Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Employee knowledge profiles – a mixed-research methods approach

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify different knowledge profiles in organizations and to analyze their contribution to innovation. This is done by analyzing how knowledge is integrated within the work processes by groups of workers with different characteristics (i.e. knowledge profiles). The paper uses a combination of qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis. Using Action Research methodology, several semi-structured group interviews were performed and a questionnaire was applied to employees of two organizations. In order to identify the employee’s profiles, different groups were found by means of a factorial analysis, which resulted in specific knowledge profiles. The major finding of this research was the identification of several knowledge profiles - Innovators, Integrators, Organizers and Facilitators,. An important conclusion is that integration of knowledge in day-by-day practices can boost innovation. The collection of evidences carried out helped to identify ways of integrating knowledge through the implementation of knowledge sharing routines and promotion of collaborative activities in systematic transfer processes, including problem-solving routines and participation in improvement, quality and maintenance projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J., & Moreland, R. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations: learning from the experience of others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2002). Market orientation, learning orientation and product innovation: delving into the organization’s black box. Journal of Market-Focused Management, 5(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C. (2001). Managing dispersed knowledge, organizational problems, managerial strategies, and their effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 1037–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P., & Rebentisch, E. (2003). Into the black box: the knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science, 49(9), 1180–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caroli, E., & Van Reenen, J. (2001). Skill-biased organisational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance: the mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: how companies actually do it. Harvard Business Review, 81(7), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, H. T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review, 66(1), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1996). The green book on innovation. EU: Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahey, L., & Prusak, L. (1998). The eleven deadliest sins of knowledge management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gera, S., & Gu, W. (2004). The effect of organizational innovation and information and communications technology on firm performance. International Productivity Monitor, 9, 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Loureiro, M., & Figueroa-Dorrego, P. (2012). Intellectual capital and system of innovation: what really matters at innovative SMEs. Intangible Capital, 8(2), 239–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Loureiro, M., & Pita-Castelo, J. (2012). A model for assessing the contribution of innovative SMEs to economic growth: the intangible approach. Economics Letters, 116(3), 312–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1996). Towards knowledge based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Li, Y. (2009). The mediating effect of knowledge management on social interaction and innovation performance. International Journal of Manpower, 30(3), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jashapara, A. (2007). Moving beyond tacit and explicit distinctions: a realist theory of organisational knowledge. Journal of Information Science, 33(6), 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R. L., & Washington, C. (2003). Employee development and job performance: a review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T., & Jackson, M. H. (2008). Accomplishing knowledge: a framework for investigating knowing in organisations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 454–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge enablers, processes and organizational performance: an integrated view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2003.). Open innovation in public services. In T. Bentley, & J. Wilsdon (Ed), The Adaptive State - Strategies for personalising the public realm (pp. 37–49). UK: Demos

  • Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Ren, F. (2007). Product innovation and process innovation in SOEs: evidence from the Chinese transition. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1), 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., & Lee, G. (2005). Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Management Decision, 43(2), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, G., & Beckett, D. (2004). Performing identities: the new focus on embodied adults learning. In P. Kell, S. Shore, & M. Singh (Eds.), Adult education @ 21st century. Studies in the postmodern theory of education (pp. 121–134). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, D., & Frangioso, T. (1997). Aligning an organization for learning: the six principles of effective learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(4), 308–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector. Netherlands: IOS Press BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, M., & Levitt, R. (2004). Agent-based modeling of knowledge dynamics. Journal of Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 2(3), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2002). Organisational change and firm performance. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. doi:10.1787/18151965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge, towards a post critical epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remus, U., & Schub, S. (2003). A blueprint for the implementation of process-oriented knowledge management. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(4), 237–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulke, D., Zaheer, S., & Anderson, M. (2000). Sources of managers - knowledge of organizational capabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarsi, E., Bolisani, E., & Di Biagi M. (2006). Knowledge Intermediation. In D.G. Schwartz(Ed.), Encyclopedia of knowledge management, IGI Global.

  • Sousa, M. J., & Sousa, S. (2013). Knowledge profiles boosting innovation. Knowledge Management, 12(4), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, M. J. (2010). Dynamic knowledge: an action research project. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 10(1), 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, M. (2003). Knowledge management in extended operations networks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willem, A., Scarborough, H., & Buelens, M. (2008). Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration. Journal of Information Science, 34(3), 370–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A. C., Lai, K. H., & Yee, R. W. (2007). Organizational learning, innovativeness, and organizational performance: a qualitative investigation. International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), 2459–2477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, W., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63(7), 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (1999). Editorial introduction. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(4), 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIEO - Algarve University, Faro, Portugal

    Maria José Sousa

  2. Universidade Europeia – Laureate International Universities, Lisbon, Portugal

    Maria José Sousa

  3. University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain

    Miguel González-Loureiro

  4. CIICESI, Politecnico de Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Miguel González-Loureiro

Authors
  1. Maria José Sousa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miguel González-Loureiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria José Sousa.

Appendix

Appendix

ᅟ

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sousa, M.J., González-Loureiro, M. Employee knowledge profiles – a mixed-research methods approach. Inf Syst Front 18, 1103–1117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9626-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9626-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation