Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of embryo retention during embryo transfer on IVF outcomes

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Propose

To investigate embryo retention (ER) rate in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on reproductive outcomes in a large database.

Methods

A matched retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic hospital-based reproductive center. A total of 15,321 ET cycles were performed from January 2008 to December 2018. Each woman was matched with three separate control subjects of the same age (± 1 year), embryo condition, main causes of infertility, and type of protocol used for fresh or frozen ET cycles. The main outcomes were ER rate, and implantation, clinical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and live birth rates.

Results

The overall incidence of ER was 1.4% (213/15,321). There was no difference in the rate of ER rate in fresh ET cycles compared with frozen transfer cycles (P = 0.54). We matched 188/213 (88%) of cases in the ER group to 564 non-ER cases. There were no cases of the blood in the catheter seen in the ER group. Pregnancy outcomes were similar between the ER and the non-ER cycles: clinical pregnancy rate (31.3% vs. 36.1%, P = 0.29), implantation rate (26.2% vs. 31.3%, P = 0.2), live birth rate (20.3% vs. 24%, P = 0.53), ectopic pregnancy rate (0.5% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.18), and miscarriage rate (10.7% vs. 11.3%, P = 0.53).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that ER rate does not affect the reproductive outcomes including clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate. Patients and physicians should not be concerned about the retention of embryos during transfer since there is no effect on pregnancy outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansour RT, Aboulghar MA. Optimizing the embryo transfer technique. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1149–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.5.1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Neithardt AB, Segars JH, Hennessy S, James AN, McKeeby JL. Embryo after-loading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:710–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Poindexter AN, et al. Residual embryos in failed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:262–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Visser DS, Fourie FL, Kruger HF. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: effect on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1993;10:37–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nabi A, Awonuga A, Birch H, Barlow S, Stewart B. Multiple attempts at embryo transfer: does this affect in-vitro fertilization treatment outcome? Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1188–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee HC, Seifer DB, Shelden RM. Impact of retained embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:334–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silberstein, T. Trimarchi JR, Shackelton R, Weitzen S, Frankfurter D, Plosker S. Ultrasound-guided mid-uterine cavity embryo transfer is associated with a decreased incidence of retained embryos in the transfer catheter. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1510–1512.

  8. Tur-Kaspa I, et al. Difficult or repeated sequential embryo transfers do not adversely afect in-vitro fertilization pregnancy rates or outcome. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2452–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubilay Vicdan, Ahmet Zeki Işık, Cem Akarsu, Eran Sözen, Gamze Çağlar, Bihter Dingiloğlu, Görkem Tuncay, The effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcome in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2007;134:79–82, ISSN 0301-2115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.01.011.

  10. Alvero R, Hearns-Stokes RM, Catherino WH, Leondires MP, Segars JH. The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1848–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jian Xu, Min-Na Yin, Zhi-Heng Chen, Li Yang, De- Sheng Ye, Ling Sun. Embryo retention significantly decreases clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate: a matched retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2020;114:0015–0282.

  12. Oraif A, Hollet-Caines J, Feyles V, Rebel M, Abduljabar H. Do multiple attempts at embryo transfer affect clinical pregnancy rates? J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:406–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yi HJ, Koo HS, Cha SH, Kim HO, Park CW, Song IO. Reproductive outcomes of retransferring retained embryos in blastocyst transfer cycles. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2016;43:133–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: fertility and genetics beyond 1999. UK: Parthenon Publishing Carnforth; 1999. p. 378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cruz JR, Dubey AK, Patel J, Peak D, Hartog B, Gindoff PR. Is blastocyst transfer useful as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple in vitro fertilization failures? Fertil Steril. 1999;72:218–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Einav Kadour-Peero, Togas Tulandi, Ido Feferkorn, Ranit Hiszkiahu & William Buckett

  2. MUHC Reproductive Center, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Einav Kadour-Peero, Togas Tulandi, Ido Feferkorn, Ranit Hiszkiahu & William Buckett

Authors
  1. Einav Kadour-Peero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Togas Tulandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ido Feferkorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ranit Hiszkiahu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William Buckett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Einav Kadour-Peero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kadour-Peero, E., Tulandi, T., Feferkorn, I. et al. Effects of embryo retention during embryo transfer on IVF outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 39, 1065–1068 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02450-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02450-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation