Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of non-viral conjunctivitis over 16 years at a tertiary eye care center in Southern India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the trends in the microbial spectrum and antibacterial susceptibility patterns of non-viral conjunctivitis over 16 years.

Methods

Microbiology data were reviewed from 2006–2021 for all the patients with clinically and culture-proven infectious conjunctivitis. Conjunctival swabs and/or conjunctival scrapings were collected for microbiological workup, and the demographic and antibiotic susceptibility data were extracted from the EMR (Electronic Medical Record). For statistical analysis, χ2-test was performed.

Results

Of the 1711 patients, 814 (47.57%) were culture positive and 897 (52.43%) were culture negative. Of the total culture-proven conjunctivitis cases, 775/814 (95.20%) were bacteria, and 39/814 (4.80%) were fungi. Among these bacterial isolates, 75.74% were gram-positive bacteria, while 24.26% were gram negative. The predominant gram-positive pathogens isolated were S. epidermidis (16.7%), S. aureus (17.9%) (p < 0.05), and S. pneumoniae (18.2%), while Haemophilus spp. (36.2%) (p < 0.05) was the most often isolated gram-negative bacteria (36.2%), and Aspergillus spp. was the most commonly isolated fungus (50%). The susceptibility of gram-positive bacteria to cefazoline increased from 90.46 to 98% (p = 0.01), whereas the susceptibility for gatifloxacin decreased in both gram-positive (81–41%; p < 0.0001) and gram-negative bacteria (73–58%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Increasing resistance of ocular isolates to mainstay antibiotics is a concern, and this data can assist healthcare practitioners in making informed choices regarding the treatment of ocular infections with ophthalmic antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hosny AES, El-Bazza ZE, Ramadan MA et al (2021) Expression levels of pro-inflammatory interleukin-8 and certain antimicrobial peptides in concurrent with bacterial conjunctivitis. Int J Ophthalmol 14:666–675. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.05.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Høvding G (2008) Acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Acta Ophthalmol 86:5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01006.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mohamed YH, Uematsu M, Morinaga Y et al (2021) Conjunctival sac microbiome in infectious conjunctivitis. Microorganisms 9:2095. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102095

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Adebayo A, Parikh JG, McCormick SA et al (2011) Shifting trends in in vitro antibiotic susceptibilities for common bacterial conjunctival isolates in the last decade at the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:111–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1426-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Azari AA, Barney NP (2013) Conjunctivitis: a systematic review of diagnosis and treatment. JAMA 310:1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280318

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sthapit PR, Tuladhar NR, Marasini S et al (2011) Bacterial conjunctivitis and use of antibiotics in Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J 9:69–72. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i2.6292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shrestha SP, Khadka J, Pokhrel AK et al (2016) Acute bacterial conjunctivitis–antibiotic susceptibility and resistance to commercially available topical antibiotics in Nepal. Nepal J Ophthalmol 8:23–35. https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v8i1.16153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alfonso SA, Fawley JD, Lu XA (2015) Conjunctivitis. Prim Care: Clin Office Pract 42(3):325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2015.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haq A, Wardak H, Kraskian N (2013) Infective conjunctivitis–its pathogenesis, management and complications. Common Eye Infect. https://doi.org/10.5772/52462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biswas P, Batra S, Gurha N et al (2022) Emerging antimicrobial resistance and need for antimicrobial stewardship for ocular infections in India: a narrative review. Indian J Ophthalmol 70(5):1513. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2537_21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunimoto DY, Das T, Sharma S et al (1999) Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates. Part I postoperative endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 128:240–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00112-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunimoto DY, Das T, Sharma S et al (1999) Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of isolates. Part II posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Am J Ophthalmol 128:242–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00113-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Garg P et al (1999) Trends in antibiotic resistance of corneal pathogens: Part I. An analysis of commonly used ocular antibiotics. Indian J Ophthalmol 47:95–100

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma S, Jalali S, Adiraju MV et al (1996) Sensitivity and predictability of vitreous cytology, biopsy, and membrane filter culture in endophthalmitis. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 16(6):525–529. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006982-199616060-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaliamurthy J, Kalavathy CM, Parmar P, Thomas PA et al (2013) Spectrum of bacterial keratitis at a tertiary eye care centre in India. BioMed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/181564

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolfensberger A, Sax H, Weber R, Zbinden R, Kuster SP, Hombach M. Change of antibiotic susceptibility testing guidelines from CLSI to EUCAST: influence on cumulative hospital antibiograms. PloS one. 2013 Nov 1;8(11):e79130.

  17. Tarabishy AB, Jeng BH (2008) Bacterial conjunctivitis—a review for internists. Clevel Clin J Med 75:507. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75.7.507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gigliotti F, Williams WT, Hayden FG et al (1981) Etiology of acute conjunctivitis in children. J Pediatr 98:531–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(81)80754-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmitz H, Wigand R, Heinrich W (1983) Worldwide epidemiology of human adenovirus infections. Am J Epidemiol 117(4):455–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitch CP, Rapoza PA, Owens S et al (1989) Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute conjunctivitis at an inner-city hospital. Ophthalmology 96:1215–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32749-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Block SL, Hedrick J, Tyler R et al (2000) Increasing bacterial resistance in pediatric acute conjunctivitis (1997–1998). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1650–1654. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.6.1650-1654.2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Aoki K, Tagawa Y (2002) A twenty–one year surveillance of adenoviral conjunctivitis in Sapporo, Japan. Int Ophthalmol Clin 42:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-200201000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Valentino MD, McGuire AM, Rosch JW et al (2014) Unencapsulated Streptococcus pneumoniae from conjunctivitis encode variant traits and belong to a distinct phylogenetic cluster. Nat Commun 12(5):5411. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mokbul MI, Islam AK, Tabassum MN et al (2022) Recent incidence of infectious conjunctivitis in Bangladesh: are we aware? Ann Med Surg 84:104819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hosny AE, El-Bazza ZE, Ramadan MA et al (2021) Expression levels of pro-inflammatory interleukin-8 and certain antimicrobial peptides in concurrent with bacterial conjunctivitis. Int J Ophthalmol 14(5):666. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.05.05

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. National Health Portal India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India, Blepharitis2016. Available from: https://ncdc.mohfw.gov.in

  27. Nuhu A, Usman A (2021) Bacterial conjunctivitis among patients of different age groups attending some eye clinics in Sokoto, Nigeria. Hmlyn Jr Appl Med Scie Res 2(5):161–165. https://doi.org/10.47310/hjamsr.2021.v02i05.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Joseph J, Karoliya R, Sheba E et al (2022) Trends in the microbiological spectrum of nonviral keratitis at a single tertiary care ophthalmic hospital in India—a review of 30 years. Cornea 13:10–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000003105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chatterjee S, Agrawal D, Gomase SN et al (2022) Fluoroquinolone resistance in bacterial isolates from ocular infections: trend in antibiotic susceptibility patterns between 2005–2020. Indian J Ophthalmol 70(12):4391–4398. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1033_22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lalitha P, Manoharan G, Karpagam R et al (2017) Trends in antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis isolates from South India. Br J Ophthalmol 101(2):108–113. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JJ shared in the conception and the design of the study. SM and JG were conducted in the data collection and statistical analysis. All authors shared in the interpretation of the data and in drafting the manuscript. All authors reviewed the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joveeta Joseph.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

The institutional ethics committee approved this study, and the procedures followed the Declaration of Helsinki’s precepts. All study participants signed a consent form.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maiti, S., Gandhi, J. & Joseph, J. Microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of non-viral conjunctivitis over 16 years at a tertiary eye care center in Southern India. Int Ophthalmol 43, 3717–3724 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02781-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02781-4

Keywords

Navigation