Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of electrolyte co-additives, TiO2 thickness, and dye concentration for the enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cells

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) primarily depends upon many factors, such as the thickness of the semiconductor layer at the working electrode, dye/sensitizer concentration, and electrolyte. A methodical study is required in one place to deliberate the impact of all these factors on DSSC performance for better understanding and further advancement of the technology. This work emphasizes optimizing the absorption layer, specifically investigating the relationship between the thickness of the TiO2 layer and the concentration of N719 dye. The objective is to elucidate the interconnected effects of these parameters on the overall performance of the device. Additionally, the optimization of electrolyte composition was done with varying concentrations of additives, such as iodine, 4-tert-butyl-pyridine (TBP), guanidinium thiocyanate (GuNCS), and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium iodide (BMII) of electrolyte. Initially, the devices with varying TiO2 absorption layers were fabricated. The efficiency, fill factor (FF), open-circuit voltage (VOC), and short-circuit current (ISC) of devices were studied. The drop in open-circuit voltage (VOC) was noticed with the increase in thickness of the TiO2 layer. The highest efficiency was observed at 7.17% with the device fabricated using 6 absorption layer (17.46 μm) of TiO2, 0.7 mM concentration of N719 dye, and 0.03-M iodine, 0.1-M GuNCS, 0.5-M TBP, and 0.6-M BMII in electrolyte. Future developments in this research could focus on further fine-tuning these parameters for improved efficiency and exploring additional innovations in DSSC technology, ultimately contributing to the advancement of sustainable and efficient solar energy conversion systems.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Błaszczyk A (2018) Strategies to improve the performance of metal-free dye-sensitized solar cells. Dyes Pigm 149:707–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomar N et al (2020) Ruthenium complexes based dye sensitized solar cells: Fundamentals and research trends. Sol Energy 207:59–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Albero J et al (2015) Efficiency records in mesoscopic dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem Rec 15(4):803–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ito S et al (2008) Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%. Thin Solid Films 516(14):4613–4619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’regan B, Grätzel M (1991) A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353(6346):737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Esgin H, Caglar Y, Caglar M (2022) Photovoltaic performance and physical characterization of Cu doped ZnO nanopowders as photoanode for DSSC. J Alloy Compd 890:161848

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agrawal A et al (2022) Advancements, frontiers and analysis of metal oxide semiconductor, dye, electrolyte and counter electrode of dye sensitized solar cell. Sol Energy 233:378–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sengupta D et al (2016) Effects of doping, morphology and film-thickness of photo-anode materials for dye sensitized solar cell application—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:356–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pallikkara A, Ramakrishnan K (2021) Efficient charge collection of photoanodes and light absorption of photosensitizers: a review. Int J Energy Res 45(2):1425–1448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kouhestanian E et al (2021) Investigating the effects of thickness on the performance of ZnO-based DSSC. Prog Color Colorants Coat (PCCC) 14(2):101–112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang S et al (2020) Harnessing hierarchical architectures to trap light for efficient photoelectrochemical cells. Energy Environ Sci 13(3):660–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang L, Cole JM (2017) Dye aggregation in dye-sensitized solar cells. J Mater Chem A 5(37):19541–19559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iftikhar H et al (2019) Progress on electrolytes development in dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials 12:1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stergiopoulos T et al (2011) Influence of electrolyte co-additives on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boschloo G, Häggman L, Hagfeldt A (2006) Quantification of the effect of 4-tert-butylpyridine addition to I-/I3-redox electrolytes in dye-sensitized nanostructured TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem B 110(26):13144–13150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iftikhar H et al (2019) Progress on electrolytes development in dye-sensitized solar cells. Materials 12(12):1998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ito S et al (2007) Fabrication of screen-printing pastes from TiO2 powders for dye-sensitised solar cells. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 15(7):603–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lan Z et al (2014) A highly efficient dye-sensitized solar cell with a blocking layer and TiCl4 treatment to suppress dark reaction. Energy Sources Part A Recover Util Environ Effects 36(16):1810–1817

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar N et al (2021) Effect of TiO2 layer thickness of TiO2/NiO transparent photovoltaics. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 29(8):943–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Z-S et al (2004) Significant influence of TiO2 photoelectrode morphology on the energy conversion efficiency of N719 dye-sensitized solar cell. Coord Chem Rev 248(13–14):1381–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sedghi A, Miankushki HN (2015) The effect of drying and thickness of TiO2 electrodes on the photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Int J Electrochem Sci 10:3354–3362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ganapathy V, Karunagaran B, Rhee S-W (2010) Improved performance of dye-sensitized solar cells with TiO2/alumina core–shell formation using atomic layer deposition. J Power Sources 195(15):5138–5143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kao M et al (2009) The effects of the thickness of TiO2 films on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Thin Solid Films 517(17):5096–5099

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ooyama Y, Harima Y (2012) Photophysical and electrochemical properties, and molecular structures of organic dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemPhysChem 13(18):4032–4080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian H et al (2008) Effect of different dye baths and dye-structures on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells based on triphenylamine dyes. J Phys Chem C 112(29):11023–11033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rahman M et al (2013) Effect of organic dye, the concentration and dipping time of the organic dye N719 on the photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized ZnO solar cell prepared by ammonia-assisted hydrolysis technique. Electrochim Acta 88:639–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lima FAS, Vasconcelos IF, Lira-Cantu M (2015) Electrochemically synthesized mesoporous thin films of ZnO for highly efficient dye sensitized solar cells. Ceram Int 41(8):9314–9320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arifin Z et al (2017) Performance enhancement of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using a natural sensitizer. In: AIP conference proceedings. AIP Publishing

  29. Jagtap CV et al (2021) Effect of binder concentration and dye loading time on titania based photoanode in dye sensitized solar cell application. Eng Sci 17:133–141

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jung NE et al (2015) Effect of iodine concentration in the quasi-solid state electrolyte on the photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 620(1):123–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lan J-L et al (2012) Effects of iodine content in the electrolyte on the charge transfer and power conversion efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells under low light intensities. J Phys Chem C 116(49):25727–25733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. AbuTalip RA, Yahya WZN, Bustam MA (2020) Ionic liquids roles and perspectives in electrolyte for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sustainability 12(18):7598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee K-M et al (2007) Effects of co-adsorbate and additive on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells: a photophysical study. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 91(15–16):1426–1431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grätzel M (2003) Dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol C 4(2):145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shao GN, Kim H, Imran S (2016) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S092633731500346X

  36. Stergiopoulos T et al (2011) Influence of electrolyte co-additives on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shah S et al (2019) Efficiency enhancement of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) using copper nanopowder (CuNW) in TiO2 as photoanode. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering. IOP Publishing

  38. Huang SY et al (1997) Charge recombination in dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem B 101(14):2576–2582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu Z et al (2011) Liquid electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Dalton Trans 40(40):10289–10303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank ‘Central Analytical Facilities (CAF)’ and ‘Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF),’ Manipal University Jaipur for providing the materials characterization facility. NT and VSD acknowledge the funding support from the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), India, under Grant No. [EMR/2016/006259] and PKS acknowledge to Grant no. [CRG/2021/002477-G].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NT performed formal analysis, investigation, and wrote the original draft. VSD contributed to conceptualization and resources. PKS was involved in the supervision and review & editing of the original draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vijaypal Singh Dhaka or Praveen K. Surolia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial or non-financial interests to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomar, N., Dhaka, V.S. & Surolia, P.K. Optimization of electrolyte co-additives, TiO2 thickness, and dye concentration for the enhanced performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. J Appl Electrochem (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-024-02124-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-024-02124-w

Keywords

Navigation