Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green supply chain management (GSCM) and green information system (GIS) are two strategic endeavors of external and internal orientations for the sustainable development of an organization. This study identifies the common dimensions between the two IT-enabled innovations in terms of environment protection, process control and organization support, and conceptualizes their operational fit. Compared with the commonly used perceived fit to measure how well IT infrastructure supports business activities, the operationalization of GSCM-GIS fit is based on both fit-as-profile-deviation and fit-as-moderation approaches to capture the synergy of GSCM and GIS practices along their common dimensions. Empirical evidence supports that operational fit as the result of functional deployment has expected long-term implications on environmental and social performances; whereas the implementation of both GSCM and GIS as the result of strategic planning has relatively short-term impacts on operational and economic performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alaeddini, M., & Salekfard, S. (2013). Investigating the role of an enterprise architecture project in the business-IT alignment in Iran. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(1), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albinger, H. S., & Freeman, S. J. (2000). Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson, V., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Information systems use as strategy practice: a multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avila, O., Goepp, V., & Kiefer, F. (2009). Understanding and classifying information system alignment approaches. Journal of computer information systems, 50(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzone, G., & Noci, G. (1998). Seeing ecology and “green” innovations as a source of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 94–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Green information technology strategic justification and evaluation. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, S., Worhach, P., & Sheng, P. S. (1995). Environmentally-conscious supply chain management. Electronics and the Environment 1995. ISEE., Proceedings of the 1995 I.E. International Symposium on (pp. 235–239). IEEE.

  • Bendoly, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Bharadwaj, S. (2012). Complementary drivers of new product development performance: cross-functional coordination, information system capability, and intelligence quality. Production and Operations Management, 21(4), 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, F., & Ågerfalk, P. J. (2011). Information technology as a change actant in sustainability innovation: insights from Uppsala. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26(2), 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, T., & McGovern, D. (2012). A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caixin Staff. (2011). Apple auditing supply plants for pollution. Caixin Online (November 16). Http://english.caixin.com/2011-11-16/100327098.html. Accessed 1 September 2015.

  • Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. E., Huff, S. L., Barclay, D. W., & Copeland, D. G. (1997). Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 125–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y. E., Sabherwal, R., & Thatcher, J. B. (2006). Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2011). Green organizational identity: sources and consequence. Management Decision, 49(3), 384–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. M., Kazman, R., & Garg, A. (2005). BITAM: an engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 57(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. J., Boudreau, M. C., & Watson, R. T. (2008). Information systems and ecological sustainability. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 10(3), 186–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, T. Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey, P., Tate, M., & Toland, J. (2013). Small business in a small country: attitudes to “green” IT. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 761–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltman, T. R., Tallon, P. P., Sharma, R., & Queiroz, M. (2015). Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on. Journal of Information Technology, 30, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J. (2013). Using information systems to improve energy efficiency: do smart meters make a difference? Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dao, V., Langella, I., & Carbo, J. (2011). From green to sustainability: information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnall, N., Jolley, G. J., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, P. J., Richey, R. G., Genchev, S. E., & Chen, H. (2005). Reverse logistics: superior performance through focused resource commitments to information technology. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(2), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Giovanni, P. (2012). Do internal and external environmental management contribute to the triple bottom line? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(3), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leede, J., Looise, J. C., & Alders, B. (2002). Innovation, improvement and operations: an exploration of the management of alignment. International Journal of Technology Management, 23(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymoke-Bradshaw, C., & Cox, B. (2005). Developing organization-technology fit: the role of evaluation in IS innovation projects. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 4(1).

  • El-Gayar, O., & Fritz, B. D. (2006). Environmental management information systems (EMIS) for sustainable development: a conceptual overview. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17(1), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. (2011). Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: a resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 197–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2009). Does fit matter? The impact of task-technology fit and appropriation on team performance in repeated tasks. Information Systems Research, 20(1), 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furneaux, B. (2012). Task-technology fit theory: A survey and synopsis of the literature. Information Systems Theory (pp. 87–106). Springer, New York.

  • Gerow, J. E., Thatcher, J. B., & Grover, V. (2014). Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 24(3), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholami, R., Sulaiman, A. B., Ramayah, T., & Molla, A. (2013). Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: results from a field survey. Information & Management, 50(7), 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010). Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice. Cambridge University Press.

  • Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonzalez-Benito, O. (2005). Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega, 33(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, G. G. (2003). Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco. Journal of Information Technology, 18(3), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green Jr., K. W., Zelbst, P. J., Meacham, J., & Bhadauria, V. S. (2012). Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 290–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39(3), 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekaran, A., & Ngai, E. W. (2004). Information systems in supply chain integration and management. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 269–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R., Sroufe, R., & Walton, S. (2005). Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(1), 277–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, M., & Wiesent, J. (2013). Investments in information systems: a contribution towards sustainability. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 815–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, K. K., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management, 40(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacob, M. E., Van Sinderen, M. J., Steenwijk, M., & Verkroost, P. (2013). Towards a reference architecture for fuel-based carbon management systems in the logistics industry. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 725–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM. (2009). Big Green Innovations. https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/files/form/anonymous/api/library/d073032c-16b7-40cd-82e6-bbeae35df4b5/document/3c201ce9-b8d2-4333-be43-4677d92cd6f5/media/Robert%20McCarthy.pdf. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  • IDC. (2008). Green IT - Understanding its role and opportunities. IDC.com, Retrieved April 9 2008, from the World Wide Web (http://www.idc.com/research/greenit.jsp).

  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkin, T. A., Webster, J., & McShane, L. (2011). An agenda for ‘green’ information technology and systems research. Information and Organization, 21(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, H. R., & Carrico, S. R. (1988). Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Quarterly, 12(1), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpovsky, A., & Galliers, R. D. (2015). Aligning in practice: from current cases to a new agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 136–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G. S., & Lederer, A. L. (2003). A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: how knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 34(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopping, I. M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the technology acceptance model and the task-technology fit model to consumer e-commerce. Information Technology Learning and Performance Journal, 22, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C. (2011). Closing the Blackbox? A status on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) studies in information systems research. Computer and Information Science (ICIS) 2011 IEEE/ACIS 10th International Conference on (pp. 409–414). IEEE.

  • Kogg, B., & Mont, O. (2012). Environmental and social responsibility in supply chains: the practise of choice and inter-organisational management. Ecological Economics, 83(7), 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwanroengjai, J., Liu, K., Tan, C., & Sun, L. (2014). Operational Alignment Framework for Improving Business Performance of an Organization. In the Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (pp.352–359).

  • Lamming, R., & Hampson, J. (1996). The environment as a supply chain management issue. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S45–S62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., Kim, S. T., & Choi, D. (2012). Green supply chain management and organizational performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(8), 1148–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W. S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 498–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loos, P., Nebel, W., Gómez, J. M., Hasan, H., Watson, R. T., vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., & Recker, J. (2011). Green IT: a matter of business and information systems engineering? Business & Information Systems Engineering, 3(4), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Chong, A. Y. L., Ngai, E. W., & Liu, M. J. (2014). Green supply chain collaboration implementation in China: the mediating role of Guanxi. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 71, 98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madapusi, A., & D’Souza, D. (2005). Aligning ERP systems with international strategies. Information Systems Management, 22(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004). Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclaren, T. S., Head, M. M., & Yuan, Y. (2004). Supply chain management information systems capabilities. An exploratory study of electronics manufacturers. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2(2–3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla, A. (2013). Identifying it sustainability performance drivers: instrument development and validation. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 705–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, V. G., & Raman, A. (2004). Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Business Review, 82(11), 94–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D., Marsillac, E., & Rao, S. (2013). Antecedents and evolution of the green supply chain. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 1(1), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2002). Formal strategic planning: the key to effective business process management? Business Process Management Journal, 8(5), 416–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2005). Enterprise architecture: business and IT alignment. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing (pp. 1344–1345). ACM.

  • Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Seth, N. (2006). Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 898–916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruppel, C. (2004). An information systems perspective of supply chain tool compatibility: the roles of technology fit and relationships. Business Process Management Journal, 10(3), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryoo, S. Y., & Koo, C. (2013). Green practices-IS alignment and environmental performance: the mediating effects of coordination. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, N. R. (2005). IT alignment in supply chain relationships: a study of supplier benefits. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(2), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J. (1995). Supply chain management and environmentally conscious design and manufacturing. International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing, 4(2), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis, J., Koo, C., & Watson, R. T. (2013). Green information systems & technologies – this generation and beyond: introduction to the special issue. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schniederjans, M., & Cao, Q. (2009). Alignment of operations strategy, information strategic orientation, and performance: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Research, 47(10), 2535–2563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seggie, S. H., Kim, D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Do supply chain IT alignment and supply chain interfirm system integration impact upon brand equity and firm performance? Journal of Business Research, 59(8), 887–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., Goldstein, S. M., & Ward, P. T. (2002). Aligning supply chain management characteristics and interorganizational information system types: an exploratory study. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 49(3), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIGGreen (2012), SIGGreen Statement on Environmental Change. http://siggreen.wikispaces.com/The+Statement-Manifesto. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  • Soh, C., Kien Sia, S., Fong Boh, W., & Tang, M. (2003). Misalignments in ERP implementation: a dialectic perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, H. (2015). Supply chain management: An overview. In H. Stadtler, C. Kilger, & H. Meyr (Eds.), Supply chain management and advanced planning: Concepts, models, software, and case studies (pp. 3–28). Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, D., Boudreau, M. C., & Gefen, D. (2004). Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, D. M., & Volkoff, O. (2010). Understanding organization-enterprise system fit: a path to theorizing the information technology artifact. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 731–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallon, P. P. (2007). A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., Costa, D., & Oliveira, T. (2016). Assessing the role of IT-enabled process virtualization on green IT adoption. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(4), 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun, J. H. (2010). Angles of integration: an empirical analysis of the alignment of internet-based information technology and global supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah, A., & Lai, R. (2013). A systematic review of business and information technology alignment. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 4(1), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S. (2007). Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4357–4379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M., & Werre, M. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2–3), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velte, T., Velte, A., & Elsenpeter, R. C. (2008). Green IT: reduce your information system’s environmental impact while adding to the bottom line. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke, J., Watson, R. T., Dwyer, C., Elliot, S., & Melville, N. (2013). Green information systems: directives for the IS discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 33(1), 30 .http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol33/iss1/30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. T., & Weitzel, T. (2006). Operational IT business alignment as the missing link from IT strategy to firm success. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings, 74.

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., Chen, A., & Huber, M. H. (2008). Green IS: Building sustainable business practices. In R. T. Watson (Ed.), Information systems: A global text (pp. 1–17). Athens: Global Text Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, L. (1994). Green purchasing: forging a new link in the supply chain. RESOUR., 1(6), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. W., Lai, K. H., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2009). Complementarities and alignment of information systems management and supply chain management. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 1(2), 156–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F., Yeniyurt, S., Kim, D., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). The impact of information technology on supply chain capabilities and firm performance: a resource-based view. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. S., Lu, C. S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013). The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 55, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2011). Energy and environmental policy in China: Towards a low-carbon economy. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S. (2014). Many international companies lax about supply chain pollution. China Daily USA (July 16). http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2014-07/16/content_17807633.htm. Accessed 1 Sept 2015.

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2006). An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(5), 472–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J. J., & Lai, K. H. (2008a). Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega, 36(4), 577–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008b). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 15BGL040) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. JB160608).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaojun Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y. et al. Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system. Inf Syst Front 20, 627–645 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9698-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9698-y

Keywords

Navigation