Abstract
The study of philosophical terms and doctrines in the Mahābhārata touches not only on important aspects of the contents, composition and the historical contexts of the epic, but also on the historiography of Indian philosophy. General ideas about the textual history of the epic and the distinction between “didactic” and “narrative” parts have influenced the study of epic philosophy no less than academic discussions about what is philosophy in India and how it developed. This results in different evaluations of the place of philosophical texts in the epic and their relationship to the history of Indian philosophy. While some scholars have suggested that there is a “philosophy of the epic” its composers wished to propagate, others have argued that “philosophy” is included in the epic either in a “proto” form or in a variety of doctrines (often presented is “mixed” or “unsystematic” ways) they deemed relevant. The article discusses these views and some of the heuristic assumptions on which they are based. It proposes to widen the scope of analysis by paying more attention to the interplay of narrative and didactic passages, the various ways in which philosophy is presented in the epic, and its connection to a larger spectrum of the reception of philosophy in textual genres and by audiences outside the expert circles of the philosophical schools.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aramaki, N. (1989). The formation of the Mokṣadharma chapter of the Śāntiparvan of the Mahābhārata. In Indian philosophy and Buddhism: Essays in Honour of Professor Kotatsu Fujita on his Sixtieth Birthday (pp. 89–122). Kyoto: Shoten.
Bailey, G. (1983). Suffering in the Mahābhārata: Draupadī and Yudhiṣṭhira. Puruṣārtha, 7, 109–129.
Bakker, H., & Bisschop, P. (1999). Mokṣadharma 187 and 239–241 reconsidered. Asiatische Studien, 52(3), 459–472.
Biardeau, M. (1976). Études de mythologie hindoue IV. Bulletin de l’ École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 63, 111–262.
Biardeau, M. (1978). Études de mythologie hindoue V. Bulletin de l’ École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 65, 87–237.
Biardeau, M. (1981). The Salvation of the King in the Mahābhārata. Contributions to Indian Sociology, New Series, 15(1–2), 75–97.
Brockington, J. L. (1999). Epic Sāṃkhya: Texts, teachers, terminology. Asiatische Studien, 53(3), 473–490.
Brockington, J. L. (2003). Yoga in the Mahābhārata. In I. Whicher & D. Carpenter (Eds.), Yoga: The Indian Tradition (pp. 13–24). London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Dahlmann, J. (1895). Das Mahābhārata als Epos und Rechtsbuch. Berlin: F. L. Dames.
Dahlmann, J. (1899). Genesis des Mahābhārata. Berlin: F. L. Dames.
Dahlmann, J. (1902). Die Sāṃkhya Philosophie als Naturlehre und Erlösungslehre nach dem Mahābhārata. Berlin: F. L. Dames.
Deussen, P. (1908). Allgemeine Geschichte der Philosophie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Religionen. Bd. I, 3. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Deussen, P., & Strauss, O. (1906). Vier philosophische Texte des Mahābhāratam. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus.
Dumézil, G. (1968). Mythe et épopée 1: L’idéologie des trois fonctions dans les épopées des peuples indoeuropéens. Paris: Gallimard.
Dumézil, G. (1971). Mythe et épopée 2: Types épiques indo-européens: un héros, un sorcier, un roi. Paris: Gallimard.
Edgerton, F. (1924). The meaning of Sāṃkhya and Yoga. American Journal of Philology, 45, 1–65.
Edgerton, F. (1965). The beginnings of Indian Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fitzgerald, J. L. (1980). The Mokṣa anthology of the Great Bhārata. An Initial Survey of Structural Issues, Themes, and Rhetorical Strategies. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chicago.
Fitzgerald, J. L. (2002). Nun Befuddles King, shows Karmayoga does not work: Sulabhā’s refutation of King Janaka at MBh 12.308. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 30, 641–677.
Fitzgerald, J. L. (Ed., Trans.). (2004). The Mahābhārata: Book 11: The Book of Women, Book 12: The Book of Peace, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fitzgerald, J. L. (2006). Negotiating the shape of ‘scripture:’ New perspectives on the development and growth of the Mahābhārata between the Empires. In P. Olivelle (Ed.), Between the empires (pp. 257–286). New York: Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, J. L. (2012). The Sāṃkhya-Yoga ‘Manifesto’ at MBh 289–290. In J. L. Brockington (Ed.), Battles, bards, brahmans (pp. 259–300). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Franco, E. (Ed.). (2013). Periodization and Historiography of Indian Philosophy. Wien: Verein Sammlung de Nobili.
Frauwallner, E. (1925a). Untersuchungen zum Mokṣadharma. Die nicht-sāṃkhyistischen Texte. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 45, 51–67.
Frauwallner, E. (1925b). Untersuchungen zum Mokṣadharma. Die sāṃkhyistischen Texte. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 32: 179–206.
Frauwallner, E. (1926). Untersuchungen zum Mokṣadharma. Das Verhältnis zum Buddhismus. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 33, 57–58.
Frauwallner, E. (1953). Geschichte der indischen Philosophie. I. Band. Die Philosophie des Veda und des Epos; der Buddha und der Jina; das Samkhya und das Klassische Yoga-System. Salzburg: O. Müller.
Garbe, R. (1917 [1894]). Die Sāṃkhya-Philosophie, eine Darstellung des indischen Rationalismus nach den Quellen (2nd ed., revised). Leipzig: H. Haessel.
Hacker, P. (1961). The Samkhyization of the emanation doctrine shown in a critical analysis of texts. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, 5, 75–112.
Halbfass, W. (1988). India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Holtzmann, A. (1892–1895). Das Mahābhārata und seine Theile (4 Vols.). Kiel: C. F. Haeseler.
Hopkins, E. W. (1898). The Bhārata and the Great Bhārata. American Journal of Philology, 19, 1–24.
Hopkins, E. W. (1902). The Great Epic of India: Its Character and Origin. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
Jacobi, H. (1895). Rezension von R. Garbe ‘Die Sāṃkhya-Philosophie, eine Darstellung des indische Rationalismus. Leipzig 1894’. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen unter den Aufsicht der Königl. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, 1, 202–211.
Kirste, J. (1900). Zur Mahābhāratafrage. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 14, 214–224.
Malinar, A. (2006). ‘Philosophische Argumentation’ und ‘religiöse Praxis’ im Hinduismus. In A. Koch (Ed.), Watchtower Religionswissenschaft: Standortbestimmungen im wissenschaftlichen Feld (pp. 67–80). Marburg: Diagonal Verlag.
Malinar, A. (2007a). The Bhagavadgītā: Doctrines and contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malinar, A. (2007b). Arguments of a queen: Draupadī’s views on kingship. In S. Brodbeck & B. Black (Eds.), Epic constructions. Gender and narrative in the Mahābhārata (pp. 79–96). London: Routledge.
Malinar, A. (2012a). Yoga powers in the Mahābhārata. In K. A. Jacobsen (Ed.), Yoga powers: Extraordinary capacities attained through meditation and concentration (pp. 33–60). Leiden: Brill.
Malinar, A. (2012b). Duryodhana’s truths: Kingship and Divinity in Mahābhārata 5.60. In J. L. Brockington (Ed.), Battles, bards, brahmans (pp. 51–79). New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Malinar, A. (2016). Ideas of ‘Indian Philosophy’ in nineteenth century Germany: Vivekananda, Deussen and Garbe. In D. Raina & H. Harder (Eds.), Indo-German Disciplinary Conversations in the Sciences and Social Sciences, Technology and the Humanities, Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
Matilal, K. B. (1989). Moral dilemmas in the Mahābhārata. Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study in association with Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi.
Pisani, V. (1939). The rise of the Mahābhārata. In S. M. Katre & P. K. Gode (Eds.), A volume of Eastern and Indian studies presented to Professor F. W. Thomas (pp. 166–176). Bombay: Karnatak Publishing House.
Ruben, W. (1956). The beginning of Epic Sāṃkhya. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 37, 74–189.
Ruben, W. (1971). Die gesellschaftliche Entwicklung der Philosophie im alten Indien. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Schreiner, P. (1999). What comes first (in the Mahābhārata): Sāṃkhya or Yoga? Asiatische Studien, 53(3), 755–777.
Strauss, O. (1908). Über den Stil der philosophischen Partien des Mahābhārata. Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 62, 661–670.
Sukthankar, V. S. (1957). On the meaning of the Mahābhārata. Bombay: Asiatic Society of Bombay.
Telang, K. T. (1882). The Bhagavadgītā with Sanatsujātīya and the Anugītā. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Buitenen, J. A. B. (1956). Studies in Sāṃkhya (I): An old text reconstituted. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 76, 153–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malinar, A. Philosophy in the Mahābhārata and the History of Indian Philosophy. J Indian Philos 45, 587–607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-016-9294-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-016-9294-y