Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Chinese Students’ Hierarchical Understanding of Part-whole and Measure Subconstructs

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractions are a very important but difficult topic in elementary and secondary mathematics curricula around the world. The difficulty in teaching and learning fractions is usually caused by their various subconstructs. To facilitate learning of fractions, a test consisting of 20 items was developed to examine 310 sixth graders’ hierarchical understanding of the part-whole and measure subconstructs of fractions. Rasch analysis and cluster analysis were used to analyze the data. The results showed six distinguishable levels of understanding of the two subconstructs. Briefly, constructing fractions alone was the easiest to develop, followed by repartitioning/reconstructing and regarding fractions as numbers. The abilities involved at the highest level were successively partitioning, defining a unit interval freely and placing fractions on number lines. The results also indicated that most of the students were able to deal with part-whole subconstruct problems but still had difficulty handling measure subconstruct problems by the end of their elementary education. They could construct fractions/the whole, recognize the number notion of fractions and fractional unit and measure distances, but lacked enough ability to partition successively and place fractions on number lines. This study provides a clearer picture of hierarchy of understanding the two subconstructs and contributes to the corresponding development of instructional resources and the teaching/learning of fractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrich, D. (2004). Controversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Medical Care, 42(1), I7–I16. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000103528.48582.7c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, H. (2018). Quantities, numbers, number names and the real number line. In M. G. B. Bussi & X. H. Sun (Eds.), Building the foundation: Whole numbers in the primary grades (pp. 465–475). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baturo, A. R. (2004). Empowering Andrea to help year-5 students construct fraction understanding. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 95–102). Bergen: University College.

  • Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T., & Lesh, R. (1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 296–333). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M. J., Lesh, R., Post, T. R., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Rational number concepts. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 91–126). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, M. J., & Post, T. (1992). Teaching rational number and decimal concepts. In T. R. Post (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research-based methods (pp. 201–248). Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Čadež, T. H., & Kolar, V. M. (2018). How fifth-grade pupils reason about fractions: A reliance on part-whole subconstructs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 335–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9838-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (2009). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambous, C., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study students’ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9036-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. A. (2003). Using a translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In R. Lesh & H. M. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 449–463). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, K. A., Post, T. R., & del Mas, R. C. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth- and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologist. Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (2012). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., . . . Changas, P. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446.

  • Gabriel, F., Coché, F., Szucs, D., Carette, V., Rey, B., & Content, A. (2013). A componential view of children’s difficulties in learning fractions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(715), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Ham, A.-K., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannula, M. S. (2003). Locating fraction on a number line. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 17–24). Honolulu: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A., & Leeming, J. (2014). Fractions, decimals, percentages, ratio and proportion. In M. Witt (Ed.), Primary mathematics for trainee teachers (pp. 99–121). London: Learning Matters/SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M. (1981a). Fractions. In K. Hart, M. L. Brown, D. E. Kuchemann, D. Kerslake, G. Ruddock, & M. McCartney (Eds.), Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16 (pp. 66–81). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M. (1981b). Hierarchies in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M., Brown, M. L., Kerslake, D., Küchemann, D., & Ruddock, G. (1985). Chelsea diagnostic mathematics tests. Berkshire: NFER-NELSON Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M., Brown, M. L., Kuchemann, D. E., Kerslake, D., Ruddock, G., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children’s understanding of mathematics: (pp 11–16). London: John Murray.

  • Herscovics, N., & Bergeron, J. C. (1983). Models of understanding. ZDM, 15(2), 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 65–97). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh & D. A. Bradhard (Eds.), Number and measurement: Papers from a research workshop (pp. 101–144). Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt, G., & Cakiroglu, E. (2009). Middle grade students’ performances in translating among representations of fractions: A Turkish perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Landau, M., & Hamilton, E. (1983). Conceptual models and applied mathematical problem-solving research. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 263–343). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (1998). Detecting multidimensionality: Which residual data-type works best? Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 266–283. Retrived September 20, 2019, from http://www.winsteps.com/a/Linacre-multidimensionality-residuals.pdf.

  • Marcoulides, G. A., & Drezner, Z. (2000). A procedure for detecting pattern clustering in measurement designs. In M. Wilson & J. George Engelhard (Eds.), Objective measurement: Theory into practice (Vol. 5, pp. 261–277). Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, C. (2001). Quanrizhi yiwu jiaoyu shuxue kecheng biaozhun (Shiyan gao) [Mathematics curriculum standard for compulsory education (trial version)]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

  • Ministry of Education, C. (2012). Yiwu jiaoyu shuxue kecheng biaozhun (2011 ban) [Mathematics curriculum standard for compulsory education (2011 version)] .Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.

  • Ngan Ng, S. S., & Rao, N. (2010). Chinese number words, culture, and mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 180–206. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310364764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, Y. (1999). Wu liu nianji xiao xuesheng dui fenshu yiyi he xingzhi de lijie [Fifth and sixth graders’ understanding of the meanings and equivalence of fractions]. Xinli Fazhan Yu Jiaoyu, 15, 26–30.

  • Ni, Y. (2001). Semantic domains of rational numbers and the acquisition of fraction equivalence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, A. A., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2016). Hierarchical levels of abilities that constitute fraction understanding at elementary school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9603-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. (2012). Levels of students’ ‘conception’ of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9338-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • People’s Education Press, C. (2007). Yiwu jiaoyu kecheng biaozhun shiyan jiaokeshu shuxue: Wuxia [Mathematics textbook for compulsory education (trial version): 5B]. Beijing: People's Education Press.

  • People’s Education Press, C. (2014). Yiwu jiaoyu jiaokeshu shuxue: Wu nianji xia [Primary mathematics textbook for compulsory education: 5B] . Beijing: People’s Education Press.

  • Pirie, S. E. B., & Kieren, T. E. (1989). A recursive theory of mathematical understanding. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(3), 7–11. Retrieved May 2, 2018, Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40248156.

  • Pitkethly, A., & Hunting, R. (1996). A review of recent research in the area of initial fraction concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00163751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B., Taylor, E. V., McIntosh, C., & Gearhart, M. (2005). Representing fractions with standard notation: A developmental analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., Susperreguy, M. I., & Chen, M. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1990). Some remarks on understanding in mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(3), 24–41 Retrieved May 2, 2018, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40247990.

  • Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics (Vol. 2). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torbeyns, J., Schneider, M., Xin, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Bridging the gap: Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different continents. Learning and Instruction, 37, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunç-Pekkan, Z. (2015). An analysis of elementary school children’s fractional knowledge depicted with circle, rectangle, and number line representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9606-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoof, J., Degrande, T., Ceulemans, E., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2018). Towards a mathematically more correct understanding of rational numbers: A longitudinal study with upper elementary school learners. Learning and Individual Differences, 61, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., & Peng, Y. (2016). Xiaoxue shuxue jiaokeshu “fenshu de chubu renshi” bufen de bijiao [comparisons of primary mathematics textbooks regarding initial learning of fractions]. Kecheng Jiaoxue Yanjiu, 1, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M. (2010). Equivalent fractions: Developing a pathway of students’ acquisition of knowledge and understanding. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 673–680). Fremantle: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B. (2013). The development of school mathematics textbooks in China since 1950. ZDM, 45(5), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0538-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (2010). Fenshu de dingyi [the definition of fractions]. Xiaoxue Jiaoxue (Shuxue ban), 1, 48–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (2014). Tuichen chuxin: Tan fenshu dingyi de xiuding [modification of the definition of fractions]. Xiaoxue Jiaoxue (Shuxue ban), 5, 4–6.

  • Zhang, Q., & Xu, W. (2016). Lun xiaoxue shuxue zhong fenshu de duocengji lijie ji qi jiaoxue [understanding of different meanings of fraction in primary mathematics and its teaching]. Kecheng, Jiaocai, Jiaofa, 36(3), 43–49.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments; Dr. Jiang for her writing assistance; Dr. Liu, Dr. Shuai, Dr. Chen, Dr. Qiu and Prof. de la Torre for their help in data collection or data analysis; all student-participants and some mathematics teachers for their contributions, especially Ms. Zhao, Mr. Xia, Ms. Li and Ms. Duan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, 999077, China

    Zheng Jiang & Ida Ah Chee Mok

  2. School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, No. 19, XinJieKouWai Street, HaiDian District, Beijing, 100875, China

    Jianhua Li

Authors
  1. Zheng Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ida Ah Chee Mok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zheng Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix: Test Items

Appendix: Test Items

figure aa
figure ab

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, Z., Mok, I.A.C. & Li, J. Chinese Students’ Hierarchical Understanding of Part-whole and Measure Subconstructs. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 1441–1461 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10118-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10118-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation