Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY OF THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN CHEMISTRY CLASSES AT ALBANIAN, KOSOVAR, ROMANIAN AND TURKISH SECONDARY SCHOOLS

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is part of a cross-national research entitled In the past and now: Constructivist practices in teaching chemistry—Bulgaria, the Balkans and Europe. The purpose of the research is to explore science secondary classroom environments in terms of the constructivist approach. The study has been carried out at international schools and state schools in Albania, Kosovo, Romania and Turkey. The data collection methods were three surveys: the What Is Happening In This Class? (WIHIC), the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES) and the Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). The questionnaires were given to 747 secondary school students. The results show that in the majority of the surveyed classrooms, a blended traditional-constructivist type of environment is present. The highest scores for all three questionnaires were given by students of the international school in Kosovo. The traditional and test-oriented teaching in the Turkish schools surveyed explains the low degree of satisfaction and enjoyment of science lessons among Turkish students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Amoush, S., Markic, S., Usak, M., Erdogan, M. & Eilks, I. (2014). Beliefs about chemistry teaching and learning—a comparison of teachers’ and student teachers’ beliefs from Jordan, Turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 767–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C. & Chen, C.-C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. & Ntuli, S. (2009). Utilising learning environment assessments to improve teaching practices among in-service teachers undertaking a distance-education programme. South African Journal of Education, 29(2), 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. O., Lin, H.-S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P. & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large scale assessment datasets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boiadjieva, E., Tafrova-Grigororva, A., Hollenbeck, J. E. & Kirova, M. (2009). An examination of teacher’s pedagogical philosophical beliefs of secondary science teachers in Sofia public schools, Sofia, Bulgaria. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Educational Policy, 3(1), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, E. & Cakiroglu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charalampous, K. & Kokkinos, C. M. (2013). The model of interpersonal teacher behaviour: A qualitative cross-cultural validation within the Greek elementary education context. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 182–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K. & Taylor, T. G. N. (2001). Using constructivism to inform tertiary chemistry pedagogy. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2(3), 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Brok, P., Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., Taconis, R. & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Learning environment profiles of Turkish secondary biology classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 13(3), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emilov, I. & Tafrova-Grigorova, A. (2013). Student perceptions of science classroom learning environment in some European countries. In M. Koleva (Ed.), Training issues of chemistry teachers: Proceedings of the international conference on teachers’ training (pp. 124–131). Gabrovo, Bulgaria.

  • Evrekli, E., Şaşmaz Ören, F. & İnel, D. (2010). Pre-service primary teachers’ self-efficacy toward the constructivist approach and their opinions about their efficacy levels. Paper presented at the 12th Annual International Conference on Education, Athens, Greece

  • Evrekli, E., Şaşmaz Ören, F. & İnel, D. (2011). Examining student teachers’ self-efficacy for implementing the constructivist approach in terms of the variables of gender, department and grade level. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(2), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of Science-Related Attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 3–27). London, England: Pergamon.

  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational learning environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Fraser, B. J. & Fisher, D. L. (1983). Development and validation of short forms of some instruments measuring student perceptions of actual and preferred classroom learning environment. Science Education, 67(1), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B.J., Fisher, D.L. & McRobbie, C.J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York

  • Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M. & Adolphe, F. S. G. (2009). A cross-national study of secondary science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., Onkol, P. E. & Sands, M. (2007). Curriculum reform in Turkish teacher education: Attitudes of teacher educators towards change in an EU candidate nation. International Journal of Educational Development, 27(2), 138–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürbüztürk, O. & Şad, S. N. (2009). Student teachers’ beliefs about teaching and their sense of self-efficacy: A descriptive and comparative analysis. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 10(3), 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenbeck, J. E., Kirova, M., Boiadjieva, E. & Grigorova-Tafrova, A. (2009). A study on students’ and teachers’ perceptions and expectations of their learning in secondary science classrooms. Chemistry, 18, 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahveci, A. & Ay, S. (2008). Different approaches—common implications: Brain-based and constructivist learning from a paradigms and integral model perspective. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 108–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khine, M. S. (2001). Using the WIHIC questionnaire to measure the learning environment. Teaching and Learning, 22(2), 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Fisher, D. L. & Fraser, B. J. (1999). Assessment and investigation of science learning environments in Korea. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(2), 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., Lavonen, J., Juuti, K., Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Teacher’s reflection of inquiry teaching in Finland before and during an in-service program: Examination by a progress model of collaborative reflection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning (pp. 559–642). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

  • Nix, R. K. (2012). Cultivating constructivist classrooms through evaluation of an integrated science learning environment. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1291–1303). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

  • Nix, K. R., Fraser, B. J. & Ledbetter, C. E. (2005). Evaluating an integrated science learning environment using the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey. Learning Environments Research, 8(2), 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, P. S. & Shin, M.-K. (2005). Students’ reflections on implementation of group investigation in Korean Secondary Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, P. S. & Yager, R. E. (2004). Development of constructivist science classrooms and changes of student attitudes toward science learning. Science Education International, 15, 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. (2000). Chemistry lessons for universities?: A review of constructivist ideas. University Chemistry Education, 4, 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafrova-Grigorova, A., Boiadjieva, E., Emilov, I. & Kirova, M. (2012a). Science teachers’ attitudes towards constructivist environment: A Bulgarian case. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafrova-Grigorova, A., Kirova, M. & Boiadjieva, E. (2012b). Science teachers’ views on the constructivist learning environment in the Bulgarian school. Chemistry, 21, 375–388 [In Bulgarian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.C., Fraser, B.J. & White, L.R. (1994, April). The revised CLES: A questionnaire for educators interested in the constructivist reform of school science and mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved May 2013 from http://surveylearning.moodle.com/cles/papers/CLES_AERA94_Award.htm

  • Taylor, P.C., Dawson, V. & Fraser, B.J. (1995, April). Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA

  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J. & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telli, S., den Brok, P. & Cakiroglu, J. (2010). The importance of teacher-student interpersonal relationships for Turkish students’ attitudes towards science. Research of Science and Technological Education, 28(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. G. (1993). Constructivist perspectives on teacher learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (Vol. 13, pp. 213–226). Washington, DC: AAAS Press.

  • Tobin, K. G. & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 623–640). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Toshev, B. V. (2007). Ранното обучение по природни науки – интегрален или модулен позход (The early science teaching and learning: Integral vs. module approach). Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, 1, 51–56.

  • Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E. (2000). The constructivist learning model. The Science Teacher, 67(1), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Laboratory on Chemistry Education and History and Philosophy of Chemistry, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 1, James Bourchier Blvd, Sofia, Bulgaria

    ILIYA EMILOV & ADRIANA TAFROVA-GRIGOROVA

Authors
  1. ILIYA EMILOV
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ADRIANA TAFROVA-GRIGOROVA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ADRIANA TAFROVA-GRIGOROVA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

EMILOV, I., TAFROVA-GRIGOROVA, A. A CROSS-NATIONAL STUDY OF THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN CHEMISTRY CLASSES AT ALBANIAN, KOSOVAR, ROMANIAN AND TURKISH SECONDARY SCHOOLS. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14 (Suppl 1), 107–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9591-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9591-4

Key words

Search

Navigation