Abstract
The demand for seaweeds has intensified in recent decades and will most certainly continue to expand. Several methods exist to evaluate the biomass of seaweeds in the field but most of them are destructive. The objectives of this study were (1) to develop and evaluate allometric equations for estimating seaweed biomass in the field for some harvested species and (2) to provide uniform calculated dry/wet biomass ratios to estimate the relative water content of these seaweeds. Sampling and measurements of more than 350 seaweed individuals were carried out for 8 species of commercial interest. Our models were fitted for both power and linear equations and were tested for different explanatory variables. While the power equation was found to be the best for predicting biomass of all species, we found that the best descriptive biometric variable varies according to seaweed morphology. Species with a bushy morphology were best described by the volume, while long stringy species were best described by the length and flat species by the surface. This study attempts to provide nondestructive tools that could be used by professional seaweed harvesters, their employers as well as scientists and public regulators, to assess the harvest potential of a field of seaweed in a nondestructive approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Åberg P (1990) Measuring size and choosing category size for a transition matrix study of the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:281–287
Airoldi L, Balata D, Beck MW (2008) The gray zone: relationships between habitat loss and marine diversity and their applications in conservation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366:8–15
Airoldi L, Beck MW (2007) Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe. Oceanogr Mar Biol 45:345–405
Alveal K, Ponce F (1997) Determination of water content in seaweeds. Gayana Oceanol 5:1–11
Benedetti-Cecchi L, Pannacciulli F, Bulleri F, Moschella PS, Airoldi L, Cinelli F (2001) Predicting the consequences of anthropogenic disturbance: large-scale effects of loss of canopy algae on rocky shores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 214:137–150
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure J-P, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riéra B, Yamakura T (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145:87–99
Connell S, Russell B, Turner D, Shepherd SA, Kildea T, Miller D, Airoldi L, Cheshire A (2008) Recovering a lost baseline: missing kelp forests from a metropolitan coast. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 360:63–72
Engel C, Åberg P, Gaggiotti OE, Destombe C, Valero M (2001) Population dynamics and stage structure in a haploid-diploid red seaweed, Gracilaria gracilis. J Ecol 89:436–450
Estes JA, Duggins DO, Rathbun GB (1989) The ecology of extinctions in kelp forest communities. Conserv Biol 3:252–264
Gevaert F, Davoult D, Creach A, Kling R, Janquin M-A, Seuront L, Lemoine Y (2001) Carbon and nitrogen content of Laminaria saccharina in the eastern English Channel: biometrics and seasonal variations. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 81:727–734
Golléty C, Migné A, Davoult D (2008) Benthic metabolism on a sheltered rocky shore: role of the canopy in the carbon budget. J Phycol 44:1146–1153
Jonson JH, Freudenberger D (2011) Restore and sequester: estimating biomass in native Australian woodland ecosystems for their carbon-funded restoration. Aust J Bot 59:640–653
Lindgren A, Bouza N, Åberg P, Sosa PA (1998) Spatial and temporal variation in distribution of Gelidium canariensis (Rhodophyta) from natural populations of the Canary Islands. J Appl Phycol 10:273–278
Mangialajo L, Chiantore M, Cattaneo-Vietti R (2008) Loss of fucoid algae along a gradient of urbanisation, and structure of benthic assemblages. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 358:63–74
Mathieson AC, Guo Z (1992) Patterns of fucoid reproductive biomass allocation. Br Phycol J 27:271–292
Mccarthy MC, Enquist BJ (2007) Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Funct Ecol 21:713–720
Migné A, Delebecq G, Davoult D, Spilmont N, Menu D, Gevaert F (2015) Photosynthetic activity and productivity of intertidal macroalgae: in situ measurements, from thallus to community scale. Aquat Bot 123:6–12
Niklas KJ, Enquist BJ (2002) On the vegetative biomass partitioning of seed plant leaves, stems, and roots. Am Nat 159:482–497
Paul KI, Roxburgh SH, England JR, Ritson P, Hobbs T, Brooksbank K, Raison RJ, Larmour JS, Murphy S, Norris J, Neumann C, Lewis T, Jonson J, Carter JL, McArthur G, Barton C, Rose B (2013) Development and testing of allometric equations for estimating above-ground biomass of mixed-species environmental plantings. For Ecol Manag 310:483–494
Perkol-Finkel S, Airoldi L (2010) Loss and recovery potential of marine habitats: an experimental study of factors maintaining resilience in subtidal algal forests at the Adriatic Sea. PLoS ONE 5:e10791
Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50
Sack L, Grubb PJ, Marañón T (2003) The functional morphology of juvenile plants tolerant of strong summer drought in shaded forest understories in southern Spain. Plant Ecol 168:139–163
Scrosati R, DeWreede RE (1997) Dynamics of the biomass-density relationship and frond biomass inequality for Mazzaella cornucopiae (Rhodophyta, Gigartinaceae): implications for the understanding of frond interactions. Phycologia 36:506–516
Scrosati R (2005) Review of studies on biomass-density relationships (including self-thinning lines) in seaweeds: main contributions and persisting misconceptions. Phycol Res 53:224–33
Scrosati R (2006) Length–biomass allometry in primary producers: predominantly bidimensional seaweeds differ from the “universal” interspecific trend defined by microalgae and vascular plants. Can J Bot 84:1159–1166
Tait LW, Schiel DR (2011) Dynamics of productivity in naturally structured macroalgal assemblages: importance of canopy structure on light-use efficiency. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 421:97–107
Vadas RL Sr, Wright WA, Beal BF (2004) Biomass and Productivity of Intertidal Rockweeds (Ascophyllum nodosum LeJolis) in Cobscook Bay. Northeast Nat 11:123–142
Vaz-Pinto F, Martínez B, Olabarria C, Arenas F (2014) Neighbourhood competition in coexisting species: the native Cystoseira humilis vs the invasive Sargassum muticum. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 454:32–41
Warton DI, Wright IJ, Falster DS, Westoby M (2006) Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol Rev 81:259–291
Watt CA, Scrosati RA (2013) Bioengineer effects on understory species richness, diversity, and composition change along an environmental stress gradient: experimental and mensurative evidence. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 123:10–18
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all the people who helped carry out the fieldwork. Our study was funded by the ALGMARBIO project, InitiativeBioBretagne (IBB), FranceAgriMer (National Institute of Agricultural and Marine Products), the Brittany Regional Council, the Côte d’Armor Departmental Council, and the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) and benefited from the support of the French Government run by the National Research Agency and with regard to the investment expenditure programme IDEALG ANR-10-BTBR-04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stagnol, D., Macé, M., Destombe, C. et al. Allometric relationships for intertidal macroalgae species of commercial interest. J Appl Phycol 28, 3407–3411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0860-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0860-1