Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embryo morphokinetic score is associated with biomarkers of developmental competence and implantation

  • Embryo Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study embryo morphokinetics in relation to release in spent media of molecules with possible roles in development and implantation (miR-20a, miR-30c, and sHLA-G).

Methods

Data were obtained from embryos generated in standard IVF and ICSI cycles. The Eeva system was used for embryo assessment, based on early morphokinetic parameters and producing a score (1–5, best–worst) corresponding to higher/medium/lower chances of development to blastocyst. miRNAs — mm miR-20a-5p and miR-30c-5p — and sHLA-G were quantified in 25 μl of spent blastocyst media (SBM) collected before vitrification or transfer. Statistical analyses were performed applying Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Shapiro-Wilk, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient tests, where appropriate.

Results

SBM were collected from a total of 172 viable blastocysts. Their analysis showed that concentration of miR-20a was progressively lower as Eeva score increased and probability of development to blastocyst decreased (P = 0.016). The opposite trend was observed in the case of miR-30c, i.e., concentration was higher as score increased and chances of development to blastocyst decreased (P = 0.004). Analysis of sHLA-G revealed a negative correlation with Eeva score, i.e., levels were progressively lower as Eeva score increased and probability of development to blastocyst decreased (R = − 0.388, N = 141, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that morphokinetic algorithms that predict development to blastocyst stage, in fact, also identify embryos with molecular and cellular profiles more consistent with developmental functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsøe KM, Ramsing NB, Remoh J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2658–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Basile N, Nogales MDC, Bronet F, Florensa M, Riqueiros M, Rodrigo L, et al. Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:699–704.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, García Velasco JA, Remohí J, et al. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithmfor embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:276–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubio I, Kuhlmann R, Agerholm I, Kirk J, Herrero J, Escribá MJ, et al. Limited implantation success of direct-cleaved human zygotes: a time-lapse study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1458–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petersen BM, Boel M, Montag M, Gardner DK. Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2231–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirkegaard K, Campbell A, Agerholm I, Bentin-Ley U, Gabrielsen A, Kirk J, et al. Limitations of a time-lapse blastocyst prediction model: a large multicentre outcome analysis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:156–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, Le Clef N, et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology†. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coticchio G, Renzini MM, Novara PV, Lain M, De Ponti E, Turchi D, et al. Focused time-lapse analysis reveals novel aspects of human fertilization and suggests new parameters of embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:23–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McCoy RC, Newnham LJ, Ottolini CS, Hoffmann ER, Chatzimeletiou K, Cornejo OE, et al. Tripolar chromosome segregation drives the association between maternal genotype at variants spanning PLK4 and aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:2573–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagalla C, Tarozzi N, Sciajno R, Wells D, Di Santo M, Nadalini M, et al. Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2017;34:137–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008

  11. Conaghan J, Chen AA, Willman SP, Ivani K, Chenette PE, Boostanfar R, et al. Improving embryo selection using a computer-automated time-lapse image analysis test plus day 3 morphology: Results from a prospective multicenter trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:412–419.e5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Giancani A, Alviggi E, Dusi L, Canipari R, et al. Definition and validation of a custom protocol to detect miRNAs in the spent media after blastocyst culture: Searching for biomarkers of implantation. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1746–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nowak I, Wilczyńska K, Radwan P, Wiśniewski A, Krasiński R, Radwan M, et al. Association of Soluble HLA-G Plasma Level and HLA-G Genetic Polymorphism With Pregnancy Outcome of Patients Undergoing in vitro Fertilization Embryo Transfer. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2982.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodríguez Díaz R, Blanes Zamora R, Vaca Sánchez R, González Pérez J, Alberto Bethencourt JC. Embryo sHLA-G secretion is related to pregnancy rate. Zygote. Cambridge University Press. 2019;27:78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzo R, Vercammen M, Van De Velde H, Horn PA, Rebmann V. The importance of HLA-G expression in embryos, trophoblast cells, and embryonic stem cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2011;68:341–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuzzi B, Rizzo R, Criscuoli L, Noci I, Melchiorri L, Scarselli B, et al. HLA-G expression in early embryos is a fundamental prerequisite for the obtainment of pregnancy. Eur J Immunol. 2002;32:311–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zacà C, Bazzocchi A, Pennetta F, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, Borini A. Cumulative live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2018;110:703–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028218304138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lagalla C, Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Tarozzi N, Zacà C, Borini A. Alternative patterns of partial embryo compaction: prevalence, morphokinetic history and possible implications. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2020;40:347–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.011

