Abstract
The growing significance of social media in research demands new ethical standards and practices. Although a substantial body of literature on social media ethics exists, studies on the ethics of conducting research using social media are scarce. The emergence of new evidence sources, like social media, requires innovative methods and renewed consideration of research ethics. Therefore, we pose the following question: What are the defining characteristics of ethics papers on social media research? Following a modified version of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, we analyzed 34 publications based on ten variables: author gender, publication year, region, academic discipline, type, design, methodology, social media platform in focus, positionality statement, and ethical issues. Our findings suggest contemporary social media research ethics primarily reflects the ethical ideals of the Global North, with limited representation from the Global South. Women authors have published more papers than men authors. Previous studies have prioritized ethical concerns such as privacy, informed consent, and anonymity while overlooking researchers’ risks and the ethics of social media sites. We particularly emphasized the lack of researchers’ positionality statements in research. Our findings will pave the way to understanding social media ethics better, especially with the rapid growth of social media research in global scholarship.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aichner, T., & Jacob, F. (2015). Measuring the degree of corporate social media use. International Journal of Market Research, 57(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2015-018
Al Zou’bi, H. W., Khatatbeh, M., Alzoubi, K. H., Khabour, O. F., & Al-Delaimy, W. K. (2020). Attitudes and knowledge of adolescents in Jordan regarding the ethics of social media data use for research purposes. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620901390
Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications.
Andreotta, A. J., Kirkham, N., & Rizzi, M. (2021). AI, big data, and the future of consent. AI & Society, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00146-021-01262-5
Bender, J. L., Cyr, A. B., Arbuckle, L., & Ferris, L. E. (2017). Ethics and privacy implications of using the internet and social media to recruit participants for health research: A privacy-by-design framework for online recruitment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7029
Bos, N., Poole, E. S., Karahalios, K., Thomas, J. C., Musgrove-Chavez, M., & Yardi, S. (2009). Research ethics in the Facebook era: Privacy, anonymity, and oversight. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2767–2770. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520402
Boyd, D. M. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publicstaken out of context. University of California, Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.30965/9783846755778_085
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1083-6101.2007.00393.X
Buchanan, E. (2017). Considering the ethics of big data research: A case of Twitter and ISIS/ISIL. PLoS ONE, 12(12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187155
Bull, S. S., Breslin, L. T., Wright, E. E., Black, S. R., Levine, D., & Santelli, J. S. (2020). Case study: an ethics case study of hiv prevention research on Facebook: The just/us study. In A. L. Caplan & B. Parent (Eds.), The ethical challenges of emerging medical technologies (pp. 127–137). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074984-9
Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
Chen, W., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020). Big data ethics and politics: Toward new understandings. Social Science Computer Review, 38(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318810734
Chen, Y., Chen, C., & Li, S. (2022). Determining factors of participants’ attitudes toward the ethics of social media data research. Online Information Review, 46(1), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0514
Chess, S., & Shaw, A. (2015). A conspiracy of fishes, or, how we learned to stop worrying about #GamerGate and embrace hegemonic masculinity. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 59(1), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.999917
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). Positionality. In W. E. Rowe (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (pp. 1–3). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446294406.n277
Costello, E., Donlon, E., & Brown, M. (2019). Research ethics of Twitter for MOOCs. Online Learning Journal, 23(3), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i3.1564
Creswell, J. W. D., & Creswell, J. W. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Cuthill, F. (2015). Positionality’ and the researcher in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 16(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.22284/QR.2015.16.2.63
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2006). Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base. Management Decision, 44(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610650201
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage Publications.
Deuze, M. (2021). Challenges and opportunities for the future of media and mass communication theory and research: Positionality, integrative research, and public scholarship. Central European Journal of Communication, 14(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.14.1(28).1
Favaretto, M., De Clercq, E., Gaab, J., & Elger, B. S. (2020). First do no harm: An exploration of researchers’ ethics of conduct in Big Data behavioral studies. PLoS ONE, 15(11), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241865
Ferretti, A., Ienca, M., Hurst, S., & Vayena, E. (2020). Big data, biomedical research, and ethics review: New challenges for IRBs. Ethics and Human Research, 42(5), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500065
Ferrigno, B. N., & Sade, R. M. (2019). Ethics of recruiting research subjects through social media. American Journal of Bioethics, 19(6), 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1602192
Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media and Society, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., & Ess, C. M. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Retrieved February 2, 2022, from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage Publications.
Fuchs, C. (2018). “Dear Mr. Neo-Nazi, can you please give me your informed consent so that I can quote your fascist tweet?” Questions of social media research ethics in online ideology critique. In G. Meikle (Ed.), Routledge Companion to Media and Activism (pp. 385–394). Routledge.
Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082
Gülpinar, Ö., & Güçlü, A. G. (2013). How to write a review article? Turkish Journal of Urology, 39(Suppl 1), 44. https://doi.org/10.5152/TUD.2013.054
Hammersley, M., & Gomm, R. (1997). Bias in social research. Sociological Research Online, 2(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.55
Hedges, L. V. (1992). Meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986017004279
Hibbin, R. A., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. E. (2018). From “a Fair game” to “a Form of covert research”: Research ethics committee members’ differing notions of consent and potential risk to participants within social media research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264617751510
Hokke, S., Hackworth, N. J., Bennetts, S. K., Nicholson, J. M., Keyzer, P., Lucke, J., Zion, L., & Crawford, S. B. (2020). Ethical considerations in using social media to engage research participants: Perspectives of Australian researchers and ethics committee members. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619854629
Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality - a consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research - a new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232
Holmes, C. E. (2021). Standing out and blending in: Contact-based research, ethics, and positionality. PS: Political Science and Politics, 54(3), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096520002024
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). Afterword: Ethics, backlash, and access in Twitter research. In S. J. Jackson, M. Bailey, & B. Foucault Welles (Eds.), #HashtagActivism (pp. 202–206). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10858.003.0012
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/EMERMED-2017-207158
Johnson, A., Lawson, C., & Ames, K. (2018). Are you really one of us?: Exploring ethics, risk and insider research in a private Facebook community. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217902
Jouhki, J., Lauk, E., Penttinen, M., Sormanen, N., & Uskali, T. (2016). Facebook’s emotional contagion experiment as a challenge to research ethics. Media and Communication, 4(4A), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.579
Kisselburgh, L., & Beever, J. (2022). The ethics of privacy in research and design: principles, practices, and potential. In B. P. Knijnenburg, X. Page, P. Wisniewski, H. R. Lipford, N. Proferes, & J. Romano (Eds.), Modern socio-technical perspectives on privacy (pp. 395–426). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82786-1_17
Laato, S., Tiainen, M., Najmul Islam, A. K. M., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). How to explain AI systems to end users: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Internet Research, 32(7), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-08-2021-0600
Lee, S. S. J. (2017). Studying “Friends”: The ethics of using social media as research platforms. American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1288969
Legewie, N., & Nassauer, A. (2018). YouTube, Google, Facebook: 21st century online video research and research ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3130
Luka, M. E., & Millette, M. (2018). (Re)framing big data: Activating situated knowledges and a feminist ethics of care in social media research. Social Media and Society, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118768297
Mancosu, M., & Vegetti, F. (2020). What you can scrape and what is right to scrape: a proposal for a tool to collect public Facebook data. Social Media + Society, 6(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940703
Mason-Bish, H. (2019). The elite delusion: Reflexivity, identity and positionality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 19(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118770078
Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Farkas, J. (2021). Racism, hate speech, and social media: A systematic review and critique. Television and New Media, 22(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230
Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. K. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1663–1693. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11192-018-2933-1/TABLES/9
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Estarli, M., Barrera, E. S. A., Martínez-Rodríguez, R., Baladia, E., Agüero, S. D., Camacho, S., Buhring, K., Herrero-López, A., Gil-González, D. M., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., & Whitlock, E. (2016). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola De Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, 20(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1/TABLES/4
Monkman, G. G., Kaiser, M., & Hyder, K. (2018). The ethics of using social media in fisheries research. Reviews in Fisheries Science and Aquaculture, 26(2), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2017.1389854
Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0334
NCPHSBBR. (1978). The Belmont report. Retrieved January 6, 2022, from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html
Nenadic, I. (2018). Journalists on Twitter: Reconfiguring professional identity, reconsidering research ethics – the case of Croatia. In Research ethics in the digital age (pp. 111–117). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_11
Nicholas, J., Onie, S., & Larsen, M. E. (2020). Ethics and privacy in social media research for mental health. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(12), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01205-9
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.N71
Parsons, T. D. (2019). Social media ethics section “Background”: Ethical research with social media. In T. D. Parsons (Ed.), Ethical challenges in digital psychology and cyberpsychology (pp. 192–207). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553384.011
Ricker, B. (2017). Reflexivity, positionality and rigor in the context of big data research. In J. Thatcher, J. Eckert, & A. Shears (Eds.), Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research (pp. 96–118). University of Iowa Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21h4z6m.9
Riedel, J. (2017). Research ethics in the doctoral project “boundary management in social media communication.” In F. M. Dobrick, J. Fischer, & L. M. Hagen (Eds.), Research ethics in the digital age: Ethics for the social sciences and humanities in times of mediatization and digitization (pp. 153–156). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12909-5_16
Rockwell, G., & Suomela, T. (2015). Gamergate reactions. Borealis, V11. https://doi.org/10.7939/DVN/10253
Samuel, G., Ahmed, W., Kara, H., Jessop, C., Quinton, S., & Sanger, S. (2018). Is it time to re-evaluate the ethics governance of social media research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618793773
Samuel, G., Derrick, G. E., & van Leeuwen, T. (2019). The ethics ecosystem: Personal ethics, network governance and regulating actors governing the use of social media research data. Minerva, 57(3), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09368-3
Schucan Bird, K. (2011). Do women publish fewer journal articles than men? Sex differences in publication productivity in the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(6), 921–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.596387
Sellers, C., Samuel, G., & Derrick, G. (2020). Reasoning “Uncharted Territory”: Notions of expertise within ethics review panels assessing research use of social media. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(1–2), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619837088
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. British Medical Journal, 349, g7647–g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Shaw, R. M., Howe, J., Beazer, J., & Carr, T. (2020). Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups. Qualitative Research, 20(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119841839
Shilton, K., & Sayles, S. (2016). We aren’t all going to be on the same page about ethics: Ethical practices and challenges in research on digital and social media. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016, 1909–1918. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.242
Skopec, M., Issa, H., Reed, J., & Harris, M. (2020). The role of geographic bias in knowledge diffusion: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41073-019-0088-0
Staccini, P., & Lau, A. Y. S. (2020). Social media, research, and ethics: Does participant willingness matter? Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1702022
Statista. (2022). Most used social media 2021. Statista. Retrieved April 27, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
Swirsky, E. S., Hoop, J. G., & Labott, S. (2014). Using social media in research: New ethics for a new meme? American Journal of Bioethics, 14(10), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.948302
Tang, L., Omar, S. Z., Bolong, J., & Mohd Zawawi, J. W. (2021). Social media use among young people in china: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016421
Teele, D. L., & Thelen, K. (2017). Gender in the journals: Publication patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 50(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002985
Warfield, K., Hoholuk, J., Vincent, B., & Camargo, A. D. (2019). Pics, dicks, tits, and tats: Negotiating ethics working with images of bodies in social media research. New Media and Society, 21(9), 2068–2086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819837715
WMA. (1964). WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. In The world medical association. Retrieved January 7, 2022, from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
Zheng, H., & Ling, R. (2021). Drivers of social media fatigue: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 64, 101696. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2021.101696
Zimmer, M. (2010). “But the data is already public”: On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9227-5
Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014). A topology of twitter research: Disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0083
Funding
We have been supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada and the Media and Technology Studies at the University of Alberta, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N/A.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
N/A.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Zaman, M.S., Khemka, A., Zhang, A. et al. The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Acad Ethics 22, 163–189 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09491-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-023-09491-7