Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical presentation and prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes of secondary macular holes after retinal vein occlusions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe clinical presentation, morphological features and surgical outcomes of macular hole (MH) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Method

This prospective interventional study evaluated eight eyes with atypical MH (secondary to RVO) and data regarding medical management, pars plana vitrectomy, postoperative anatomical hole closure, visual acuity improvement, morphological features of hole were noted till the last follow-up.

Results

Eight eyes with full-thickness MH in an RVO eye were followed-up for a minimum period of 3 months postoperatively. Five subjects had a RVO episode which occurred more than 6 months before the onset of the recent symptoms (Group 1; 4 branch RVO and 1 central RVO), and 3 subjects had a recent onset branch RVO within 6 months (Group 2). All FTMH cases except one showed closure at the last follow-up. Visual acuity of all eyes improved from 0.91 ± 0.57 logMAR to 0.5 ± 0.3 logMAR (p = 0.093). At baseline, visual acuities of the two groups had no significant difference. Postoperatively, group 1 holes had better visual prognosis, than Group 2 holes, further substantiated by persistence of subretinal fluid in Group 2 eyes till last follow-up. Minimum hole diameter was higher in the recent RVO group, although anatomical closure was obtained in all of these eyes. Most holes had favorable morphological hole features like raised configuration with rounded edges.

Conclusion

In the presence of favorable morphological features, secondary macular holes associated with retinal vein occlusion may show optimal outcomes after surgery. It is not clear whether acutely created holes in recent onset RVO should be operated early. Older holes may have better prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glacet-Bernard A, Voigt M, Coscas G, Soubrane G (2007) Full-thickness macular hole following intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide in central retinal vein occlusion. Retin Cases Brief Rep 1:62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muramatsu D, Mitsuhashi R, Iwasaki T, Goto H, Miura M (2015) Macular hole formation following intravitreal injection of ranibizumab for branch retinal vein occlusion: a case report. BMC Res Notes 8:358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagpal M, Mehta V, Nagpal K (2011) Progression after intravitreal bevacizumab for hemicentral retinal vein occlusion. Case Rep Ophthal Med. Article ID 679751

  4. Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2002) Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 86(4):390–393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.4.390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghoraba H (2002) Types of macular holes encountered during diabetic vitrectomy. Retina 22:176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flynn HW Jr (1994) Macular hole surgery inpatients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 112:877–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shukla D (2013) Secondary macular holes: when to jump in and when to stay out. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 8:437–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forooghian F, Kertes PJ, Eng KT, Agrón E, Chew EY (2010) Alterations in the intraocular cytokine milieu after intravitreal bevacizumab. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:2388–2392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakao S, Ishikawa K, Yoshida S, Kohno R, Miyazaki M, Enaida H et al (2013) Altered vascular microenvironment by bevacizumab in diabetic fibrovascular membrane. Retina 33:957–963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shukla D, Rajendran A, Kim R (2006) Macular hole formation and spontaneous closure after vitrectomy for central retinal vein occlusion. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:1350–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang X, Liu W (2019) Characteristics and risk factors for spontaneous closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole. J Ophthalmol. Article ID 4793764

  12. Huang J, Liu X, Wu Z et al (2009) Classification of full-thickness traumatic macular holes by optical coherence tomography. Retina 29:340–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brockmann T, Steger C, Weger M, Wedrich A, Haas A (2013) Risk assessment of idiopathic macular holes undergoing vitrectomy with dye-assisted internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 33:1132–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sou R, Kusaka S, Ohji M, Gomi F, Ikuno Y, Tano Y (2003) Optical coherence tomographic evaluation of a surgically treated traumatic macular hole secondary to Nd:YAG laser injury. Am J Ophthalmol 135:537–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shukla D (2011) Evolution and management of macular hole secondary to type 2 idiopathic macular telangiectasia. Eye 25:532–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shukla D, Kalliath J, Tandon M, Vijayakumar B (2012) Vitrectomy for optic disk pit with macular schisis and outer retinal dehiscence. Retina 32:1337–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Driscoll AM, Goble RR, Kirkby GR (2001) Vitrectomy for retinal detachments with both peripheral retinal breaks and macular holes: an assessment of outcome and the status of the macular hole. Retina 21:221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan EH Jr, Bramante CA, Mittra RA et al (2011) Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with coexistent macular hole in the era of internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 152:815–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shukla D, Kalliath J, Srinivasan K et al (2013) Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with coexisting macular hole: a comparison of vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 33:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhatnagar P, Kaiser PK, Smith SD, Meisler DM, Lewis H, Sears JE (2007) Reopening of previously closed macular holes after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 144:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Halkiadakis I, Pantelia E, Giannakopoulos N, Koutsandrea C, Markomichelakis NN (2003) Macular hole closure after peribulbar steroid injection. Am J Ophthalmol 136:1165–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shukla D, Dhawan A (2011) Pharmacotherapeutic closure of a uveitic macular hole persisting after vitrectomy. Indian J Ophthalmol 59:335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zinkernagel MS, Groppe M, Maclaren RE (2013) Macular hole surgery in patients with end-stage choroideremia. Ophthalmology 120:1592–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shukla D, Naresh KB, Rajendran A, Kim R (2006) Macular hole secondary to X-linked retinoschisis. Eye 20:1459–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Park DH, Kim IT (2010) Long-term effects of vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion and hemiretinal vein occlusion. Retina 30:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamoto T, Hitani K, Tsukahara I et al (2003) Early postoperative retinal thickness changes and complications after vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol 135:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mandelcorn MS, Mandelcorn E, Guan K, Adatia FA (2007) Surgical macular decompression for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion. Can J Ophthalmol 42:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gandorfer A, Messmer EM, Ulbig MW, Kampik A (2000) Resolution of diabetic macular edema after surgical removal of the posterior hyaloid and the inner limiting membrane. Retina 20:126–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman MB, Podhajsky P (1994) Incidence of various types of retinal vein occlusion and their recurrence and demographic characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol 117:429–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were obtained separately for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sagnik Sen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the author declares that he has any conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (Aravind Eye Hospital Institutional Research Committee, RET201900210).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishra, C., Kannan, N.B., Sen, S. et al. Clinical presentation and prognostic factors affecting surgical outcomes of secondary macular holes after retinal vein occlusions. Int Ophthalmol 40, 2817–2825 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01465-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01465-7

Keywords

Navigation