Skip to main content
Log in

Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Disaster Management (DM), reusing knowledge of best practices from past experiences is envisaged as the best approach for dealing with future disasters. But analysing and modelling processes involved in those experiences is a well-known challenge. But the efficient storage of those processes to allow reuse by others in future DM endeavours is even more challenging and less discussed. Without an efficient process in place, DM knowledge reuse becomes even more remote as the effort incurred gets construed as a hindrance to more pressing activities during the execution of disaster activities. Efficiency has to also be pursued without compromising the effectiveness of the knowledge analysis and reuse. It is important to ensure that knowledge remains meaningful and relevant after it is transformed. This paper presents and validates a DM knowledge analysis framework (DMKAF 2.0) that caters for efficient transformation of DM knowledge intended for reuse. The paper demonstrates that undertaking knowledge transformation and storage in the context of its use is crucial in DM for both, effectiveness and efficiency of the transformation process. Design Science Research methodology guides the research undertaken, by informing enhancements and how the framework is evaluated. A real case study of flood DM from the State Emergency Service of Victoria State Australia is successfully used to validate these enhancements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allam, L. (2020). “Right Fire for Right Future: How Cultural Burning Can Protect Australia from Catastrophic Blazes”. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jan/19/right-fire-for-right-future-how-cultural-burning-can-protect-australia-from-catastrophic-blazes (Access date: 28 January 2020)

  • Audefroy, J. F., & Sánchez, B. N. C. (2017). Integrating Local Knowledge for Climate Change Adaptation in Yucatán, Mexico. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6(1), 228–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC Indonesia. (2018). “Gempa, Tsunami Dan Likuifaksi: Rangkaian Bencana Di Palu Yang Perlu Anda Ketahui”. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-45832237 (Access date: 1 Maret 2019)

  • Bellinger, G., Castro, D., & Mills, A. (2005). “Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom”. Retrieved from https://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~amendes/SistemasInformacaoTP/TextosBasicos/Data-Information-Knowledge.pdf (Access date: 19 July 2021)

  • Beydoun, G., Low, G., Henderson-Sellers, B., Mouratidis, H., Gomez-Sanz, J., & J., Pavon, J., & Gonzalez-Perez, C. (2009). Faml: A Generic Metamodel for Mas Development. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 35(6), 841–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. (2007). “Knowledge Ecosystems: A Theoretical Lens for Organizations Confronting Hyperturbulent Environments”. In T., M., D., W., E., F., & J.I., D. (Eds.), Organizational Dynamics of Technology-Based Innovation: Diversifying the Research Agenda (Vol. 235, pp. 457-462). IFIP International Federation for Information Processing: Springer Boston MA.

  • CCCM Cluster. (2016). “The Mend Evacuation Guide, Planning Mass Evacuations in Natural Disasters”. Retrieved from http://www.globalcccmcluster.org/system/files/publications/MEND_download.pdf (Access date: 1 January 2017)

  • Chen, Y.-J. (2010). Development of a Method for Ontology-Based Empirical Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Decision Support Systems, 50(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). “Flood Preparedness”. AUSTRALIAN EMERGENCY MANUALS SERIES: Manual 20. Retrieved from http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/flood/EMA_Flood_preparedness_manual.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 2020.

  • Coppola, D. P. (2011). Introduction to International Disaster Management - (2nd ed.). Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, G., & Margherita, A. (2018). Can We Solve Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Framework and a Collective Intelligence System to Support Problem Analysis and Solution Design for Complex Social Issues. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 133(2018), 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiantis, D., & Minasny, B. (2018). “2012 Research Had Identified Indonesian City Palu as High Risk of Liquefaction”. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/2012-research-had-identified-indonesian-city-palu-as-high-risk-of-liquefaction-104578 (Access date: 1 Maret 2019)

  • Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337-A355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information System Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (2015). Distinguishing and Contrasting Two Strategies for Design Science Research. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, D. I. (2017). Agent-Based Modelling for Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework (Doctor of Philosophy). University of Technology Sydney Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inan, D. I., & Beydoun, G. (2017a). “Disaster Knowledge Management Analysis Framework Utilizing Agent-Based Models: Design Science Research Approach”. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 116–124.

  • Inan, D. I., & Beydoun, G. (2017b). “Facilitating Disaster Knowledge Management with Agent-Based Modelling”. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty First Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS2017), Langkawi Malaysia. pp. 1–15.

  • Inan, D. I., Beydoun, G., & Opper, S. (2016). Customising Agent Based Analysis Towards Analysis of Disaster Management Knowledge. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS2016), Wollongong NSW Australia

  • Inan, D. I., Beydoun, G., & Opper, S. (2018a). Agent-Based Knowledge Analysis Framework in Disaster Management. Information Systems Frontiers, 20(4), 783–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, D. I., Beydoun, G., & Pradhan, B. (2018b). Developing a Decision Support System for Disaster Management: Case Study of an Indonesia Volcano Eruption. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 31(2018), 711–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T., Wang, Q., & Xie, Z. (2019). Disaster Response Knowledge and Its Social Determinants: A Cross-Sectional Study in Beijing. PLOS ONE, 14(3), e0214367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, P.-S.S., & Chang, K.-M. (2020). Metamorphosis from Local Knowledge to Involuted Disaster Knowledge for Disaster Governance in a Landslide-Prone Tribal Community in Taiwan. Internaltional Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42(2020), 101339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Lorca, A. A., Beydoun, G., Valencia-Garcia, R., & Martinez-Bejar, R. (2016). Supporting Agent Oriented Requirement Analysis with Ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 87(2016), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdoo, B. G., Dengler, L., Prasetya, G., & Titovd, V. (2006). Smong: How an Oral History Saved Thousands on Indonesia’s Simeulue Island During the December 2004 and March 2005 Tsunamis. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 22(S3), 661–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mejri, O., & Pesaro, G. (2015). “Knowledge Based Strategies for Disaster Risk Reduction: A Knowledge Management Framework to Increase Understanding and Awareness of Value of Prevention and Preparedness”. Paper presented at the Safety and Reliability of Complex Engineered Systems - Proceedings of the 25th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2015.

  • Mens, T., & Van Gorp, P. (2006). A Taxonomy of Model Transformation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 152, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., Yeo, S., & Walsh, M. (2013). “Flood Intelligence: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Is Generated – Lessons from Lockhart and Urana Shire Floods 2010–2012”. Paper presented at the Floodplain Management Association National Conference, Tweed Heads NSW Australia.

  • OMG. (2013). Omg Meta Object Facility (Mof) Core Specification Version 2.4.1. In: Object Management Group (OMG).

  • Othman, S. H., & Beydoun, G. (2016). A Metamodel-Based Knowledge Sharing System for Disaster Management. Expert Systems with Applications, 63, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, B. (2012). “Why Did the 2011 Japan Tsunami Kill So Many People?”. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-parker/japan-tsunami_b_1335737.html?ir=Australia. Accessed 23 May 2021.

  • Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., & Vaezi, R. (2012). “Design Science Research Evaluation In K. Peffers, M. Rothenberger, & Kuechler, B. (Eds.), Design Science Research in Information Systems: Advances in Theory and Practice (Desrist 2012) (pp. 398–410): Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

  • Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., & Venable, J. R. (2008). Strategies for Design Science Research Evaluation. Paper presented at the Proceedigns of the 16th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2008), Galway, Ireland.

  • Regional Development Victoria. (2016). “Regional Development Victoria”. Retrieved from http://www.rdv.vic.gov.au/victorian-regions. Accessed 23 Jul 2020.

  • Richardson, C., & Goll, H. (2020). “This Thousand-Year-Old Aboriginal Tradition of Lighting Fires Could Be a Solution to Fight Australia’s Devastating Bushfires”. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.sg/australia-fires-aboriginal-indigenous-groups-2020-1/?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.

  • Rivera, C., Tehler, H., & Wamsler, C. (2015). “Fragmentation in Disaster Risk Management Systems: A Barrier for Integrated Planning”. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14, 445–456.

  • Rossi, M., Purao, S., & Sein, M. K. (2012). “Generalizating from Design Research”. Paper presented at the International workshop on IT Artefact Design & Workpractice Intervention, Barcelona Spain.

  • Rowley, J. (2007). The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the Dikw Hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, J. S. S., Manuela, W. S., Tan, M. L. L., Sañez, S. K., & Tong, A. Z. U. (2016). Of Timelines and Timeliness: Lessons from Typhoon Haiyan in Early Disaster Response. Disasters, 40(4), 644–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satake, K. (2014). Advances in Earthquake and Tsunami Sciences and Disaster Risk Reduction since the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami. Geoscience Letters, 1(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action Design Research. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendall, S., & Kozaczynski, W. (2003). Model Transformation: The Heart and Soul of Model-Driven Software Development. IEEE Software, 20(5), 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SES NSW Australia. (2016). “Floodsafe - State Emergency Service Nsw”. Retrieved from http://www.floodsafe.com.au. Accessed 8 Jul 2018.

  • SES Victoria Australia. (2014). “Moira Shire Flood Emergency Plan”. A Sub-Plan of the Municipal Emergency Management Plan. North East Region and the Cobram, Nurnurkah and Yarrawonga Units: SES Victoria Australia.

  • Sword-Daniels, V., Eriksen, C., Hudson-Doyle, E. E., Alaniz, R., Adler, C., Schenk, T., & Vallance, S. (2016). “Embodied Uncertainty: Living with Complexity and Natural Hazards”. Journal of Risk Research, 21(3), 290–307.

  • Syafwina. (2014). Recognizing Indigenous Knowledge for Disaster Management: Smong, Early Warning System from Simeulue Island, Aceh. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, D., Budhathoki, N. R., & Munkvold, B. E. (2017). Analyzing Crisis Response through Actor-Network: The Case of Kathmandu Living Labs. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS), 41(2017), 414–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDSR. (2015). “Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–20130”. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction.

  • Velasquez, J. (2014). “Disasters and Business Continuity in the Philippines”. Retrieved from http://www.unisdr.org/archive/40331 (Access date 10 September 2016)

  • Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). Feds: A Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. European Journal of Information Systems (EJIS), 25(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner, J., & Pigeon, P. (2015). The Role of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widianto, S. (2018). “Indonesia’s Indigenous Languages Hold the Secrets of Surviving Disaster”. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/15/indonesias-indigenous-languages-hold-the-secrets-of-surviving-disaster/ (Access date: 1 Maret 2019)

  • YEO, S., DAVIES, B., WINKLER, D., & GALVIN, A. (2010). “Using Flood Intelligence to Inform Emergency Response”. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Floodplain Management Authorities Conference, Gosford Central Coast NSW Australia.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Andrew Sheehan and Mr. Simon Opper, as the DM experts from the SES Victoria and New South Wales States of Australia respectively for their contributions to the evaluation of the research. Their involvements and feedbacks in the evaluation activities has helped the authors with the improved version of the framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dedi I. Inan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 5 Evaluation outcome of benefits and usability of the deposited knowledge from the DM experts of the SES State of Victoria and New South Wales of Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inan, D.I., Beydoun, G. & Pradhan, B. Disaster Management Knowledge Analysis Framework Validated. Inf Syst Front 24, 2077–2097 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10245-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10245-w

Keywords

Navigation