Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Educational Robotics in Down Syndrome: A Feasibility Study

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Educational robotics (ER) uses robotic kits as a channel for education and collaborative learning in a play setting. Thanks to adaptability of robots, ER could facilitate inclusion of special-needs children, such as children with Down syndrome (DS), in learning programs. In a previous study, we provided evidence that ER could promote superior cognitive functions, such as executive functions, which are involved in problem solving, reasoning and planning in typically developing preschool children. In this preliminary study, we aimed to evaluate ER training feasibility, adapting methodology and previously experimented activities to promote executive functions in DS children. Eight DS children carried out 45-min weekly group sessions for 8 weeks in an ER laboratory (ER-Lab) using the Bee-Bot. Training setting was generally well-suited for this small sample of DS children. Due to sample heterogeneity, qualitative results of only two exemplificative children are presented and discussed. Results indicate that Bee-Bot is a very significant device for promoting interest, attention and interaction with adults and peers. Promotion of executive functions seemed to be possible in one child, who eagerly participated in ER-Lab activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alimisis, D. (2013). Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiacchi, P. S., Cendron, M., Gugliotta, M., Tressoldi, P. E., & Vio, C. (2005). BVN 5-11: batteria di valutazione neuropsicologica per l’età evolutiva. Trento: Centro studi Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Businaro, N., Zecca, L., & Castiglioni, M. (2014). Implicazioni psicologiche di un laboratorio di robotica educativa nella scuola primaria: riflessioni sul caso di un bambino con ritardo mentale. Psicologia clinica dello sviluppo, 18(2), 311–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. A. C., Pritchard, V. E., & Woodward, L. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conchinha, C. (2015). Playful learning: Educational robotics applied to students with learning disabilities. In 2015 International symposium on computers in education (SIIE) (pp. 167–171). IEEE.

  • Di Lieto, M. C., Inguaggiato, E., Catro, E., Cecchi, F., Cioni, G., Dell’Omo, M., Laschi, C., Pecini, C., Santerini, G., Sgandurra, G., Dario, P. (2017). Educational robotics intervention on executive functions in pre-school children: A pilot study. Computers in human behavior, 71, 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2012). Activities and programs that improve children’s executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 335–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S., Lindh, J., & Shukur, G. (2006). The effect of LEGO training on pupils’ school performance in mathematics, problem solving ability and attitude: Swedish data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 182–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janka, P. (2008). Using a programmable toy at preschool age: Why and how. In Teaching with robotics: Didactic approaches and experiences. Workshop of international conference on simulation, modeling and programming autonomous robots (SIMPAR 2008).

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2007). NEPSY-II. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroux, P. (1999). W4: Educational robotics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 1080–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mammarella, I. C., Toso, C., Pazzaglia, F., & Cornoldi, C. (2008). Il Test di Corsi e la batteria BVS per la valutazione della memoria visuospaziale [The Corsi blocks task and the BVS battery for visuospatial memory assessment]. Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P. J., & Drew, A. R. (2014). What makes Simon Says so difficult for young children? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 112–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., & Grandgenett, N. (2008). The effect of 4-H robotics and geospatial technologies on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and attitudes. In EdMedia: World conference on educational media and technology (Vol. 2008, No. 1, pp. 447–452).

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Ferrari, E., Kronreif, G., Prazak-Aram, B., Marti, P., et al. (2012). Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. Interaction Studies, 13(2), 189–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., TeBoekhorst, R., & Billard, A. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, 4(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, B., Dickerson, P., Stribling, P., & Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot-human interaction. Interaction Studies, 5(2), 161–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, M. R., Checa, P., & Combita, L. M. (2012). Enhanced efficiency of the executive attention network after training in preschool children: Immediate changes and effects after two months. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S192–S204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso, L., Viterbori, P., & Usai, M. C. (2015). Improving executive function in childhood: Evaluation of a training intervention for 5-year-old children. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(525), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urgesi, C., Campanella, F., & Fabbro, F. (2011). NEPSY-II. Contributo alla Taratura Italiana. Florence: Giunti OS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usai, M. C., Viterbori, P., Traverso, L., & De Franchis, V. (2013). Latent structure of executive function in five- and six-year-old children: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(4), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valeri, G., Stievano, P., Ferretti, M. L., Mariani, E., & Pieretti, M. (2015). BAFE: Batteria per l’Assessment delle Funzioni Esecutive. Florence: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1987). Zone of proximal development. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, 5291, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1989). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence—Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2002). WPPSI-III administration and scoring manual. Psychological Corporation.

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-WISC-IV. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the parents of the children who participated in this study and the Fondazione TIM which is supporting the ER research activity of our group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Developmental Neuroscience, IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Viale del Tirreno 331, Calambrone, 56128, Pisa, Italy

    S. Bargagna, G. Cioni, M. Dell’Omo, M. C. Di Lieto, E. Inguaggiato, A. Martinelli, C. Pecini & G. Sgandurra

  2. The BioRobotics Institute, Polo Sant’Anna Valdera, Viale Rinaldo Piaggio 34, 56026, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy

    E. Castro, F. Cecchi & P. Dario

  3. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 56125, Pisa, Italy

    G. Cioni & G. Sgandurra

Authors
  1. S. Bargagna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Cecchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Cioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Dario
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Dell’Omo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. C. Di Lieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Inguaggiato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A. Martinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. Pecini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. G. Sgandurra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sgandurra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bargagna, S., Castro, E., Cecchi, F. et al. Educational Robotics in Down Syndrome: A Feasibility Study. Tech Know Learn 24, 315–323 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9366-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation