Abstract
Purpose
With the progress of medical technology and renovated conception of fertility, the prospective studies and practice of fertility preservation are drawing more and more attention from medical workers. With the largest population of over 1.4 billion, China makes the experience accumulated in fertility preservation efforts even more relevant. This article summarizes China’s experience and shares it with the world to promote the healthy development of fertility preservation.
Methods
This study was based on multiple Chinese expert consensuses on fertility preservation issued in 2021 and the current national regulations and principles, compared with the latest advice and guidelines issued by global reproductive authorities such as the ASRM and ESHRE. Summarize the experience and reflection of Chinese scholars in the process of fertility preservation.
Results
This study reports on the current situation of fertility preservation in China, sharing the Chinese experience gained in the process of development, and offering Chinese reflections on worrying issues.
Conclusion
Fertility preservation is a medical and social issue of reproductive health security, which is conducive to the sound development of the world population and social production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
As fertility rates are declining globally, ART has been designed to address the fertility needs of couples with infertility since the very beginning, and as medical technology advances and ideology on childbearing changes, fertility protection and preservation based on prospective fertility appeal are becoming increasingly important to ART practitioners and reproductive biologists. Since the first fertility preservation guidelines were published by American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2006 [1], fertility preservation has been practiced on a global scale. In 2021, China published the Chinese Expert Consensus on Fertility Preservation [2] and the Chinese Expert Consensus on Male and Female Fertility Preservation [3, 4], but China’s work is still in its infancy.
Starting from the current status of fertility preservation in China and with reference to the latest recommendations and guidelines published by global professional authorities such as ASRM, SART, ESHRE, and ISFP, this article discusses China’s decisions and reflections on the development of fertility preservation, summarizes China’s experience, and shares it with the world to promote the healthy development of fertility preservation.
The current situation of fertility in China
Population issues are increasingly attracting the attention of the international community, and the birth rate in China was 8.52‰ in 2020, falling below 10‰ for the first time, while the natural population growth rate was only 1.45‰ in the same period [5]; the total fertility rate of 1.3 was lower than the international warning line of 1.5, a record low [6]. The average age of first childbearing for Chinese women was postponed from 24.3 years to 27.3 years from 2006 to 2017 [7], which has caused a superimposed effect on the decline of fertility. The Chinese government fully implemented the two-child and three-child fertility policies in 2015 and 2021, respectively, incorporating the promotion of population fertility into the basic state policy [8]. However, this has been followed by a significant increase in the number of pregnant women of advanced maternal age; according to statistics, in 2016, there were about 90 million couples eligible for the two-child policy in China, 60% were above 35 years of age and 50% were above 40 years of age, and the risk of maternal comorbidities and complications as well as birth defects will be greatly increased [9].
In addition, the incidence of infertility/sterility worldwide shows an increasing trend, which has become a global medical and social problem. There is a lack of national large-scale data on the prevalence rate of infertility/sterility in China. In regional studies, the prevalence rate of infertility among women of reproductive age varies, but still shows an overall increasing trend. According to recent reports, the prevalence rate of infertility among women of childbearing age in Henan and Liaoning provinces of China reached 24.6% and 13.4%, respectively, in 2021 [10, 11]. The most direct way to assess male infertility is to examine the parameters of semen. And sperm concentration in fertile men in China decreased significantly from 1984 to 2019, from 98.85 × 106/ml to 72.55 × 106/ml [12]; the human sperm bank in Hunan Province, China, counted the quality of sperm donated by more than 30,000 young men from 2001 to 2015, and in addition to a significant decrease in the sperm concentration (the number of sperm per milliliter of semen), the percentage of sperm with normal morphology decreased from 31.8 to 10.8%, and the progressively motile sperm count decreased from 34 × 106/ml to 21 × 106/ml [13].
In summary, China’s population growth rate and fertility rate are decreasing year by year, the trend of delaying the childbearing age is serious, and the prevalence rate of infertility/sterility is increasing year by year, which has a long-lasting and far-reaching impact on social production and economic development. It is imperative to implement measures to protect and preserve the fertility of Chinese men and women of childbearing age as soon as possible and to promote long-term balanced population development.
Current status of fertility preservation in China
At present, China lacks special statistics on fertility preservation, so this section will indirectly reflect the current situation of fertility preservation in China through the existing data. As of December 2020, there were 536 medical institutions and 27 human sperm banks approved to carry out ART in Chinese mainland. Guangdong has 56 ART medical institutions, ranking first among mainland provinces. Then there are 33 in Jiangsu, and 32 in Shandong and Henan, respectively. However, there is only 1 ART medical institution in Tibet, followed by 2 in Qinghai and Ningxia, respectively (Fig. 1) [14]. In summary, the allocation of ART medical institutions in China has increased year by year, and the availability of technical services has improved significantly, but the development among regions is unbalanced.
The number of oocyte retrieval cycles can directly reflect the scale and volume of ART medical institutions. According to the data published at the CSRM Annual Meeting in August 2022, there are 4 mainland ART medical institutions with 10,000 cycles or more (accounting for 1.0%) and there are 24 institutions with more than 4000 cycles (accounting for 5.9%) in 2020. 341 institutions with cycles ranging from 100 to 4,000 are the majority (accounting for 84.3%), but there are 36 institutions with less than 100 cycles (accounting for 8.9%) (Fig. 2) [15]. From the above, it can be seen that China’s ART medical institutions are large in scale and volume, and their service capacity is constantly improving, but it also highlights the problem of uneven development among institutions.
According to the published data of China’s human sperm bank, the total number of stocks increased from 187 thousand in 2010 to 1 million in 2020. In 10 years, the number of net stored sperm increased from 143 to 946 thousand, becoming 6 times more (Fig. 3) [15]. It shows that the service ability of Chinese human sperm bank is improved, which can meet the clinical needs of male fertility preservation. Although the continuous development of China’s sperm bank has brought us good news, this problem is more prominent and urgent for women with fertility preservation needs. This also puts forward higher requirements and greater challenges to China’s fertility preservation work.
Application scope of fertility preservation in China
Fertility preservation begins with the forward-looking protection and preservation of fertility in patients with diseases that predictably affect fertility, or medically induced injuries that inevitably disrupt reproductive function during the course of treatment. A clear scope of application is a prerequisite for the standardization of fertility preservation, and a comparison of national attitudes toward preservation in different populations illustrates the current status of fertility preservation in China (Table 1).
Cancer/benign conditions patients
With the rapid development of medical technology, the survival rate of cancer patients has increased significantly. According to the latest data from the National Center for Health Statistics, cancer mortality rates have continued to decline since 1991, with an overall decrease of 29% and approximately 2.9 million cancer patients surviving [16]. Meanwhile, the incidence of cancer in AYA increased by nearly 30% from 2011–2015 compared to 1975–1979 [17]. The trend of younger and younger incidence rates leads to more and more cancer patients having reproductive needs, and fertility preservation before starting a treatment cycle can be the best option to meet their fertility appeal.
In the Chinese Expert Consensus on Male Fertility Preservation, recommendations were classified into three levels 4 (Table 2). In the Chinese Expert Consensus on Female Fertility Preservation, the assessment of the risk of ovarian impairment is used as the main basis for clarifying the scope of application [4, 18]. It mainly includes oncologic diseases with the most significant trend of rejuvenation, such as breast cancer, gynecologic tumors, and hematologic tumors, and also non-oncologic diseases with a high risk of fertility decline, such as autoimmune diseases, endometriosis, and Turner syndrome. The consensus elaborates on the impact of different diseases, various stages, and treatment strategies on fertility, and proposes corresponding fertility preservation measures and recommendations.
With the concerted efforts of multidisciplinary physicians and scientists in reproductive medicine and oncology worldwide, optimal fertility preservation strategies are now available for cancer and benign conditions patients of all types and stages, which can maximize the protection and preservation of their fertility. There is a worldwide consensus on the significance and effectiveness of fertility preservation before foreseeable reproductive impairment occurs [19,20,21].
Healthy adults
Ageing as an independent risk factor affecting fertility makes fertility preservation in healthy adults feasible from a reproductive health and preservation technology perspective, but this is not uniformly understood and policy-wise across countries [20, 22]. Men have a larger scope and a higher degree of tolerance in determining the applicability of fertility preservation due to differences in technical difficulty and social ethical constraints in fertility preservation by gender.
The Chinese Expert Consensus on Male Fertility Preservation clearly states that all men with fertility preservation needs have the right to fertility preservation and rates such appeal as level B which is recommending fertility preservation [3]. And the Chinese Expert Consensus on Female Fertility Preservation does not mention fertility preservation recommendations for healthy adult women [4]. However, under current policy in mainland China, egg freezing can only be performed on married women with indications. The guidelines issued by organizations such as ASRM and ESHRE emphasize risk-informed consent and respect for reproductive rights [19, 20] and are more positive than China’s guidelines on the issue concerning whether fertility preservation can be performed on healthy adults. Moreover, in some countries or continents, governments have allowed the commercialization of “sperm banks” and “egg banks.”
Children
According to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Male Fertility Preservation, fertility preservation in underage males should be performed with the consent of their guardians after a thorough evaluation by oncologists and reproductive medicine physicians [3]. According to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Female Fertility Preservation merely mentions the fertility preservation strategy of ovarian tissue freezing for underage oncology patients [4, 18]. Fertility preservation in children is performed internationally with equal caution.
At the technical level, the techniques for obtaining and freezing sperm and eggs are relatively mature, while reproductive tissue freezing is still in the experimental stage for adolescents and young adults with immature or underdeveloped sexual development [23]. Regardless of gender, these methods involve invasive operations and still have a long way to go for reproductive tissue freezing techniques due to the uncertain risk of tissue contamination for malignant tumors, blood disorders, etc. [24]. However, experts and scholars from various countries have given full recognition to the development of counseling for fertility preservation in children, emphasizing the importance of pediatricians’ inclusion in pre-treatment recommendations, and pointing out that fertility preservation in adolescents and young adults is still at the counseling and recommendation stage, which is difficult to implement universally due to the lack of technical support and supporting management systems for them [25,26,27,28].
Groups requiring special attention
According to the current law of China, it is forbidden for medical personnel to implement ART for single women and couples who do not meet the national population and family planning laws and regulations. In addition to the above specific groups, there are various “non-standard” situations and relationships with fertility needs, including but not limited to single women, unmarried couples, the unmarried, homosexuals, transgender people, and people with high-risk occupations. With the development of economy, social is becoming more and more diversified, and the proportion of special populations is increasing. The achievements of the human assisted reproduction and fertility preservation technologies have become the primary, or even the only, way for this population to exercise their reproductive rights. None of the Chinese expert consensus mentions fertility preservation recommendations for the above-mentioned special populations [2,3,4]. According to current Chinese regulations, fertility centers are temporarily unable to perform fertility preservation services for this population for the reasons mentioned above.
In recent years, developed countries have taken a more positive view of fertility preservation in this groups. High-risk occupational groups, such as front-line military personnel, military police, firefighters, pilots, and nuclear-radiated close contacts, whose occupational activities pose a high risk to life safety, should be made more aware of fertility preservation techniques, and early completion of fertility protection and preservation is recommended. In general, fertility preservation claims should be safeguarded for all types of populations, except in cases where there is clear evidence-based medical evidence of serious life and health risks to future generations [19, 20]. It is undeniable that a high degree of social acceptance, tolerance, and a well-established sperm/egg bank management system can provide more comprehensive and professional medical services for all types of people with fertility preservation needs.
The expert consensus of organizations such as ASRM and ESHRE has a more positive attitude toward the preservation of reproduction among sexual minorities. It is emphasized that categorically denying the reproductive needs of sexual minorities is disrespectful and a violation of human rights [29, 30]. Attitudes toward sexual minorities are closely related to national marriage laws, and since 2000, when the Netherlands was the first country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage, a total of 37 countries and territories have legalized same-sex marriage by the end of 2020. Taiwan became the first region in Asia to recognize same-sex marriage in 2017, which provides a research base and legal guarantee for China to carry out fertility preservation work for sexual minorities.
Reflections on fertility preservation in China
Although fertility preservation was introduced late in China, it has developed rapidly. The world’s first case of live birth after autologous transplantation of frozen ovarian tissue was reported in Belgium in 2004 [31], and China also successfully broke through the technology of live birth after transplantation in 2017 [32], and more than 200 babies have been born worldwide by applying this technology so far [33]. Medical technology is developing rapidly, but the transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements involves many realistic factors such as cultural background, social environment, management level, and ethical issues. Technology not only has the positive value of meeting human needs but also will bring certain crises, hidden dangers, and even catastrophic negative effects. This section will discuss the concerns and considerations in the process of fertility preservation in China, with the aim of promoting the healthy development of fertility preservation in the world.
Technology options and risks
In the implementation of fertility preservation, it is important to select and precisely apply the appropriate fertility preservation method for each patient in order to achieve precise medical services that minimize medical damage, minimize medical costs, and maximize patient benefits. Based on basic research results in reproductive biology and cryobiology, the available fertility preservation technologies include embryo freezing, gamete (sperm/oocyte) freezing, reproductive tissue freezing, and sub-tissue freezing (Fig. 4), with varying levels of basic research and clinical application, which highlights the expertise and importance of the fertility physician in making decisions.
Ovarian/testicular tissue cryopreservation of patients, one of the most prominent clients in fertility preservation efforts, will inevitably carry residual cancer cells, posing a risk of malignancy recurrence for future in situ transplantation. Although rare, there is still a greater risk of recurrence for certain tumors with a high risk of recurrence [34]. For certain types of hematologic tumors, there are individual differences in the damage of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on fertility, and data show that about 50% of patients still have a chance of natural pregnancy in the future, and how to avoid excessive medical interventions should be given full consideration [35]. In addition, the use of ovulation-promoting drugs to obtain more oocytes in practice, especially for reproductive/endocrine system tumors, will likely have the undesirable consequence of stimulating tumor cell growth or delaying the timing of tumor treatment [36]. It would be putting the cart before the horse to compromise the effectiveness of tumor treatment or even reduce patient survival due to fertility preservation.
