Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Duelling Commonwealth Family of Nations Metaphors and Britain’s Post-Brexit Global Identity

  • Published:
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the communication of conceptual metaphors in contemporary narratives of British politics, and specifically, the competitive communication of a Commonwealth ‘family of nations’ metaphor in the context of ongoing Brexit debates. This line of inquiry has been pursued through an analysis of parliamentary speeches made in the House of Commons and the House of Lords in the period from 23 June 2015 (1 year before the EU Referendum) through October 2018, facilitated by the use of computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software. Although multiple ‘family of nations’ metaphors were identified, British parliamentarians made more references to the Commonwealth as a family unit than other multi-national groupings, and two prominent variants of this family metaphor have been defined. Speakers competed for control over the meaning of the base metaphor, with mainly English Conservative speakers communicating a positive aspirational variant (framing the Commonwealth as a historically rooted, harmonious and prosperous alternative to the EU), while speakers from the other main parties communicated a competing critical judgmental variant (framing the Commonwealth as discriminatory, unequal and failing to defend shared human rights principles). It is argued that this metaphor, and particularly its positive aspirational variant, contributes to a broader communicative effort to encourage the imagination of a transnational and global British orientation and identity outside Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Chart 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, K., & Lee, S. Y. M. (2009). Gender versus politics: When conceptual models collide in the US senate. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, A. (2008). Ambiguity and metaphor. Semiotica, 172 (1/4),151–169.

  • Bell, D., & Vucetic, S. (2019). Brexit, CANZUK, and the legacy of empire. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 21, 367–382.

  • Bell, D. (2007). The idea of greater Britain: Empire and the future of world order, 1860–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M. (1977). More about metaphor. Dialectica, 31(3–4), 431–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer, E. (2005). Scouting for Boys: A Handbook for Instruction in Good Citizenship. By Robert Baden-Powell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Empire Exhibition. (1924). Handbook of general information. Wembley, Middlesex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk, A., Parsons, C., & Sandholtz, W. (2002). After empire: National identity and postcolonial families of nations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(2), 267–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, David (2014). The importance of Scotland to the UK: David Cameron’s speech. 7 February: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-importance-of-scotland-to-the-uk-david-camerons-speech (accessed 15-12-2018).

  • Chan, N. (2013). ‘Remember the empire, filled with your cousins’: Poetic exposition in the documentaries of the empire marketing board. Studies in Documentary Film, 7(2), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charteris-Black, J. (2009). Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, P. A. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Peter (1996). Hope and Glory: Britain 1900–1990. London: Penguin Group.

  • Clendinning, Anne (2012). “On the British empire Exhibition, 1924-25.” Branch: Britain, Representation, and Nineteenth-Century History. Ed. Dino Franco Felluga. http://www.branchcollective.org/.

  • Commonwealth Secretariat (2015). The Commonwealth in the unfolding global trade landscape: Prospects, priorities, perspectives (commonwealth trade review 2015). London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

  • Constantine, S. (1986). ‘Bringing the empire alive’: The Empire Marketing Board and Imperial propaganda, 1926-33. In J. M. Mackenzie (Ed.), Imperialism and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  • Conquest (1928). Produced by the Empire Marketing Board (EMB) film unit.

  • Dearden, L. (2014). Scottish independence: Full text of David Cameron’s ‘no going back’ speech. In Independent. 16 September.https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/scottish-independence/scottish-independence-full-text-of-david-camerons-no-going-back-speech-9735902.html.

  • Dominiczak, Peter and Simon Johnson (2014). “Scottish referendum: David Cameron begs scots not to leave the UK.” In The Telegraph. 15 September.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scottish-independence/11098311/Scottish-referendum-David-Cameron-begs-Scots-not-to-leave-the-UK.html.

  • Dilke, C. W. (1869). Greater Britain: A record of travel in English-speaking countries during 1866 and 1867. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drifters (1929). Directed by John Grierson. Produced by the Empire Marketing Board (EMB) film unit.

  • Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. A. (1886). Greater Greece and greater Britain, and George Washington, the expander of England. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber, K. G. (1978). The uses of history in political debate. History and Theory, 17(4), 36–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. (2015). Imagining transnational Orphanhoods: Nation-as-family in recent Spanish Children’s books. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 40(4), 322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, Christopher (2018). “How Brexit got metaphorical.Prospect, 19 October. https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/how-brexit-got-metaphorical (accessed 19-01-2019).

  • Grieveson, Lee (2010). “Empire Marketing Board.” http://www.colonialfilm.org.uk/production-company/empire-marketing-board (accessed 16-11-2018).

  • Hayden, S. (2003). Family metaphors and the nation: Promoting a politics of care through the million mom march. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89(3), 196–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, K. (2005). The political thought of the conservative party since 1945. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons (HC) Debates (23 June 2015-10 October 2018). https://hansard.parliament.uk/.

  • House of Lords (HL) Debates (21 July 1905). ‘Tariff reform’. Available at: https://www.hansard-corpus.org/x.asp.

  • House of Lords (HL) Debates (23 June 2015-10 October 2018). https://hansard.parliament.uk/.

  • Hülsse, R. (2006). Imagine the EU: The metaphorical construction of a supra-nationalist identity. J Int Relat Dev, 9, 396–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, R., & Spencer, A. (2008). The metaphor of terror: Terrorism studies and the constructivist turn. Security Dialogue, 39(6), 571–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Boris (2016). “Beyond Brexit: A global Britain.” GOV.UK, 2 December (Online).

  • Jones, R. (2018). Frozen state pensions: Thousands sign protest petition. In The Guardian, 13 October. https://www.theguardian.com/money/2018/oct/13/frozen-state-pensions-petition.

  • Jowett, G., & O’Donnell, V. (2012). Propaganda and persuasion (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, D. (1996). Empire: The British Imperial experience from 1765 to the present. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarbo, J., & Kenealy, D. (2017). Precedents, parliaments, and foreign policy: Historical analogy in the house of commons vote on Syria. West Eur Polit, 40(1), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals Don’t. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. C. (1924). The British Empire Exhibition: Official guide. London: Fleetwood Press Ltd.

  • May, Theresa (2017). “The government's negotiating objectives for exiting the EU: PM speech.” GOV.UK, 17 January (Online).

  • McIntyre, W. D. (1998). British decolonization, 1946–1997. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. D. (2016). Graveyard of analogies: The use and abuse of history for the war in Afghanistan. J Strateg Stud, 39(3), 446–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, J. (1999). The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musolff, A. (2017). Metaphor, irony and sarcasm in public discourse. J Pragmat, 109, 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namusoke, E. (2016). A divided family: Race, the commonwealth and Brexit. The Round Table, 105(5), 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadt, R. E., & May, E. R. (1986). Thinking in time: The uses of history for decision-makers. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, V., & Kable, J. (1982). Persuasion: An interactive dependency approach. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olusogo, D. (2017). ‘Empire 2.0 is dangerous nostalgia for something that never existed’. In The Guardian. 19 March. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/19/empire-20-is-dangerous-nostalgia-for-something-that-never-existed

  • One Family (1930). Directed by Walter Creighton. Produced by the Empire Marketing Board (EMB) film unit.

  • O’Shaughnessy, J., & O’Shaughnessy, N. J. (2003). The marketing power of emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2002). Kosovo and the metaphor war. Political Science Quarterly, 117(3), 423–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonska-Kimunguyi, E., & Kimunguyi, P. (2017). ‘Gunboats of soft power’: Boris on Africa and post-Brexit ‘global Britain’. Camb Rev Int Aff, 30(4), 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince of Wales, H.R.H. Edward VII. (1924). The British Empire Exhibition, Wembley, April to October 1924. London: 16 Grosvenor Gardens.

  • Pugh, M. (2017). State and Society: A Social and Political History of Britain since 1870, fifth edition. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (2014). How to be a conservative. Bloomsbury.

  • Seeley, J. R. (1914). The expansion of England. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimko, K. L. (1994). Metaphors and foreign policy decision making. Polit Psychol, 15(4), 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song of Ceylon (1934). Directed by Basil Wright. Produced by the Empire Marketing Board (EMB) film unit.

  • Tapper, James (2019). “The many metaphors of Brexit.” JSTOR Daily, 9 January. https://daily.jstor.org/many-metaphors-brexit/ (accessed 19-01-2019).

  • Wellings, B., & Baxendale, H. (2015). Euroscepticism and the Anglosphere: Traditions and dilemmas in contemporary English nationalism. J Common Mark Stud, 53(1), 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellings, B. (2016). Our Island Story: England, Europe and the Anglosphere alternative. Political Studies Review, 14(3), 368–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmills in Barbados (1933). Directed by John Grierson. Produced by the Empire Marketing Board (EMB) film unit.

  • Wolf, M. (2017). Six impossible notions about ‘global Britain'. Financial Times, 30 November (Online).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Ølholm Eaton.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the Welfare of Animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

No individuals participated in this study and therefore informed consent is not relevant.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix List of CW-FON metaphor statements, 23 June 2015–31 October 2018

Appendix List of CW-FON metaphor statements, 23 June 2015–31 October 2018

Date

Speaker

Party

Location

# CW-FON refs

09-09-2015

David Cameron

Conservative

Commons

1

15-09-2015

Andrew Rosindell

Conservative

Commons

1

01-12-2015

Martin John Docherty

SNP

Commons

1

17-12-2015

Lord Luce

Crossbencher

Lords

1

04-02-2016

Craig Mackinlay

Conservative

Commons

1

11-02-2016

Baroness Verma

Conservative

Lords

1

14-03-2016

Hugo Swire

Conservative

Commons

2

14-03-2016

Ian Liddell-Grainger

Conservative

Commons

2

14-03-2016

Patrick Grady

SNP

Commons

1

21-04-2016

David Cameron

Conservative

Commons

1

08-09-2016

Lord Howell

Conservative

Lords

1

11-10-2016

Jake Berry

Conservative

Commons

1

20-10-2016

Lord Howell

Conservative

Lords

1

20-01-2017

Alan Mak

Conservative

Commons

1

20-01-2017

Peter Heaton-Jones

Conservative

Commons

1

21-02-2017

Lord Taylor (Warwick)

Non-affiliated

Lords

1

22-02-2017

Jake Berry

Conservative

Commons

2

22-02-2017

John Howell

Conservative

Commons

1

22-02-2017

Jim Shannon

DUP

Commons

1

16-03-2017

Baroness Anelay

Conservative

Lords

4

16-03-2017

Baroness Benjamin

Liberal Democrat

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Baroness D’Souza

Crossbencher

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Baroness Jenkin

Conservative

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Baroness Mobarik

Conservative

Lords

3

16-03-2017

Baroness Uddin

Non-affiliated

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Earl of Sandwich

Crossbencher

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Lord Goodlad

Conservative

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Lord Lexden

Conservative

Lords

1

16-03-2017

Lord Popat

Conservative

Lords

3

16-03-2017

Lord Purvis

Liberal Democrat

Lords

3

16-03-2017

Lord Scriven

Liberal Democrat

Lords

5

16-03-2017

Viscount Waverly

Crossbencher

Lords

1

20-04-2017

Nigel Evans

Conservative

Commons

1

12-09-2017

Hugo Swire

Conservative

Commons

1

12-09-2017

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

3

02-11-2017

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

1

02-11-2017

Lord Cashman

Labour

Lords

1

02-11-2017

Lord Collins

Labour

Lords

1

02-11-2017

Lord Mendelsohn

Labour

Lords

1

02-11-2017

Lord Taylor (Warwick)

Non-affiliated

Lords

2

27-11-2017

Baroness Fairhead

Conservative

Lords

1

27-11-2017

Lord Taylor (Warwick)

Non-affiliated

Lords

4

13-12-2017

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

2

31-01-2018

Lord Taylor (Warwick)

Non-affiliated

Lords

2

22-01-2018

Lord Popat

Conservative

Lords

1

20-02-2018

Hugo Swire

Conservative

Commons

1

20-02-2018

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

1

06-03-2018

Hugo Swire

Conservative

Commons

3

06-03-2018

Mark Fields

Conservative

Commons

1

21-03-2018

Baroness Spelman

Conservative

Lords

1

21-03-2018

Hugo Swire

Conservative

Commons

1

21-03-2018

Richard Graham

Conservative

Commons

1

21-03-2018

Sir Nicolas Soames

Conservative

Commons

2

22-03-2018

Baroness Anelay

Conservative

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Earl of Sandwich

Crossbencher

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Lord Cashman

Labour

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Lord Kakkar

Crossbencher

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Lord Luce

Crossbencher

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Lord Popat

Conservative

Lords

1

22-03-2018

Viscount Waverly

Crossbencher

Lords

1

27-03-2018

David Evennett

Conservative

Commons

1

18-04-2018

Theresa May

Conservative

Commons

1

03-05-2018

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

1

15-05-2018

Jim Shannon

DUP

Commons

1

15-05-2018

Mary Robinson

Conservative

Commons

1

14-06-2018

Tom Tugendhat

Conservative

Commons

1

21-06-2018

Lord Stunell

Liberal Democrat

Lords

1

23-07-2018

Lord Ahmad

Conservative

Lords

1

Total

   

95

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eaton, M.Ø. Duelling Commonwealth Family of Nations Metaphors and Britain’s Post-Brexit Global Identity. Int J Polit Cult Soc 33, 283–307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09326-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-019-09326-7

Keywords

Navigation