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Villanacci, R., Buzzaccarini, G., Marzanati, D. et al. Delayed blastocyst development is influenced by the level of progesterone on the day of trigger. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 361–370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02682-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02682-y