Abstract
The rockweed Ascophyllum nodosum is a dominant component of intertidal communities across the North Atlantic Ocean, providing both habitat and primary productivity to nearshore ecosystems. Commercial exploitation of this species is widespread and typically involves cutting the distal portion of fronds thereby permitting regrowth by lateral branching and generation of new fronds from the perennial holdfast. Two key management parameters for determining the sustainability of this resource are the cutting height and the recovery period between successive harvests. Here, we assess the influence of these two parameters on several indicators of exploitation, including harvested biomass, remaining biomass, annual harvest yield, and biomass recovery. Over a 28-year period, treatments of two levels of cutting height (15 and 30 cm) and five levels of recovery period (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years) were applied to individual 25-m2 plots. This study provides unique observations of the long-term impacts of different management scenarios on Ascophyllum biomass. In general, indicators were lower for shorter recovery periods of 1 and 2 years. Surprisingly, longer recovery periods of 4 and 5 years rarely increased indicators, suggesting that a 3-year recovery period maximizes harvested biomass. Moreover, a longer cutting height did not consistently result in increased indicators, and indeed, the 15-cm cutting height often provided higher values (e.g., annual harvest rates), than the 30-cm cutting height, especially at longer recovery periods. Other impacts of harvesting beyond effects on biomass (e.g., reproductive capacity, canopy structure, scale of harvested areas) were not measured but are discussed and merit further investigation to better determine harvesting regulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baardseth E (1955) Regrowth of Ascophyllum nodosum after harvesting. Institute for Industrial Research and Standards, Dublin
Baardseth E (1970) Synopsis of biological data on knobbed wrack Ascophyllum nodosum (Linneaus) Le Jolis. FAO Fisheries Synopsis. No. 38
Bertness MD, Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Silliman BR (2002) Do alternate stable community states exist in the Gulf of Maine rocky intertidal zone? Ecology 83:3434–3448
Bertness MD, Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Silliman BR (2004a) Do alternate stable community states exist in the Gulf of Maine rocky intertidal zone? Reply. Ecology 85:1165–1167
Bertness MD, Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Silliman BR, Crain CM (2004b) Consumer-controlled community states on Gulf of Maine rocky shores. Ecology 85:1321–1331
Cervin G, Lindegarth M, Viejo R, Åberg P (2004) Effects of small-scale disturbances of canopy and grazing on intertidal assemblages on the Swedish west coast. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 302:35–49
Chapman VJ (1950) Seaweeds and their uses. Methuen & Co. Ltd., London
Cousens R (1981) The population biology of Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis. Dissertation, Dalhousie University
Cousens R (1982) Popular misconceptions about Acophyllum nodosum and their effect on the interpretation of its population dynamics from existing data. Br Phycol J 17:231
Cousens R (1984) Estimation of annual production by the intertidal brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis. Bot Mar 27:217–227
Cousens R (1985) Frond size distributions and the effects of the algal canopy on the behavior of Ascophyllum nodosum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 92(2-3):231–249
de Virville D (1953) Dépeuplement de la flore marine sur les côtes occidentales du Cotentin. Proc 1st Intl Seaweed Symp 1:26-28
DFO (1998) Rockweed (Ascophyllum nodosum). DFO Sci Stock Status Report C3-57(1988)
DFO (1999) The impact of rockweed harvest on the habitat of southwest New Brunswick. DFO Maritimes Regional Habitat Status Report 99/2E
Dudgeon S, Kübler JE, Wright WA, Vadas RL, Petraitis PS (2001) Natural variability in zygote dispersal of Ascophyllum nodosum at small spatial scales. Funct Ecol 15:595–604
Dudgeon S, Petraitis PS (2001) Scale-dependent recruitment and divergence of intertidal communities. Ecology 82:991–1006
Dudgeon S, Petraitis PS (2005) First year demography of the foundation species, Ascophyllum nodosum, and its community implications. Oikos 109:405–415
Fegley JC (2001) Ecological implications of rockweed, Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis, harvesting. Dissertation, University of Maine
Garbary DJ, Galway ME, Halat L (2016) Response to Ugarte et al.: Ascophyllum (Phaeophyceae) annually contributes over 100% of its vegetative biomass to detritus. Phycologia 56:116–118
Gendron L, Bergeron P (1985) Développement d'une méthode d'estimation de la biomasse d'A. nodosum restant au sol après une récolte à partir des mesures de la circonférence des plants coupés. Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec. Direction de la recherche scientifique et technique, Document de recherche 85/06
Gendron L, Bergeron P, Gosselin L (1988) Détermination d'un niveau de récolte admissible de l'algue brune Ascophyllum nodosum sur la rive sud de l'estuaire du St-Laurent (Anse-au-Persil, Saint-Fabien-sur-Mer et Métis). CSCPCA Document de recherche 88/15
Golléty C (2008) Fonctionnement (métabolisme et réseau trophique) d’un système intertidal rocheux abrité, la zone à Ascophyllum nodosum, relation avec la biodiversité algale et animale. Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Dissertation
Golléty C, Riera P, Davoult D (2010) Complexity of the food web structure of the Ascophyllum nodosum zone evidenced by a δ13C and δ15N study. J Sea Res 64:304–312
Guiry MD, Morrison L (2013) The sustainable harvesting of Ascophyllum nodosum (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae) in Ireland, with notes on the collection and use of some other brown algae. J Appl Phycol 25:1823–1830
