Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Students’ perceptions of engineers: dimensionality and influences on career aspiration in engineering

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many career development theories (e.g., Gottfredson, in: Brown SD, Lent RW (eds), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, Wiley, Hoboken, 2005) posit that occupational perceptions are fundamental for understanding youngsters’ career aspirations, research relating school students’ perceptions of engineers and students’ career interest in engineering has been scarce. This study sought to (a) identify the factors underlying the image of engineers to secondary school students, (b) test the invariance of the factors’ measurement model across gender and school years, and (c) examine the hypothesis that the factors mediate the effects of engineering experiences at school on students’ career interest. Data were collected via a questionnaire from a representative sample of 3724 students at Hong Kong. A measurement model with four latent perception factors (innovation and entrepreneurship competencies; aptitudes related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics; hands-on work status; and career prestige) fit the responses well and was replicable across gender and school years. Construct validity of the factors was supported by the pattern of their partial mediation effects in the relationship between students’ experiences and their career interest in engineering. The results deepened the understanding of the image of engineers and the image’s influences on students’ career aspiration in engineering. The perception dimensions identified provide a framework useable for engineering education in school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 397–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bame, E., Dugger, W., Jr., de Vries, M., & McBee, J. (1993). Pupils’ attitudes toward technology—PATT-USA. Journal of Technology Studies, 19(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(2), 186–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. S. (2010). Why don’t young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. S. (2017). Shu li tui xiu jian. STEM xian shu guang. [Enrollments in mathematics and sciences have stopped declining. A glimmer of hope for STEM.] Wen Wei Po. http://pdf.wenweipo.com/2017/10/24/a21-1024.pdf.

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, P., & Chen, W. (2017). Elementary school students’ conceptions of engineers: a drawing analysis study in Taiwan. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(1), 476–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behaviorial sciences. Lawrence Erlbauni Associates: Hillsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Development Council (2015). Promotion of STEM education. Hong Kong: HKSAR. http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/Brief%20on%20STEM%20(Overview)_eng_20151105.pdf.

  • Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gago, J. M. (Ed.). (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe: Report of the high level group on human resources for science and technology in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Information and Communication Unit. Retrieved from https://www.eirma.org/sites/www.eirma.org/files/doc/documents/EU/HLG-2004-gago-HumanResource.pdf.

  • Giannantonio, C. M., & Hurley-Hanson, A. E. (2006). Applying image norms across Super’s career development stages. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(4), 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, A., Potvin, G., & Hazari, Z. (2014). Do Engineers Beget Engineers? Exploring Connections Between the Engineering-related Career Choices of Students and Their Families. In Paper Presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Applying Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise in career guidance and counseling. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 71–100). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Hong Kong SAR (2015). Report on manpower projections to 2022. Hong Kong: HKSAR. http://www.lwb.gov.hk/report/mp2022_en.pdf.

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth-grade students’ views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2015). Measuring model fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.

  • Klapwijk, R., & Rommes, E. (2009). Career orientation of secondary school students (m/f) in the Netherlands. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. In Paper presented at the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://www.eie.org/engineering-elementary/research/articles/draw-engineer-test-daet-development-tool-investigate.

  • Kőycű, Ü., & de Vries, M. J. (2016). What preconceptions and attitudes about engineering are prevalent amongst upper secondary school pupils? An international study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutnick, P. J., Chan, Y. Y., & Lee, P. Y. (2012). Engineering education opportunities, perceptions and career choice of secondary school students in Hong Kong SAR, China. Paper presented at the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. Retrieved from https://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/166937/1/Content.pdf?accept=1.

  • Kutnick, P., Zhu, Z., Chan, C., Chan, R. Y. Y., Lee, B. P. Y., & Lai, V. K. W. (2017). Attitudes and aspirations regarding engineering among Chinese secondary school students: comparisons between industrialising and post-industrial geo-engineering regions of Mainland China and Hong Kong. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 48(4), 608–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401), 1198–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. S. (2011). GK-12 engineering fellows change student perceptions; science fellows, not so much. In Paper presented at the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/18028.

  • Madara, D. S., & Namango, S. (2016). Perceptions of female high school students on engineering. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(25), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies. www.acola.org.au.

  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montfort, D., Brown, S., & Pollock, D. (2009). An investigation of students’ conceptual understanding in related sophomore to graduate-level engineering and mechanics courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raat, J. H., & de Vries, M. (1985). What do 13-year old students think about technology? The conception of and the attitude towards technology of 13-year old girls and boys. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262-998).

  • Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2015). STEM and technology education: international state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skamp, K. (2007). Conceptual learning in the primary and middle years: The interplay of heads, hearts, and hands-on science. Teaching Science, Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 53(3), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, S. Y., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Perceptions of engineering among Korean youth. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(1), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Super, D. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In D. Brown, L. Brooks, et al. (Eds.), Career choice development (2nd ed., pp. 197–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. L., Steward, J. C., & Lapan, R. T. (2004). Family factors associated with sixth-grade adolescents’ math and science career interests. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. W. (2016). Study choice and career development in STEM fields: an overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research project was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Grant No. 744013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, Centennial Campus, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan

  2. Department of Psychology, Centennial Campus, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong

    Nai Chi Jonathan Yeung

  3. Department of Education and Professional Studies, King’s College London, London, UK

    Peter Kutnick

  4. Department of Information Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin N.T., Hong Kong

    Rosanna Yuen-Yan Chan

Authors
  1. Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nai Chi Jonathan Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Kutnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rosanna Yuen-Yan Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nai Chi Jonathan Yeung.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, C.K.Y., Yeung, N.C.J., Kutnick, P. et al. Students’ perceptions of engineers: dimensionality and influences on career aspiration in engineering. Int J Technol Des Educ 29, 421–439 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-09492-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-09492-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation