Abstract
The purpose of this review was to assess the effectiveness of tablet-based speech-generating devices (SGDs) in improving communication skills for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A total of 31 single-case design intervention studies involving 84 individuals with ASD were reviewed and included in the analysis. We calculated Tau-U to evaluate the impact of interventions involving tablet-based SGDs on four different communication responses: specifically, mands, intraverbals, tacts, and vocalizations. To explore potential moderating variables for mand outcomes, we used the Kruskal–Wallis one-way test. The analysis revealed that interventions utilizing tablet-based SGDs led to improvements in communication responses. Specifically, large to very large changes were observed in mand and intraverbal responses, whereas moderate changes were noted in tact responses and vocalizations. The findings of this review underscore the potential of tablet-based SGDs in enhancing communication among individuals with ASD. We discuss the findings and provide implications for future research and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alzrayer, N. M., & Banda, D. R. (2017). Implementing tablet-based devices to improve communication skills of students with autism. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(1), 50–57.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Publications.
Battaglia, D. (2017). Functional communication training in children with autism spectrum disorder. Young Exceptional Children, 20, 30–40.
Beukelman, D. R., & Light, J. C. (2019). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Brookes Publishing.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for exceptional children standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Retrieved from https://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/Standards/Evidence%20based%20Practices%20and%20Practice/EBP%20FINAL.pdf
Estes, A., Rivera, V., Bryan, M., Cali, P., & Dawson, G. (2011). Discrepancies between academic achievement and intellectual ability in higher-functioning school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1044–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1127-3
Ganz, J. B., Hong, E. R., Leuthold, E., & Yllades, V. (2019). Naturalistic augmentative and alternative communication instruction for practitioners and individuals with autism. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451219833012
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., et al. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
Liptak, G. S., Kennedy, J. A., & Dosa, N. P. (2011). Social participation in a nationally representative sample of older youth and young adults with autism. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e31820b49fc
Logan, K., Iacono, T., & Trembath, D. (2022). A systematic search and appraisal of intervention characteristics used to develop varied communication functions in children with autism who use aided AAC. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 90, 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101896
Lorah, E. R., Chatham, C., & Taylor, K. N. (2022a). A systematic review of evidence-based instruction for individuals with autism using mobile augmentative and alternative communication technology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 38(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1955858
Lorah, E. R., Holyfield, C., Griffen, B., & Caldwell, N. (2022b). A systematic review of evidence-based instruction for individuals with autism using mobile augmentative and alternative communication technology. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-022-00334-6
Lorah, E. R., Holyfield, C., Miller, J., Griffen, B., & Lindbloom, C. (2022c). A systematic review of research comparing mobile technology speech-generating devices to other AAC modes with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 4, 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-021-09803-y
McNaughton, D., Bryen, D., Blackstone, S., Williams, M., & Kennedy, P. (2012). Young adults with complex communication needs: Research and development in AAC for a “diverse” population. Assistive Technology, 24, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.648715
Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017)
Morin, K. L., Ganz, J. B., Gregori, E. V., Foster, M. J., Gerow, S. L., Genc-Tosune, D., & Hong, E. R. (2018). A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1458900
Muharib, R., & Alzrayer, N. M. (2018). The use of high-tech speech-generating devices as an evidence-based practice for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 5, 43–57.
Muharib, R., Lang, R., Walker, V. L., Phinney, A., & Rodriguez, M. (2021a). An evaluation of reinforcer magnitude and echoic prompts on vocal requesting of individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33(6), 947–961.
Muharib, R., Walker, V. L., Alresheed, F., & Gerow, S. (2021b). Effects of multiple schedules of reinforcement on appropriate communication and challenging behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(3), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04569-2
Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., & Davis, J. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine overlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322.
Reichow, B., et al. (2011). Development, procedures, and application of the evaluative method for determining evidence-based practices in autism. In B. Reichow (Ed.), Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism (pp. 25–39). Springer.
Schlosser, R. (2003). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/0743461032000056450
Schlosser, R. W., & Wendt, O. (2008). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 17(3), 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Prentice Hall.
Tincani, M., Cassella, M. A., & Tierney, K. (2020). Systematic review of verbal operants in speech-generating device research from Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(4), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1781584
Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., & Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single Case Research: web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University.
Walker, V. L., & Snell, M. E. (2013). Effects of augmentative and alternative communication on challenging behavior: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.785020
Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1128–e1134. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-2221
*Refers to the included studies in this review
*Alzrayer, N. M. (2020). Transitioning from a low- to high-tech Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system: Effects on augmented and vocal requesting. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 36(3), 155–165.
*Alzrayer, N. M., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. (2017). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities to perform multistep requesting using an iPad. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 33(2), 65–76.
*Alzrayer, N. M., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. K. (2019). The effects of systematic instruction in teaching multistep social-communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorder using an iPad. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 22(6), 415–429.
*Alzrayer, N. M., Muharib, R., & Wood, C. (2020). Effects of a behavior intervention package on augmented and vocal mands by children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 32(1), 57–74.
*Carnett, A., Bravo, A., & Waddington, H. (2019). Teaching mands for actions to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction, behavior chain interruption, and a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 98–107.
*Carnett, A., Hansen, S., Tullis, C., & Machalicek, W. (2021). Using behavioural skills training via telehealth to increase teachers use of communication interventions and increase student use of speech-generating devices in a high school functional skills classroom. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 65(2), 133–148.
*Carnett, A., Ingvarsson, E. T., Bravo, A., & Sigafoos, J. (2020). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder to ask “where” questions using a speech-generating device. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(3), 1383–1403.
*Carnett, A., Waddington, H., & Bravo, A. (2018). Teaching intraverbal fill-ins to a child with autism spectrum disorder using a speech-generating device and systematic instruction. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(1), 62–68.
*Genc-Tosun, D., Kurt, O., Cevher, Z., & Gregori, E. V. (2022). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder to answer questions using an iPad-based speech-generating device. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05683-z
*Gevarter, C., Groll, M., Stone, E., & Medina Najar, A. (2021). A parent-implemented embedded AAC intervention for teaching navigational requests and other communicative functions to children with autism spectrum disorder. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 37(3), 180–193.
*Holyfield, C. (2021). Comparative effects of picture symbol with paired text and text-only augmentative and alternative communication representations on communication from children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30, 584–597.
*King, M. L., Takeguchi, K., Barry, S. E., Rehfeldt, R. A., Boyer, V. E., & Mathews, T. L. (2014). Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1107–1120.
*Krcek, T. E. (2015). Effectiveness of Proloquo2Go in enhancing communication in children with autism during ABA therapy. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). [The University of Tennessee].
*Lorah, E. R. (2018). Evaluating the iPad Mini as a speech-generating device in the acquisition of a discriminative mand repertoire for young children with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 47–54.
*Lorah, E. R., Crouser, J., Gilroy, S. P., Tincani, M., & Hantula, D. (2014a). Within stimulus prompting to teach symbol discrimination using an iPad speech generating device. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(3), 335–346.
*Lorah, E. R., & Griffen, B. (2023a). Teaching children with autism traveling skills for using a speech-generating device for manding. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 35, 509–522.
*Lorah, E. R., & Griffen, B. (2023b). Establishing a mand repertoire using an interrupted chain procedure with SGD in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 35(1), 97–110.
*Lorah, E. R., Karnes, A., Miller, J., & Welch-Beardsley, J. (2019). Establishing peer manding in young children with autism using a speech-generating device. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 31(6), 791–801.
*Lorah, E. R., Karnes, A., & Speight, D. R. (2015). The acquisition of intraverbal responding using a speech generating device in school-aged children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(4), 557–568.
*Lorah, E. R., Miller, J., & Griffen, B. (2021). The acquisition of peer manding using a speech-generating device in naturalistic classroom routines. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 33, 619–631.
*Lorah, E. R., & Parnell, A. (2017). Acquisition of tacting using a speech-generating device in group learning environments for preschoolers with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29(4), 597–609.
*Lorah, E. R., Parnell, A., & Speight, D. R. (2014b). Acquisition of sentence frame discrimination using the iPad as a speech generating device in young children with developmental disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(12), 1734.
*Lorah, E. R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(6), 637–649.
*McLay, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M. C. M., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Marschik, P. B., Green, V. A., Sigafoos, J., & Sutherland, D. (2015). Comparing acquisition, generalization, maintenance, and preference across three AAC options in four children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9417-x
*Muharib, R., Alzrayer, N. M., Wood, C. L., & Voggt, A. P. (2019). Backward chaining and speech-output technologies to enhance functional communication skills of children with autism spectrum disorder and developmental disabilities. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 35(4), 251–262.
*Rinaldi, B. (2019). Effects of naturalistic time delay on promoting functional requests using AAC in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). [University of Kentucky].
*Sawchak, A., Waddington, H., & Sigafoos, J. (2023). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to five autistic children using speech-generating devices and systematic instruction. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-023-00320-x
*Tullis, C. A., Marya, V., & Alice Shillingsburg, M. (2019). Enhancing instruction via instructive feedback for a child with autism using a speech-generating device. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(1), 103–112.
*Waddington, H., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., & Sigafoos, J. (2017). Teaching a child with ASD to approach communication partners and use a speech-generating device across settings: Clinic, school, and home. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 32, 228–243.
*Wendt, O., Hsu, N., Simon, K., Dienhart, A., & Cain, L. (2019). Effects of an iPad-based speech-generating device infused into instruction with the picture exchange communication system for adolescents and young adults with severe autism spectrum disorder. Behavior Modification, 43(6), 898–932.
*Yong, Y. H. L., Dutt, A. S., Chen, M., & Yeong, A. M. (2021). Evaluating acquisition, preference and discrimination in requesting skills between picture exchange and iPad®-based speech generating device across preschoolers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 37(2), 123–136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Muharib, R., Walker, V. & Dunn, W. Effects of Interventions Involving Tablet-Based Speech-Generating Devices for Individuals with ASD: A Meta-analysis. J Autism Dev Disord (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06173-6
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-06173-6