Halat L, Galway ME, Gitto S, Garbary DJ (2015) Epidermal shedding in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae): seasonality, productivity and relationship to harvesting. Phycologia 54:599–608
Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–201
Ingólfsson A, Hawkins SJ (2008) Slow recovery from disturbance: a 20-year study of Ascophyllum canopy clearances. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88:689–691
Jenkins SR, Norton TA, Hawkins SJ (2004) Long term effects of Ascophyllum nodosum canopy removal on mid shore community structure. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:327–329
Keser M, Vadas RL, Larson BR (1981) Regrowth of Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus under various harvesting regimes in Maine, USA. Bot Mar 24:29–38
Lazo L, Chapman ARO (1996) Effects of harvesting on Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. (Fucales, Phaeophyta): a demographic approach. J Appl Phycol 8:87–103
Miller SL, Vadas RL (1984) The population biology of Ascophyllum nodosum. Biological and physical factors affecting survivorship of germlings. Br Phycol J 19:198
Petraitis PS, Dudgeon SR (2015) Variation in recruitment and the establishment of alternative community states. Ecology 96:3186–3196
Petraitis PS, Methratta ET (2006) Using patterns of variability to test for multiple community states on rocky intertidal shores. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338:222–232
Petraitis PS, Methratta ET, Rhile EC, Vidargas NA, Dudgeon SR (2009) Experimental confirmation of multiple community states in a marine ecosystem. Oecologia 161:139–148
Pielou EC (1981) Rapid estimation of the standing crop of intertidal fucoids on an exposed shore. J Environ Manag 13:81–94
Printz H (1956) Recuperation and recolonization of Ascophyllum. Proc 2nd Intl Seaweed Symp 2:194-197
Printz H (1959) Investigations of the failure of recuperation and repopulation in cropped Ascophyllum areas. Avh Norske Vidensk Akad I Mat-Naturv Klasse 3:3–15
Rangeley RW, Kramer DL (1998) Density-dependent antipredator tactics and habitat selection in juvenile pollock. Ecology 79:943–952
Seeley RH, Schlesinger WH (2012) Sustainable seaweed cutting ? The rockweed (Ascophyllum nodosum) industry of Maine and the Maritime Provinces. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1249:84–103
Seip KL (1980) A computational model for growth and harvesting of the marine alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Ecol Model 8:189–199
Sharp GJ (1981) An assessment of Ascophyllum nodosum harvesting methods in southwestern Nova Scotia. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1012
Sharp GJ, Pringle JD (1990) Ecological impact of marine plant harvesting in the northwest Atlantic: a review. Hydrobiologia 204/205:17–24
Sharp GJ, Semple RE (1991) An assessment of Ascophyllum nodosum resources in Scotia/Fundy. CAFSAC Research Document 91/52
Ugarte R, Lauzon-Guay JS, Critchley AT (2016) Comments on Halat L., Galway M.E., Gitto S. & Garbary D.J. 2015. Epidermal shedding in Ascophyllum nodosum (Phaeophyceae): seasonality, productivity and relationship to harvesting. Phycologia 54(6): 599–608. Phycologia 56:114–115
Ugarte RA, Sharp GJ (2001) A new approach to seaweed management in Eastern Canada: the case of Ascophyllum nodosum. Cah Biol Mar 42:63–70
Ugarte R, Sharp G (2012) Management and production of the brown algae Ascophyllum nodosum in the Canadian maritimes. J Appl Phycol 24:409–416
Ugarte RA, Sharp GJ, Moore B (2006) Changes in the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. plant morphology and biomass produced by cutter rake harvests in southern New Brunswick, Canada. J Appl Phycol 18:351–359
Underwood AJ (1994) On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances. Ecol Appl 4:3–15
Vadas RL, Wright WA, Beal BF (2004) Biomass and productivity of intertidal rockweeds (Ascophyllum nodosum Le Jolis) in Cobscook Bay. Northeastern Nat 11 (special issue 2):123-142
Vadas RL, Wright WA, Miller SL (1990) Recruitment of Ascophyllum nodosum: wave action as a source of mortality. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 61:263–272
Vandermeulen H (2013) Information to support assessment of stock status of commercially harvested species of marine plants in Nova Scotia: Irish moss, rockweed and kelp. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2013/042
Viejo RM, Åberg P, Cervin G, Lindegarth M (1999) The interactive effects of adult canopy, germling density and grazing on germling survival of the rockweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 187:113–120
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Acknowledgements
This work received funding from the Ministère de l’Agriculture des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec (MAPAQ), from the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and Laval University. We acknowledge the assistance of all biologists, technicians, students, and volunteers who helped with the fieldwork, especially Gilles Savard, Renée Morneau, Lucienne Chénard, Marie-France Beaulieu, and Nathalie Paille. Special thanks also to Marie-Dominique Fréchette and Brigitte Fréchette for their assistance in the field. We thank Karine Gagnon for compiling the data and Louis Gosselin for helpful discussions and his contribution to fieldwork early in the project. We also thank Hélène Crépeau and Benoît Bruneau for their advice on statistical analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gendron, L., Merzouk, A., Bergeron, P. et al. Managing disturbance: the response of a dominant intertidal seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis to different frequencies and intensities of harvesting. J Appl Phycol 30, 1877–1892 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1346-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1346-5