  19. Liu Y, Chapple V, Roberts P, Matson P. Prevalence, consequence, and significance of reverse cleavage by human embryos viewed with the use of the embryoscope time-lapse video system. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1295–1300.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Campbell AJ, Fishel SB, Duffy S, Montgomery S. Embryo selection model defined using morphokinetic data from human embryos to predict implantation and live birth. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CFL. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:477–85.

  22. Tejera A, Castelló D, de los Santos JM, Pellicer A, Remohí J, Meseguer M. Combination of metabolism measurement and a time-lapse system provides an embryo selection method based on oxygen uptake and chronology of cytokinesis timing. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:119–126.e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gebert LFR, MacRae IJ. Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:21–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salas-Huetos A, James ER, Aston KI, Jenkins TG, Carrell DT, Yeste M. The Expression of miRNAs in human ovaries, oocytes, extracellular vesicles, and early embryos: a systematic review. Cells. 2019;8:1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan S, Schuster A, Tang C, Yu T, Ortogero N, Bao J, et al. Sperm-borne miRNAs and endo-siRNAs are important for fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development. Dev. 2016;143:635–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Noli L, Khalaf Y, Farcomeni A, et al. MicroRNAs in spent blastocyst culture medium are derived from trophectoderm cells and can be explored for human embryo reproductive competence assessment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:225–235.e3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Foshay KM, Gallicano GI. miR-17 family miRNAs are expressed during early mammalian development and regulate stem cell differentiation. Dev Biol [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;326:431–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.11.016

  28. Lin X, Beckers E, Mc Cafferty S, Gansemans Y, Joanna Szymańska K, Chaitanya Pavani K, et al. Bovine embryo-secreted microRNA-30c is a potential non-invasive biomarker for hampered preimplantation developmental competence. Front Genet [Internet]. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 14];10:315. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2019.00315/full.

  29. Nilsson LL, Djurisic S, Hviid TVF. Controlling the immunological crosstalk during conception and pregnancy: HLA-G in reproduction. Front Immunol. 2014;5:198.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sher G, Keskintepe L, Nouriani M, Roussev R, Batzofin J. Expression of sHLA-G in supernatants of individually cultured 46-h embryos: a potentially valuable indicator of “embryo competency” and IVF outcome. Reprod BioMed Online. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. 2004;9:74–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yie SM, Balakier H, Motamedi G, Librach CL. Secretion of human leukocyte antigen-G by human embryos is associated with a higher in vitro fertilization pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:30–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Noci I, Fuzzi B, Rizzo R, Melchiorri L, Criscuoli L, Dabizzi S, et al. Embryonic soluble HLA-G as a marker of developmental potential in embryos. Hum Reprod. Oxford University Press. 2005;20:138–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rebmann V, Switala M, Eue I, Grosse-Wilde H. Soluble HLA-G is an independent factor for the prediction of pregnancy outcome after ART: a German multi-centre study. Hum Reprod. Oxford University Press. 2010;25:1691–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kotze D, Kruger TF, Lombard C, Padayachee T, Keskintepe L, Sher G. The effect of the biochemical marker soluble human leukocyte antigen G on pregnancy outcome in assisted reproductive technology - a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by Merck Serono S.p.A., Italy, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Coticchio.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Giovanna Orlando is no longer an employee of Merck Serono S.p.A., Rome, Italy.

Merck Serono S.p.A. is an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 130 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coticchio, G., Pennetta, F., Rizzo, R. et al. Embryo morphokinetic score is associated with biomarkers of developmental competence and implantation. J Assist Reprod Genet 38, 1737–1743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02162-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02162-9

Keywords

Navigation