Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The teacher recruitment crisis: examining influential recruitment factors from a United States technology and engineering teacher preparation program

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decades of declining enrollment trends and additional program closures of Technology and Engineering (T&E) teacher preparation programs in the United States (US) continue to raise concerns about the trajectory and sustainability of the profession. These concerns are not insular to the US though as other countries have also presented data indicating a T&E teacher shortage crisis. In attempts to address these concerning trends, T&E teacher preparation programs in the US have implemented an amalgam of creative recruitment strategies. However, the data continues to show a downward trend in the country, questioning what is the sufficiency of these efforts and which are the most influential? This study surveyed 51 students enrolled in a T&E teacher preparation program in the eastern US to determine which recruitment methods had the greatest influence on their decision to enroll in the program. The findings revealed that face-to-face interactions with secondary level T&E educators, alumni, T&E teacher education faculty members, and an interest in hands-on hobbies related to T&E education were found to have a statistically significant influence on students’ decision to enroll in the T&E teacher preparation program. A number of recruitment factors such as secondary school counselors, brochures, and social media platforms did not have a significant influence on students’ enrollment decision. Recommendations and implications for T&E teacher preparation programs, teacher educators, program alumni, researchers, secondary level T&E teachers, administrators, and school counselors are provided to help countries facing a similar T&E teacher shortage crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Design and Technology Education in the United States is commonly referred to as Technology and Engineering Education.

References

  • Argyrous, G. (1997). The z-test for a single proportion. In Statistics for Social Research. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14777-9_11

  • Bransberger, P., Falkenstern, C., & Lane, P. (2020). Knocking at the college door: Projections of high school graduates (10th ed.). Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. https://knocking.wiche.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2020/12/Knocking-pdf-for-website.pdf

  • Craft, C. O. (1980). Recruitment of industrial arts education majors-A professional obligation of all industrial arts educators. Man/Society/Technology, 39(5), 21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Design and Technology Teachers’ Association Australia (DATTA Australia) (2019). Technologies teacher shortage survey: National overview 2019. https://www.datta.wa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/TECHNOLOGY-TEACHER-SHORTAGE-SURVEY-REPORT-2019-DATTA-AUSTRALIA.pdf

  • Daugherty, M. (1998). A recruitment crisis: Strategies for affecting change. The Technology Teacher, 57(7), 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Devier, D. H. (1982). The recruitment of industrial arts teacher education students in Ohio with possible implications for the total profession. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 19(3), 27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds, N. A. (1980). Effective recruiting—A tool to replenish, sustain, and improve the profession. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 6(1), 17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, J. V., & Williams, T. O. (2015). The “Who, what, and how conversation”: Characteristics and responsibilities of current in-service technology and engineering educators. The Journal of Technology Studies, 41(1), 48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. J. (1967). Handbook on recruitment of potential industrial arts teachers. New York: New York University

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., & Daugherty, M. (2004). Factors that influence students to enroll in technology education program. Journal of Technology Education, 15(1), 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Education Committee (2017). Recruitment and retention of teachers. HC 199. London. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/199/199.pdf

  • Isbell, C. H., & Lovedahl, G. G. (1989). A survey of recruitment techniques used in industrial arts/technology education programs. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 15(1), 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Izadi, M., & Toosi, M. (1995). Effective recruitment techniques as identified by students majoring in industrial technology. Journal of Industrial Technology, 11(3), 13–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Litowitz, L. (2014). A curricular analysis of undergraduate technology & engineering teacher preparation programs in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 25(2), 73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R., & Danechi, S. (2021). Teacher recruitment and retention in England. House of Commons Library Briefing Paper no. 07222. London: House of Commons Libraryhttps://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7222/CBP-7222.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, T. S. (2015). Examining the demographics and preparation experiences of foundations of technology teachers. The Journal of Technology Studies, 41(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v41i1.a.7

  • Love, T. S., Love, Z. J., & Love, K. S. (2016). Better practices for recruiting T&E teachers. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(1), 10–15

  • Love, T. S., & Maiseroulle, T. (2021). Are technology and engineering educator programs really declining? Reexamining the status and characteristics of programs in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 33(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v33i1.a.1

  • Moye, J. J. (2017). The supply and demand of technology and engineering teachers in the United States: Who knows? Technology and Engineering Teacher, 76(4), 32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Moye, J. J., Reed, P. A., Wu-Rorrer, R., & Lecorchick, D. (2020). Current and future trends and issues facing technology and engineering education in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 32(1), 35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsfield, E., & Lee, K. (2021). Exploring the technology teacher shortage in New Zealand: The implications for quality teaching and learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09668-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ressler, R. (1966). Recruitment of industrial arts teachers in the state of Ohio. [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University]. OhioLINK

  • Sanders, M. (1986). Recruitment strategies for industrial arts teacher education. The Journal of Epsilon Pi Tau, 12(1), 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, J. W. (1989). The need for a defensible content base for industrial technology; An editorial. Journal of Industrial Technology, 6(1), 6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Soboloski, M. (2003). The current status of graduate and undergraduate programs in technology education. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Technology, State University of New York at Oswego

  • Starkweather, K. N. (1999). Teacher shortage. In M. R. Karnes (Ed.), Technology education prospect: Perceptions, change, and the survival of the profession. Journal of Technology Studies, 25(1), 27–28

  • Ujifusa, A. (2018, April 17). Here’s how the public views teachers, their salaries, and their impact. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/leadership/heres-how-the-public-views-teachers-their-salaries-and-their-impact/2018/04

  • United States Department of Education (USDOE) (2020). Teacher shortage areas. https://tsa.ed.gov/#/reports

  • Volk, K. S. (1993). Enrollment trends in industrial arts/technology education programs from 1970–1990. Journal of Technology Education, 4(2), 46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, K. S. (1997). Going, going, gone? Recent trends in technology teacher education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 8(2), 67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, K. S. (2000). Trends in U.S. technology teacher education programs: Home thoughts from abroad.Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 37(3). https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v37n3/volk.html

  • Volk, K. S. (2019). The demise of traditional technology and engineering education teacher preparation programs and a new direction for the profession. Journal of Technology Education, 31(1), 2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S. A., Erli, L. M., Johnson, C. W., & Greiner, S. S. (2007). Identifying the paradigm of design faculty in undergraduate technology education in the United States. Journal of Technology Education, 18(2), 68–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. D., & Custer, R. L. (1998). Why they want to teach: Factors influencing students to become technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v10i1.a.4

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author ZJL designed the study and collected the data. Author TSL drafted the manuscript and conducted the statistical analyses. Both authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript and the approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tyler S. Love.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Survey items

Directions: Please rank the extent to which the following recruitment factors influenced your decision to pursue a career as a Technology and Engineering (T&E) educator. Responses range from 1 to 6, with 1 representing no influence, and 6 representing very influential.

  1. 1.

    University recruiter visited my high school.

  2. 2.

    University social media account.

  3. 3.

    University or program website.

  4. 4.

    Program brochures.

  5. 5.

    Face to face interaction with a faculty member from the program.

  6. 6.

    Interaction(s) with alumni from the program.

  7. 7.

    Positive T&E education job characteristics.

  8. 8.

    Current student(s) in the T&E education program.

  9. 9.

    University open house event.

  10. 10.

    Involvement with Technology Student Association (TSA).

  11. 11.

    High school counselor(s).

  12. 12.

    Friends/peers.

  13. 13.

    Family members.

  14. 14.

    Middle or high school T&E teacher.

  15. 15.

    Interest in hands-on T&E hobbies.

  16. 16.

    Other (please describe).

.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Love, T.S., Love, Z.J. The teacher recruitment crisis: examining influential recruitment factors from a United States technology and engineering teacher preparation program. Int J Technol Des Educ 33, 105–121 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09727-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09727-4

Keywords

Navigation