Cryobiology is the core foundation of fertility preservation technology, and we have experienced the progress from slow freezing to cryopreservation. Currently, vitrification is used as the major method of cryopreservation. Although milestones have been achieved in its development, it is still inconclusive whether it will pose long-term effects over time. The use of frozen embryo transfer, this cohort study includes slow freezing and cryopreservation, was significantly associated with an increased risk of cancer in children, mainly including leukemia and neurological tumors [37]. In 2020, the European Cancer Research Center also clarified that frozen embryo transfer was associated with an increased incidence of cancer in offspring [38]. Professor Huang Hefeng, a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, has long been concerned about the safety and genetic effects of human ART, and a recent study by this team found that male mouse offspring transferred after freezing–thawing showed impaired glucose metabolism, mainly manifesting as insulin resistance [39]. In addition, correlations with the risk of high birth weight, neurological disorders, metabolic disorders, and cardiovascular diseases have been reported [40,41,42,43]. Because of the insidious and cumulative effects of cell cryopreservation on offspring, continued and more in-depth studies are needed.
Construction of human “egg bank”
In China, there is still no national plan for the establishment of “egg banks,” and only some qualified fertility centers have set up “egg freezing and storage banks” on an exploratory basis. Throughout the world, the first human egg bank was established in Argentina in 2002, and in 2013, the ASRM issued guidelines that no longer considered oocyte freezing a research project, but as a routine ART technique [44]. Since then, national academic organizations in reproductive medicine have issued consensus and guidelines to promote the development of “egg banks” [19, 34].
Compared with women, the medical technology, the high volume of male spermatozoa per discharge, the non-invasive sperm acquisition, the mature technology of sperm freezing and resuscitation, the social background, the high acceptance of the public, the low ethical controversy, and the low space for commercialization, have laid a good foundation for the pioneering work of male fertility protection and the establishment of “sperm bank.” China’s first human sperm bank was established in 1981, and after more than 40 years of development, China’s human sperm banks have formed a relatively standardized and perfect management system to ensure the smooth development of male fertility preservation in China.
The most influential journal in the field of reproductive medicine in China published a special feature in 2022, highlighting the medical and social importance of establishing “egg banks” in China [45], but at the same time raising several practical issues that should alert relevant practitioners. First, it potentially alters women’s fertility patterns and induces women to give up their fertility opportunities at an appropriate age, increasing the risk of high-risk pregnancies and perinatal complications. Second, the extent to which donors should be quarantined and screened, especially for carriers of genetic diseases, can vary from country to country depending on medical conditions, laws, and cultures. Finally, hot topics such as the potential risk of egg quality, whether the age of the recipient should be limited, and financial compensation for donors are reviewed. It is pointed out that adequate research and evidence should be conducted, and the principles of stepwise, pilot, and planning can be used to promote technical improvement, strengthen regulation, and carry out fertility preservation in a reasonable and healthy manner.
Posthumous-assisted reproduction
PAR is a special phenomenon in the development of ART, including both planned PAR and unplanned PAR—planned PAR means that the deceased had fertility preservation during his or her lifetime, i.e. there was already frozen sperm, eggs, or embryos; unplanned PAR is a sudden accident or death due to an acute illness occurs to the deceased, and his or her spouse or parents request gametes from his or her remains for ART [46]. The latest ASRM Consensus on PAR states that if the deceased did not sign the relevant written documents before death, the spouse or parents may request ART after the written request [47].
The first PAR case was publicly reported in China in 2001, which occurred in the case of Zheng Xueli in Zhejiang Province, where the court denied the client’s request for postmortem sperm retrieval for PAR from the husband of the condemned prisoner [48]. The first planned PAR occurred in 2004 in the case of Wang Xia in Guangdong Province, where the client’s husband intended to use frozen embryos for delivery after his accidental death in a car accident, and the court eventually granted his request to continue using frozen embryos [49]. The first unplanned PAR occurred in 2005 in Taiwan in the case of Sun Jixiang, whose family and girlfriend wanted to perform a PAR after his death in the line of duty and were immediately rejected by the court. Subsequent cases of unplanned PAR were not followed by IVF to produce PAR offspring [49].
In Chinese judicial practice, there is an increasing emphasis on the “Best Interests of the Child” as an important theoretical support for adjudication. For PAR offspring, it is inevitable that they will have the single-parent or reconstituted family as a special growing environment with the psychological and mental aspects of the possible irreversible harm, which is unfair to the offspring and irresponsible of the court decision. At the same time, how to identify the legal status of PAR offspring and protect their rights and interests needs to be urgently resolved. Moreover, PAR inevitably violates the dignity of the deceased and infringes on the deceased’s right to informed consent; and the remains and tissues of the deceased do not belong to general objects and are not legal objects, so they cannot be disposed of by their relatives and friends as the subject of inheritance.
In China, due to the deep-rooted traditional concept of “carry on the family line,” especially after the accidental death of a male in a family, his parents and spouse will have an extremely strong claim to the PAR. In addition to considering the interests of the PAR applicants, the rights and interests of the deceased should be fully respected, and the interests of the PAR descendants should be fully evaluated. Countries with similar cultural backgrounds and social environments should be equally cautious when conducting PAR. This not only poses new challenges to medical technology, laws, and regulations, but also places higher demands on civilization.
Compassionate preservation
A recommendation published by the ASRM is worth noting. A patient has strongly requested that her physician transfer embryos into her body when conception is almost impossible. The ASRM believes that there are valid and reasonable reasons to support the patient’s decision to transfer at his or her own discretion in order to safeguard his or her reproductive right, and defines this type of embryo transfer as “compassionate transfer” [50]. Similarly, we propose the concept of “compassionate preservation” in cases where fertility preservation is not recommended at this stage of research, in patients where fertility preservation does not significantly improve reproductive outcomes, and in cases where there is evidence of serious life and health risks to offspring. For example, ovarian cancer, testicular cancer, metastatic carcinoma from other tissues. For example, ovarian cancer, testicular cancer, metastatic carcinoma from other tissues, at the present level of medical technology, although these preserved reproductive tissues cannot be safely transplanted back and restoring fertility. The psychological treatment is aimed at replacing “abandonment of treatment” with “ineffective treatment,” and aims to achieve a certain degree of “placebo effect” and “hope.” The aim is to achieve a certain degree of “placebo effect” and “hope giving” medical help.
Perspectives on fertility preservation technologies
Stem cells have the ability to self-renew, proliferate, and differentiate into a variety of functional cells with directional differentiation. As the researches of stem cells continue to advance, fertility preservation is gradually explored and practiced, and various stem cells have been found to induce spermatogenesis, including SSCs, MSCs, ESCs, and iPSCs (Fig. 5).
SSCs can be isolated from testicular tissue for cryopreservation and can be differentiated into spermatozoa by autologous transplantation or in vitro culture when the time is right [51,52,53,54]. MSCs are derived from umbilical cords, bone marrow, adipose, and systemic vascularized tissues and can differentiate to germ cell lineage in vitro [55,56,57]. ESCs need to be isolated from proto-intestinal pre-embryonic or primordial gonads, so research stays in animal experiments [58, 59]. Human iPSCs technology can be used to obtain PGCs by inducing somatic cells to express a specific gene, which can then be implanted in vivo to induce normal reproductive physiological processes [60,61,62]. Because oogenesis is more complex, studies on in vitro differentiation of stem cells or improvement of the ovarian microenvironment have only been conducted in animal studies [63, 64]. Although stem cell technology is in the exploratory stage in the field of fertility protection, its clinical significance and application prospects are very much worthy of recognition and expectation.
With the support of national policies and increasing awareness of ART, and with the growing social demand for fertility preservation, fertility preservation in China has much room for development. Harboring the aim of promoting China’s progress together with the rest of the world and contributing China’s strength and wisdom to human fertility preservation, we actively learn about key issues in fertility preservation, discuss hot topics that have attracted widespread social attention, share China’s experiences and solutions, and present China’s concerns and thoughts.
Abbreviations
- ART:
-
Assisted reproductive technology
- ASRM:
-
American Society for Reproductive Medicine
- ESHRE:
-
European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
- SART:
-
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
- ISFP:
-
International Society of Fertility Preservation
- CSRM:
-
Chinese Society of Reproductive Medicine
- AYA:
-
Adolescents and young adults
- PAR:
-
Posthumous-assisted reproduction
- IVF:
-
In vitro fertilization
- SSCs:
-
Spermatagonial stem cells
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stromal cells
- ESCs:
-
Embryonic stem cells
- iPSCs:
-
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
- PGCs:
-
Primordial germ cells
References
Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K, Beck LN, Brennan LV, Oktay K. American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2917–31. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5888.
Reproductive Medicine Branch of Chinese Medical Association. 生育力保存中国专家共识 [Chinese Expert Consensus on Fertility Preservation]. 生殖医学杂志, 2021;30(9), 1129–1134. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2021.09.002.
Chinese Male Fertility Preservation Consensus Writing Committee. 中国男性生育力保存专家共识 [Chinese Consensus on Male Fertility Preservation]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, (2021);41(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20200831-00469.
Fertility Preservation Committee of Chinese Maternal and Child Association. 女性生育力保存临床实践中国专家共识 [Chinese Expert Consensus on Clinical Practice of Female Fertility Preservation]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, (2021);41(5), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20210228-00092.
China National Bureau of Statistics. 中国统计年鉴 [China Statistical Yearbook]. China Statistics Press, 2021.
Chen, W. 中国的低生育率与三孩政策-基于第七次全国人口普查数据的分析[China’s Low Fertility and the Three-child Policy: Analysis Based on the Data of the Severth], 人口与经济, (2021);5, 25–35. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=RKJJ202105003&DbName=CJFQ2021. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
Chen, W., Duan, YY. 中国近10年来的生育水平与趋势 [Recent Levels and Trends of Fertility in China]. 人口研究, (2019);43(1), 3–17. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=RKYZ201901001&DbName=CJFQ2019. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/20/content_5626190.htm. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-01/11/content_5032116.htm. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
Zhang JW, Chen YH, Hao CF, Liang SJ, and Zhang CL. 河南省育龄期女性生育力现状及不孕症发生情况调查 [Investigation on fertility status and incidence of infertility among women of childbearing age in Henan Province]. 医药论坛杂志, (2021);42(24), 81–84. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=HYYX202124019&DbName=DKFX2021. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
Li YN. 辽宁省育龄女性生育力下降现况调查及体外受精-胚胎移植女性卵巢储备功能与妊娠结局预测模型的建立 [Investigation on the current status of fertility decline in women of childbearing age in Liaoning Province and establishment of a predictive model for ovarian reserve and pregnancy outcome of in vitro fertilization - embryo transfer]. 中国医科大学, (2019). https://doi.org/10.27652/d.cnki.gzyku.2021.000132.
Li X, Li Y, Shao J, Shao Y, and Huang ZL. 中国有生育力男性精子浓度35年变化趋势分析 [Trend of change in sperm concentration in Chinese fertile males from 1984 to 2019]. 中华男科学杂志, (2021);27(7), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.13263/j.cnki.nja.2021.07.012.
Huang C, Li B, Kongrong Xu, Liu D, Jing Hu, Yang Y, Nie H, Fan L, Zhu W. Decline in semen quality among 30,636 young Chinese men from 2001 to 2015. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):83-88.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.035.
http://www.nhc.gov.cn/fys/s3582/202105/0cf528f318f84eafaf19b6e18ac2c44f.shtml. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
https://csrm.sciconf.cn/cn/web/index. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590.
Close AG, Dreyzin A, Miller KD, Seynnaeve BKN, Rapkin LB. Adolescent and young adult oncology-past, present, and future. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(6):485–96. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21585.
Liang XY, Fang C, Li JJ, Li TT, Li ZM, Xie XM, Wang X, Liu XK, and Yao HR. 中国女性肿瘤患者生育力保护及保存专家共识 [Expert Consensus on Fertility Preservation of Female Tumor Patients in China]. 中国肿瘤临床, (2020);47(5), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2020.05.051.
ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(4):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa052.
Martinez F, Andersen CY, Barri PN, Brannigan R, Cobo A, Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Evers JLH, Feki A, Goddijn M, Gracia C, Kim S, Meirow D, Patrizio P, Pellicer A, Picton H, Rosen M, de Sutter P, Veiga A, Wallace H. Update on fertility preservation from the Barcelona International Society for Fertility Preservation-ESHRE-ASRM 2015 expert meeting: indications, results and future perspectives. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(9):1802-1811.e2. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex218.
Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, Quinn GP, Reinecke J, Taylor HS, Wallace WH, Wang ET, Loren AW. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14(6):381–5. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00160.
Stoop D, Cobo A, Silber S. Fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline. The Lancet. 2014;384(9950):1311–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61261-7.
Goossens E, Jahnukainen K, Mitchell R, van Pelt A, Pennings G, Rives N, Poels J., Wyns C, Lane S, Rodriguez-Wallberg K, Rives A, Valli-Pulaski H, Steimer S, Kliesch S, Braye A, Andres M, Medrano J, Ramos L, Kristensen S, … Stukenborg J. Fertility preservation in boys: recent developments and new insights. Human Reproduction Open, (2020);2020(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa016.
Anderson RA, Mitchell RT, Kelsey TW, Spears N, Telfer EE, Wallace WHB. Cancer treatment and gonadal function: experimental and established strategies for fertility preservation in children and young adults. In The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology. Lancet Publ Group. 2015;3(7):556–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00039-X.
Demeestere I, Ferster A. Fertility preservation counselling for childhood cancer survivors. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(3):329–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30065-6.
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Green DM, Loeffen EAH, Hudson MM, Loonen J, Yu R., Ginsberg JP, Mitchell RT, Byrne J, Skinner R, Anazodo A, Constine LS, de Vries A, Jahnukainen K, Lorenzo A, Meissner A, Nahata L, Dinkelman-Smit M, … Verhaak C. Fertility preservation for male patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol, (2021);22(2), e57-e67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30582-9.
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, Hudson MM, van Santen HM, Loeffen E.A.H, Burns KC, Quinn GP, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Byrne J, Haupt R, Wallace WH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Anazodo A, Anderson RA, Barnbrock A, Beck JD, Bos AME, Demeestere I, Denzer C, … Verhaak C. Fertility preservation for female patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol, (2021);22(2), e45-e56.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30594-5
Mulder RL, Font-Gonzalez A, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Quinn GP, Ginsberg JP, Loeffen E, Hudson MM, Burns KC, van Santen H M, Berger C, Diesch T, Dirksen U, Giwercman A, Gracia C, Hunter SE, Kelvin JF, Klosky JL, Laven J, Lockart BA, Neggers S, … PanCareLIFE Consortium. Communication and ethical considerations for fertility preservation for patients with childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: recommendations from the PanCareLIFE Consortium and the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol, (2021);22(2), e68–e80.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30595-7
ASRM. Access to fertility treatment irrespective of marital status, sexual orientation, or gender identity: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(2):326–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.034.
De WG, Dondorp W, Shenfield F, Barri P, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis B, v Provoost, & G Pennings. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 23: medically assisted reproduction in singles, lesbian and gay couples, and transsexual people. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(9):1859–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu183.
Donnez J, Dolmans MM, Demylle D, Jadoul P, Pirard C, Squifflet J, Martinez-Madrid B, and A Van Langendonckt. Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet, (2004)354, 1405–1410. www.thelancet.com. Accessed 22 Sep 2022.
Sun NX, Li ZY, Pang WJ, Wang L, and Li W. 中国首例卵巢组织冷冻移植活产2年随访 [Live birth after transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue with two-year follow-tup: report of the first Chinese case]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, (2021);41(11), 1026–1030. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20210719-00312.
Dolmans MM, Falcone T, Patrizio P. Importance of patient selection to analyze in vitro fertilization outcome with transplanted cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):279–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.050.
Grynberg M, Sonigo C, Santulli P. Fertility preservation in women. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):400. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1715731.
Salama M, Anazodo A, Woodruff TK, Woodruff TK, Watkins Professor of Obstetrics TJ. Preserving fertility in female patients with hematological malignancies: a multidisciplinary oncofertility approach. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(11):1760–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz284/5550673.
Dolmans MM, Luyckx V, Donnez J, Andersen CY, Greve T. Risk of transferring malignant cells with transplanted frozen-thawed ovarian tissue. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1514–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.027.
Hargreave M, Jensen A, Hansen MK, Dehlendorff C, Winther JF, Schmiegelow K, Kjær SK. Association between fertility treatment and cancer risk in children. JAMA. 2019;322(22):2203–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.18037.
Zhang Y, Gao R, Chen H, Xu W, Yang Y, Zeng X, Sun X, Zhang S, Hu X, Qin L. The association between fertility treatments and the incidence of paediatric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2020;138:133–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.001.
Qin N, Zhou Z, Zhao W, Zou K, Shi W, Yu C, Liu X, Dong Z, Mao Y, Liu X, Sheng J, Ding G, Wu Y, Huang H. Abnormal glucose metabolism in male mice offspring conceived by in vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9(9):637781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.637781.
Guo XY, Liu XM, Jin L, Wang TT, Ullah K, Sheng JZ, Huang HF. Cardiovascular and metabolic profiles of offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(3):622-631.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.007.
Magnusson Å, Laivuori H, Loft A, Oldereid NB, Pinborg A, Petzold M, Romundstad LB, Söderström-Anttila V, Bergh C. The association between high birth weight and long-term outcomes - implications for assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2021;23(9):675775. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.675775.
Norrman E, Petzold M, Clausen TD, Henningsen AK, Opdahl S, Pinborg A, Rosengren A, Bergh C, Wennerholm UB. Type 1 diabetes in children born after assisted reproductive technology: a register-based national cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(1):221–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez227.
Rissanen E, Gissler M, Lehti V, Tiitinen A. The risk of psychiatric disorders among Finnish ART and spontaneously conceived children: Finnish population-based register study. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;29(8):1155–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01433-2.
ASRM. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.028.
Zhang Y, Diao FY, and Liu JY. 人类“卵子库”建设述评 [Commentary on the construction of human "egg bank" in China]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2022;42(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20211130-00530.
Trawick E, Sampson A, Goldman K, Campo-Engelstein L, Caplan A, Keefe DL, Quinn GP. Posthumous assisted reproduction policies among a cohort of United States’ in vitro fertilization clinics. F&S Reports. 2020;1(2):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.005.
ASRM. Posthumous retrieval and use of gametes or embryos: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.002.
Wang LQ.论美国法上死后生殖孩子的利益保护及其对我国的启示 [Study on the protection of the interests of the children born by posthumously reproduction in the U.S. and its enlightenment to China]. 医学与社会, (2020);33(10), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.13723/j.yxysh.2020.10.027.
Li L, and Shen YR. 死后人工生殖的伦理思考 [Ethical thinking of postmortem artificial reproduction]. 医学与哲学, (2021);42(15), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2021.15.08.
ASRM. Compassionate transfer: patient requests for embryo transfer for nonreproductive purposes. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(1):62–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.013.
Brinster RL, Zimmermannt JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:11298–302.
Murdock MH, David S, Swinehart IT, Reing JE, Tran K, Gassei K, Orwig KE, Badylak SF. Human testis extracellular matrix enhances human spermatogonial stem cell survival in vitro. Tissue Eng. 2019;25(7–8):663–76. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0147.
Kitamura SY, Ikeda S, Minami N, Yamada M, Imai H. Long-term culture of undifferentiated spermatogonia isolated from immature and adult bovine testes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2018;85(3):236–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22958.
Tian J, Ma K, Pei C-B, Zhang SH, Li X, Zhou Y, Yan B, Wang HY, Ma LH. Relative safety of various spermatogenic stem cell purification methods for application in spermatogenic stem cell transplantation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):382. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1481-9.
de Chiara L, Famulari ES, Fagoonee S, van Daalen SKM, Buttiglieri S, Revelli A, Tolosano E, Silengo L, van Pelt AMM, and Altruda F. Characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the testis. Stem Cells International, (2018);2018.https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4910304
Shlush E, Maghen L, Swanson S, Kenigsberg S, Moskovtsev S, Barretto T, Gauthier-Fisher A, Librach CL. In vitro generation of Sertoli-like and haploid spermatid-like cells from human umbilical cord perivascular cells. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-017-0491-8.
Nayernia K, Lee JH, Drusenheimer N, Nolte J, Wulf G, Dressel R, Gromoll J, Engel W. Derivation of male germ cells from bone marrow stem cells. Lab Invest. 2006;86(7):654–63. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700429.
Makoolati Z, Movahedin M, Forouzandeh-Moghadam M, Naghdi M, Koruji M. Embryonic stem cell derived germ cells induce spermatogenesis after transplantation into the testes of an adult mouse azoospermia model. Clin Sci. 2017;131(18):2381–95. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20171074.
Nayernia K, Nolte J, Michelmann HW, Lee JH, Rathsack K, Drusenheimer N, Dev A, Wulf G, Ehrmann IE, Elliott DJ, Okpanyi V, Zechner U, Haaf T, Meinhardt A, Engel W. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Dev Cell. 2006;11(1):125–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.010.
Mishra S, Kacin E, Stamatiadis P, Franck S, van der Jeught M, Mertes H, Pennings G, Sutter D, Sermon K, Heindryckx B, Geens M. The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2018;24(4):173–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay007/4872633.
Hayashi K, Ogushi S, Kurimoto K, Shimamoto S, Ohta H, Saitou M. Offspring from oocytes derived from in vitro primordial germ cell-like cells in mice. Science. 2012;338(6109):971–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1226889.
Panula S, Medrano JV, Kee K, Bergström R, Nguyen HN, Byers B, Wilson KD, Wu JC, Simon C, Hovatta O, Pera RAR. Human germ cell differentiation from fetal- and adult-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Human Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):752–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq520.
Hikabe O, Hamazaki N, Nagamatsu G, Obata Y, Hirao Y, Hamada N, Shimamoto S, Imamura T, Nakashima K, Saitou M, Hayashi K. Reconstitution in vitro of the entire cycle of the mouse female germ line. Nature. 2016;539(7628):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20104.
Zeng M, Sheng X, Keefe DL, Liu L. Reconstitution of ovarian function following transplantation of primordial germ cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01648-w.
Acknowledgements
My sincere and hearty thanks and appreciations go firstly to my supervisor, Prof. Mao, whose suggestions and encouragement have given me much insight into these studies. It has been a great privilege and joy to study under his guidance and supervision. Moreover, I wish to extend my thanks to the library and the electronic reading room for their providing much useful information for my thesis. Finally, I also want to thank to all the people who help me, care about me and wish me for the best. The achievement of the thesis belongs to us, testifying our cooperation, our diligence, persistence, and perpetual friendship.
Funding
This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81671535), National Science and technology support program project (2013BAI04B05), Jiangsu Key Discipline of Human Assisted Reproduction Medicine Foundation (FXK202149), and Jiangsu Key Discipline of Medicine Foundation of Commission of Health (ZDB2020007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This study was completed under the guidance of Prof. Shucheng Lu and Prof. Caiping Mao. Prof. Lu paid for the publication, and Prof. Mao provided research funds. Jiakai Zhang, Lun Wei and Xiaoling Deng wrote the main manuscript text. Chao Luo and Qianmeng Zhu prepared figures and tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jiakai Zhang, Lun Wei, and Xiaoling Deng have contributed equally to this work and share the first authorship.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Wei, L., Deng, X. et al. Current status and reflections on fertility preservation in China. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 2835–2845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02648-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02648-0