Skip to main content
Log in

Does the government-mandated adoption of international financial reporting standards reduce income tax revenue?

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has been the most noteworthy accounting regulatory change in a multitude of countries. After adopting IFRS, the gap between accounting earnings and taxable income increases in most of these countries. Previous literature suggests that low book-tax conformity is associated with higher corporate tax avoidance, thereby collecting lower income tax revenues. This study applies the propensity score matching method and the difference-in-differences design to empirically examine the impact of the government-mandated adoption of IFRS on a country’s income tax revenue. Using panel data of 137 countries covering the period from 2000 to 2010, the empirical results show that the mandatory IFRS adoption results in a decrease in income tax revenue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example, according to accounting conservatism of accounting principles, IFRS includes a number of rules on permission of unrealized losses recognition, which causes lower accounting earnings and therefore less income tax revenue based on IFRS-based taxation.

  2. Erickson et al. (2004) show that increased tax payment is less than one-tenth of the overstated accounting earnings.

  3. We apply nearest neighbor matching with replacement, meaning that a comparison unit can be used more than once as a match. Matching with replacement helps to reduce bias (Dehejia and Wahba 2002).

  4. We use a quarter of a standard deviation of the sample estimated propensity as a tolerance level, which is suggested by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1985).

  5. We choose 0.05 as the bandwidth value for the kernel matching. Low-bandwidth values yield an unbiased estimate of the true density function.

  6. These dependent variables in the DID model are common to the literature on tax revenues. For example, Gupta (2007) contributes on the principal determinants of tax revenue performance across developing countries, and the study applies the ratio of income tax revenue to total government revenue to measure tax revenue. Baunsgaard and Keen (2010) examine the effect of trade liberalization on tax revenue. They use the ratio of tax revenue to GDP as a proxy of tax revenue. In addition, the data of the first two variables (taxttr and taxtgr) are directly calculated by World Development Indicators (WDI), which means that the data are commonly used by analysts. The last variable (taxgdp) measures the importance of income tax revenue in terms of the overall economic scale.

  7. In order to control for the cross-sectional variation in the extent to which the adoption of IFRS reduces book-tax conformity, we need to include a proxy variable in the list of explanatory variables. Procházka and Molín (2016) argue that most countries derive taxable income by adjusting accounting earnings reported in statutory accounts in accordance with special provisions set forth in income tax acts. Based on the number of adjustments required, they classify 27 EU countries into three categories: high book-tax conformity, middle book-tax conformity, and low book-tax conformity. Therefore, the number of adjustments required can be used as the proxy variable. Unfortunately, it is quite difficult for us to find the data of this proxy variable for all 137 sample countries. Alternatively, we include the country dummy variables to capture the extent to which IFRS reduces the book-tax conformity and its effect on the tax revenues of each country. Besides, we also use the country fixed effect to capture the extent to which tax law changes and its effect on tax revenues for specific countries.

  8. Tax morale represents taxpayers’ motivation to pay taxes (Luttmer and Singhal 2014). It influences not only personal behaviors but also corporate tax avoidance behaviors.

  9. We exclude 2005 to avoid the potential confounding effects during the transition year (Hong et al. 2014).

  10. 12 percent = 4.754/38.422, where 4.754 is the coefficient of ifrs×post in Column (3) of Table 4, and 38.422 is the mean value of taxttr for IFRS adoption countries reported in Table 1.

References

  • Atwood, T. J., Drake, M. S., Myers, J. N., & Myers, L. A. (2012). Home country tax system characteristics and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1831–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (2001). Human capital and growth. American Economic Review, 91(2), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2010). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baunsgaard, T., & Keen, M. (2010). Tax revenue and (or?) trade liberalization. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., & Mo, P. L. L. (2010). Will a departure from tax-based accounting encourage tax noncompliance? Archival evidence from a transition economy. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(1), 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental casual studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A. (2003). The divergence between book income and tax income. Tax Policy and the Economy, 17, 169–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D., & Kraay, A. (2004). Trade, growth, and poverty. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F22–F49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, M., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2004). How much will firms pay for earnings that do not exist? Evidence of taxes paid on allegedly fraudulent earnings. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, M. J. (1997). In favor of financial liberalization. The Economic Journal, 107(442), 754–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. S. (2007). Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries. IMF Working paper WP/07/184.

  • Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, M., & Shevlin, T. (2005). Book-tax conformity for corporate income: An introduction to the issues. Tax Policy and the Economy, 19, 101–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H. A., Hung, M., & Lobo, G. J. (2014). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on IPOs in global capital markets. The Accounting Review, 89(4), 1365–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiraskova, S. (2015). The relationship between tax and book income after adoption IFRS in the Czech republic in comparison with other European countries. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(12), 1180–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karampinis, N. I., & Hevas, D. L. (2013). Effects of IFRS adoption on tax-induced incentives for financial earnings management: Evidence from Greece. The International Journal of Accounting, 48(2), 218–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lago-Penas, I., & Lago- Penas, S. (2010). The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from European countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(4), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, E. F. P., & Singhal, M. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspective, 28(4), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, L. F. (1998). Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro, M. R., Brandão, E. F. M., & Martins, F. V. D. S. (2011). A panel data econometric study of corporate tax revenue in European Union: Structural, cyclical business and institutional determinants. FEP Working papers (Vol. 437, pp. 1–38).

  • Procházka, D., & Molín, J. (2016). Book-tax conformity: The review of recent research and its implication for the IFRS adoption in Europe. eJournal of Tax Research, 14(1), 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, F. F. (2013). Tax morale and tax evasion reports. Economics Letters, 121(1), 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shima, K. M., & Yang, D. C. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of IFRS. International Journal of Business, 17(3), 276–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, T. (2015). Does book-tax conformity deter opportunistic book and tax reporting? An international analysis. European Accounting Review, 24(3), 441–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. (1988). The impact of macroeconomic policies on the level of taxation (and on the fiscal balance) in developing countries. IMF Working paper WP/88/95.

  • Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, W. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal, D., & Mhedhbi, K. (2006). An analysis of the factors affecting the adoption of international accounting standards by developing countries. The International Journal of Accounting, 41(4), 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehri, F., & Chouaibi, J. (2013). Adoption determinants of the international accounting standards IAS/IFRS by the developing countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 18(35), 56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the insightful comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers and the editor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Chieh Wu.

Appendices

Appendix A

See Table 7.

Table 7 Sample countries

Appendix B

See Table 8.

Table 8 Variable definitions

Appendix C

See Table 9.

Table 9 Test of differences in means after matching

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, CW., Wu, WC. Does the government-mandated adoption of international financial reporting standards reduce income tax revenue?. Int Tax Public Finance 26, 145–166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9495-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9495-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation