Abstract
The global trends related to the concept of Metaverse in architecture have significantly expanded in recent years, thanks to the increasing number of scientific publications. Systematically examining the literature on this topic and identifying research trends and potential directions provides comprehensive data maps, thus charting a roadmap for researchers interested in working in this field. In this context, the research aims to identify the trends and tendencies of the concept of the Metaverse in the scientific literature over time at the primary analysis levels, such as countries, institutions, resources, articles, authors, and research topics. The research conducted with this aim involves a dynamic, visual, and systematic examination of the academic literature on academic publishing using data accessed without year limitations from the Web of Science Core Collection-Citation database. In the research conducted without year limitations, a sample comprising 334 articles published/planned to be published between 2005 and 2024 is analyzed. The bibliometrix R-Tool was used to enhance the analysis, and metadata was obtained from the WoS database. This analysis analyzed publications, citations, and information sources, including the most published journals, the most used keywords, the most cited and leading articles, the most cited academics, and the most contributing institutions and countries. In conclusion, this study aims to define the profile of international academic publishing in the field of the Metaverse, present its development, identify research fronts, detect emerging trends, and uncover the working themes and trends in the Metaverse specific to architecture. This study describes the profile of international academic publishing on the metaverse, presents its development, identifies research frontiers, identifies emerging trends, and reveals metaverse study themes and trends in architecture. As a result, education, virtual perception of space, building operation and maintenance, building evacuation, BIM (Building Information Modeling), cultural heritage, physical environment, built environment/planning, smart home, design and creativity, universal design/accessibility, sustainability, smart city/GIS, urban transportation systems, and in-use evaluation are identified as themes that have been studied in relation to the metaverse concept in architecture and design disciplines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Information and communication technologies are undergoing rapid change and transformation every day. The concept of technology, which developed with computers in the 1990s, evolved into the Web in the 2000s, Web 2.0, the second stage of the evolution of the Web in the 2004s (Murugesan, 2007), telecommunications in the 2010s, and the metaverse in the 2020s (Lee, 2021).
Information and communication technologies are undergoing rapid change and transformation every day. The concept of technology, which developed with computers in the 1990s, evolved into the Web in the 2000s, Web 2.0, the second stage of the evolution of the Web in the 2004s (Murugesan, 2007), telecommunications in the 2010s, and the metaverse in the 2020s (Lee, 2021).
Until the 1990s, Web 1.0 emerged as the first version. In this process, access to information was only one-way and there was no interaction. The Web 1.0 era was focused on making connections and obtaining information on the internet. Web 2.0, which emerged in 2004, includes forums, comments, blogs and social networks. However, Web 2.0 allowed users to share information as well as read. Thus, people started to communicate, collaborate and interact in another way (Alby, 2007). The concept of Web 3.0, known as the semantic web, which became active in 2010, made it possible to conduct a content search using keywords. Here, instead of humans, computers have come to the forefront to produce new information and think. Web 4.0, which started in 2016, focuses on access and intelligence (Latorre, 2018). Using machine learning technologies and artificial intelligence, users started to interact with data. Interpreted as an iteration of the Internet, the metaverse brings together a large number of different virtual spaces that provide access to various projects and entertainment environments using the full spectrum of augmented reality. In summary, the metaverse is the latest in a long line of emerging technologies (Nath, 2022). All these definitions are presented in the graph in Fig. 1.
The Changing Face of the Internet: Journey from Web 1.0 to Web 3.0 (Nath, 2022)
The concept of Metaverse (fictional universe), which first emerged in Neal Stephenson's cyberpunk novel "Snow Crash" in 1992 (Ağırman & Barakalı, 2022), has seen a significant increase in studies on this subject after Marc Zuckerberg changed the name of Facebook and announced it as "Meta" in 2021 (see Figure 1). The word Metaverse is a combination of the prefix "meta" (meaning "beyond") and the suffix "verse" (short for "universe") (Dionisio et al., 2013). In this context, the Metaverse is defined as a virtual structure that allows participants to participate in real life or recreate real life through self-created avatars in a virtual metaphorical environment, independent of temporal and spatial constraints (Díaz et al., 2020). The concept of a metaverse or virtual world is a social and economic universe beyond commerce and entertainment, where digital users or avatars represent the individual (Lee, 2021). The Metaverse offers a potential environment in various fields, such as culture, education, design, and entertainment.
In the literature, there are studies on metaverse conducted with various keywords in different databases. For example, Abbate et al, (2022) conducted a study with the keyword “metaverse” in the title, abstract and keywords in the Scopus database, regardless of the time period studied, and the aim of the study was to review the studies on the Metaverse using bibliometric analysis. Feng et al. (2024), (2024) was conducted in the WOS database with the keywords “metaverse” and “Non-Fungible Token” between 2000 and 2023. Tas and Bolat, (2022), unlike these studies, conducted a bibliometric analysis of studies on the use of metaverse in education. Similarly, Bızel (2023) conducted a bibliometric analysis on the concept of “metaverse” and “education” in education between 2004 and 2022. Zhou et al. (2023) analyzed articles on the concept of metaverse in different databases between 1992 and 2022 and examined the concept of metaverse, its technical features, user behaviors and their theoretical foundations. Studies in the literature have examined the concept of metaverse in general or in relation to education. The scope of this study is the relationship between metaverse and architecture.
Given its inherent connection with architecture and design, this study primarily focuses on the Metaverse universe. Therefore, this study conducts a bibliometric examination of research related to the Metaverse and performs content analysis specifically within architecture. Bibliometrics is a quantitative analysis method that uses mathematical and statistical tools to measure the interrelation and impact of publications within a specific research field (Lee et al., 2020). Bibliometric research encompasses empirical methods focusing on quantitative literature studies (Ding et al., 2001). As a powerful tool for analyzing the information domain and revealing the cognitive-epistemological structure of the field (Van Eck & Waltman, 2010), it provides a macroscopic view across numerous academic studies. This method highlights influential research, authors, journals, institutions, and countries within a specific domain (Mora et al., 2019). Based on this premise, this research chose the WoS database for bibliometric analysis. Indeed, in every article indexed in WoS, research data such as authors, sources, cited references, keywords, and more can be accessed (Wang et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c). Furthermore, the Metaverse literature obtained from the WoS database is systematically analyzed using the Bibliometrix and Biblioshiny software packages available in the R program. The following scientific questions guide this research.
RQ1: What is the development trend of publications in the Metaverse field over the years?
RQ2: How are the relationships among stakeholders in this field, such as authors, institutions, and countries?
RQ3: What are the main keywords in the study domain, and how are they clustered?
RQ4: What are the key elements, trends, and themes that characterize the global development of the Metaverse literature?
This bibliometric and content analysis conducted within this framework presents structured information and a comprehensive examination of the Metaverse field. Gaps, significant, and emerging points in the area are identified for researchers in this domain. The significance and contribution of this study lie in its examination of the literature related to the Metaverse and architectural design up to the present day.
Methodology
Data collection
This study uses the Web of Science (WoS) database for bibliometric analysis. Indeed, the Web of Science database is preferred due to its wide range of tools for manipulating search results and its general, cited reference, and advanced search features (Norris & Oppenheim, 2007:163; Merigó et al., 2015; Gaviria-Marin, 2019). On April 29, 2024, a comprehensive search was conducted across all fields in the Web of Science database using the following search query: "metaverse" AND "architect*" or "design" or "architectural studio" or "architectural education" or "building" or "architectural space" or "built environment" AND "virtual space" or "mixed reality" or "augmented reality" or "extended reality" or "cyberspace" or "virtual reality" or "virtual environment" or "virtual worlds" or "digital world" as keywords (Fig. 2). This search resulted in the identification of 513 studies.
The flow chart of the study is shown in Fig. 3.
Bibliometric analysis
Bibliometric analysis, a quantitative approach to analyzing academic literature using bibliographies to identify, evaluate, and monitor published research, first used in 1969 (Broadus, 1987; Lee et al., 2020), is employed in this study to analyze trends and potentials in the field of the Metaverse. Bibliometric analysis distills a comprehensive overview of a specific area by processing a large volume of literature. In this context, bibliometric study provides a broad perspective on extensive research literature and enables the quantitative and objective delineation of research topics from the past to the present (Chen et al., 2021). The bibliometric analysis method analyzes development trends in various scientific research fields (Li & Ye, 2016). It aids researchers in creating knowledge maps that represent information structure in a particular area and examine their characteristics using statistical and mathematical methods (Ding et al., 2001; Godin, 2006).
In this study, the graphical web interface Biblioshiny, based on Bibliometrix 3.0 (URL-1), is used within the R software and RStudio environment to create knowledge maps. R software is noted as a dynamically writable and interpretable programming language for statistics and data analysis (Diez-Vial & Montoro-Sanchez, 2017; Donoho, 2021; Khan et al., 2016; Xu & Marinova, 2013).
The Bibliometrix R package plays an essential role in scientific methodology by providing a set of tools for quantitative research. This package is developed within the R programming language, an open-source environment and ecosystem. The R language offers substantial opportunities in scientific computation due to its multitude of practical statistical algorithms, access to high-quality numerical data, and integrated data visualization tools (Aria & Cuccurullo, 2017; Xie et al., 2020). Within the scope of this study, the literature data obtained from the WoS database was analyzed using the bibliometric analysis method within the Bibliometrix software environment. The knowledge maps and data obtained are presented in the findings section.
Results
Distribution of annual documents
To reflect the trends in literature research, it is essential to analyze the accelerations that studies have demonstrated over time (Xie et al., 2020). In this context, it was determined that this research, without a time constraint, covers the relevant data from the years 2005 to 2023. It is seen that the number of research studies published on the Metaverse from 2005 to 2023 shows a similar trend with a small number of publications until 2021 but shows a significant increase starting from 2022 (Fig. 4). Based on the graphical data, it is anticipated that research in the Metaverse field will rapidly increase.
According to the analysis data from the Web of Science category, the top five categories prominently featured are Engineering Electrical Electronic (103), Computer Science Information Systems (102), Telecommunications (86), Computer Science Artificial Intelligence (58), and Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications (58) (Fig. 5).
When the classification of the retrieved studies is examined in the context of Sustainable Development Goals, it is determined that 168 studies were conducted for Quality Education, 61 for Good Health and Well-being, 32 for Sustainable Cities and Communities, 30 for Industry Innovation and Infrastructure, 17 for Responsible Consumption and Production, 3 for Affordable and Clean Energy, 1 for Gender Equality, 1 for Decent Work and Economic Growth, 1 for Reduced Inequality and 1 for Life on Land (Fig. 6).
As a result of the studies on the Metaverse, 291 articles, 128 proceeding papers, 46 review articles, 37 early access, 5 book chapters and 4 editorial material were identified (Fig. 7).
Data screening and inclusion criteria
As a result of the search conducted in the WoS database on April 29, 2024, a total of 513 sources potentially suitable for this study were identified. In this research, 323 documents were retrieved from 199 sources. In this study, which did not apply any time constraints, the retrieved documents spanned the period from 2005 to 2023. The data file downloaded in Bibtex format from the WoS database was uploaded to the Bibliometrix software (URL-1). In this step, publications written in English, accessible, and peer-reviewed were preferred for examination. In this context, the document type was limited to 'Article/Article; Book Chapter/Article; Early Access/Article; Review; Early Access/Review.' As a result of these restrictions, a total of 190 studies were excluded from the analysis. Figure 8 provides general information about these data.
Most relevant sources
The retrieved articles have been published in a total of 289 different sources. The sources with the most publications are the ‘IEEE Access’ (N = 13), ‘IEEE Network’ (N = 11), ‘Sustainability’ (N = 10), ‘Internet Research’ (N = 8) and ‘Electronics’ (N = 7) publications. Figure 9 presents the top 20 sources with the highest number of publications.
Most frequent words
Keywords ensure the general comprehensibility of a research topic and its content. The analysis of high-frequency keywords reflects important and current topics in the Metaverse field. In this context, Fig. 9, which includes the ‘TreeMap’, illustrates the tree structure of the 50 most frequently used keywords. In this representation, the size of the rectangle indicates the frequency of usage of the term within the rectangle. In this context, 'virtual-reality (50), augmented reality (30), design (28), system (24), technology (22)' are identified as the top five prominent terms. Additionally, this situation can also be observed through the created 'WordCloud,' which represents the frequency of usage of key terms in a word cloud (Fig. 10).
Most relevant countries
Figure 11 shows the collaborations between co-authors and their countries. In this context, it is understood that the most co-authors are commonly found in China. In terms of the number of articles published by a single country; China (N = 51), USA (N = 27), Korea (N = 26), Italy (N = 12) and the United Kingdom (N = 9) are ranked as the top five. Similarly, for multiple-authored articles, the top five countries are as follows: China (N = 35), United Kingdom (N = 11), India (N = 8), USA (N = 6), Malaysia (N = 6), Singapore (N = 6), Korea (N = 5), Italy (N = 5) and USA (N = 5). When looking at Fig. 11, the turquoise bars represent single-country publications (SCP), while the orange bars represent multi-country publications (MCP).
Most relevant authors
Figure 12 presents a list of the top 20 authors with the highest number of publications. In this context, it is observed that Niyato has the highest number of publications (10). Following Niyato (N = 11), Xiong (7), Wang (6), Bibri (5), Kim (5), Li (5), Liu (5) and Wang (5) respectively.
Authors' production over time
The article dataset related to Metaverse publications includes a total of 1044 authors. Figure 13 displays a diagram depicting the top 20 most productive Metaverse authors during the study period. The size of the dots in this diagram represents the number of articles, while the colors' dimensions represent the annual total citation counts. Regarding the number of articles published during the study period, the top three most productive authors are Niyato (10 articles), followed by Xiong (6 articles), Wang (5 articles), Bibri (2 articles), and Kim (4 articles).
Most relevant affiliations
When evaluating the institutions where publications on the Metaverse have been conducted, Nanyang Technology University (Number of Articles = 20), Singapore University of Technology and Design (N = 15), Norwegian University (N = 12), Sungkyunkwan University (N = 11), and Gachon Univercity (N = 11) are listed as the top institutions (Fig. 14).
Country scientific production
The countries with the highest number of publications in the field of Metaverse are shown in Fig. 15. The number of research articles is represented by the blue color intensity on the map. According to this graph, China (134), USA (130), Korea (87), United Kingdom (72), India (45), and Singapore (48) are ranked as leading countries in terms of publications.
Country collaboration map
International research collaboration for articles on Metaverse is depicted in Fig. 16. The number of published articles is indicated by the intensity of the blue color on the map. The thickness of brown lines represents the intensity of collaboration based on frequency. While China stands out as the country with the strongest collaboration compared to other countries, the most collaborative countries are ranked as USA, Australia, and the United Kingdom, respectively.
Most cited countries
According to the graph shown in Fig. 17, the top five countries receiving the most citations are ranked as follows: China (810), USA (689), Korea (659), France (275), and United Kingdom (207).
Three-field plot
A three-field graph illustrating the relationship between keywords, countries, and journals is presented in Fig. 18. The height of the rectangular nodes within the graph represents the frequency of author keywords, keywords plus, and authors. The thickness of the lines between nodes represents the number of connections (Wang et al., 2022a, 2022b, 2022c).
Thematic map
To comprehensively capture the theme map of big data research, author keywords and index keywords from bibliographic records were clustered and classified by dividing them into two using the k-means and naive Bayes algorithms (Parlina et al., 2020). The revealed thematic map consists of thirteen clusters. For the clustering of metaverse topics, four categories are represented as clusters in different colors. In the first cluster represented by the green color, the terms ‘virtual reality’, ‘augmented reality’, and ‘design’ take prominence. In the blue cluster, terms such as ‘impact’, ‘experience’, and ‘virtual worlds’' are observed. As seen in Fig. 19, the red cluster encompasses significant research topics.
Trend topics
The Trend topics chart presented in Fig. 20 is created based on Keywords Plus. In this context, the size of the circles within the graph indicates the frequency of the term, while the length of the lines represents how long this concept has been studied. In this context, the results of the analysis conducted to identify trend topics with Keywords Plus are presented in Fig. 20. Accordingly, virtual reality (f = 50), augmented reality (f = 30), technology (f = 24), design (f = 28), model (f = 22), and environments (f = 10) are determined as trend topics.
Examination of publications in the field of architecture through content analysis
Among these studies, a total of 76 research papers were subjected to content analysis within the context of the relationship between architecture and the Metaverse, and the obtained data are presented in Table 1. Each study has been categorized according to thematic areas within the fields of architecture and design, revealing that the studies were produced in a total of 15 categories: education, building operation and maintenance, building evacuation, Building Information Modelling (BIM), physical environment, virtual space perception, cultural heritage, built environment/planning, smart city/GIS, smart home, design and creativity, universal design/accessibility, sustainability, urban transportation systems, and post-occupancy evaluation. In addition, brief information about the specific topics each study within the field of architecture and design focused on under each study theme has been provided. According to the content analysis conducted, it is evident that education and virtual space perception themes are the most prevalent subjects of scientific research within disciplines related to architecture and design. The fact that the metaverse universe is a virtual fiction of the real world brings to the fore the question of how this universe is perceived by individuals. Consequently, the perception of virtual spaces becomes significant in studies related to the Metaverse. Furthermore, Table 1 indicates that the concept of the Metaverse is gaining importance in various themes related to architecture. It has the potential to be a promising research area in different fields such as different age groups, disability conditions, construction systems and technologies, cultural heritage, and transportation. The density and relevance of research themes in the fields of architecture and design align with the sustainable development goals related to the Metaverse. Themes such as education quality and sustainable cities and communities, as well as community objectives, are prominent in architectural studies as well.
Discussion and conclusion
This research, in general, reveals the overall trends in scientific research related to the Metaverse and specifically within the disciplines of architecture and design. The number of studies analyzed within the scope of the research has increased rapidly since 2021 and this momentum is expected to increase in the coming years. WoS categories such as Electrical-Electronic Engineering, Computer Science Information, and Telecommunications are prominent areas where the concept of the Metaverse is emphasized. In terms of sustainable development goals, topics like education quality, good health and well-being, and sustainable cities and communities are the focal points of research related to the Metaverse. When the document types are evaluated, it is seen that articles come to the forefront. The most frequently used keywords related to the Metaverse concept include virtual reality, augmented reality, design, system, and technology. In terms of the countries where the most studies are produced, China takes the lead, followed by countries such as the USA, Korea, and the United Kingdom. Additionally, the study provides data related to authors, citations, institutions, and journals.
The results of the bibliometric analysis conducted within the scope of the questions guiding the research are as follows.
RQ1: What is the development trend of publications in the Metaverse field over the years?
This study, which evaluates the research conducted between 2005 and 2023, shows that there is a similar trend with a small number of publications until 2021, but there has been a significant increase since 2021. It is predicted that the research on this subject increased rapidly in 2023 and will increase rapidly in the coming years.
RQ2: How are the relationships among stakeholders in this field, such as authors, institutions, and countries?
In the study, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Norwegian University, Sungkyunkwan University, and Gachon University stand out as research institutions related to the metaverse. In the study, Niyato was found to be the author with the highest number of publications. He is followed by Xiong Wang, Bibri, Kim, Li, Liu and Wang. In the study, China, the USA, Korea, the United Kingdom, India and Singapore are ranked as the leading countries in terms of publications. However, when the cooperation potentials of the countries are analyzed, China stands out as the country with the strongest cooperation compared to other countries, while the countries with the most cooperation are the USA, Australia and the UK, respectively.
RQ3: What are the main keywords in the study domain, and how are they clustered?
In the publications examined in the study, it was determined that the keywords metaverse, virtual reality, augmented reality, extended reality, artificial intelligence, blockchain, reality, mixed reality, virtual were frequently used.
RQ4: What are the key elements, trends, and themes that characterize the global development of the Metaverse literature?
The prominent themes clustered in the study are “impact, experience, virtual worlds”, “internet, challenges, blockchain”, “integration, rehabilitation, walking” and “virtual-reality, augmented reality, design”. The global collaborative network framework of Metaverse literacy and research needs to be strengthened. In the future, it is envisioned that this research area will further develop in sectors such as education, health, arts, commerce and entertainment. The results of this study are intended to serve as a reference for future applied research on the metaverse.
The particular focus of this study is to examine the themes in which the concept of the Metaverse has been explored within the disciplines of architecture and design. The content of architectural publications addressing the Metaverse has been analyzed in the study, revealing research trends in this field. Within this context, various themes related to the concept of the Metaverse have been explored in the disciplines of architecture and design. These themes include education, building operation and maintenance, building evacuation, Building Information Modelling (BIM), physical environment, virtual space perception, cultural heritage, built environment/planning, smart cities/GIS, smart homes, design and creativity, universal design/accessibility, sustainability, urban transportation systems, and evaluation in the usage process. Among these themes, education and virtual space perception stand out as the most researched areas.
In conclusion, this study aims to provide guidance for researchers by demonstrating how the concept of the Metaverse has shaped a research landscape within the disciplines of architecture and design over time.
This study presents a bibliometric and content analysis of a research conducted in the WoS database with the keywords “metaverse” AND “architect*” or “design” or “architectural studio” or “architectural education” or “building” or “architectural space” or “built environment” AND “virtual space” or “mixed reality” or “augmented reality” or “extended reality” or “cyberspace” or “virtual reality” or “virtual environment” or “virtual worlds” or “digital world”. The study covers the use of metaverse in the field of architecture and design.
Although the concrete reality of the Metaverse has not materialized due to its conceptual novelty, its future prospects are interpreted as promising (Piñeiro-Chousa et al., 2024). In this context, researchers can contribute to this point by analyzing the theoretical foundations of the Metaverse in depth. In future studies, in order to obtain more systematic quantitative results on the metaverse, it is planned to expand the keywords, search different databases and include various contents in the study. In addition, it is planned to examine architectural content produced on digital architecture platforms related to metaverse. In order to expand the scope of the study, the relationship of the metaverse with different disciplines will be discussed.
References
Abbate, S., Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Oropallo, E., & Riccio, E. (2022). A first bibliometric literature review on Metaverse. In 2022 IEEE technology and engineering management conference TEMSCON EUROPE, pp. 254–260.
Ağırman, E., & Barakalı, O. C. (2022). Finans ve finansal hizmetlerin geleceği: Metaverse. Avrasya Sosyal Ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 329–346.
Alby, T. (2007). Web 2.0: Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien, Hanser.
Algerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y. L., Oubibi, M., Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the potential: a comprehensive evaluation of augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Electronics. 12(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Allam, Z., Sharifi, A., Bibri, S. E., Jones, D. S., & Krogstie, J. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of smart cities: Opportunities and challenges for environmental, economic, and social sustainability in urban futures. Smart Cities., 5(3), 771–801. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030040
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
Ayiter, E. (2014). (Re)Building Proun #5A in the Metaverse. In International conference on cyberworlds (CW). Spain. 403–406. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2014.63
Bardzell, S., & Shankar, K. (2007). Video game technologies and virtual design: A study of virtual design teams in a metaverse. In 2nd International conference on virtual reality held at the HCI ınternational 2007. Beijing. vol. 4563.
Bartels, N., & Hahne, K. (2023). Teaching building information modeling in the metaverse-an approach based on quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the students perspective. Buildings 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092198
Bibri, S. E., & Jagatheesaperumal, S. K. (2023). Harnessing the potential of the metaverse and artificial intelligence for the internet of city things: Cost-effective XReality and synergistic AIoT technologies. Smart Cities, 6(5), 2397–2429.
Bigne, E., Curras-Perez, R., Ruiz, C., Andreu, L. (2023). I want to travel to the past! The role of creative style and historical reconstructions as antecedents of informativeness in a virtual visit to a heritage tourist destination. Current Issues in Tourism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2263615
Bızel, G. (2023). A bibliometric analysis: Metaverse in education concept. Journal of Metaverse, 3(2), 133–143.
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics, 12, 373–379.
Camilleri, M. A. (2023). Metaverse applications in education: A systematic review and a cost-benefit analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-01-2023-0017
Casini, M. (2022). Extended reality for smart building operation and maintenance: a review. Energies 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103785
Casillo, M., Cecere, L., Colace, F., Lorusso, A., Santaniello, D., & Valentino, C. (2023). Exhibition spaces in the metaverse: a novel design approach. In 8th IEEE history of electrotechnology conference (HISTELCON), pp. 116–119.
Chen, J., Xi, N. N., Pohjonen, V., & Hamari, J. (2023). Paying attention in Metaverse: An experiment on spatial attention in Metaverse: An experiment on spatial attention allocation in extended reality shopping. Information Technology & People., 36(8), 255–283.
Chen, X., Zou, D., Kohnke, L., Xie, H., & Cheng, G. (2021). Affective states in digital game-based learning: Thematic evolution and social network analysis. PLoS ONE, 16(7), e0255184.
Cho, Y., Hong, S., Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2022). DAVE: Deep learning-based asymmetric virtual environment for immersive experiential metaverse content. Electronics 11(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11162604
Choi, H. S., & Kim, S. H. (2017). A content service deployment plan for metaverse museum exhibitions-Centering on the combination of beacons and HMDs. International Journal of Information Management, 37(1), 1519–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.04.017
Chua, H. W., & Yu, Z. G. (2023). A systematic literature review of the acceptability of the use of Metaverse in education over 16 years. Journal of Computers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00273-z
Chun, H. (2023). A study on the design education method using Metaverse by wireless communication with computing for UAV-enabled B5G/6G network. Wireless Networks. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-023-03523-1
Chung, S. J., Kim, S. Y., Kim, K. H. (2024). Comparison of visitor experiences of virtual reality exhibitions by spatial environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103145
Crolla, K., & Goepel, G. (2022). Entering hyper-reality: "Resonance-In-Sight," a mixed-reality art installation. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.1044021
De Francesco, G., & Falcone, M. (2022). Metaverse architecture and territory. The experience of Sicily Lab 2022 in Gioiosa Marea. Archeomatica-Tecnologie Per I Beni Culturali 13(4). 16–19.
Díaz, J., Saldaña, C., & Avila, C. (2020). Virtual world as a resource for hybrid education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(15), 94–109.
Diez-Vial, I., & Montoro-Sanchez, A. (2017). Research evolution in science parks and incubators: Foundations and new trends. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1243–1272.
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G. G., & Foo, S. (2001). Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 37(6), 817–842.
Dionisio, J. D. N., Iii, W. G. B., & Gilbert, R. (2013). 3D virtual worlds and the Metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1–38.
Doma, O. O., & Mert, S. (2022). Dreamscape bricks VR: An experimental virtual reality tool for architectural design. Interaction Design and Architectures., 52, 234–258.
Donoho, A. (2021). A quick ıntroduction to the R ecosystem. World Wide Technology. https://www.wwt.com/blog/a-quick-introduction-to-the-r-ecosystem
Dozio, N., Marcolin, F., Scurati, G. W., Ulrich, L., Nonis, F., Vezzetti, E., Marsocci, G., La Rosa, A., Ferrise, F. (2022). A design methodology for affective Virtual Reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102791
Dreamson, N., & Park, G. (2023). Metaverse-based learning through children’s school space design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 42(1), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12449
Fang, L. B., Dong, X. F., Weng, Z. C., & Chen, T. Q. (2023). Designing an attractive metaverse: Research on design factors influencing audience satisfaction with a virtual space based on QCA. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research., 18(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18010003
Feng, X., Wang, X., & Su, Y. (2024). An analysis of the current status of metaverse research based on bibliometrics. Library Hi Tech, 42(1), 284–308.
Filimonau, V., Ashton, M., & Stankov, U. (2022). Virtual spaces as the future of consumption in tourism, hospitality and events. Journal of Tourism Futures. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-07-2022-0174
Franco, P. A. C., De La Plata, A. R. M., Bernal, E. G. (2022). Protocols for the graphic and constructive diffusion of digital twins of the architectural heritage that guarantee universal accessibility through AR and VR. Applied Sciences-Basel 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178785
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194–220.
Godin, B. (2006). On the origins of bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 68(1), 109–133.
Gu, J. L., Wang, J. C., Guo, X. W., Liu, G. J., Qin, S. J., & Bi, Z. L. (2023). A metaverse-based teaching building evacuation training system with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems., 53(4), 2209–2219. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3231299
Guan, J., & Morris, A. (2022). Extended-XRI body ınterfaces for hyper-connected metaverse environments. In IEEE Games, entertainment, media conference (GEM). Barbados. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM56474.2022.10017701
Guan, J., Morris, A., Irizawa, J. (2023). Extending the metaverse: Hyper-connected smart environments with mixed reality and the ınternet of things. In 30th IEEE conference virtual reality and 3D user ınterfaces, Shanghai, pp. 817–818.
Guan, J. E., Morris, A., Irizawa, J. (2023). Cross-reality for extending the metaverse: designing hyper-connected ımmersive environments with XRI. In 30th IEEE conference virtual reality and 3D user ınterfaces (IEEE VR). Shanghai. 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW58643.2023.00071
Hassouneh, D., & Brengman, M. (2015). Retailing in social virtual worlds: Developing a typology of virtual store atmospherics. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research., 16(3), 218–241.
Hedrick, E., Harper, M., Oliver, E., Hatch, D. (2022). Teaching and learning in virtual reality: Metaverse classroom exploration. In 2nd Annual ıntermountain conference on engineering, technology, and computing (IETC). Orem, UT. https://doi.org/10.1109/IETC54973.2022.9796765
Hu, P., Boorboor, S., Jadhav, S., Marino, J., Mirhosseini, S., Kaufman, A. E. (2022). Spatial perception in ımmersive visualization: A study and findings. In 21st IEEE ınternational symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR). Singapore, pp. 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00080
Huang, H. K., Zeng, X. B., Zhao, L. J., Qiu, C., Wu, H. J., & Fan, L. S. (2022). Fusion of building information modeling and blockchain for Metaverse: A Survey. IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society., 3, 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1109/OJCS.2022.3206494
Hudson-Smith, A. (2022). Incoming metaverses: Digital mirrors for urban planning. Urban Planning., 7(2), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i2.5193
Ibanez, L. A. H., Naya, V. B. (2012). Cyberarchitecture: A Vitruvian approach. In Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on cyberworlds. Germany. 283289. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2012.48
Jauhiainen, J. S., Krohn, C., Junnila, J. (2023). Metaverse and sustainability: systematic review of scientific publications until 2022 and beyond. Sustainability. 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010346
Jin, Q., Liu, Y., Yarosh, S., Han, B., Qian, F. (2022). How will VR enter university classrooms? Multi-stakeholders Investigation of VR in Higher Education. CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI). New Orleans. LA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517542
Jin, Y., & Tiejun, Z. (2023). The application of Metaverse XiRang game in the mixed teaching of art and Design in Colleges and Universities. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 15625–15655.
Jot, J. M., Audfray, R., Hertensteiner, M., Schmidt, B. (2021). Rendering spatial sound for ınteroperable experiences in the audio metaverse. In Conference on ımmersive and 3D audio—from architecture to automotive (I3DA). https://doi.org/10.1109/I3DA48870.2021.9610971
Jovanovic, A., & Milosavljevic, A. (2022). VoRtex metaverse platform for gamified collaborative learning. Electronics 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030317
Khan, G. F., Lee, S., Park, J. Y., & Park, H. W. (2016). Theories in communication science: A structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach. Scientometrics, 108, 531–557.
Kim, T., Planey, J., & Lindgren, R. (2023). Theory-Driven design in metaverse virtual reality learning environments: Two illustrative cases. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(6), 1141–1153.
Koohsari, M. J., McCormack, G. R., Nakaya, T., Yasunaga, A., Fuller, D., Nagai, Y., Oka, K. (2023). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, https://doi.org/10.2196/43549
Kuru, K. (2023). MetaOmniCity: Toward immersive urban metaverse cyberspaces using smart city digital twins. IEEE Access, 11(43), 844–868. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3272890
Kye, B., Han, N., Kim, E., Park, Y., & Jo, S. (2021). Educational applications of Metaverse: Possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32
Latorre, M. (2018). Historia de las web, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 y 4.0. Universidad Marcelino Champagnat. http://umch.edu.pe/arch/hnomarino/74_Historia%20de%20la%20Web.pdf
Lee, J. Y. (2021). A study on metaverse hype for sustainable growth. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 10(3), 72–80.
Lee, I. S., Lee, H., Chen, Y. H., & Chae, Y. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of research assessing the use of acupuncture for pain treatment over the past 20 years. Journal of Pain Research, 367–376.
Li, J., & Ye, F. Y. (2016). Distinguishing sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 108, 821–828.
Liu, Z., Gong, S. Q., Tan, Z. Y., Demian, P. (2023). Immersive technologies-driven building ınformation modelling (BIM) in the context of metaverse. 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061559
Lo, S. C., & Tsai, H. H. (2022). Design of 3D virtual reality in the Metaverse for environmental conservation education based on cognitive theory. Sensors 22(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218329
Lucchi, E. (2023). Digital twins for the automation of the heritage construction sector. Automation in Construction, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105073
Lv, Z. H., Shang, W. L., Guizani, M. (2022). Impact of digital twins and Metaverse on cities: history, current situation, and application perspectives. Applied Sciences-Basel, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412820
Lyu, Q., Watanabe, K., Umemura, H., & Murai, A. (2023). Frontiers in virtual reality, vol. 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1137293
Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420–433.
Mora, L., Deakin, M., & Reid, A. (2019). Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 56–69.
Murugesan, S. (2007). Understanding Web 2.0. IT professional, 9(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2007.78
Nath, K. (2022). Evolution of the internet from web 1.0 to metaverse: The good, the bad and the ugly. TechRxiv Powered by IEEE. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.19743676
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007). Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 161–169.
Oliveira, E., Trevisan, D., Clua, E., Silva, M., Mesquita, C., Cruz, M., & Porcino, T. (2023). Modeling and designing clinical sessions with hybrid environments in the metaverse. In Proceedings of the 25th symposium on virtual and augmented reality, pp. 183–193.
Onecha, B., Cornado, C., Morros, J., Pons, O. (2023). New approach to design and assess metaverse environments for improving learning processes in higher education: the case of architectural construction and rehabilitation. Buildings, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051340
Ortega-Rodriguez, P. J. (2022). From extended reality to the Metaverse: A critical reflection on contributions to education. Teoria De La Educacion., 34(2), 189–208.
Park, B., Namkung, K., & Pan, Y. (2023). Could you evaluate sounds in a virtual environment? evaluation components of auditory experience in a metaverse environment. Applied Sciences-Basel, 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910991
Parlina, A., Ramli, K., & Murfi, H. (2020). Theme mapping and bibliometrics analysis of one decade of big data research in the scopus database. Information, 11(2), 69.
Piñeiro-Chousa, J., López-Cabarcos, M. Á., VittoriRomero, V., & Pérez-Pérez, A. (2024). Evolution and trends of the metaverse in business and management: A bibliometric analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 1–26.
Radanliev, P., De Roure, D., Novitzky, P., & Sluganovic, I. (2023). Accessibility and inclusiveness of new information and communication technologies for disabled users and content creators in the Metaverse. Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2023.2241882
Reis, C. M. & Camara, A. (2023). Expanding nature's storytelling: Extended reality and debiasing strategies for an eco-agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.941373
Ricci, M., Scarcelli, A., Fiorentino, M. (2023). Designing for the Metaverse: A multidisciplinary laboratory in the industrial design program. Future Internet, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15020069
Ruhimat, M., Logayah, D. S., & Darmawan, R. A. (2023). Mobile augmented reality application through metaverse approach as social studies learning media in junior high school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology., 18, 176–185.
Schlemmer, E., & Backes, L. (2015). Online education in metaverse: Novelty or ınnovation?. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series. 183–214. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6351-0.ch009
Sghaier, S., Elfakki, A. O., Alotaibi, A. A. (2022). Development of an intelligent system based on Metaverse learning for students with disabilities. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2022.1006921
Shah, S. H. H., Hameed, I. A., Karlsen, A. S. T., Solberg, M. (2022). Towards a social VR-based exergame for elderly users: An exploratory study of acceptance, experiences and design principles. In 14th International conference on virtual, augmented and mixed reality (VAMR) held as part of the 24th ınternational conference on human–computer ınteraction (HCII), vol. 13317, pp. 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_34
Shishehgarkhaneh, M. B., Keivani, A., Moehler, R. C., Jelodari, N., Laleh, S. R. (2022). Internet of hhings (IoT), building information modeling (BIM), and digital twin (DT) in construction industry: a review, Bibliometric, and Network Analysis. Buildings 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101503
Sra, M. (2023). Enhancing the sense of presence in virtual reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications., 43(4), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2023.3252182
Su, P. Y., Hsiao, P. W., Fan, K. K. (2023). Investigating the relationship between users' behavioral intentions and learning effects of VR system for sustainable tourism development. Sustainability, 15(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097277
Suanpang, P., Niamsorn, C., Pothipassa, P., Chunhapataragul, T., Netwong, T., Jermsittiparsert, K. 2022). Extensible metaverse implication for a smart tourism city. Sustainability, 14(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114027
Tas, N., & Bolat, Y. İ. (2022). Bibliometric mapping of metaverse in education. International Journal of Technology in Education, 5(3), 440–458.
Tian, X. Y., Chen, X. Z., & Feng, L. L. (2023). Quality improvement path and countermeasures for future-oriented film and animation teaching: Based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems., 44(2), 2981–2997. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-222779
Tlili, A. Huang, R. H., Shehata, B., Liu, D. J., Zhao, J. L., Metwally, A. H. S., Wang, H. H., Denden, M., Bozkurt, A., Lee, L. H. (2022). Is metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: A combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00205-x
Türker, O., & Işık, A. (2023). E-augmented reality supported museum application in the context of NFT applications. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sanat & Tasarım Dergisi., 13(1), 326–342.
Wang, M. J., Yu, H. Y., Bell, Z., & Chu, X. Y. (2022a). Constructing an edu-metaverse ecosystem: A new and innovative framework. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies., 15(6), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3210828
Wang, Y. Y., Lee, L. H., Braud, T., Hui, P. (2022). Re-shaping post-COVID-19 teaching and learning: A blueprint of virtual-physical blended classrooms in the metaverse era. In 42nd IEEE ınternational conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS), Italy. 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW56584.2022.00053
Wang, M. L., Liu, S. S., Hu, L. L., Lee, J. Y. (2023). A study of metaverse exhibition sustainability on the perspective of the experience economy. Sustainability, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129153
Wang, X., Lu, J., Song, Z., Zhou, Y., Liu, T., & Zhang, D. (2022c). From past to future: Bibliometric analysis of global research productivity on nomogram (2000–2021). Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 997713.
Wortley, D. J. (2022). Gis, Covid-19 and the Metaverse. In 8th International conference on cartography and GIS. Bulgaria, 2, 148–154.
Wu, L. Y., Yu, R. J., Su, W., Ye, S. S. (2022). Design and implementation of a metaverse platform for traditional culture: the chime bells of Marquis Yi of Zeng. 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00828-w
Xia, X., & Pan, Y. W. (2022). Interactive relationships in the future of virtual reality. In 24th International conference on human–computer ınteraction (HCII), vol. 13518, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21707-4_17
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, Z., & Lv, T. (2020). A bibliometric analysis on land degradation: Current status, development, and future directions. Land, 9(1), 28.
Xu, A. F. & Zeng, W. J. (2022). Dynamic optimization modeling of smart tourism information system using VRGIS in big data environment. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7914674
Xu, L. Q., & Zhang, Z. B. (2022). Effects of user construction behavior on user experience in a virtual ındoor environment. In 21st IEEE ınternational symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR). Singapore. 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR55827.2022.00073
Xu, L., & Marinova, D. (2013). Resilience thinking: A bibliometric analysis of socio-ecological research. Scientometrics, 96, 911–927.
Xu, M., Niyato, D., Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Miao, C., & Kim, D. I. (2022). Wireless edge-empowered metaverse: A learning-based incentive mechanism for virtual reality. In ICC 2022-IEEE International conference on Communications, pp. 5220–5225.
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Yang, E. S. (2023). Implications of immersive technologies in healthcare sector and its built environment. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1184925
Yang, Y. Q., Shi, Q. F., Zhang, Z. X., Shan, X. C. A., Salam, B., Lee, C. (2023). Robust triboelectric information-mat enhanced by multi-modality deep learning for smart home. Infomat, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12360
You, J., Wen, X., Liu, L., Yin, J., & Ji, J. S. (2023). Biophilic classroom environments on stress and cognitive performance: A randomized crossover study in virtual reality (VR). PLoS ONE, 18(11), e0291355.
Yu, K. J. (2021). From slime mold to meta. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 9(5), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-1-010019
Yu, X., Wang, C., Xu, L., Wu, C., Wang, Z., He, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). When connected and automated vehicles meet mobile crowdsensing: A perception and transmission framework in the metaverse. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.
Zhang, H., Luo, G. Y., Li, Y. D., & Wang, F. Y. (2023). Parallel vision for intelligent transportation systems in Metaverse: Challenges, solutions, and potential applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man Cybernetics-Systems., 53(6), 3400–3413. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2022.3228314
Zhou, X., Fang, N.Y., Gu, Z. W. (2022). Scene design of virtual singing bar oriented to metauniverse. In 3rd International conference on design, operation and evaluation of mobile communications (MOBILE) held as part of 24th ınternational conference on human–computer ınteraction (HCII), 13337, pp. 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_9
Zhou, Z., Chen, Z., & Jin, X. L. (2023). A review of the literature on the metaverse: Definition, technologies, and user behaviors. Internet Research, 34(1), 129–148.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of ınterest
The authors whose names are listed above certify that they have NO affi liations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any fi nancial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-fi nancial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affi liations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mutlu Avinç, G., Yıldız, A. A bibliometric and systematic review of scientific publications on metaverse research in architecture: web of science (WoS). Int J Technol Des Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09918-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09918-1