Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How Can We Support Students’ Learning Experiences in Higher Education? Campus Wide Course Transformation Program Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this paper are to examine the breadth of scholarship that emerged from a large-scale university-wide course transformation program between 2011 and 2021, to investigate how the course transformation program influenced students’ perceptions of their learning environment and learning achievement, and to discuss future directions for improving autonomy-supportive learning in higher education. We gathered all quantitative and qualitative publications related to the IMPACT course transformation program, and 35 articles were included in the study. Since the scope of the study topics in the course transformation program varied and program implementation was applied to various study contexts and disciplines, the findings were first summarized in a narrative manner. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the course transformation based on 10 journal articles that adopted quasi-experimental designs. The findings revealed that the courses redesigned through the program supported students’ positive learning experiences, including motivation, satisfaction regarding basic psychological needs, knowledge transferability, and academic performance. This paper discusses implications and future directions to enhance undergraduate students’ academic success through course redesign. Further exploration is needed to determine the additional effect of course redesign in higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2008). Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motivation & Emotion, 32(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9095-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. International Biometric Society, 50(4), 1088–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatman, A. (2012). Evaluating institutional efforts to streamline postsecondary remediation: The causal effects of the Tennessee Developmental Course Redesign Initiative on early student academic success. National Center for Postsecondary Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533916.pdf

  • Bonem, E. M., Fedesco, H. N., & Zissimopoulous, A. N. (2019). What you do is less important than how you do it: The effects of learning environment, contact hours and active learning on student outcomes. Learning Environment Research, 23(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09289-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonem, E. M., Wang, C., Lott, E. A., Fedesco, H. N., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2021). Modeling the experiences of women in STEM course using a self-determination theory framework [Manuscript in preparation]. Purdue University.

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digest. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports,The George Washington University.

  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley.

  • Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasteen, S., Perkins, K., Beale, P., Pollock, S., & Weiman, C. (2011). A thoughtful approach to instruction: Course transformation for the rest of us. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(4), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2013). Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure?: A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14, 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(3), 365–396. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.3.365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, W. N. W. (2016). Turning the classroom upside down: Experimenting with the flipped classroom in American government. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1063437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuseo, J. (2007). The empirical case against large class size: Adverse effects on the teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students. Journal of Faculty Development, 21(1), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Re, A. C. (2015). A practical tutorial on conducting meta-analysis in R. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 11(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, A., Yesliyurt, S., & Takkac, M. (2012). The effects of autonomy-supportive climates on EFL learners’ engagement, achievement and competence in English speaking classrooms. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46(2), 3890–3894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, C. T., & Wilson, A. L. (2015). Shifting to active learning: Assessment of a first-year biology course in South Africa. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 261–274. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

  • Drab-Hudson, D. L., Whisenhunt, B. L., Shoptaugh, C. F., Newman, M. C., Rost, A., & Fondren-Happe, R. N. (2012). Transforming introductory psychology: A systematic approach to course redesign. Psychology Learning and Teaching,11(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2012.11.2.146

  • Duval, S. (2005). The “Trim and Fill” method. In H. Rothstein, A. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 127–144). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdei, R., Ravai, G., & Nunes, L. D. (2021). Improving grades in a computer science course: Effects of a theoretically-driven course redesign [Manuscript in preparation]. Purdue University.

  • Essig, R. R., Troy, C. D., Jesiek, B. K., Boyd, J., & Trellinger, N. M. (2014, June 15-18). Adventures in paragraph writing: The development and refinement of scalable and effective writing exercises for large-enrollment engineering courses [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2014, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-20032

  • Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting student-centered learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590402700203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J. L., & Paulson, D. R. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedesco, H. N., Bonem, E. M., Wang, C., & Henares, R. (2019). Connections in the classroom: Separating the effects of instructor and peer relatedness in the basic needs satisfaction scale. Motivation and Emotion, 43, 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09765-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedesco, H. N., Kentner, A., & Natt, J. (2017). The effect of relevance strategies on student perceptions of introductory courses. Communication Education, 66(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1268697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fedesco, H. N. & Troy, C. D. (2016, June 26-29). Why this flip wasn’t a flop: What the numbers don’t tell you about flipped classes [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2016, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.27203

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Oconnor, E., Parks, J. W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-09-0194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froyd, J., & Simpson, N. (2008). Student-centered learning addressing faculty questions about student-centered learning. The course, Curriculum, Labor, and Improvement Conference, 30(11), 1–11. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.526.348

  • González, L., Tomás, I., Castillo, I., Duda, J. L., & Balaguer, I. (2017). A test of basic psychological needs theory in young soccer players: Time-lagged design at the individual and team levels. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27(11), 1511–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach, E., Maybee, C., & O’Shea, K. (2015). Statistical literacy social media project for the masses. The Journal of Faculty Development, 29(2), 71–80.

  • Gundlach, E., Richards, K. A. R., Nelson, D., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2015). A comparison of student attitudes, statistical reasoning, performance, and perceptions for web-augmented traditional, fully online, and flipped sections of a statistical literacy class. Journal of Statistics Education, 23(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2015.11889723

  • Herrmann, N., Popyack, J. L., Char, B., Zoski, P., Cera, C. D., Lass, R. N., & Nanjappa, A. (2003). Redesigning introductory computer programming using multi-level online modules for a mixed audience. Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611967

  • Hodge, K., & Gucciardi, D. F. (2015). Antisocial and prosocial behavior in sport: The role of motivational climate, basic psychological needs, and moral disengagement. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2014-0225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H., Wang, C., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, D. L., Hudson, A. L., Whisenhunt, B. L., Shoptaugh, C. F., Rost, A., & Fondren-Happel, R. N. (2014). Redesigning a large enrollment course: The impact on academic performance, course completion and student perceptions in introductory psychology. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, D. L., Whisenhunt, B. L., Shoptaugh, C. F., Visio, M. E., Cathey, C., & Rost, A. D. (2015). Change takes time: Understanding and responding to culture change in course redesign. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMPACT Management Team and IMPACT Evaluation Team. (2018). IMPACT annual report 2018. IMPACT Reports. Paper 9. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/impactreps/10/

  • Jackson, A., Mentzer, N., & Zissimopoulos, A. N. (2015, June 14-17). Factors of group design decision making [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2015, Seattle, Washington. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24098

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., Bonem, E. M., Zissimopoulous, A., Wang, C., & Yu, S. (2021). Using self-determination theory to model the effects of autonomy-supportive learning environments on the satisfaction of basic psychological needs, motivation and learning outcomes [Manuscript in preparation]. Purdue University.

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., Flierl, M., Zywicki, C., Parker, L.C., Connor, C., Guberman, D., Nelson, D., Maybee, C., Bonem, E. M., FitzSimmons, J., & Lott, E. (2019). Creating student-centered learning environments and changing teaching culture: Purdue University’s IMPACT program. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/OccasionalPaper38.pdf

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., Maybee, C., Parker, L. C., Zywicki, C., Connor, C., & Flierl, M. (2019). Shifting culture: Professional development through academic course transformation. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 51(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2019.1547077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque-Bristol, C., Richards, K. A. R., Zissimopoulous, A., Wang, C., & Yu, S. (2020). An evaluation of the integrative model for learning and motivation in the college classroom. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00671-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucietto, A. M., Moss, J. D., Efendy, E., & French, M. (2017). Engineering technology vs. engineering students: Differences in perception and understanding. Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190614

  • Lucietto, A. M., Moss, J. D., & French, M. (2017, June 25-28). Examining engineering technology students: How they perceive and order their thoughts [Paper presentation]. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2017, Columbus, OH. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-27418

