Abstract
The consequences of solitude depend on one’s preference and motivations for solitude, some of which correlate with high psychological risks (e.g., loneliness, depression) with others relating to low risk or benefits. When life is suffused with stress, people are used to escaping and seeking solitude time for restoration, which is especially true for established adults who are burdened with the heaviest care responsibilities and work stress. However, little is known about the development of preference and motivations for solitude in established adulthood. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the level of preference and motivations for solitude and their potential antecedents and consequences in established (aged 30–45) adulthood as compared to emerging (aged 18–29) and midlife adulthood (aged 46–64). We recruited 465 young to middle-aged adults from MTurk and an undergraduate class (Fall 2019). Preference and motivations for solitude were measured with the Preference for Solitude Scale and the Motivation for Solitude Scale-Short Form. Well-being and social measures were included as potential consequences and sociodemographic, psychological, and physical measures as potential antecedents. Results showed that both preference for solitude and controlled motivation peaked in established adulthood. Same as adjacent adulthood phases, in established adulthood (a) preference for solitude related to mildly compromised well-being, (b) controlled motivation was robustly associated with worse well-being, and (c) self-determined motivation was consistently associated with better well-being. Antecedences for preference and motivations for solitude showed distinctiveness for each adulthood phase. Future interventions on well-being should focus on controlled motivation for solitude and established adults.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author, JY, upon reasonable request.
Code Availability
The codes used for analysis are available from the corresponding author, JY, upon reasonable request.
References
Allen, M. S., Robson, D. A., Vella, S. A., & Laborde, S. (2021). Extraversion development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood: Testing the role of sport participation in three nationally-representative samples. Journal of Sports Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1930672
Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52(4), 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.4.366
Banks, J., Batty, G. D., Coughlin, K., Deepchand, K., Marmot, M., Nazroo, J., Oldfield, Z., Steel, N., Steptoe, Wood, M., & Zaninotto, P. A. (2019). English longitudinal study of ageing: Waves 0-8, 1998–2017 (data collection) (29th Ed.). UK Data Service. SN: 5050. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5050-16.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
Birditt, K. S., Manalel, J. A., Sommers, H., Luong, G., & Fingerman, K. L. (2019). Better off alone: Daily solitude is associated with lower negative affect in more conflictual social networks. The Gerontologist, 59(6), 1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny060
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Volume II: Separation, anxiety and anger. In J. Bowlby (Ed.), Attachment and loss: Volume II: Separation, anxiety and anger (pp. 1–429). The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis.
Buffone, A. E., Poulin, M., DeLury, S., Ministero, L., Morrisson, C., & Scalco, M. (2017). Don’t walk in her shoes! Different forms of perspective taking affect stress physiology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.001
Burger, J. M. (1995). Individual differences in preference for solitude. Journal of Research in Personality, 29(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1995.1005
Coplan, R. J., Ooi, L. L., & Baldwin, D. (2019). Does it matter when we want to be alone? Exploring developmental timing effects in the implications of unsociability. New Ideas in Psychology, 53, 47–57.
Cramer, K. M., & Lake, R. P. (1998). The Preference for Solitude Scale: Psychometric properties and factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(2), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00167-0
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Fraley, R. C. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102813
Huang, J., Van den Brink, H. M., & Groot, W. (2009). A meta-analysis of the effect of education on social capital. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.03.004
Hudson, N. W., Fraley, R. C., Chopik, W. J., & Heffernan, M. E. (2015). Not all attachment relationships develop alike: Normative cross-sectional age trajectories in attachment to romantic partners, best friends, and parents. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2015.10.001
Jewell, R. D., & Kidwell, B. (2005). The moderating effect of perceived control on motivation to engage in deliberative processing. Psychology and Marketing, 22(9), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20083
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). University of California.
Kaya, N., & Weber, M. J. (2003). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of crowding and privacy regulation: American and Turkish students. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00087-7
Lafontaine, M. F., Brassard, A., Lussier, Y., Valois, P., Shaver, P. R., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Selecting the best items for a short-form of the Experiences in Close Relationships questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000243
Lamothe, M., Boujut, E., Zenasni, F., & Sultan, S. (2014). To be or not to be empathic: The combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Family Practice, 15(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-15
Larson, R. W. (1990). The solitary side of life: An examination of the time people spend alone from childhood to old age. Developmental Review, 10(2), 155–183.
Larson, R., Zuzanek, J., & Mannell, R. (1985). Being alone versus being with people: Disengagement in the daily experience of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40(3), 375–381.
Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3_Part 1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
Lay, J. C., Pauly, T., Graf, P., Mahmood, A., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2020). Choosing solitude: Age differences in situational and affective correlates of solitude-seeking in midlife and older adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(3), 483–493.
Leary, M. R., Herbst, K. C., & McCrary, F. (2003). Finding pleasure in solitary activities: Desire for aloneness or disinterest in social contact? Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00141-1
Lee, S. (2013). A study on exploring people’s affinity for solitude. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/149243.
Leung, L. (2015). Using tablet in solitude for stress reduction: An examination of desire for aloneness, leisure boredom, tablet activities, and location of use. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.068
Lévesque, S., Bisson, V., Charton, L., & Fernet, M. (2020). Parenting and relational well-being during the transition to parenthood: Challenges for first-time parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29, 1938–1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01727-z
Luhmann, M., & Hawkley, L. C. (2016). Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age. Developmental Psychology, 52(6), 943. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000117
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.927
Manczak, E. M., DeLongis, A., & Chen, E. (2016). Does empathy have a cost? Diverging psychological and physiological effects within families. Health Psychology, 35(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000281
Mehta, C. M., Arnett, J. J., Palmer, C. G., & Nelson, L. J. (2020). Established adulthood: A new conception of ages 30 to 45. American Psychologist, 75(4), 431. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000600
Nguyen, T. V. T., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2018a). Solitude as an approach to affective self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217733073
Nguyen, T. V. T., Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. (2018b). Do introverts enjoy solitude? University of Rochester (Manuscript submitted for publication).
Nicol, C. C. (2005). Self-determined motivation for solitude and relationship: Scale development and validation. Publication No. 3195333. Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Ost Mor, S., Palgi, Y., & Segel-Karpas, D. (2020). The definition and categories of positive solitude: Older and younger adults’ perspectives on spending time by themselves. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020957379
Pauly, T., Lay, J. C., Nater, U. M., Scott, S. B., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2017). How we experience being alone: Age differences in affective and biological correlates of momentary solitude. Gerontology, 63(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000450608
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurements, 1, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
Righetti, F., Gere, J., Hofmann, W., Visserman, M. L., & Van Lange, P. A. (2016). The burden of empathy: Partners’ responses to divergence of interests in daily life. Emotion, 16(5), 684. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000163
Russell, D. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Specht, J. (2017). Personality development in adulthood and old age. In J. Specht (Ed.), Personality development across the lifespan (pp. 53–67). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804674-6.00005-3.
Thomas, V., & Azmitia, M. (2019). Motivation matters: Development and validation of the motivation for solitude scale-short form (MSS-SF). Journal of Adolescence, 70, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.004
Toyoshima, A., & Sato, S. (2017). Examination of the relationship between preference for solitude and emotional well-being after controlling for the effect of loneliness. Osaka Human Sciences, 3, 171–183.
Toyoshima, A., & Sato, S. (2019). Examination of the effect of preference for solitude on subjective well-being and developmental change. Journal of Adult Development, 26(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9307-z
Waskowic, T., & Cramer, K. M. (1999). Relation between preference for solitude scale and social functioning. Psychological Reports, 85(3), 1045–1050. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3.1045
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Weinstein, N., & Nguyen, T. V. (2020). Motivation and preference in isolation: A test of their different influences on responses to self-isolation during the COVID-19 outbreak. Royal Society Open Science, 7(5), 200458. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200458
Zimmermann, P., & Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025413515405
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by JY. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that is relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, J., Grühn, D. Preference and Motivations for Solitude in Established Adulthood: Antecedents, Consequences, and Adulthood Phase Differences. J Adult Dev 30, 64–77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09415-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09415-6