Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Next-generation sequencing panel analysis in 24 Chinese patients with congenital ectopia lentis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital ectopia lentis (CEL) is a rare but serious disease. We use next-generation sequencing to detect genes associated with lens abnormalities in 24 patients with bilateral CEL and search for pathogenic genes and mutation sites.

Materials and methods

A total of 24 patients diagnosed with CEL from January 2019 to November 2019 were enrolled in this study, and their clinical data were collected and genome-wide deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from peripheral venous blood. Targeted gene capture technology was used to obtain 188 exons of lens abnormality-related genes, which were sequenced using a high-throughput method. The mutation sites were determined through data analysis and verified by the Sanger method. According to the data from previous studies, the association between the genotype and clinical phenotype was analysed.

Result

Of the 24 patients, 23 had mutations in the fibrillin-1 (FBN1) gene, and 20 were diagnosed with Marfan syndrome. The 23 cases of FBN1 mutations were all heterozygous mutations, including 17 missense mutations, 3 splicing variants, 2 exon deletion mutations, 1 codon mutation, and 9 new mutations. A total of 17 mutations were located in the calcium-binding epidermal growth factor domain, including 16 mutations that contained missense mutations of cysteine. In addition, a heterozygous mutation of the gap junction protein alpha 8 (GJA8) gene was detected in one patient.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified 23 FBN1 gene mutations and 1 GJA8 gene mutation in 24 patients with CEL. Of these, 9 new FBN1 mutations and 14 known mutations were found. The results expanded the mutation spectrum of the FBN1 gene, suggesting that FBN1 mutation may be the main cause of CEL in Chinese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greene VB, Stoetzel C, Pelletier V, Perdomo-Trujillo Y, Liebermann L, Marion V, De Korvin H, Boileau C, Dufier JL, Dollfus H (2010) Confirmation of ADAMTSL4 mutations for autosomal recessive isolated bilateral ectopia lentis. Ophthalmic Genet 31(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810903567604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen AE, Fiskerstrand T, Knappskog PM, Boman H, Rødahl E (2010) A novel ADAMTSL4 mutation in autosomal recessive ectopia lentis et pupillae. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(12):6369–6373. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azar G, Dureau P, Barjol A, Edelson C, Bergès O, Caputo G (2013) Ectopia lentis associated with primary congenital glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 23(4):597–600. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra A, Ekwalla V, Child A, Charteris D (2014) Prevalence of ectopia lentis and retinal detachment in Marfan syndrome. Acta Ophthalmol 92(1):e82–e83. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sadiq MA, Vanderveen D (2013) Genetics of ectopia lentis. Semin Ophthalmol 28(5–6):313–320. https://doi.org/10.3109/08820538.2013.825276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aldahmesh MA, Alshammari MJ, Khan AO, Mohamed JY, Alhabib FA, Alkuraya FS (2013) The syndrome of microcornea, myopic chorioretinal atrophy, and telecanthus (MMCAT) is caused by mutations in ADAMTS18. Hum Mutat 34(9):1195–1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loeys BL, Dietz HC, Braverman AC, Callewaert BL, De Backer J, Devereux RB, Hilhorst-Hofstee Y, Jondeau G, Faivre L, Milewicz DM, Pyeritz RE, Sponseller PD, Wordsworth P, De Paepe AM (2010) The revised Ghent nosology for the Marfan syndrome. J Med Genet 47(7):476–485. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2009.072785

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mizuguchi T, Collod-Beroud G, Akiyama T, Abifadel M, Harada N, Morisaki T, Allard D, Varret M, Claustres M, Morisaki H, Ihara M, Kinoshita A, Yoshiura K, Junien C, Kajii T, Jondeau G, Ohta T, Kishino T, Furukawa Y, Nakamura Y, Niikawa N, Boileau C, Matsumoto N (2004) Heterozygous TGFBR2 mutations in Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet 36(8):855–860. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Haji-Seyed-Javadi R, Jelodari-Mamaghani S, Paylakhi SH, Yazdani S, Nilforushan N, Fan JB, Klotzle B, Mahmoudi MJ, Ebrahimian MJ, Chelich N, Taghiabadi E, Kamyab K, Boileau C, Paisan-Ruiz C, Ronaghi M, Elahi E (2012) LTBP2 mutations cause Weill-Marchesani and Weill-Marchesani-like syndrome and affect disruptions in the extracellular matrix. Hum Mutat 33(8):1182–1187. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards AO (2008) Clinical features of the congenital vitreoretinopathies. Eye (Lond) 22(10):1233–1242. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Noor J, Salem A, Alkuraya FS (2015) Lens subluxation and retinal dysfunction in a girl with homozygous VSX2 mutation. Ophthalmic Genet 36(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810.2013.827217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robinson PN, Booms P, Katzke S, Ladewig M, Neumann L, Palz M, Pregla R, Tiecke F, Rosenberg T (2002) Mutations of FBN1 and genotype-phenotype correlations in Marfan syndrome and related fibrillinopathies. Hum Mutat 20(3):153–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.10113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Comeglio P, Evans AL, Brice G, Cooling RJ, Child AH (2002) Identification of FBN1 gene mutations in patients with ectopia lentis and marfanoid habitus. Br J Ophthalmol 86(12):1359–1362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.12.1359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Comeglio P, Johnson P, Arno G, Brice G, Evans A, Aragon-Martin J, da Silva FP, Kiotsekoglou A, Child A (2007) The importance of mutation detection in Marfan syndrome and Marfan-related disorders: report of 193 FBN1 mutations. Hum Mutat 28(9):928. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.9505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Booms P, Cisler J, Mathews KR, Godfrey M, Tiecke F, Kaufmann UC, Vetter U, Hagemeier C, Robinson PN (1999) Novel exon skipping mutation in the fibrillin-1 gene: two “hot spots” for the neonatal Marfan syndrome. Clin Genet 55(2):110–117. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-0004.1999.550207.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiecke F, Katzke S, Booms P, Robinson PN, Neumann L, Godfrey M, Mathews KR, Scheuner M, Hinkel GK, Brenner RE, Hövels-Gürich HH, Hagemeier C, Fuchs J, Skovby F, Rosenberg T (2001) Classic, atypically severe and neonatal Marfan syndrome: twelve mutations and genotype-phenotype correlations in FBN1 exons 24–40. Eur J Hum Genet 9(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palz M, Tiecke F, Booms P, Göldner B, Rosenberg T, Fuchs J, Skovby F, Schumacher H, Kaufmann UC, von Kodolitsch Y, Nienaber CA, Leitner C, Katzke S, Vetter B, Hagemeier C, Robinson PN (2000) Clustering of mutations associated with mild Marfan-like phenotypes in the 3’ region of FBN1 suggests a potential genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Med Genet 91(3):212–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(20000320)91:3%3c212::aid-ajmg12%3e3.0.co;2-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ponnam SP, Ramesha K, Tejwani S, Ramamurthy B, Kannabiran C (2007) Mutation of the gap junction protein alpha 8 (GJA8) gene causes autosomal recessive cataract. J Med Genet 44(7):e85. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2007.050138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangyu Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qi, M., Wang, C., Liu, Y. et al. Next-generation sequencing panel analysis in 24 Chinese patients with congenital ectopia lentis. Int Ophthalmol 42, 2245–2253 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02224-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02224-6

Keywords

Navigation