  • Machemer, P. L., & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407074008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybee, C., Doan, T., & Riehle, C. F. (2013). Making an IMPACT: Campus-wide collaboration for course and learning space transformation. College and Research Libraries News, 74(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.74.1.8884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maybee, C., & Flierl, M. (2017). Motivating learners through information literacy. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 676, 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, J. E., Roth, M. T., Glatt, D. M., Gharkholonarehe, N., Davidson, C. A., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., & Mumper, R. J. (2014). The flipped classroom: A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, N., Laux, D., Zissimopoulos, A., & Richards, K. A. R. (2017). Peer evaluation of team member effectiveness as a formative educational intervention. Journal of Technology Education, 28(2), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v28i2.a.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. C., & Parker, L. C. (2014). Examining the connection between classroom technology and student engagement. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v3n1.4720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. C., Parker, L. C., Nelson, D., Pistilli, M. D., Hagen, A., Levesque-Bristol, C., & Weaver, G. (2014). Development of a student self-reported instrument to assess course reform. Educational Assessment, 19(4), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.964119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, M., Phipps, C., Kask, S., & Higgins, S. (2001). University students’ perceptions of cooperative learning: Implications for administrators and instructors. Journal of Experimental Education, 24(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/501484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, P., & Attardo, D. (2013). Designing the wheel: Built-in instructional technology. IMPACT Publications. Paper 1. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/impactpubs/1

  • Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Science, 105(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs105.2.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 654–678). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, V., & Richards, E. (2015). Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(3), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonebraker, I., Robertshaw, M. B., Kirkwood, H., & Dugan, M. (2014). Bring your own device in the information literacy classroom. Indiana Libraries, 33(2), 64–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonebraker, I., Robertshaw, M. B., & Moss, J. D. (2016). Student see versus student do: A comparative study of two online tutorials. TechTrends, 60(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0026-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B., Potetz, J., & Fedesco, H. N. (2017). Simulations in the classroom: An innovative active learning experience. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(12), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Cho, H. J., Wiles, B. C., Moss, J. D., Bonem, E. M., Li, Q., Lu, Y., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2021). Motivational Predictors of College Students’ Mathematics Achievement: From the Perspective of Self-Determination Theory [Manuscript in preparation]. Purdue University.

  • Wang, C., Hsu, H., Bonem, E. M., Moss, J. D., Yu, S., Nelson, D. B., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Need satisfaction and need dissatisfaction: A comparative study of online and face-to-face learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Zhang, Y., Moss, J. D., Bonem, E. M., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020). Multilevel factors affecting college students’ perceptions of knowledge transferability: From the perspective of self-determination theory. Research in Higher Education, 61(8), 1002–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09592-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, N. D., Fedesco, H. N., & Marshall, M. (2019). Student perceptions and performance in fully online versus flipped diversity courses: Is there too much distance in distance learning? Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 30(3), 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Jossey-Bass.

  • Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yough, M., Merzdorf, H., Fedesco, H. N., & Cho, H. J. (2019). Flipping the classroom in teacher education: Implications for motivation and learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117742885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2018). Are students in some college majors more self-determined in their studies than others? Motivation & Emotion, 42(6), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9711-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2020). A cross-classified path analysis of the self-determination theory model on the situational, individual and classroom levels in college education. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S., Traynor, A., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2018). Psychometric examination of the short version of the learning climate questionnaire using item response theory. Motivation and Emotion, 42(6), 795–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9704-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Purdue University, Center for Instructional Excellence, Young Hall, 155 S Grant St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Hyun Jin Cho, Cong Wang, Emily M. Bonem & Chantal Levesque-Bristol

Authors
  1. Hyun Jin Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Emily M. Bonem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chantal Levesque-Bristol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy). HJC, CW: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, writing-original draft preparation, writing—review & editing. EB, CL-B: conceptualization, writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Jin Cho.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cho, H.J., Wang, C., Bonem, E.M. et al. How Can We Support Students’ Learning Experiences in Higher Education? Campus Wide Course Transformation Program Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Innov High Educ 47, 223–252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09571-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09571-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation