Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the current percentage of United States (U.S.) assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics offering sex selection via pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) for non-medical purposes.

Methods

The authors conducted website review and telephone interview survey of 493 U.S. ART clinics performing in vitro fertilization (IVF) in 2017. Main outcome measures were pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS)/pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) practices and non-medical sex selection practices including family balancing.

Results

Of the 493 ART clinics in the USA, 482 clinics (97.8%) responded to our telephone interview survey. Among all U.S. ART clinics, 91.9% (n = 449) reported offering PGS and/or PGD. Furthermore, 476 clinics responded to survey questions about sex selection practices. Of those ART clinics, 72.7% (n = 346) reported offering sex selection. More specifically among those clinics offering sex selection, 93.6% (n = 324) reported performing sex selection for family balancing, and 81.2% (n = 281) reported performing for elective purposes (patient preference, regardless of rationale for the request). For couples without infertility, 83.5% (n = 289) of clinics offer sex selection for family balancing and 74.6% (n = 258) for non-specific elective reasons.

Conclusions

The majority of U.S. ART clinics offer non-medical sex selection, a percentage that has increased substantially since last reported in 2006.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baruch S, Kaufman D, Hudson KL. Genetic testing of embryos: practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1053–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hens K, Dondorp WJ, Geraedts JP, de Wert GM. Comprehensive embryo testing: experts' opinions regarding future directions: an expert panel study on comprehensive embryo testing. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1418–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, Sikkema-Raddatz B, Korevaar JC, Verhoeve HR, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Use of reproductive technology for sex selection for nonmedical reasons. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1418–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Committee on Ethics American College of Obstetricians, Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 360: sex selection. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:475–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2015 fertility clinic success rates report: data clinic tables and data dictionary. Atlanta: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2014 assisted reproductive technology fertility clinic success rates report. Atlanta: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2016. Report No.: GS-23F-8144H.

  8. Fertility Authority. Fertility Clinics by State. New York: Progyny Inc.; 2017. Available at: https://www.fertilityauthority.com/clinics/bystate. Accessed 15 June 2017.

  9. Infertility Resources. Lafayette: Internet Health Resources Company; 1996–2017. Available at: http://www.ihr.com/infertility/provider/fertility-ivf-clinics.html. Accessed 17 June 2017.

  10. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Preliminary Clinic Summary Report. 2015. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2015. Accessed 25 June 2017.

  11. U.S. Census Bureau. Geographic areas reference manual. 1994. Available at: https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/garm.html. Accessed 15 June 2017.

  12. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010 Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria. Available at: https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html. Accessed 15 June 2017.

  13. U.S. Census Bureau. Census 2000 Urban and Rural Classification. Available at: https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2000.html. Accessed 15 June 2017.

  14. Census Viewer. Census 2010 and 2000 Interactive Maps, Demographics, Statistics, Quick Facts. Eugene: Moonshadow Mobile Inc.; 2016. Available at: http://censusviewer.com/free-maps-and-data-links/. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.

  15. Census.gov. Geography atlas: regions. Washington: United States Census Bureau. Available at: https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/webatlas/regions.html. Accessed 25 June 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emory University School of Medicine, 1648 Pierce Drive NE, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA

    Sarah M. Capelouto & Sydney R. Archer

  2. Emory University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Glenn Building, 4th Floor, 69 Jesse Hill Jr. Drive SE, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA

    Jerrine R. Morris

  3. Emory University Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Emory Reproductive Center, 550 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1800, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA

    Jennifer F. Kawwass & Heather S. Hipp

Authors
  1. Sarah M. Capelouto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sydney R. Archer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jerrine R. Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer F. Kawwass
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heather S. Hipp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah M. Capelouto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capelouto, S.M., Archer, S.R., Morris, J.R. et al. Sex selection for non-medical indications: a survey of current pre-implantation genetic screening practices among U.S. ART clinics. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 409–416 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1076-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-1076-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation