Abstract
Can the early Yogācāra be said to present a systematic theory of meaning? The paper argues that Sthiramati’s bhāṣya on Vasubandhu’s Triṃśikā (Treatise in Thirty Verses), in which he argues that all language-use is metaphorical, indeed amounts to such a theory, both because of the text’s engagement with the wider Indian philosophical conversation about reference and meaning and by virtue of the questions it addresses and its motivations. Through a translation and analysis of key sections of Sthiramati’s commentary I present the main features of this theory of meaning and discuss the ways in which it is distinct from Vasubandhu’s ideas. I demonstrate how this theory of meaning enabled Sthiramati to present a unique understanding of discourse that distinguishes between varying levels of truth within the conventional realm. This understanding sat well with the Yogācāra soteriological and theoretical needs, and most importantly, enabled him to establish the meaningfulness of the school’s own metaphysical discourse. Securing this meaningfulness was especially important to Sthiramati in meeting the challenge posed by the radical conventionalism of the Madhyamaka, and his response as I interpret it suggests that one of the main disputes between the early Yogācāra with the Mādhyamika, at least as reflected in the Triṃśikā-bhāṣya, in fact turns on linguistic rather than ontological issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, D. A. (2005). Buddhists, brahmins, and belief: Epistemology in South Asian philosophy of religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ben-Menahem, Y. (2005). Hilary Putnam (Contemporary philosophy in focus). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buescher, H. (2007). Sthiramati’s Trimsikavijnaptibhasya: Critical editions of the Sanskrit text and its Tibetan translation (Beiträge zur Kultur- und Geistesgeschichte Asiens Nr. 57). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenachaften, ÖAW.
Buescher, H. (2008). The Inception of Yogacāra-Vijñānavāda, Beiträge Zur Kultur- Und Geistesgeschichte Asiens. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Cox, C. (1992). The unbroken treatise: Scripture and argument in early Buddhist scholasticism. In M. A. Williams, C. Cox, & M. S. Jaffee (Eds.), Innovation in religious traditions: Essays in the interpretation of religious change (Vol. 31, pp. 143–189). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
D’Amato, M. (2012). Distinguishing the Middle from the extremes: A study and annotated translation of the Madhyāntavibhāga, along with its commentary, the Madhyantāvibhaga-bhāṣya. New York: American Institute of Buddhist Studies.
Derge. (1986). Derge T. (199–?). Bstan ’gyur sde dge’i par ma: Commentaries on the Buddha’s word by Indian masters (electronic ed., 11 CDs). [Reproduced from editions of the individual sections published in Delhi at the Delhi Karmapae Chodhey, Gyalwae Sungrab Partun Khang, 1986, itself a reproduction from prints from the 18th century Sde-dge blocks] (213 Vols.). (New York: Tibetan Buddhist Resource Center.
Deshpande, M. (1992). The meaning of nouns: semantic theory in classical and medieval India, studies of classical India. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dhammajoti, K. L. (2007). Sarvastivada abhidharma (3rd rev ed.). Hong Kong: Centre for Buddhist Studies, University of Hong Kong.
Dutt, N. (1978). Boddhisattvabhūmiḥ (2nd ed.). Patna: K.P. Jayaswal Research Institute.
Eckel, M. D. (2008). Bhaviveka and his Buddhist opponents: [chapters 4 and 5 of Bhaviveka’s Madhyamakahrdayakarikah with Tarkajvala commentary. Harvard oriental series (Vol. 70). Cambridge, MA: Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies, Harvard University.
Ejima, Y. (1980). Chūgan-shisō no Tenkai (Development of the Mādhyamika Philosophy in India). Tokyo: Shunjūsha.
Gold, J. C. (2007). Yogācāra strategies against realism: Appearances (Ākṛti) and metaphors (Upacāra). Religion Compass, 1, 131–147.
Gold, J. C. (2015). Paving the great way: Vasubandhu’s unifying Buddhist philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kajiyama, Y. (1968/1969). Bh!vaviveka, Sthiramati and Dharmap!la. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Ostasiens, 12–13, 193–203. (Reprinted from Y. Kajiyama, Studies in Buddhist philosophy (Selected Papers), pp. 177–187, by K. Mimaki et al., Eds., Rinsen Book, Kyoto, 1989.)
Kramer, J. (2014). Sthiramati’s Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā, Part 1: Critical Edition. Part 2: Diplomatic Edition (2 Vols.). Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften/China Tibetology Publishing House.
Kramer, J. (2015). Innovation and the Role of Intertextuality in the Pañcaskandhaka and Related Yogācāra Works. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies, 36/37, 281–352.
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kunjunni-Raja, K. (1977). Indian theories of meaning (2nd ed., Vol. 91). Adyar Library series. Madras: Adyar Library and Research Centre.
Lamotte, É. (1973). La somme du grand véhicule d’Asaṅga (Mahāyānasaṁgraha). Louvain-La-Neuve: Université de Louvain, Institut Orientaliste.
Nguyen, C. T. (1990). Sthiramati’s interpretation of Buddhology and Soteriology. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Pradhan, P. (1975). Abhidharmakośabhāṣyaṃ of Vasubandhu (2nd ed.). Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Center.
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Mind, language, and reality (Vol. 2, pp. 215–271). Philosophical papers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Putnam, H. (1981). Brains in a Vat. In Reason, truth, and history (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruegg, D. S. (1981). The literature of the Madhyamaka School of Philosophy in India. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Saito, A. (2007). Is Nāgārjuna a Mādhyamika? In K. Mochizuki (Ed.), Hokekyō to Daijōkyōten no Kenkyū. Studies in the Saddharma puṇḍa rī-ka sūtra and Mahāyāna Scriptures (pp. 153–164). Tokyo: Sankibo Press.
Saito, A. (2010). Nagārjuna’s influence on the formation of early Yogācāra thoughts: From the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā to the Bodhisattvabhūmi. Journal of Indian and Buddhist studies, 58(3), 1212–1218.
Sakuma, H. (2015). The Yoga Practitioner’s viewpoint as a benchmark for analyzing Yogācāra thought. Paper presented at the “Scholastic and /or Yogin? The works attributed to the Indian medieval scholar Sthiramati” symposium, The Tsukuba-Hamburg Symposium Series, Hamburg, August 2015.
Schmithausen, L. (1987). Ālayavijñāna: On the origin and the early development of a central concept of Yogācāra philosophy. Studia Philologica Buddhica. Monograph series 4a. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies.
Silk, J. (2009). Remarks on the Kāśyapaparivarta commentary. In M. Straube, R. Steiner, J. Soni, M. Hahn, & M. Demoto (Eds.), Pāsādikadānaṃ: Festschrif für Bhikkhu Pāsādika (Indica et Tibetica 52) (pp. 381–397). Marburg: Indica et Tibetica Verla.
Silk, J. (2015). Sthiramati and question of the authorship of the commentary to the Kāśyapaparivarta (Ratnakūṭa): A comparison with passages in the Madhyāntavibhāgaṭīkā citing the Sūtra. Paper presented at the “Scholastic and/or Yogin? The works attributed to the Indian medieval scholar Sthiramati” symposium, The Tsukuba-Hamburg Symposium Series, Hamburg, August 2015.
Sponberg, A. (1982). The Trisvabhāva doctrine in India and China: A study of three exegetical models. Bukkyō Bunka Kenkyū-jo Kiyō, 21, 97–119.
Tarkatirtha, T. N., & Tarkatirtha, A. (Ed.). (1936–1944). Nyayadarsanam with Vatsyayana’s bhasya, Uddyotakara’s varttika, Vacaspati Misra’s tatparyatika & Visvanatha’s vrtti. Calcutta Sanskrit series, Vols. 18, 29. Calcutta: Metropolitan Printing & Publishing House.
Tzohar, R. (2011). Metaphor (Upacāra) in early Yogacara thought and its intellectual context. Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Tzohar, R. (forthcoming). Thoughts on early Indian Yogācāra understanding of Āgama-Pramāṇa. Kervan: International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies edited by professors at the Universities of Turin and Enna.
Unebe, T. (2004). The ‘grammarian’s’ objection in Sthiramati’s Triṃśikābhāṣya and Bhatṛhari’s argument on the secondary application of words. In M. Tachikawa, S. Hino, & T, Wada (Eds.), Three mountains and seven rivers. Prof. Musashi Tachikawa’s felicitation volume (pp. 135–137). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Waldron, W. S. (2003). The Buddhist Unconscious: The aalaya-vijñaana in the context of Indian Buddhist thought. RoutledgeCurzon critical studies in Buddhism. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Yamaguchi, S., & Lévi, S. (1934). Madhyantavibhagatika: Exposition systématique du Yogacaravijñaptivada. Nagoya: Librairie Hajinkaku.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tzohar, R. Does Early Yogācāra Have a Theory of Meaning? Sthiramati’s Arguments on Metaphor in the Triṃśikā-bhāṣya . J Indian Philos 45, 99–120 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-016-9300-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-016-9300-4